December 2002 - Wine-Devel - list.winehq.org

Reviewing an article on Winelib
by Matthew Bloch Dec. 13, 2002

Dec. 13, 2002

I'd like to solicit a bit of feedback on an article I wrote for the C/C++ User's Journal entitled "Dropping Windows with Winelib" and is an introduction to making Win32 code run with Winelib under Linux. I'm conscious of a duty to present the work of others, and what I consider to be an important free software project, in an helpful light. Because it's intended for publication I can't post it publically but would appreciate anyone who knows WINE better than I do to cast a critical eye over it; if you email me privately I'll send it to you. thanks, -- Matthew Bloch Bytemark Computer Consulting http://www.bytemark.co.uk/ tel. +44 (0) 8707 455026

2 1

Re: wine/ tools/winebuild/winebuild.man.in tools/w ...
by Dimitrie O. Paun Dec. 13, 2002

Dec. 13, 2002

On December 11, 2002 09:20 pm, Alexandre Julliard wrote: > Removed the -noimport flag in spec files. Alexandre, mind if you explain in a few words the rationale for this one? Not that I have a problem with it, but I like to know where you're going... :) TIA, Dimi.

6 9

Prototype implementation of a shared memory winserver
by Peter Hunnisett Dec. 13, 2002

Dec. 13, 2002

Hi, in the quest for speed parity in multimedia applications TransGaming has investigated a few options in dealing with the nasty overhead of the present wineserver implementation. I have just recently posted a prototype patch for a shared memory wineserver, to the ReWind project, (http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=1413925&forum_id=8836) which, in a small benchmarking suite, has shown some remarkable performance gains. The concept for the shm wineserver came about during discussions at the OLS in 2002 and remained a concept until a little while ago we had enough time to create a working prototype. TransGaming is donating this code to the ReWind project in the hopes that it will encourage other Wine developers to continue to share code under the more open BSD/X11 style license and to help overcome the remaining issues with this approach. Rather than make a really long technical email, we decided that a bit of a paper would be more appropriate (it also has links to the patches). The paper can be found at http://www.transgaming.com/papers/shmserver.html Regards, Peter Hunnisett peter(a)transgaming.com

2 1

Re: XIM support patch
by Dimitrie O. Paun Dec. 13, 2002

Dec. 13, 2002

On December 13, 2002 09:58 am, liu spider wrote: > + if ((charW == VK_RETURN || charW == VK_ESCAPE) && > es->hwndListBox) Sorry to complain again :), but yahoo.com wrapped your patch... I'm not sure if you can turn of line wrapping in Yahoo, so you should just attach it to avoid that (otherwise patch can not apply it). -- Dimi.

1 0

Winsocket hanging
by Uwe Bonnes Dec. 13, 2002

Dec. 13, 2002

Hallo, some application (jtagserver.exe from Altera Quartus) hangs in Winsock. trace:winsock:DllMain 0x407a0000 0x1 0x1 trace:winsock:DllMain 0x407a0000 0x2 (nil) trace:winsock:WSAStartup verReq=1 trace:winsock:WSAStartup succeeded trace:winsock:WS_socket af=2 type=1 protocol=0 trace:winsock:WSASocketA af=2 type=1 protocol=0 protocol_info=(nil) group=0 flags=0x1 trace:winsock:WSASocketA created 0060 trace:winsock:WS_setsockopt socket: 0060, level 0x6, name 0x1, ptr 406e2c80, len 4 trace:winsock:WS_ioctlsocket socket 0060, cmd 8004667e, ptr 406e2c88 trace:winsock:WS_bind socket 0060, ptr 0x406e2c94, length 16 fixme:winsock:WS_bind Setting WS_SO_REUSEADDR on socket before we binding it trace:winsock:WS_setsockopt socket: 0060, level 0xffff, name 0x4, ptr 406e2c6c, len 4 trace:winsock:WS_listen socket 0060, backlog 10 trace:winsock:__ws_select read 0x406e2bb0, write (nil), excp (nil) timeout 0x406e2cb4 Is this hang expected? More debug information needed? One problem is, that the installer hanged, and I exported only the directory tree from an NT vmware install. As sophisticated NT functionality is used in NT mode (e.g. LockServiceDatabase) I ran with win95 mode in wine. Bye -- Uwe Bonnes bon(a)elektron.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de Institut fuer Kernphysik Schlossgartenstrasse 9 64289 Darmstadt --------- Tel. 06151 162516 -------- Fax. 06151 164321 ----------

2 1

New Contributions / Donations page
by Tom Wickline Dec. 12, 2002

Dec. 12, 2002

Hello, The Contrib page at : http://www.winehq.com/about/index.php?contrib is in need of updating and I would like to do this :) I would like to split this page into two pages 1) Contributing to web maintenance, graphics, documentation, testing, bug triaging and coding. 2) Monetary or equipment donations Any one want to Volinteer to help do this ? Tom

1 0

Re: XIM support patch
by Dimitrie O. Paun Dec. 12, 2002

Dec. 12, 2002

On December 13, 2002 12:30 am, liu spider wrote: > 58a59 > > > WINE_DECLARE_DEBUG_CHANNEL(xim); > > 275a277 > > > extern BOOL XIM_SetIMPos(RECT ); Please send unified diffs. For how to submit patches, please read: http://www.winehq.org/development/#patches http://www.winehq.com/hypermail/wine-devel/2002/09/0127.html -- Dimi.

1 0

WinME conformance tests - 12 Dec 02
by Justin Dec. 12, 2002

Dec. 12, 2002

>From Kevin Podgursky justintyme(a)accesswave.ca Compared to http://fgouget.free.fr/wine/tests-en.shtml Dec 12, 02 Advapi32/registry - crashed - last messages in terminal: registry.c:123: Test failed: type 2 is not REG_SZ registry.c:134: Test failed: expected ERROR_SUCCESS, got 234 registry.c:135: Test failed: val_count set to 20 instead of 4 registry.c:136: Test failed: data_count set to 24 instead of 7 registry.c:137: Test failed: type 2 is not REG_SZ registry.c:138: Test failed: value is 'xxxxxxxxxx' instead of Test registry.c:139: Test failed: data is 'xxxxxxxxxx' instead of foobar registry.c:153: Test failed: expected ERROR_MORE_DATA, got 0 registry.c:155: Test failed: data_count set to 2 instead of 7*sizeof(WCHAR) registry.c:156: Test failed: type 1234 is not REG_SZ registry.c:167: Test failed: expected ERROR_MORE_DATA, got 0 registry.c:169: Test failed: data_count set to 20 instead of 7*sizeof(WCHAR) registry.c:170: Test failed: type 1234 is not REG_SZ registry.c:181: Test failed: expected ERROR_MORE_DATA, got 0 registry.c:182: Test failed: val_count set to 20 instead of 4 registry.c:183: Test failed: data_count set to 2 instead of 7*sizeof(WCHAR) registry.c:184: Test failed: type 1234 is not REG_SZ registry.c:185: Test failed: value is not 'Test' registry.c:196: Test failed: val_count set to 20 instead of 4 registry.c:197: Test failed: data_count set to 20 instead of 7*sizeof(WCHAR) registry.c:198: Test failed: type 1234 is not REG_SZ registry.c:199: Test failed: value is not 'Test' registry.c:200: Test failed: data is not 'foobar' dsound/dsound passed kernel/alloc - same results as for Win95 kernel/atom F:\Temp>kernel32_test.exe atom - hmm does this mean passed or unsupported? atom.c:55:WARNING: Unicode atom APIs are not supported on this platform atom: 163850 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 0 failures. kernel/codepage F:\Temp>kernel32_test.exe codepage codepage.c:40: Test failed: any negative value should work as strlen() + 1 codepage: 2 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 1 failure. kernel/directory - passed kernel/drive - passed kernel/environ - passed kernel/file - same comments as Win95 - line numbers different F:\Temp>kernel32_test.exe file file.c:631: Test failed: WriteFile error 183 file.c:632: Test failed: expected number of bytes written 0 file.c:633:Current offset = 0100 file.c:634: Test failed: expected file offset 21 file.c:639: Test failed: WriteFile error 87 file.c:640: Test failed: expected number of bytes written 0 file.c:642: Test failed: expected file offset 517 file.c:656: Test failed: ReadFile error 0 file.c:657: Test failed: expected number of bytes read 0 file.c:658:Current offset = 0000 file.c:659: Test failed: expected file offset 21 file.c:661: Test failed: pattern match failed file: 487224 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 10 failures. kernel/format_msg Same as for Win95 kernel/generated - passed kernel/locale F:\Temp>kernel32_test.exe locale locale.c:126: Test failed: GetTimeFormat with len=2 got xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx¦¦ instead of AMxx locale.c:181: Test failed: GetDateFormat got xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx¦¦- instead of Saxx locale.c:199: Test failed: GetDateFormatW allowed flags and format locale.c:205: Test failed: GetDateFormatW did not detect null buffer pointer. locale.c:208: Test failed: GetDateFormatW did not permit null buffer pointer whe n counting. locale.c:224: Test failed: Day of week correction failed locale.c:312: Test failed: GetNumberFormat with len=2 got xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx¦¦____W instead of 2,xx locale.c:270: Test failed: GetCurrencyFormat got xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx¦¦____W instead of $23.53 locale: 54 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 8 failures. kernel/path F:\Temp>kernel32_test.exe path path.c:738: Test failed: GetLongPathNameA returned 'F:\shortdir\pathtest.pth' in stead of 'C:\shortdir\pathtest.pth' path.c:889:TMP=F:\TEMP path.c:900:TMP=C:\WINDOWS path.c:910:TMP=C:\ path.c:920:TMP=C: path: 1772 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 1 failure. kernel/process - passed kernel/thread F:\Temp>kernel32_test.exe thread thread.c:273: Test failed: SuspendThread did not obey access restrictions thread.c:275: Test failed: ResumeThread did not obey access restrictions thread.c:323: Test failed: TerminateThread did not obey access restrictions thread.c:393: Test failed: SetThreadPriority did not obey access restrictions thread.c:395: Test failed: GetThreadPriority did not obey access restrictions thread.c:403: Test failed: GetExitCodeThread did not obey access restrictions thread.c:430: Test failed: SetThreadPriorityBoost Failed thread.c:432: Test failed: GetThreadPriorityBoost Failed thread.c:434: Test failed: SetThreadPriorityBoost Failed thread.c:436: Test failed: GetThreadPriorityBoost Failed thread: 103 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 10 failures. msvcrt/scanf - passed netapi32/access -crash with message box The NETAPI32_TEST.EXE file is linked to missing export NETAPI32.DLL:NetApiBufferSize (Same occurs if just netapi32_test is executed without the access parameter.) netapi32/apibuf - same as above netapi32/wksta - same as above ntdll - no such file in zip oleaut32 - no such file in zip rpcrt4/rpc - passed shell32/generated - passed shell32/shlfileop F:\Temp>shell32_test shlfileop shlfileop.c:286: Test failed: Files are copied to other directory shlfileop.c:287: Test failed: The file is copied shlfileop: 121 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 2 failures. shlwapi/clist F:\Temp>shlwapi_test clist clist.c:367: Test failed: allowed bad element size clist.c:372: Test failed: allowed adding a container clist: 236 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 2 failures. shlwapi/generated - passed shlwapi/shreg - crashed F:\Temp>shlwapi_test shreg shreg.c:206: Test failed: (ImARatherLongButIndeedNeededString) shreg.c:207: Test failed: (ImARatherLongButIndeedNeededString) shreg.c:263: Test failed: didn't open copy user32/class - passed user32/generated - passed user32/sysparams - corrupts the environment and properties for command.com user32/win - crashes Last output from terminal win.c:60: Test failed: Wrong result for GWL_HWNDPARENT 00000000 expected 00000908 win.c:62: Test failed: Wrong result for GetParent 00000908 expected 00000000 win.c:70: Test failed: Wrong result for GA_ROOTOWNER 000008F8 expected 0000078C win.c:60: Test failed: Wrong result for GWL_HWNDPARENT 00000000 expected 00000908 win.c:62: Test failed: Wrong result for GetParent 00000908 expected 00000000 win.c:70: Test failed: Wrong result for GA_ROOTOWNER 000008F8 expected 0000078C win.c:140:created top-level 00000788 win.c:62: Test failed: Wrong result for GetParent 00000000 expected 00000080 win.c:70: Test failed: Wrong result for GA_ROOTOWNER 00000788 expected 00000080 win.c:150:created owned top-level 00000784 win.c:60: Test failed: Wrong result for GWL_HWNDPARENT 00000000 expected 000008F8 win.c:60: Test failed: Wrong result for GWL_HWNDPARENT 00000000 expected 000008F8 win.c:62: Test failed: Wrong result for GetParent 00000000 expected 000008F8 win.c:70: Test failed: Wrong result for GA_ROOTOWNER 00000784 expected 000008F8 win.c:60: Test failed: Wrong result for GWL_HWNDPARENT 00000000 expected 000008F8 win.c:62: Test failed: Wrong result for GetParent 00000000 expected 00000080 win.c:70: Test failed: Wrong result for GA_ROOTOWNER 00000784 expected 00000080 win.c:160:created popup 00000790 win.c:62: Test failed: Wrong result for GetParent 00000000 expected 00000080 win.c:70: Test failed: Wrong result for GA_ROOTOWNER 00000790 expected 00000080 win.c:170:created owned popup 00000794 win.c:60: Test failed: Wrong result for GWL_HWNDPARENT 00000000 expected 000008F8 win.c:60: Test failed: Wrong result for GWL_HWNDPARENT 00000000 expected 000008F8 win.c:62: Test failed: Wrong result for GetParent 000008F8 expected 00000080 win.c:70: Test failed: Wrong result for GA_ROOTOWNER 000008F8 expected 00000080 win.c:60: Test failed: Wrong result for GWL_HWNDPARENT 00000000 expected 000008F8 win.c:62: Test failed: Wrong result for GetParent 000008F8 expected 00000000 win.c:70: Test failed: Wrong result for GA_ROOTOWNER 000008F8 expected 00000794 win.c:180:created top-level owned by child 0000079C win.c:60: Test failed: Wrong result for GWL_HWNDPARENT 00000000 expected 000008F8 win.c:186:created popup owned by desktop 000007A0 win.c:192:created popup owned by child 000007AC win.c:60: Test failed: Wrong result for GWL_HWNDPARENT 00000000 expected 000008F8 win.c:198:created WS_CHILD popup 000007A8 win.c:204:created owned WS_CHILD popup 000007A4 win.c:60: Test failed: Wrong result for GWL_HWNDPARENT 00000000 expected 000008F8 win.c:209:testing parent changes user32/wsprintf F:\Temp>user32_test wsprintf wsprintf.c:46: Test failed: wsPrintfW length failure wsprintf: 4 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 1 failure. wininet/generated - passed wininet/http last messages in terminal http.c:78:Callback 00CC0004 0xdeadbeef INTERNET_STATUS_HANDLE_CREATED(60) 0067E808 4 http.c:104:InternetConnectA --> http.c:108:HttpOpenRequestA <-- http.c:78:Callback 00CC0008 0xdeadbead INTERNET_STATUS_HANDLE_CREATED(60) 0067EA7C 4 http.c:122:HttpOpenRequestA --> http.c:126:HttpSendRequestA --> http.c:78:Callback 00CC000C 0xdeadbead INTERNET_STATUS_CONNECTING_TO_SERVER(20)0067E8B4 12 http.c:78:Callback 00CC000C 0xdeadbead INTERNET_STATUS_CONNECTED_TO_SERVER(21) 0067E890 12 http.c:78:Callback 00CC000C 0xdeadbead INTERNET_STATUS_SENDING_REQUEST(30) 00000000 0 http.c:78:Callback 00CC000C 0xdeadbead INTERNET_STATUS_REQUEST_SENT(31) 0067E9A0 4 http.c:78:Callback 00CC000C 0xdeadbead INTERNET_STATUS_RECEIVING_RESPONSE(40) 00000000 0 http.c:78:Callback 00CC000C 0xdeadbead INTERNET_STATUS_RESPONSE_RECEIVED(41) 0067E988 4 http.c:133:HttpSendRequestA <-- http.c:140:Option 0x17 -> 1 8 http.c:144:Option 0x22 -> 1 http://www.winehq.com/about/ http.c:149:Option 0x16 -> 1 HTTP/1.1 200 OK Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 01:13:16 GMT Server: Apache/1.3.22 (Unix) (Red-Hat/Linux) mod_ssl/2.8.5 OpenSSL/0.9.6 PHP/4.1.2 X-Powered-By: PHP/4.1.2 Keep-Alive: timeout=15, max=100 Connection: Keep-Alive Transfer-Encoding: chunked Content-Type: text/html http.c:154:Option 0x22 -> 1 http://www.winehq.com/about/ http.c:158:Option 0x5 -> 0 http://www.winehq.com/about/ (12150) http.c:163:Option 0x1 -> 1 text/html http.c:166:Entery Query loop http.c:183:ReadFile -> 1 743 http.c:183:ReadFile -> 1 3348 http.c:183:ReadFile -> 1 4380 http.c:183:ReadFile -> 1 1460 http.c:183:ReadFile -> 1 1974 http.c:78:Callback 00CC000C 0xdeadbead INTERNET_STATUS_HANDLE_CLOSING(70) 0067EAA8 4 http.c:78:Callback 00CC0008 0xdeadbeef INTERNET_STATUS_HANDLE_CLOSING(70) 0067EAA8 4 http: 24 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 1 failure. winmm/wave - passed ws2_32/sock - passed hth Kevin

1 0

Re: Cross-compiling the tests with MinGW
by Steven Edwards Dec. 12, 2002

Dec. 12, 2002

Francois Gouget wrote: >Changelog: > > * documentation/testing.sgml > > Document how to cross-compile the tests with MinGW > > > When I get the time I will submit mingw on Windows documentation. Could be a few more weeks. Thanks Steven

1 0

RE: Houston, we have a problem...
by Patrik Stridvall Dec. 12, 2002

Dec. 12, 2002

> On December 12, 2002 02:07 pm, Alexandre Julliard wrote: > > > In which case, shouldn't our includes use <> instead of > ""? Using "" > > > is not 100% correct, let alone non standard. I know, > minor point, but... > > > :) > > > > I guess they should, yes. > > A perfect job for a cool Perl script :) Sure. Will try to look at in the next few days. > I haven't heard much from Patrik lately... <g> You will here more from me soon. I'm going to have a long vacation around christmas where I will have much more time to work with Wine. Of course family and friends usually takes up more time than usual around christmas as well...

1 0