December 2002 - Wine-Devel - list.winehq.org

POSE (Palm OS Emulator) on WINE?
by Bodo Wenzel Dec. 12, 2002

Dec. 12, 2002

Hi list. Because Sony doesn't provide a Unix source code branch, I tried to run their Windows based POSE on WINE. At first glance it runs, but only until a command of the context menu is chosen. WINE reports an "unhandled exception" and launches the debugger. My question: does anyone heard about how to make POSE run on WINE? Is anyone interested in making them work together? Both are Open Source... Unfortunately I can't because of my lack of time :-( TIA, Bodo

2 2

Re: Comctl32.StrStrIW implementation
by Dmitry Timoshkov Dec. 12, 2002

Dec. 12, 2002

"Robert Shearman" <R.J.Shearman(a)warwick.ac.uk> wrote: > StrStrIW is used by native Regedit when searching the registry. This patch > enables this function of Regedit to work. > > ChangeLog: > - Implement StrStrIW (find a string inside a string) > + first = towlower (*lpStr2); > + while (len1 >= len2) { > + if (towlower(*lpStr1) == first) { It almost always is a bad idea to use unicode or locale dependant functions from a system libc (isalpha() in your other patch). It could sometimes produce bad side effects due to different unicode implementations and the fact that Wine's default ANSI code page often is not the same as a one used by an underlying system. The best way to avoid discrepancies is to use Win32 APIs to deal with locale sensitive data. Other way to avoid use of the libc locale dependant functions is to delegate all the work to unicode version of the API and leaving to ANSI version only simple work of converting strings to unicode and adopting the returned data if necessary. -- Dmitry.

1 0

Wine conformance testing on native platforms
by Luke Stras Dec. 12, 2002

Dec. 12, 2002

Dimi, I see that you've added me as a "volunteer" for running the conformance tests on NT. Gee, thanks :). In any case, I don't mind doing this. However, I have a question : what should I do with the test results? Posting them to wine-devel every time a test changes seems somewhat high-bandwidth... What we (i.e., the testers) could do is to keep track of what changes between successive test runs, I guess, and we could just post a summary of the changes. This brings up another point: these test results should be put up somewhere on the Web for everyone to see. Might I suggest putting them up on the Wine Janitorial Projects page? For every platform, just put in a link to "Most recent test results", say. One last thing: is there any way to be automatically notified whenever the available test suite changes? -- Luke Stras <stras(a)utias.toronto.edu> "The meek can have the Earth; the rest of us have other plans" --Henry Spencer

2 1

Re: Fix shell32.ExtractIcon with A->W and 32 -> 16 calls
by Dimitrie O. Paun Dec. 12, 2002

Dec. 12, 2002

On December 11, 2002 04:47 pm, Rolf Kalbermatter wrote: Patrik, How come winapi_check did not pick up this one as a bad 32->16 cross call? > /************************************************************************* > * ExtractIconA [SHELL32.@] > - * > - * FIXME > - * if the filename is not a file return 1 > */ > -HICON WINAPI ExtractIconA( HINSTANCE hInstance, LPCSTR lpszExeFileName, > - UINT nIconIndex ) > -{ HGLOBAL16 handle = InternalExtractIcon16(HINSTANCE_16(hInstance),lpszExeFileName,nIconIndex, 1); > - TRACE("\n"); > - if( handle ) > - { > - HICON16* ptr = (HICON16*)GlobalLock16(handle); > - HICON16 hIcon = *ptr; > - > - GlobalFree16(handle); > - return HICON_32(hIcon); > - } > - return 0; -- Dimi.

1 0

advapi32_test registry 3 errors vs 31 errors
by Kye Lewis Dec. 12, 2002

Dec. 12, 2002

Hi, Just ran the conformance tests on my laptop: The first time I went through I got 3 errors, the second time I got 31 So I get the feeling that one of the tests (maybe even that one) is doing something weird. Im on a quest now to find out which one (if any!) Thanks, Kye Lewis ================ You can reach me at: kyethespy(a)liquid2k.com at most times lew01(a)mcsc.vic.edu.au from 9am to 3pm Monday to Friday lewislan(a)net2000.com.au is an alternative email

1 1

WinXP Professional conformance test update
by David Miller Dec. 12, 2002

Dec. 12, 2002

Here are the results of all the tests which produced different results today using the new binaries, as well as output from tests I didn't run previously because I didn't realize they existed. (I followed the script) C:\winetests>dsound_test.exe dsound dsound.c:56:Testing Primary Sound Driver - dsound.c:70: DirectSound Caps: flags=0x00000f5f secondary min=5000 max=44100 dsound.c:100: PrimaryBuffer Caps: flags=0x00000009 size=32768 dsound.c:113: tag=0x0001 22050x8x2 avg.B/s=44100 align=2 dsound.c:129: status=0x0000 dsound.c:56:Testing Sound Blaster AWE64 - ctlsb16.sys dsound.c:70: DirectSound Caps: flags=0x00000f5f secondary min=5000 max=44100 dsound.c:100: PrimaryBuffer Caps: flags=0x00000009 size=32768 dsound.c:113: tag=0x0001 22050x8x2 avg.B/s=44100 align=2 dsound.c:129: status=0x0000 dsound: 27 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 0 failures. C:\winetests>kernel32_test.exe file file.c:633:Current offset = 0015 file.c:658:Current offset = 0015 file: 487239 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 0 failures. C:\winetests>kernel32_test.exe path path.c:514: Test failed: GetLongPathNameA: wrong return code, 106 instead of 46 path.c:889:TMP=C:\DOCUME~1\ADMINI~1\LOCALS~1\Temp path.c:900:TMP=C:\WINDOWS path.c:910:TMP=C:\ path.c:920:TMP=C: path: 1800 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 1 failure. C:\winetests>msvcrt_test.exe scanf scanf: 6 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 0 failures. C:\winetests>kernel32_test.exe generated generated: 609 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 0 failures. C:\winetests>shlwapi_test.exe generated generated: 19 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 0 failures. C:\winetests>shell32_test.exe generated generated: 272 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 0 failures. C:\winetests>user32_test.exe generated generated: 1524 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 0 failures. C:\winetests>wininet_test.exe generated generated: 252 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 0 failures.

1 0

Serious problem with / and mount points
by Sylvain Petreolle Dec. 12, 2002

Dec. 12, 2002

Trying to read a dvd rom that wasn't mounted, I did "dir" in wcmd. The label of the disc was displayed and "file not found". C>d: D>dir Volume in drive D is SPY_KIDS Volume Serial Number is 1234-5678 File not found 0 bytes free D> I then mounted the dvd and typed "dir" again. D>dir Volume in drive D is SPY_KIDS Volume Serial Number is 1234-5678 Directory of D:\ 01/01/1970 01:00:00 <DIR> a_imprim 01/01/1970 01:00:00 <DIR> audio_ts ... 2 files 7,904 bytes 7 directories 0 bytes free @> It appears that the '@' letter is normally inexistant and points to the root of the system, '/' directory (my dvd is mounted under /mnt/dvd). @>cd @:\mnt\dvd @> When trying to do "cd ..", the command silently fails and does nothing. Comments ? ===== Sylvain Petreolle spetreolle(a)users.sourceforge.net Fight against Spam ! http://www.euro.cauce.org/en/index.html ICQ #170597259 "Don't think you are. Know you are." Morpheus in Matrix, chapter 15. ___________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? -- Une adresse @yahoo.fr gratuite et en français ! Yahoo! Mail : http://fr.mail.yahoo.com

1 0

Re: Fix the kernel/locale tests
by Mehmet YASAR Dec. 12, 2002

Dec. 12, 2002

Francois Gouget wrote: > > So undocumented features should not be tested unless there is a really > good reason to do so. Unless you know of a specific application that > depends on it, there is no good reason to check whether a buffer is or > is not modified when it is too short. > Hi, I'm the author of the locale test. It has been written mainly to help fixing bug 367 (see http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=637) and that's why it is testing undocumented behavior. Two application like "HTMLKit" or "Font xplorer lite" rely on this weird behavior. Mehmet

2 1

Resend of Win98 Conformance Test Output
by Dustin Navea Dec. 11, 2002

Dec. 11, 2002

I guess it would help if I actually attached the zip

1 0

Ran conformance tests on Win98 Regular (My output)
by Dustin Navea Dec. 11, 2002

Dec. 11, 2002

Ok, you can add me to Win98 (non-SE) testing as well as Win2k (SP3) testing, here is the zipped output of the conformance tests, I ran each test individually (instead of using runtests.bat) and sometimes had to run it 2 or more times to get all of the output because for some reason Win98 on this box (at work) isnt letting me redirect output to a file...go figure. Anyways, here it is for anyone that wants it..

1 0