July 2002 - Wine-Devel - list.winehq.org

China developing Windows clone
by Roland July 22, 2002

July 22, 2002

Did you read this: http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/07/19/2116234&mode=thread&tid=99 Are they using WINE? Do they know about WINE? It sure would help if they work on the WINE source base :) Roland

2 1

Re: PATCH: SetParent optimization
by Alexandre Julliard July 22, 2002

July 22, 2002

Marcus Meissner <meissner(a)suse.de> writes: > Lotus Notes R5 5.0.10 has a Details Popup Window which stays over the > normal Lotus window usually. > > If it is started and the focus leaves this window, Lotus reparents > to the toplevel window, using "SetWindowLong(hwnd, GWL_HWNDPARENT, > toplevelhwnd);" and later does "BringWindowToTop(toplevelhwnd);". Probably SetWindowLong(GWL_HWNDPARENT) should not do a full SetParent, but just set the window owner. Looks like this needs more testing under Windows to find out exactly what it's supposed to do. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.com

2 1

Put WINE into the donation directory?
by Roland July 22, 2002

July 22, 2002

Here is an open source donation directory: http://slashdot.org/articles/02/07/21/1813204.shtml?tid=117 How about adding WINE into it? Roland

1 0

Winsock 2 functions
by Peter Lord July 22, 2002

July 22, 2002

I'm trying to get a java application running under wine. Amazingly (at least to me :-) ), the application gets a fair way through loading lots of classes as it goes. But, the stumbling block is when the application starts to use network operations, specifically WPUCompleteOverlappedRequest and WSAAddressToStringA. Right now, these are unimplimented and the java app crashes when trying to call them. Before I start looking into these in more detail (I've really no idea what overlapped I/O is all about ...), does anyone plan to implement these in the near future ? Oh, BTW, before you ask... the java app loads a native windows dll as part of its functionality, so I can't use the Linux jvm :-( Cheers, Pete

2 2

Re: Resent: Partial PeekNamedPipe Implementation
by Alexandre Julliard July 22, 2002

July 22, 2002

Uwe Bonnes <bon(a)elektron.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de> writes: > wine/server/pipe.c, wine/server/named_pipe.c: xxx_get_info > Return the number of bytes available for reading > wine/dlls/kernel/sync.c: PeekNamedPipe > Use get_file_info to get the number of bytes available for reading I don't think it's a good idea to overload get_file_info that way. You should retrieve the pipe file descriptor and do the FIONREAD on the client side. We will need the file descriptor anyway to implement the full peek functionality. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.com

1 0

RE: Errors running winapi_extract --stub-statistics
by Patrik Stridvall July 22, 2002

July 22, 2002

> I think this is because the module name is no longer in the > .spec file. Lines > 71-73 of winapi_extract look for "name" in the .spec file, > which no longer > exists. Should we be using the file name as the module name? Correct. Patch for this and other problem with winapi_extract coming soon.

4 3

Re: Makedll.rules.in
by Gregg Mattinson July 22, 2002

July 22, 2002

Oops.. This patch fixes the linking of tests, but it breaks..well..all the .dlls, atleast for me. So, my question is, why does the $(MODULE).so rule in Makedll.rules.in contain $(LDDLLFLAGS)? Until I submitted this patch, that variable was not defined in the makefiles for the .dlls, and the dlls appeared to work fine. Now that this flag is defined, the .dlls don't work, but the tests do work. Should LDDLLFLAGS be removed from the $(MODULE).so rule? What is LDDLLFLAGS defined to on Linux? I only have a Solaris box here to test on, so my insight into the problem is limited. Any insight would be appreciated. Thanks, Gregg >From: Gregg Mattinson <gm138242(a)opcom-mail.canada.sun.com> >Subject: Makedll.rules.in >To: wine-patches(a)winehq.com >Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2002 10:39:22 -0400 (EDT) > >Changelog: dlls/Makedll.rules.in > - Added LDDLLFLAGS to Makedll.rules.in so that tests get linked properly > >Gregg Mattinson >Co-op Developer >Sun Microsystems of Canada

2 1

Broken forwards in .spec files
by Patrik Stridvall July 22, 2002

July 22, 2002

When I, with the help of Francois, fixed the statistics for forwarded functions in winapi_extract I notice that a few of the forwards in the .spec files are broken. winapi_check now checks for broken forward when it is run. However I'm not sure how the broken forwards are best fixed, so what I why I'm asking for people on the list with the appropriete knowledge to fix them. crtdll.spec: forward is broken: _strdec => msvcrt._strdec crtdll.spec: forward is broken: _strinc => msvcrt._strinc crtdll.spec: forward is broken: _strncnt => msvcrt._strncnt crtdll.spec: forward is broken: _strnextc => msvcrt._strnextc crtdll.spec: forward is broken: _strninc => msvcrt._strninc crtdll.spec: forward is broken: _strspnp => msvcrt._strspnp msvcrt20.spec: forward is broken: __seh_longjmp_unwind(a)4 => msvcrt.__seh_longjmp_unwind msvcrt20.spec: forward is broken: _mtlock => msvcrt._mtlock msvcrt20.spec: forward is broken: _mtunlock => msvcrt._mtunlock msvcrt20.spec: forward is broken: _tccpy => msvcrt._tccpy msvcrt20.spec: forward is broken: _tclen => msvcrt._tclen msvcrt20.spec: forward is broken: _tcschr => msvcrt._tcschr msvcrt20.spec: forward is broken: _tcsclen => msvcrt._tcsclen msvcrt20.spec: forward is broken: _tcscmp => msvcrt._tcscmp msvcrt20.spec: forward is broken: _tcscspn => msvcrt._tcscspn msvcrt20.spec: forward is broken: _tcsdec => msvcrt._tcsdec msvcrt20.spec: forward is broken: _tcsicmp => msvcrt._tcsicmp msvcrt20.spec: forward is broken: _tcsinc => msvcrt._tcsinc msvcrt20.spec: forward is broken: _tcslwr => msvcrt._tcslwr msvcrt20.spec: forward is broken: _tcsnbcnt => msvcrt._tcsnbcnt msvcrt20.spec: forward is broken: _tcsncat => msvcrt._tcsncat msvcrt20.spec: forward is broken: _tcsnccat => msvcrt._tcsnccat msvcrt20.spec: forward is broken: _tcsnccmp => msvcrt._tcsnccmp msvcrt20.spec: forward is broken: _tcsnccnt => msvcrt._tcsnccnt msvcrt20.spec: forward is broken: _tcsnccpy => msvcrt._tcsnccpy msvcrt20.spec: forward is broken: _tcsncicmp => msvcrt._tcsncicmp msvcrt20.spec: forward is broken: _tcsncmp => msvcrt._tcsncmp msvcrt20.spec: forward is broken: _tcsncpy => msvcrt._tcsncpy msvcrt20.spec: forward is broken: _tcsncset => msvcrt._tcsncset msvcrt20.spec: forward is broken: _tcsnextc => msvcrt._tcsnextc msvcrt20.spec: forward is broken: _tcsnicmp => msvcrt._tcsnicmp msvcrt20.spec: forward is broken: _tcsninc => msvcrt._tcsninc msvcrt20.spec: forward is broken: _tcsnset => msvcrt._tcsnset msvcrt20.spec: forward is broken: _tcspbrk => msvcrt._tcspbrk msvcrt20.spec: forward is broken: _tcsrchr => msvcrt._tcsrchr msvcrt20.spec: forward is broken: _tcsrev => msvcrt._tcsrev msvcrt20.spec: forward is broken: _tcsset => msvcrt._tcsset msvcrt20.spec: forward is broken: _tcsspn => msvcrt._tcsspn msvcrt20.spec: forward is broken: _tcsspnp => msvcrt._tcsspnp msvcrt20.spec: forward is broken: _tcsstr => msvcrt._tcsstr msvcrt20.spec: forward is broken: _tcstok => msvcrt._tcstok msvcrt20.spec: forward is broken: _tcsupr => msvcrt._tcsupr shell32.spec: forward is broken: StrNCpyW => shlwapi.StrNCpyW

1 0

RE: regsvr32 with multiple arguments
by Medland, Bill July 22, 2002

July 22, 2002

> -----Original Message----- > From: Andriy Palamarchuk [mailto:apa3a(a)yahoo.com] > Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 7:41 AM > To: Medland, Bill; Wine devel (E-mail) > Subject: Re: regsvr32 with multiple arguments > > > > --- "Medland, Bill" <Bill.Medland(a)accpac.com> wrote: > > Did I miss something? > > > > Yesterday when I ran regsvr32 with multiple > > arguments it registered each > > one. Today it only registers the first. Yesterday > > it popped up a > > MessageBox with the result; today it puts the result > > on stdout. > > > > Does this make sense to anyone? > > Yes, the day before you used the native one, now you > are using the built-in. And didn't I feel a fool when I looked at the code and realised it (when I got home) > Thanks for the patch. My pleasure. > > Andriy > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live better > http://health.yahoo.com > Bill

1 0

Bug 434 Update/shot in the dark
by Rick Romero July 22, 2002

July 22, 2002

Referring to bug: http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434 Under normal circumstances the mouse button doesn't get released in certain applications. These include, Macromedial Flash 5, MS Visual Foxpro 5/6, and Adobe Illustrator 8. I'm working with FoxPro 5. (I have a demo app in the bug report) In *MY* testing, I've noticed that the following command allows the mouse button to be released. wine --debugmsg +scroll,+event,+toolbar,+gdi,+heap vfp.exe If, while running under this command, I _hold_ the mouse button down - longer than a 'click', it will not be released. This seems like a timing issue to me, and started after functions were moved into the wineserver. Not that I know anything about how Wine is setup, but could the 'buttonup' be 'lost', or sent out of sequence, causing it to not be executed? And that sequence is slowed by the debug message enough, that a longer 'buttondown' duration is needed before the bug shows up? Where would be the best place to insert a delay, or extend the timing for a single click (So only the mouseclick function is 'slowed')? I'm sure this isn't the best bug report ever sent, but any suggestions would be appreciated. ;) Rick -- -- Rick Romero IT Manager Valeo, Inc. ph: 262.695.4841 Sussex, WI. fax: 262.695.4850 Rick(a)valeoinc.com

1 0