December 2003 - Wine-Devel - list.winehq.org

Re: wine/ programs/Makefile.in ./configure.ac ./co ...
by Ferenc Wagner Dec. 5, 2003

Dec. 5, 2003

Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> writes: > Added files: > programs/winetest: winetest.h util.c send.c maketest main.c > Makefile.in .cvsignore First of all, thank you very much for adapting and putting this into the tree! Losing some of the automation is not a problem as we seldom have new modules to test. But we've got an error in the cross-configured tree: tba:/usr/local/src/wine/pe/dlls/msvcrt/tests/ $ make i586-mingw32msvc-gcc cpp.o file.o heap.o scanf.o testlist.o -o msvcrt_test.exe -L../../../dlls -lmsvcrt -L../../../libs/wine -lwine -L../../../libs/port -lwine_port -lm ../../../dlls/libmsvcrt.a(ds00464.o)(.text+0x0): multiple definition of `atexit' /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i586-mingw32msvc/2.95.3-7/../../../../i586-mingw32msvc/lib/crt2.o:/home/ron/devel/debian/mingw32-runtime/mingw32-runtime-3.2/build_dir/src/mingw-runtime-3.2/crt1.c:266: first defined here ../../../dlls/libmsvcrt.a(ds00332.o)(.text+0x0): multiple definition of `_onexit' /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i586-mingw32msvc/2.95.3-7/../../../../i586-mingw32msvc/lib/crt2.o:/home/ron/devel/debian/mingw32-runtime/mingw32-runtime-3.2/build_dir/src/mingw-runtime-3.2/crt1.c:274: first defined here make: *** [msvcrt_test.exe] Error 1 On the other hand, $ i586-mingw32msvc-gcc cpp.o file.o heap.o scanf.o testlist.o -o msvcrt_test.exe works all right, and makes winetest.exe build flawlessly. Best wishes, Feri.

4 4

direct X 9 and troubles ..
by Lars Segerlund Dec. 4, 2003

Dec. 4, 2003

Hi, I don't know how far along the directX9 support in wine is, and I am having trouble getting a game to run to which there is a downloadable demo (http://www.gamershell.com/news_BMotoGP2BDemo.shtml) which I thought might be usefull. The question is, should this run ? Is there something I have configured wrongly ? ( I have tried it on two different machines with different settings and hardware + soft OpenGL and hardware OpenGL ). Still it beats me .. any help appreciated if only 'no this should not work' .. / regards, Lars Segerlund.

2 1

warning fixes in comctl32.dll
by Jonathan Wilson Dec. 4, 2003

Dec. 4, 2003

I just posted a patch to the reactos list that gets whatever comctl32.dll reactos has building with -Wall -Werror. But I dont have a WINE tree or any way to "port" these fixes over to WINEHQ. Can someone do it for me?

2 1

Re: sysparams: slight optimisation for IDA 3
by Dmitry Timoshkov Dec. 4, 2003

Dec. 4, 2003

"Andrew de Quincey" <adq_dvb(a)lidskialf.net> wrote: > Version 3 > + spi_idx = SPI_GETICONTITLELOGFONT; > + > + if (!spi_loaded[spi_idx]) > + { > + memcpy(lpLogFont, &iconTitleLogFont, sizeof(LOGFONTA)); > + break; > + } Sorry to bother you again, but probably the comparison statement needs to be reverted... -- Dmitry.

7 10

Sound capture issues...
by Thomas Brix Larsen Dec. 4, 2003

Dec. 4, 2003

Hi list, in the voice com program Skype (www.skype.org) I'm able to hear other people but I can't talk to them myself. Does anyone have a clue why? I believe this program uses DirectX to capture voice input. Not implented? Greetings, --Thomas _________________ My worst enemy gave me a copy of Windows...

2 3

Font matching algorithms
by Mike Hearn Dec. 4, 2003

Dec. 4, 2003

Hi, Recently Wine CVS has started always matching "System" to "Bitstream Vera Mono", and nothing I alter in the config file can seem to change it. This is kind of annoying as it's not a very good match, I'd rather it used Vera Sans, is there a way to override Wines choice? thanks -mike

1 0

Re: new old winetests
by Brian Vincent (C) Dec. 4, 2003

Dec. 4, 2003

>> -- we're linking against ws2_32 >> Is this DLL available on all versions of Windows we >> want to run on? > >As far I know ><http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us/winsock/winsock/windows_sockets_st art_page_2.asp> >yes. But I am not sure whether it is installed in the base >system or only an option if you want to have networking >(like on Win3.1). Probably not too many people would run >the tests on a standalone machine anyway, but who knows... I actually just ran into this the other night. I installed TaxCut 2003 (which, by the way, mostly works with a few native DLL's) when it didn't like Wine's ws2_32. According to the references built into TaxCut this wasn't part of the original Win95 that shipped. It came out shortly after as an add-on and was likely first included in OSR2. --------------- Brian Vincent Copper Mountain Telecom vincentb(a)coppercolorado.com

6 8

Re: Missing msvcmaker .cvsignores 1
by Jakob Eriksson Dec. 4, 2003

Dec. 4, 2003

:-D Shachar Shemesh wrote: > Ferenc Wagner wrote: > >> There will be no further parts, sorry. >> >> Feri. >> >> >> > Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition! Our chief weapon is suprise. > Suprise and fear. Fear and suprise. Are TWO weapons are fear, suprise, > and ruthless eficiency. >

1 0

JournalPlayBack hook
by Juan Antonio Boscá Lloret Dec. 3, 2003

Dec. 3, 2003

Hello, I'm trying to use the JournalPlayBack hook in a Win32 application and it doesn't work. However it looks to work in 16 bits. Any idea? Thank you --------------------------------------------------------------- Juan Antonio Boscá Lloret Departamento Programación CAE, S.A. jabosca(a)edicurs.com ---------------------------------------------------------------

3 2

Question about simple profiling implementation
by Andrew de Quincey Dec. 3, 2003

Dec. 3, 2003

Hi, the last thing I have to do with the profiling stuff is the trickiest: To decide what is the best way to determine the times. To get times that are useful, I'm using the RDTSC opcode (which returns the number of CPU clock cycles since the machine was powered on).. basically I've added a couple of defines to wine/debug.h: #define GET_COUNTER(__COUNTER) __asm__ __volatile__ ( "rdtsc" : "=a" (__COUNTER.LowPart), "=d" (__COUNTER.HighPart) ) and theres another, GET_ELAPSED which takes a start time, and calculates the difference. (BTW: I don't think these names are very good; I'm going to change them) The elapsed value is output when the relay trace for the function return is printed. I've also created a new script to analyse these to give you the average times, total times etc, and I've fixed tools/examine-relay to cope with the addition to the trace output. The problem is.. not all i386-derived CPUs support this feature. As far as I can see there are three ways of determining this. Which would people prefer? 1) Check in /proc/cpuinfo for the "tsc" flag. 2) I could write a short amount of assembly to interrogate the chip itself for this feature (a couple of instructions) 3) Use the existing QueryPerformanceCounter(). Personally, I'm favouring (2)... but what do other people think?

6 12