September 2003 - Wine-Devel

Re: Viruses sent from forged mail adresses ?
by Ivan Leo Murray-Smith Sept. 29, 2003

Sept. 29, 2003

Yes, loads.

1 0

Re: [ros-general] RE: Wineconf 2004, otherwise known as...
by Steven Edwards Sept. 29, 2003

Sept. 29, 2003

Hello Aleksey Ge and I discussed trying to attend LinuxTax in Germany. The only problem with this is that I think my wife may be due at the same time as LinuxTag!!! I would still like for us to try and do a conf in Germany though. Vizzini suggested alternating ReactOS confs in the US and EU every other year so maybe we could partner with the WINE project to do a join confernce once a year? I still would like to do St. Petersburg in Feb. We will really see how dedicated our developers are. =) Thanks Steven --- Aleksey Bragin <aleksey(a)studiocerebral.com> wrote: > If it will ever be in Germany, I will definately visit it (many > reasons, > like I'm learning Deutsch language, Deutschland is a good and > beatufil > country by what I heard from my brother who worked there, etc,etc > :)). > > > With the best regards, > Aleksey Bragin. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Thomas Weidenmueller" <info(a)w3seek.de> > To: <ros-general(a)reactos.com> > Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 9:36 PM > Subject: Re: [ros-general] RE: Wineconf 2004, otherwise known as... > > > > Aleksey Bragin wrote: > > > > >I guess some RosConf'200X should be held in Russia, and especially > during > > >winter, then :-) > > > > > >But unfortunately I don't see a lot of ReactOS-developers from > Russia > yet... > > > > > > > > >With the best regards, > > >Aleksey Bragin. > > > > > > > > > > > >----- Original Message ----- > > >From: "Steven Edwards" <steven_ed4153(a)yahoo.com> > > >To: <wine-devel(a)winehq.com>; <jwhite(a)codeweavers.com> > > >Cc: <ros-general(a)reactos.com> > > >Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 9:26 PM > > >Subject: [ros-general] RE: Wineconf 2004, otherwise known as... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>Hey Jer, > > >>I will try to be there. I can't speak for the rest of the ReactOS > > >>developers but I think we may have one or two that would like > > >>to come. > > >> > > >>I have always wanted to see the Russian Winter so I guess > > >>St. Paul in January is good practice. > > >> > > >>Thanks > > >>Steven > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >>>-----Original Message----- > > >>>From: wine-devel-admin(a)winehq.org > > >>>[mailto:wine-devel-admin(a)winehq.org]On > > >>>Behalf Of Jeremy White > > >>>Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 5:41 PM > > >>>To: wine-devel(a)winehq.com > > >>>Subject: Wineconf 2004, otherwise known as... > > >>> > > >>> > > >>>...making good on my threat. > > >>> > > >>>We are making plans to host Wineconf 2004, > > >>>in St. Paul, MN, during January 2004. > > >>> > > >>>This is the last chance for someone in Europe to volunteer > > >>>to organize it in their neck of the woods... > > >>> > > >>>Otherwise, we plan to provide: > > >>> * A meeting space for 2 days > > >>> * Arrangements for moderately price hotel rooms > > >>> * Advice on transportation, which should be straightforward > > >>> * A meal or two, and drinks for at least one evening > > >>> * We'll have all CodeWeavers Wine hackers in town for the > event > > >>> * Free buttons for the St. Paul Winter Carnival: > > >>> http://www.winter-carnival.com/ > > >>> <grin> > > >>> > > >>>What we will expect you to provide: > > >>> * Your airfare (sorry, no IPO money for us) > > >>> * Your hotel room > > >>> * A laptop with wireless > > >>> * Long underwear and Parkas > > >>> > > >>>What I don't know yet: > > >>> * We may need to charge some sort of modest fee, > > >>> depending on how the budget and our bank account > > >>> look. We're willing to shoulder some costs, > > >>> but we may need extra help. We'll also plan on > > >>> using the Wine party fund to help cover some costs. > > >>> * Exact dates; my thinking is to do it in conjunction > > >>> with a weekend (e.g. Fri/Sat or Sun/Mon), but > > >>> I want to see what meeting space cost/availability > > >>> looks like before I pick. Right now, Fri Jan 16th/ > > >>> Sat Jan 17th are looking good (note that LinuxWorld NY > > >>> is the following week for those that might be able > > >>> to get their employer to sponsor the trip Stateside). > > >>> > > >>> > > >>>Thoughts? Comments? > > >>> > > >>>If you think you would come, please email me privately; > > >>>I'd like to get a rough count to help with planning. > > >>> > > >>>Cheers, > > >>> > > >>>Jeremy > > >>> > > >>> > > >>__________________________________ > > >>Do you Yahoo!? > > >>The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search > > >>http://shopping.yahoo.com > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > How about Germany? ;) > > > > Regards > > Thomas > > > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search http://shopping.yahoo.com

1 0

Re: Get calling stack after application crash
by BiGgUn Sept. 29, 2003

Sept. 29, 2003

Hi Unfortunately, when i have tried 'bt' yet. winedbg complains that there is no process loaded :( So there is no backtrace. Stephan

2 1

Viruses sent from forged mail adresses ?
by Sylvain Petreolle Sept. 29, 2003

Sept. 29, 2003

Hi, I received today a mail from office-support-mailman _at_ wine.codeweavers.com, with 125k in size. Since it doesnt have an attachment, it looks strange. Did someone got the same ? ===== Sylvain Petreolle (spetreolle_at_users_dot_sourceforge_dot_net) ICQ #170597259 Say NO to software patents Dites NON aux brevets logiciels "What if tomorrow the War could be over ?" Morpheus, in "Reloaded". ___________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? -- Une adresse @yahoo.fr gratuite et en français ! Yahoo! Mail : http://fr.mail.yahoo.com

1 0

Re: ddraw.txt and gui
by Alexandre Julliard Sept. 29, 2003

Sept. 29, 2003

"Dimitrie O. Paun" <dimi(a)intelliware.ca> writes: > For the gui, I'm not sure if it would fit better somewhere > else, or if you can come up with a better name, or if we > should just merge it into a .c file (it is kinda big for > that though), or even add the message traces in the comments > for each of the functions they document (having them all > in one file is also helpful, as it gives a nice summary > about how and when these messages are sent). IMO the right place for that info is in a regression test that actually checks the message order. It should be pretty trivial to write a window procedure that takes an expected message list and checks that each successive message it receives corresponds to the next entry in that list. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.com

4 6

Re: Wineconf 2004, otherwise known as...
by Brian Vincent (C) Sept. 29, 2003

Sept. 29, 2003

> Of course, now that I know Lionel is going to host this on the ski slopes, > I'm beginning to be willing to go over there...<grin> Now that would be a compelling reason to go to Europe, even if Lionel snowboards. No one has mentioned France yet as a location but it seems like a lot of you live there. I also know this ski resort in Colorado that has some pretty nice conference facilities - dedicated T1, wifi, lots of conference rooms. I think I could get a good deal on it - probably just for the cost of catering. For anyone who skis I can get cheap lift tickets. Likewise, I can get a deal on lodging, but it wouldn't be that great ($80 USD /night or so). However, I don't think Colorado is as convenient as Minneapolis and the few $$$ saved on facilities probably wouldn't justify it. The one nice thing about Minneapolis is the major airport closeby - Northwest is the major carrier there and they partner with KLM. A quick look on Travelocity shows tickets for under $600 USD (under 500 Euro?) for airfare from various European cities to Minneapolis. Despite what Jeremy says about Minneapolis, I don't think anyone from Europe will be surprised by cold temperatures. If you're used to seeing snow on the ground it's not much different.. except for the times when your eyelids freeze shut. I agree with Jeremy that having dual conferences doesn't sound as appealing. --------------- Brian Vincent Copper Mountain Telecom vincentb(a)coppercolorado.com

1 0

Re: expand on -documentation of -dll option
by Ferenc Wagner Sept. 29, 2003

Sept. 29, 2003

Bill Medland <billmedland(a)mercuryspeed.com> writes: > Bill Medland (billmedland(a)mercuryspeed.com) > Expand the documentation on the --dll option > > +Syntax: -dll name[,name[,...]]={native|so|builtin}[,{n|s|b}[,...]] > + - 'name' is the name of any dll without extension > + - the order of loading (native, so and builtin) can be abbreviated > + with the first letter I thought so was not supported any more... Feri.

1 0

[jakob@vmlinux.org: Fixes to dlls/shlwapi/tests/]
by Jakob Eriksson Sept. 29, 2003

Sept. 29, 2003

So, what do you think? It's not yet commited, should I start being in despair? :-) ----- Forwarded message from Jakob Eriksson <jakob(a)vmlinux.org> ----- From: Jakob Eriksson <jakob(a)vmlinux.org> To: wine-patches(a)winehq.com Subject: Fixes to dlls/shlwapi/tests/ Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 03:44:11 +0200 Fixes to dlls/shlwapi/tests/shreg.c Fixes a hang bug which appears when running shlwapi shreg test on Windows XP. Also fixes a broken test for SHCopyKey, which did not work on neither XP, NT nor Wine. Now it works on NT and XP. Plus four off-by-one fixes where NT and XP differs. regards, Jakob Index: shreg.c =================================================================== RCS file: /home/wine/wine/dlls/shlwapi/tests/shreg.c,v retrieving revision 1.13 diff -u -r1.13 shreg.c --- shreg.c 5 Sep 2003 23:08:30 -0000 1.13 +++ shreg.c 25 Sep 2003 01:39:31 -0000 @@ -32,9 +32,9 @@ /* Keys used for testing */ #define REG_TEST_KEY "Software\\Wine\\Test" +#define REG_SRC_KEY "Software\\Wine\\ToBeCopied" #define REG_CURRENT_VERSION "Software\\Microsoft\\Windows NT\\CurrentVersion" -static HMODULE hshlwapi; typedef DWORD (WINAPI *SHCopyKeyA_func)(HKEY,LPCSTR,HKEY,DWORD); static SHCopyKeyA_func pSHCopyKeyA; typedef DWORD (WINAPI *SHRegGetPathA_func)(HKEY,LPCSTR,LPCSTR,LPSTR,DWORD); @@ -50,35 +50,14 @@ static char * sEmptyBuffer ="0123456789"; -/* delete key and all its subkeys */ -static DWORD delete_key( HKEY hkey ) -{ - WCHAR name[MAX_PATH]; - DWORD ret; - - while (!(ret = RegEnumKeyW(hkey, 0, name, sizeof(name)))) - { - HKEY tmp; - if (!(ret = RegOpenKeyExW( hkey, name, 0, KEY_ENUMERATE_SUB_KEYS, &tmp ))) - { - ret = delete_key( tmp ); - RegCloseKey( tmp ); - } - if (ret) break; - } - if (ret != ERROR_NO_MORE_ITEMS) return ret; - RegDeleteKeyA( hkey, NULL ); - return 0; -} - -static HKEY create_test_entries(void) +static HKEY create_test_entries( const char *prefix ) { HKEY hKey; SetEnvironmentVariableA("LONGSYSTEMVAR", "bar"); SetEnvironmentVariableA("FOO", "ImARatherLongButIndeedNeededString"); - ok(!RegCreateKeyA(HKEY_CURRENT_USER, REG_TEST_KEY, &hKey), "RegCreateKeyA failed"); + ok( !RegCreateKeyA( HKEY_CURRENT_USER, prefix, &hKey ), "RegCreateKeyA failed" ); if (hKey) { @@ -170,7 +149,11 @@ */ dwSize = 6; ok(! SHQueryValueExA( hKey, "Test3", NULL, NULL, NULL, &dwSize), "SHQueryValueExA failed"); - ok( dwSize == nUsedBuffer2, "(%lu,%lu)", dwSize, nUsedBuffer2); + ok( + dwSize == nUsedBuffer2 || + (dwSize - 1) == nUsedBuffer2, /* Windows XP sp1 */ + "(%lu,%lu)" , dwSize, nUsedBuffer2 + ); /* @@ -194,7 +177,12 @@ dwRet = SHQueryValueExA( hKey, "Test3", NULL, &dwType, buf, &dwSize); ok( ERROR_MORE_DATA == dwRet, "ERROR_MORE_DATA"); ok( 0 == strcmp(sEmptyBuffer, buf), "(%s)", buf); - ok( dwSize == nUsedBuffer2, "(%lu,%lu)" , dwSize, nUsedBuffer2); + ok( + dwSize == nUsedBuffer2 || + (dwSize - 1) == nUsedBuffer2, /* Windows XP sp1 */ + "(%lu,%lu)" , dwSize, nUsedBuffer2 + ); + ok( dwType == REG_SZ, "(%lu)" , dwType); /* @@ -204,9 +192,19 @@ dwSize = sExpLen2 - 4; dwType = -1; ok( ERROR_MORE_DATA == SHQueryValueExA( hKey, "Test3", NULL, &dwType, buf, &dwSize), "Expected ERROR_MORE_DATA"); - ok( 0 == strncmp(sExpTestpath2, buf, sExpLen2 - 4 - 1), "(%s)", buf); - ok( sExpLen2 - 4 - 1 == strlen(buf), "(%s)", buf); - ok( dwSize == nUsedBuffer2, "(%lu,%lu)" , dwSize, nUsedBuffer2); + /* FIXME - what is this above test meant to do exactly? */ + ok( 0 == strlen( buf ), "(%s)", buf ); /* Windows NT 4.0 sp6 and XP sp1 do return empty strings */ + + /* Old, non working test + ok( 0 == strncmp(sExpTestpath2, buf, sExpLen2 - 4 - 1), "(%s)", buf); + ok( sExpLen2 - 4 - 1 == strlen(buf), "(%s)", buf); + */ + + ok( + dwSize == nUsedBuffer2 || + (dwSize - 1) == nUsedBuffer2, /* Windows XP sp1 */ + "(%lu,%lu)" , dwSize, nUsedBuffer2 + ); ok( dwType == REG_SZ, "(%lu)" , dwType); /* @@ -215,75 +213,104 @@ strcpy(buf, sEmptyBuffer); dwSize = 6; dwType = -1; - dwRet = SHQueryValueExA( hKey, "Test3", NULL, &dwType, NULL, &dwSize); - ok( ERROR_SUCCESS == dwRet, "(%lu)", dwRet); - ok( dwSize == nUsedBuffer2, "(%lu,%lu)" , dwSize, nUsedBuffer2); - ok( dwType == REG_SZ, "(%lu)" , dwType); + dwRet = SHQueryValueExA( hKey, "Test3", NULL, &dwType, NULL, &dwSize ); + ok( ERROR_SUCCESS == dwRet, "(%lu)", dwRet ); + + ok( + dwSize == nUsedBuffer2 || + (dwSize - 1) == nUsedBuffer2, /* Windows XP sp1 */ + "(%lu,%lu)" , dwSize, nUsedBuffer2 + ); + ok( dwType == REG_SZ, "(%lu)" , dwType ); RegCloseKey(hKey); } -static void test_SHCopyKey(void) +static void test_SHCopyKey( ) { - HKEY hKeySrc, hKeyDst; + HKEY hKeySrc; + HKEY hKeyDest; - /* Delete existing destination sub keys */ - hKeyDst = NULL; - if (!RegOpenKeyA(HKEY_CURRENT_USER, REG_TEST_KEY "\\CopyDestination", &hKeyDst) && hKeyDst) + /* Requires Internet Explorer 5.0 or later */ + if (NULL == pSHCopyKeyA) { - SHDeleteKeyA(hKeyDst, NULL); - RegCloseKey(hKeyDst); - } - hKeyDst = NULL; - if (RegCreateKeyA(HKEY_CURRENT_USER, REG_TEST_KEY "\\CopyDestination", &hKeyDst) || !hKeyDst) - { - ok(0, "didn't open dest"); - return; - } - - hKeySrc = NULL; - if (RegOpenKeyA(HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE, REG_CURRENT_VERSION, &hKeySrc) || !hKeySrc) - { - ok(0, "didn't open source"); - return; + return; } + hKeySrc = create_test_entries( REG_SRC_KEY ); - if (pSHCopyKeyA) - ok (!(*pSHCopyKeyA)(hKeyDst, NULL, hKeySrc, 0), "failed copy"); + /* Delete any existing destination key */ + SHDeleteKey( HKEY_CURRENT_USER, REG_TEST_KEY "\\CopyDestination" ); - RegCloseKey(hKeySrc); - RegCloseKey(hKeyDst); - - /* Check we copied the sub keys, i.e. AeDebug from the default wine registry */ - hKeyDst = NULL; - if (RegOpenKeyA(HKEY_CURRENT_USER, REG_TEST_KEY "\\CopyDestination\\AeDebug", &hKeyDst) || !hKeyDst) - { - ok(0, "didn't open copy"); - return; - } + hKeyDest = NULL; + ok( + ERROR_SUCCESS == + RegCreateKeyA( + HKEY_CURRENT_USER, + REG_TEST_KEY "\\CopyDestination", + &hKeyDest + ), + "did not open dest; RegCreateKeyA failed" + ); + ok( NULL != hKeyDest, "hKeyDest is NULL" ); + + ok( + ERROR_SUCCESS == (*pSHCopyKeyA)( hKeySrc, NULL, hKeyDest, 0 ), + "SHCopyKeyA failed" + ); + + + RegCloseKey( hKeySrc ); + RegCloseKey( hKeyDest ); + + + /* Check we copied the keys */ + ok( + ERROR_SUCCESS == + RegOpenKeyA( + HKEY_CURRENT_USER, + REG_TEST_KEY "\\CopyDestination", + &hKeyDest + ), + "did not open copy: RegOpenKeyA failed" + ); + ok( NULL != hKeyDest, "did not open dest; hKeyDest is NULL" ); /* And the we copied the values too */ - ok(!SHQueryValueExA(hKeyDst, "Debugger", NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL), "SHQueryValueExA failed"); + ok( + !SHQueryValueExA(hKeyDest, "Test1", NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL), + "SHQueryValueExA failed" + ); - RegCloseKey(hKeyDst); + RegCloseKey( hKeyDest ); } -START_TEST(shreg) +START_TEST( shreg ) { - HKEY hkey = create_test_entries(); - hshlwapi = GetModuleHandleA("shlwapi.dll"); - if (hshlwapi) - { - pSHCopyKeyA=(SHCopyKeyA_func)GetProcAddress(hshlwapi,"SHCopyKeyA"); - pSHRegGetPathA=(SHRegGetPathA_func)GetProcAddress(hshlwapi,"SHRegGetPathA"); - } - test_SHGetValue(); - test_SHQUeryValueEx(); - test_SHGetRegPath(); - test_SHCopyKey(); - delete_key( hkey ); + HKEY hkey; + HMODULE hshlwapi; + + hshlwapi = GetModuleHandleA( "shlwapi.dll" ); + + if (NULL == hshlwapi) + { + + return; + } + + hkey = create_test_entries( REG_TEST_KEY ); + + pSHCopyKeyA = (SHCopyKeyA_func) GetProcAddress( hshlwapi, "SHCopyKeyA" ); + pSHRegGetPathA = (SHRegGetPathA_func) GetProcAddress( hshlwapi, "SHRegGetPathA" ); + + test_SHGetValue( ); + test_SHQUeryValueEx( ); + test_SHGetRegPath( ); + test_SHCopyKey( ); + + SHDeleteKey( HKEY_CURRENT_USER, REG_TEST_KEY ); + SHDeleteKey( HKEY_CURRENT_USER, REG_SRC_KEY ); } ----- End forwarded message ----- -- regards, Jakob It's is not, it isn't ain't, and it's it's, not its, if you mean it is. If you don't, it's its. Then too, it's hers. It isn't her's. It isn't our's either. It's ours, and likewise yours and theirs. -- Oxford University Press, Edpress News

1 0

Get calling stack after application crash
by BiGgUn Sept. 29, 2003

Sept. 29, 2003

Hi folks, How can i get the calling stack of program after its crash ? Running the program in winedbg doesn't give me anything. Using --debugmsg +xxx ... doesn't give me useful info. I give up with the +relay solution because it generates too big file. Thanks in advance. Stephan

2 1

winebuild & Winelib
by Dimitrie O. Paun Sept. 29, 2003

Sept. 29, 2003

I am sorry, but I'm going to ask this without RTF{M,C}: 1. Building Winelib DLLs We need the .spec file, I know. But can we also use a .def file instead (without relay support, of course). My understanding is that the extra information in the .spec file is needed only for relay debugging... If we are to ask people for extra work to create Winelib DLLs, I think we can get away with a .def file, but not with a .spec file (no tool support in Windows, etc.) 2. Linking Winelib apps with Windows (PE) DLLs Is this possible? We will not be able to use the original import libs, we should be able to make do with a .def file. Is this supported by winebuild? I am trying to understand this a bit better for (a) winegcc support for building DLLs (b) updating the Winelib docs Thanks! -- Dimi.

3 5