February 2005 - Wine-Devel - list.winehq.org

Re: [RESEND2] Uninstaller localization
by Dmitry Timoshkov Feb. 25, 2005

Feb. 25, 2005

"Jonathan Ernst" <Jonathan(a)ErnstFamily.ch> wrote: > Next I'll change the window to a dialog if I can. Thanks. > - wc.lpszClassName = appname; > + wc.lpszClassName = sAppname; > > if (!RegisterClass(&wc)) exit(1); > - hWnd = CreateWindow( appname, "Wine Application Uninstaller", > + hWnd = CreateWindow( sAppname, sAppname, Sorry for not pointing out to it earlier, but it's better to leave the window class name in ASCII. -- Dmitry.

1 0

Re: working installshield?
by Robert Shearman Feb. 25, 2005

Feb. 25, 2005

Marcus Meissner wrote: >Hi, > >Is there any chance to have a working installshield at some time? > >I don't really want to fall back to the december or even earlier WINE >releases for our spring SUSE Linux product ;) > > I haven't been testing against InstallShield for a while, but last time I checked it was hanging because we do not process window messages during RPCs. If you want to implement this yourself, I can give you details on how to do this. I will get around to this eventually, but at the moment I have other priorities. If the worst happens and InstallShield is still not working, then you can still ship the December ole32 with the most recent Wine. Rob

2 2

WINE: Rendering in Diamond2.x works :-)
by Tobias Burnus Feb. 25, 2005

Feb. 25, 2005

Hello, I'd like to thank the Winegrowers for providing such a nice flavoured Wine. With the current version, the program Diamond is even able to render the output (at least if one turns off the double buffering): w/o rendering: http://www.physik.fu-berlin.de/~tburnus/wine/diamond2.png w/ rendering: http://www.physik.fu-berlin.de/~tburnus/wine/diamond_rend.png (somehow the menu/tool/status bars are not correctly redrawn and the rendering seems to be too low by the height of a toolbar, but rendering works :-) and hitting Shift-Ctrl-N now works as well (thanks to Dimitry!). Tobias

1 0

wsock32 conformance test
by Thomas Kho Feb. 25, 2005

Feb. 25, 2005

Hi, We're working on a set of tests for wsock32.dll. So far we've completed a test of blocking network I/O with multiple threads. Before we post to wine-patches, we'd appreciate any critiques/input. Fredy, Doug, and I are UCLA undergraduates in a software engineering course. Thanks for your help, Thomas Kho cc: Fredy Garcia, Douglas Rosenberg (group members) Files available at: http://www.geekymedia.com/viewcvs/cgi/viewcvs.cgi/wine4/wine/dlls/wsock32/t…

1 0

Re: [RESEND] Uninstaller localization
by Dmitry Timoshkov Feb. 25, 2005

Feb. 25, 2005

"Jonathan Ernst" <Jonathan(a)ErnstFamily.ch> wrote: > This time I didn't translate the WINE_ERR messages and translated another messagebox. It would be better to not touch WINE_ERR lines at all then. > Changelog: > - localization of uninstaller > + /* We load the strings */ > + LoadString( hInst, IDS_APPNAME, sAppname, sizeof(sAppname)); ... > - wc.hIcon = LoadIcon( hInst, appname ); > + wc.hIcon = LoadIcon( hInst, sAppname ); LoadIcon will always fail in the localized case. -- Dmitry.

1 0

Re: Fix recently introduced SEGV in DOCFILE IStorage implementation
by Troy Rollo Feb. 24, 2005

Feb. 24, 2005

On Thursday 24 February 2005 20:39, Paul Vriens wrote: > Could you send the patch to wine-patches :-). Damn, another typo on my part (I meant it to go there in the first place) On Friday 25 February 2005 03:26, Mike McCormack wrote: > Thanks for finding this problem. I think the root cause of the problem > is that three structures that need to be the same require 3 seperate > tweaks. > > Can you confirm that this patch also fixes the problem for you? I probably could, but given the nature of your patch there's a much more efficient test that should give much greater confidence in it - compiling the affected source files without debugging information using your patch and mine should give identical object files (except for time stamps in the object file headers).

1 1

broken faq.sgml
by Vitaly Lipatov Feb. 24, 2005

Feb. 24, 2005

Patch http://cvs.winehq.org/patch.py?id=16300 breaks faq.sgml in line <question id="Can-I-bundle-everything-in-one-huge-executable"> during compiling: jade:/home/lav/RPM/BUILD/wine-20050224/documentation/faq.sgml:1716:66:Q: length of name token must not exceed NAMELEN (44) -- Vitaly Lipatov, ALT Linux Team Russia, Saint-Petersburg, www.etersoft.ru

2 1

Re: Fix recently introduced SEGV in DOCFILE IStorage implementation
by Paul Vriens Feb. 24, 2005

Feb. 24, 2005

On Thu, 2005-02-24 at 17:26, Mike McCormack wrote: > Troy Rollo wrote: > > After changing StorageBaseImpl, StorageInternalImpl was not updated to reflect > > the change. > > Thanks for finding this problem. I think the root cause of the problem > is that three structures that need to be the same require 3 seperate tweaks. > > Can you confirm that this patch also fixes the problem for you? > > thanks, > > Mike > Hi Mike, this fixes one of the problems I had with the Uru_Ages_Beyond_Myst_Demo. I still have problems with InstallShield but that's a known problem, and worked on ;-). Cheers, Paul.

1 0

Re: Child windows require IsWindowVisible() test in DestroyWindow()
by Dmitry Timoshkov Feb. 24, 2005

Feb. 24, 2005

"Dmitry Timoshkov" <dmitry(a)baikal.ru> wrote: > in the msg.c,test_DestroyWindow() test case adding WS_VISIBLE to all > windows except a parent shows that behaviour doesn't change for child > windows but a popup window starts to receive WM_WINDOWPOSCHANGING and > friends indicating that child windows require IsWindowVisible() test. > > I don't want to add that to the real test in order to keep the test > as simple as possible. > > Changelog: > Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)codeweavers.com> > A test shows that child windows require IsWindowVisible() test > in DestroyWindow() in order to suppress ShowWindow() call. Alexandre, please do not apply this patch, it's wrong. -- Dmitry.

1 0

Re: Uninstaller localization
by Dmitry Timoshkov Feb. 24, 2005

Feb. 24, 2005

"Jonathan Ernst" <Jonathan(a)ErnstFamily.ch> wrote: > Changelog: > - localization of uninstaller You should not localize WINE_ERR messages, encoding of strings might be incompatible in Wine and underlying system. Also, is it possible to use normal dialog for uninstaller's main window? We could use conventional dialog templates in resources for different locales then. Right now localization will look ugly if lengths of strings in various locales are different. -- Dmitry.

1 0