March 2005 - Wine-Devel - list.winehq.org

Re: wine/dlls/comctl32 status.c
by Thomas Weidenmueller March 1, 2005

March 1, 2005

Alexandre Julliard wrote: >Log message: > Filip Navara <navaraf(a)reactos.com> > Implement SB_SETBORDERS. > > Just FYI: Win95, 98, 98SE, ME, NT4, NT5.0, NT5.1 and later do not support this message even though MS Office might try to use them. Best Regards, Thomas

1 0

Re: Patch for wsock32 conformance test
by Alexandre Julliard March 1, 2005

March 1, 2005

Thomas Kho <thomaskho(a)gmail.com> writes: > We're working on a set of tests for wsock32.dll with guidance from Dan > Kegel. So far we've > completed a test of blocking network I/O with multiple threads. > Attached is a patch from our efforts. We look forward to suggestions. This stuff should be merged with the other winsock tests in dlls/winsock/tests/sock.c (assuming it does something that the current tests don't, I haven't checked this). There is no point in having duplicate tests for wsock32 since it just forwards everything to ws2_32. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

1 0

Re: [programs/regedit] Use Favorit* instead of Favourit*
by Robert Shearman March 1, 2005

March 1, 2005

Paul Vriens wrote: >Hi, > >Our regedit displays Favourites in the menu. This patch changes that to >use Favorites. The patch also changes the variables with FAVOURITE in >the name. The reasoning is: > >a. Windows uses Favorite(s) all over the place. >b. We do too. > >That's the only reasoning and not if either one is better (UK/US etc..) > >No functional changes btw. > >Changelog > Change Favourite(s) into Favorite(s) > > Fair enough for strings in the English, US resources, as long as the strings in the English, Neutral resources are still spelt correctly. > Change variables containing FAVOURITE into FAVORITE > > Why do this? Rob

2 1