June 2005 - Wine-Devel - list.winehq.org

Copy Protection & WINE
by Jonathan Wilson June 2, 2005

June 2, 2005

From what I understand, there are 3 ways to do copy protection in WINE (at least for copy protection that needs a kernel driver to work): 1.Implement a WINE implementation of that kernel driver (in the same way various stock windows kernel drivers have been implemented). Problem with this is that there is a big DMCA risk (which is why AFAIK its been rejected) 2.Implement a fake NTOSKRNL that has just the entrypoints for accessing and loading copy protection drivers (the set of kernel calls needed by the copy protection drivers is only a very small subset of the total set of kernel calls and AFAIK none of them are hardware related) or 3.Implement a proper kernel driver loader (i.e. one that would sit in the windows kernel and do the same sort of thing as that ndiswrapper and that ntfs.sys loader do) What is the current state of copy protection work for WINE? Which of these 3 options do the developers intend to follow? (I remember someone posted some actual code for option 2 but I dont remember if anything happened with it)

2 1

Re: fixes for -Wmissing-declarations and -Wwrite-strings warnings
by Pouech Eric DMI AEI CAEN June 2, 2005

June 2, 2005

looking at the patch, I saw something in the code that made me sick: char *audioAutoDetect(void) { [snip] char *driversFound[10]; [snip] return driversFound[0]; [snip] } can someone fix that broken code ? that would be another nice janitorial task to check whether this kind of error exists somewhere else (I'd bet it does) A+

2 1

Re: fixes for -Wmissing-declarations and -Wwrite-strings warnings
by Andreas Mohr June 2, 2005

June 2, 2005

Hi, On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 08:31:36PM +0900, Mike McCormack wrote: > ChangeLog: > * fixes for -Wmissing-declarations and -Wwrite-strings warnings Argh, this is what I had done recently but didn't manage to submit yet. (I told in a mail that I had done programs/ and tools/) > -static char *ignored_fstypes[] = { > +static const char *ignored_fstypes[] = { > "devpts", > "tmpfs", > "proc", > @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ static char *ignored_fstypes[] = { > NULL > }; Imperfect - it should be static const char * const ignored_fstypes[] since otherwise the ignored_fstypes pointer is still non-const (objdump -x) which it doesn't need to be (may mark more memory pages as read-write than necessary). Sure, your objective was to fix all strict compiler warnings which that patch probably did successfully, but why not go that extra mile... Andreas Mohr

2 1

Winelib MFC app crashes after printing
by Eugene Aksenov June 2, 2005

June 2, 2005

Hello, I have a small MFC app ported to winelib which uses MFC compiled with winelib. Really, it is just an App-Wizard generated application. I always have a crash of the application after printing. The page is printed ok but after that the app crashes. I use LPD for printing and my command line from wine is 'lpr -P<myprinter>'. I also try to print without MFC support i.e creating the printer DC by hand etc - the crash is the same, it follows EndDoc() call. There is no crash like this at the same linux configuration using in a 'pure' Win32 simple application without MFC though the code for printing is the same. When i print to file, all is ok. So , my current workaround is printing to a temp file and then send the file to lpr. I use RH9.0, wine20050419. My [spooler] section in config is the default from the wine installation. Did anybody meet a problem like that ? Is it MFC that has some impact here ? Thanks a lot for any hints.

2 2

dlls/kernel/tests/locale.c warning regression
by Gerald Pfeifer June 2, 2005

June 2, 2005

The following change to dlls/kernel/tests/locale.c revision 1.36 date: 2005/05/31 09:30:46; author: julliard; state: Exp; lines: +4 -4 Mike McCormack <mike(a)codeweavers.com> Some warning fixes for the regression tests. actually doesn't fix any warning on FreeBSD 4.x, but adds the following one: locale.c:763: warning: `test_EnumTimeFormats' defined but not used Would you mind looking into that? Thanks, Gerald

1 0

Weirdness in the makefile
by Scott Ritchie June 2, 2005

June 2, 2005

Can someone explain the significance of these targets in the makefile: manpages: $(MKINSTALLDIRS) $(TOPOBJDIR)/documentation/man3w cd dlls && $(MAKE) man htmlpages: $(MKINSTALLDIRS) $(TOPOBJDIR)/documentation/html cd dlls && $(MAKE) doc-html sgmlpages: $(MKINSTALLDIRS) $(TOPOBJDIR)/documentation/api-guide cd dlls && $(MAKE) doc-sgml Do they do anything? Those don't seem to be valid directories anymore. Thanks, Scott Ritchie

1 0

Re: PATCH: Re: Wine does not build (preloader.c, line 863, a_ptr union)
by Andreas Mohr June 2, 2005

June 2, 2005

Hi, On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 09:10:10AM +0200, Marcus Meissner wrote: > On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 03:22:01PM +0900, Mike McCormack wrote: > > > > Ivan Gyurdiev wrote: > > >I hate bothering the -devel list with compile errors, but > > >they don't seem to get fixed, so I start wondering > > >if anyone else besides me is using gcc4 at all.. > > > > > >preloader.c: In function ???is_in_preload_range???: > > >preloader.c:863: error: ???union <anonymous>??? has no member named > > >???a_ptr??? > > >preloader.c:864: error: ???union <anonymous>??? has no member named > > >???a_ptr??? > > > > This is more likely to be a problem with your headers than with gcc. > > No, this is the start of this years approach to break WINE from our friends at glibc. > > a_un.a_ptr no longer exists in the elf aux vector struct. Darn, can't they use a magic keyword or similar mechanisms to mark elements scheduled for clean removal right before the next major version?? (and not out of sudden within almost the same version number) OK, some changes in that area might be non-trivial, so they do it when they feel like doing it, but I really doubt that this is the majority. But OTOH projects have to do binary incompatible changes a bit before the release of the next major version, otherwise there won't be any testing. And perhaps glibc is in such a version change phase right now... Andreas Mohr

1 0

Re: Age of Empires 2 splash screen
by Jesse Allen June 1, 2005

June 1, 2005

On 6/1/05, Ivan Leo Puoti <ivanleo(a)gmail.com> wrote: > I actually got this for the first time a few days ago, but I thought I > might as well share it as I think it's cool. AFAIK DMCA compliant code > has never got this far with safedisc 1. > http://www003.portalis.it/115/download/aoe.png > > Ivan. > > > Was this with the current wine tree?

2 1

DCOM and Google's Summer of Code
by Ivan Pechorin June 1, 2005

June 1, 2005

Hello! I'm in trouble trying to estimate effort needed to implement marshalling interoperable with MS. Is it a right task for 2-2.5 months of Google's "Summer of Code"? Best regards, Ivan Pechorin.

5 8

Re: Add a window station server object
by Robert Shearman June 1, 2005

June 1, 2005

Robert Shearman wrote: > Changelog: > Add a window station server object. Alexandre, Do you want me to flesh out the window station object and add some server calls before committing this work or is there something else? -- Rob Shearman

2 1