July 2005 - Wine-Devel - list.winehq.org

file locking
by Brian Vincent July 18, 2005

July 18, 2005

I've been playing around with file locking and Wine, namely the fact that Wine doesn't have any. Is there any way around this, maybe placing the burden on a filesystem? If I wanted to share files between two different users (say with something dumb like file permissions 666), is there any way to prevent the two people from stomping on each other? -Brian

5 7

Failed to find a suitable visual
by Saulius Krasuckas July 18, 2005

July 18, 2005

Since the patch [1] every time I run any larger app I get this in wine output: | fixme:opengl:X11DRV_setup_opengl_visual Failed to find a suitable visual Does this mean some misconfiguration on my box? How can it be described in simpler words? [1] http://cvs.winehq.org/patch.py?id=18642

4 12

Re: Implement GdiGetCharDimensions
by Alexandre Julliard July 18, 2005

July 18, 2005

Robert Shearman <rob(a)codeweavers.com> writes: > +LONG WINAPI GdiGetCharDimensions(HDC hdc, LPTEXTMETRICW lptm, LONG *height) > +{ > + SIZE sz; > + static const WCHAR alphabet[] = { > + 'a','b','c','d','e','f','g','h','i','j','k','l','m','n','o','p','q', > + 'r','s','t','u','v','w','x','y','z','A','B','C','D','E','F','G','H', > + 'I','J','K','L','M','N','O','P','Q','R','S','T','U','V','W','X','Y','Z',0}; > + > + if(lptm && !GetTextMetricsW(hdc, lptm)) return 0; > + > + if(!GetTextExtentPointW(hdc, alphabet, 52, &sz)) return 0; > + > + if (height) *height = sz.cy; > + return (sz.cx / 26 + 1) / 2; > +} Again I think you should be using tmHeight instead of sz.cy for the height. Some fonts may well have characters larger than the alphabet ones, and the current behavior is always to use tmHeight. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

2 3

Re: WLDAP32: implement ber_* functions
by Alexandre Julliard July 18, 2005

July 18, 2005

Hans Leidekker <hans(a)it.vu.nl> writes: > > This won't work I'm afraid, you would need a ber_vprintf. Though it > > seems to me you could link directly to the Unix lib from the spec file > > and avoid all the wrappers. > > Indeed, I can. Unlike with the ldap_* functions there are no encoding > differences to account for here. However you will still need to provide dummy functions when the library is missing, otherwise it won't link. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

1 0

Re: WLDAP32: implement ber_* functions
by Alexandre Julliard July 18, 2005

July 18, 2005

Hans Leidekker <hans(a)it.vu.nl> writes: > +INT WLDAP32_ber_printf( BerElement *berelement, PCHAR fmt, ... ) > +{ > + INT ret = LBER_ERROR; > +#ifdef HAVE_LBER_H > + va_list valist; > + > + TRACE( "(%p, %p)\n", berelement, fmt ); > + > + va_start( valist, fmt ); > + ret = ber_printf( berelement, fmt, valist ); > + va_end( valist ); This won't work I'm afraid, you would need a ber_vprintf. Though it seems to me you could link directly to the Unix lib from the spec file and avoid all the wrappers. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

1 0

Keyboard Layout
by Altan Íz³dogru July 18, 2005

July 18, 2005

My computer works with Linux 8.2. I have tried to install (to execute) a Windows Program on my Computer. The wine-program started and the windows sreen appeared. Suddenly the programm stopped and I got the message: Your keyboard layout was not found! Using closest match instead (German keyboard layout without dead keys) for scancode mapping. Please define your layout in windows/x11drv/keyboard.c and submit them to us for inclusion into future Wine releases. I don´t know how to define my keyboard layout. It would be very nice, when you could explain me how to define my keyboard layout. Thank You

2 1

Did I do something wrong?
by Vikram Kumar July 18, 2005

July 18, 2005

Hi, Any particular reason this patch didn't get commited? http://www.winehq.org/hypermail/wine-patches/2005/07/0361.html It's only a stub but I need it for an app to run.... Shall I just resubmit? Cheers Vik

1 0

Re: MSCMS: Use lcms only if both library and headers are detected
by Alexandre Julliard July 18, 2005

July 18, 2005

Jacek Caban <jack(a)itma.pwr.wroc.pl> writes: > --- dlls/mscms/mscms_priv.h 21 Feb 2005 18:38:15 -0000 1.7 > +++ dlls/mscms/mscms_priv.h 16 Jul 2005 16:12:03 -0000 > @@ -22,7 +22,11 @@ > #define HAVE_LCMS_H 1 > #endif > > -#ifdef HAVE_LCMS_H > +#if defined(HAVE_LCMS_H) && defined(HAVE_LCMS) > +#define USE_LCMS > +#endif Checking HAVE_LCMS should be enough, there's no need to define a new symbol for the same thing. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

1 0

Re: unixfs and CP_ACP versus CP_UNIXCP
by Michael Jung July 18, 2005

July 18, 2005

Hi Troy, On Monday 18 July 2005 09:37, you wrote: > I just noticed that your unixfs code appears to be using CP_ACP for all > conversions between wide characters and multi byte characters. This is OK > for multi byte display names, but for file names being used in or received > from the UNIX file system, CP_UNIXCP is probably more appropriate. See > wcstoumbs in ntdll, which uses unix_cptable, set by kernel32, which uses > the same table for CP_UNIXCP Thanks for the tip! I'll fix this. Bye, -- Michael Jung mjung(a)iss.tu-darmstadt.de

1 0

operating with non-existent files
by Saulius Krasuckas July 18, 2005

July 18, 2005

When I operate with "c:\nonexist_subdir" and "c:\\nonexist_subdir" filenames in Wine and in NT5, most of API functions set the same LastError. That functions are: OpenFile() CreateFileA() SetCurrentDirectoryA() FindFirstFileA() GetFileAttributesA() But if I call this: IShellFolder_ParseDisplayName(IDesktopFolder, NULL, NULL, cNonExistDirW, NULL, &newPIDL, 0) then I get two different codes: * for the first one HRESULT_FROM_WIN32(ERROR_FILE_NOT_FOUND), * for the second one E_FAIL. This is true for winME and win2k (and not for Wine). Do we need to distinguish between these two filenames in Wine? If so, on top of what functions should it be implemented? Do someone know, how native IShellFolder_ParseDisplayName works in the case of IDesktopFolder? I think the double-slash in the filename has something to do with object names, but I have no ground here.

1 1