October 2007 - Wine-Devel - list.winehq.org

Moving the wine status pages to the wiki
by Kai Blin Oct. 8, 2007

Oct. 8, 2007

Hi folks, I'm currently looking into getting an up-to-date list of maintainers for certain subsystems. I would like to keep that in the context of the dll status pages, but in order to keep them maintainable, I'm considering to move those pages to the wiki. Any thoughts about that? Cheers, Kai -- Kai Blin WorldForge developer http://www.worldforge.org/ Wine developer http://wiki.winehq.org/KaiBlin Samba team member http://www.samba.org/samba/team/ -- Will code for cotton.

3 2

WineConf - Slides online
by Marcus Meissner Oct. 8, 2007

Oct. 8, 2007

Hi, I have uploaded the slides of Alexandres Status report to http://wiki.winehq.org/WineConf2007 (direct link: http://wiki.winehq.org/WineConf2007?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=winecon… ) Feel free to upload more slides, and if you are lazy, send them to me and I will ;) Ciao, Marcus

5 4

Bugzilla and spam harvesting
by Dan Kegel Oct. 8, 2007

Oct. 8, 2007

Should we modify our Bugzilla to hide email addresses at least a little? I'd like that myself, and users request it occasionally. Just now, somebody asked that he be removed from bugzilla because it doesn't do this. - Dan -- Wine for Windows ISVs: http://kegel.com/wine/isv

3 2

Re: Request to be unbanned from #winehq (Jan Zerebecki)
by luis.busquets＠ilidium.com Oct. 8, 2007

Oct. 8, 2007

Dear all, Which program do I have to use to get connected in the #winehq channel? I have truly been out of chatting for a long time.

2 1

AW: 1.0 Bugs - Microsoft Office 2003
by Roland Kaeser Oct. 8, 2007

Oct. 8, 2007

Hello Sorry for my cheek, but don't a 1.0-Version mean that every Windows app works on Wine? Regards Roland ----- Ursprüngliche Mail ---- Von: Dan Kegel <dank(a)kegel.com> An: EA Durbin <ead1234(a)hotmail.com> CC: Wine Developers List <wine-devel(a)winehq.org> Gesendet: Sonntag, den 7. Oktober 2007, 22:36:41 Uhr Betreff: Re: 1.0 Bugs - Microsoft Office 2003 On 10/7/07, EA Durbin <ead1234(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > I was able to get around bug 9023 with a patch applied to the appdb I see you attached the patch to bug 9023, thanks. > and I > did some further testing in Office 2003 today. Initially I'm prompted to > activate my copy of microsoft office 2003, and both means of activating the > application are broken in wine due to bugs 9943 and 9944. Then I tried to > open VBA inside of Office and was prompted with a dialog stating unable to > open macro storage(bug 8795). The only real reason I use Microsoft Office > over Open Office is the need for VBA integration. > > I think we should add these bugs to the 1.0 target http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8795 http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9023 http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9943 http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9944 I'm not opposed, but perhaps we should be clear. Do we want to add Microsoft Word 2003 to the "must have" apps list for 1.0? It might delay the release. - Dan ________ Yahoo! Clever: Stellen Sie Fragen und finden Sie Antworten. Teilen Sie Ihr Wissen. www.yahoo.de/clever

2 1

RE: Wine 1.0 bugs, release criteria
by Karl Relton Oct. 7, 2007

Oct. 7, 2007

I would like consideration given to http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3739 http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4362 I would imagine Adobe PhotoDeluxe might be quite common among home users (who may get a copy with their digital camera, and not fork out for full Photoshop). The other bug has a proposed fix - and something of a testcase to prove it. Its just a matter of getting it squared up and applied. Regards Karl

2 1

Request to be unbanned from #winehq
by Tsukasa Oct. 7, 2007

Oct. 7, 2007

Vitamin banned me today - you can see the full log here. Also I was about to say at the end there, if redhat automounts usb sticks. http://pastebin.com/mb489dc I think what really pissed him off was that I asked for help identifying a bug in Loki in #winehackers originally. I asked in the user channel after i was informed it was the wrong channel. Anyways, can I get unbanned from #winehq? You can do a whois on tsukasa to find my info.

5 4

Re: problem compiling dlls/ntdll/actctx.c
by sol11x86＠comcast.net Oct. 7, 2007

Oct. 7, 2007

-------------- Original message ---------------------- From: Jacek Caban <jacek(a)codeweavers.com> > Hi Ben, > > Ben Taylor wrote: > > haven't built wine in a while, and ran into this on Solaris 10: > > > > actctx.c:76: error: `version' defined as wrong kind of tag > > gmake[2]: *** [actctx.o] Error 1 > > gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/export/src/wine/100607/wine/dlls/ntdll' > > gmake[1]: *** [ntdll] Error 2 > > gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/export/src/wine/100607/wine/dlls' > > gmake: *** [dlls] Error 2 > > > > > > Does the attached patch help? Yes. That works. Ben > > Jacek >

1 0

No joy with XComposite extension on Gutsy on Thinkbook X60
by Dan Kegel Oct. 7, 2007

Oct. 7, 2007

Sorry, here's a little brain dump before I go to bed. I'm running updated Gutsy beta on a Thinkbook X60, and am testing out wine from git on Google Earth. Initially it aborted on startup with X Error of failed request: BadValue (integer parameter out of range for operation) Major opcode of failed request: 145 (XFree86-DRI) The log also showed it couldn't find the XComposite extension, and sure enough, config.log showed configure hadn't found it. I think I fixed this with sudo apt-get install libxcomposite-dev and reconfiguring and rebuilding Wine. But now when I start Google Earth, it aborts with DRM_I830_CMDBUFFER: -22 According to http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=394311 this is "libgl1-mesa-dri: i965_dri.so miscompiled with current gcc". A patch was attached there: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=30;bug=394311 The bug's been reported to Ubuntu: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/+bug/66645 Any clues? - Dan

2 3

problem compiling dlls/ntdll/actctx.c
by sol11x86＠comcast.net Oct. 7, 2007

Oct. 7, 2007

haven't built wine in a while, and ran into this on Solaris 10: actctx.c:76: error: `version' defined as wrong kind of tag gmake[2]: *** [actctx.o] Error 1 gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/export/src/wine/100607/wine/dlls/ntdll' gmake[1]: *** [ntdll] Error 2 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/export/src/wine/100607/wine/dlls' gmake: *** [dlls] Error 2 starting line 74 of actctx.c, I see struct version { USHORT major; USHORT minor; USHORT build; USHORT revision; }; struct assembly_identity { WCHAR *name; WCHAR *arch; WCHAR *public_key; WCHAR *language; WCHAR *type; struct version version; BOOL optional; }; struct entity { DWORD kind; union { struct { WCHAR *tlbid; WCHAR *version; WCHAR *helpdir; } typelib; struct { WCHAR *clsid; } comclass; struct { WCHAR *iid; WCHAR *name; } proxy; struct { WCHAR *name; } class; struct { WCHAR *name; WCHAR *clsid; } clrclass; struct { WCHAR *name; WCHAR *clsid; } clrsurrogate; } u; }; But after some google searches and such, I can't come to a conclusion if it's a clash with a predefined version in a Solaris include file, or a clash with the version in the union which is a WCHAR. Ideas.?

2 1