November 2007 - Wine-Devel - list.winehq.org

Re: #winehq admin troubles
by feba thatl Nov. 8, 2007

Nov. 8, 2007

Tom, you can try to guilt me, but I don't care. There are two sides to this. Either you think that #winehq is a support channel for end users, and should if not cater to them, at least treat them with some respect until they've proved that they deserve none, or you think that #winehq is a channel where people can go for help if some one with an @ isn't in a mood to ban them. If you can honestly say that you fully agree with the latter, and would have no problem getting banned from a random channel when you were seeking help, I don't know what to tell you. If, however, you think the first thing, we're on the same side. I don't think anyone here doesn't want to see #winehq, and the entire project really, become a better place. There might be one or two people exploiting this for personal reasons, but I cannot control that. I posted this in the hopes that #winehq would be made a better place, not for me, but for everyone. Including vitamin and the rest of the ops. I have a question for you, what offends you so much about my comments that you are not only refusing to help me, but also trying to pin me with the blame for your refusal to help others? Is it because you feel that your experience with wine gives you to the right to mistreat users, or because you are offended by what a few other people said in a thread that I started? Do you not want #winehq to be a better place? Or do you not realize the actual point of what I'm saying?

1 0

Re: svchost: Implementation of svchost
by Robert Shearman Nov. 8, 2007

Nov. 8, 2007

Roy Shea wrote: > Changelog: > * Implementation of svchost > You've got a lot of global functions in this patch that should be static. -- Rob Shearman

1 0

Re: wininet: Fully initialize a variable
by Alexandre Julliard Nov. 8, 2007

Nov. 8, 2007

"Juan Lang" <juan.lang(a)gmail.com> writes: > static void COOKIE_crackUrlSimple(LPCWSTR lpszUrl, LPWSTR hostName, int hostNameLen, LPWSTR path, int pathLen) > { > - URL_COMPONENTSW UrlComponents; > + URL_COMPONENTSW UrlComponents = { 0 }; > > - UrlComponents.lpszExtraInfo = NULL; > - UrlComponents.lpszPassword = NULL; > - UrlComponents.lpszScheme = NULL; > UrlComponents.lpszUrlPath = path; > - UrlComponents.lpszUserName = NULL; > UrlComponents.lpszHostName = hostName; > UrlComponents.dwHostNameLength = hostNameLen; > UrlComponents.dwUrlPathLength = pathLen; Please avoid that unportable array initialization syntax, and since the code is already explicitly setting the fields you should simply add the ones that are needed and missing. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

1 0

Re: wininet: initialize a buffer
by Alexandre Julliard Nov. 8, 2007

Nov. 8, 2007

"Lei Zhang" <thestig(a)google.com> writes: > Valgrind is complaining we are doing strcmp() on the buffer without > initializing it. You should fix the code to not do the strcmp when we don't have a valid buffer, instead of hiding the bug by clearing memory. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

1 0

Wine LivePC
by T.J. Purtell Nov. 7, 2007

Nov. 7, 2007

Hey, I've build a Wine LivePC so that people can take a linux operating system capable of running Windows programs on a USB drive. Its great for carrying a portable work environment with you, providing a container for safely running executables you download from the internet, or making an isolated environment for a family member that they can carry with them. http://www.moka5.com/node/1620 Obviously the LivePC is free, but registration on the site is required to download the free engine for using LivePC (Its based off VMware player). It has the latest version of Wine, so using this is an easy way to check if a particular application is well supported in Wine. Cheers, -T.J.

1 0

valgrind results for Oct 7
by Dan Kegel Nov. 7, 2007

Nov. 7, 2007

This time I filtered out files whose only error was trying to close(-1). http://kegel.com/wine/valgrind/20071107/ Quite a few tests no longer show problems (partly because of the new filtering): comctl32/imagelist crypt32/oid crypt32/store d3d9/visual kernel32/console msi/package oleaut32/vartest rpcrt4/server shell32/shlfileop That leaves 75 tests with problems. - Dan -- Wine for Windows ISVs: http://kegel.com/wine/isv

1 0

Re: advapi32: fix buffer overrun in tests/registry.c:wine_debugstr_wn(), try 3
by Alexandre Julliard Nov. 7, 2007

Nov. 7, 2007

"Dan Kegel" <dank(a)kegel.com> writes: > Fixes an off-by-one buffer overflow in wine_debugstr_wn() > in which the wchar after the end of the buffer was read. > > This is same as try 2, but is slightly clearer and more correct. > > Found via Valgrind warning: > Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s) > at 0x45F3219: wine_debugstr_wn (registry.c:151) > by 0x45F34F5: test_hkey_main_Value_W (registry.c:284) > by 0x45F7644: func_registry (registry.c:327) > by 0x460A127: run_test (test.h:387) > > Alexandre, if you don't like this 'un, please tell me why. That function is really supposed to print n chars, not n-1. The terminating null probably needs to be included in the length. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

2 1

Re: ntdll: Architecture may be '*' in lookup_manifest_file so don't rely on the first '*' of the format indiacting where the version number is.
by Alexandre Julliard Nov. 7, 2007

Nov. 7, 2007

Robert Shearman <rob(a)codeweavers.com> writes: > Instead use the underscores that separate the string fields. Of course the assembly name can contain underscores too... I think that the whole idea of checking the version number from the file name is flawed. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

1 0

Re: [10/14] WineD3D: Implement the varying map
by Allan Tong Nov. 7, 2007

Nov. 7, 2007

On 11/6/07, Stefan Dösinger <stefan(a)codeweavers.com> wrote: > + /* Don't do any register mapping magic if it is not needed, or if we can't > + * achive anything anyway > + */ > + if(highest_reg_used < (GL_LIMITS(glsl_varyings) / 4) || > + num_regs_used >= (GL_LIMITS(glsl_varyings) / 4) ) { > + if(num_regs_used >= (GL_LIMITS(glsl_varyings) / 4)) { Should it not be "num_regs_used > (GL_LIMITS(glsl_varyings) / 4)"? - Allan

2 2

Mistakes in my yesterday evening patches
by Laurent Vromman Nov. 7, 2007

Nov. 7, 2007

I have send 4 patches yesterday. The 2 first of them are tagged resend. Please do not take those two first patches into account, they have already been merged in the git tree. My proxy played me a trick, i haven't see that before I sent them again. Only the 2 last ones (3/4 and 4/4) are to be merged by now. Sorry for my mistake, Laurent

1 0