August 2010 - Wine-Devel - list.winehq.org

Re: [PATCH 7/8] msvcp90/tests: Added basic_string<char> tests
by testbot＠testbot.winehq.org Aug. 21, 2010

Aug. 21, 2010

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4597 Your paranoid android. === WINEBUILD (build) === Patch failed

1 0

Re: [PATCH 2/2] d3dcompiler: Add D3DCreateBlob() test.
by testbot＠testbot.winehq.org Aug. 21, 2010

Aug. 21, 2010

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4596 Your paranoid android. === WINEBUILD (build) === Patch failed

1 0

Re: [PATCH try 2] ntdll: IMAGE_REL_BASED_HIGH, IMAGE_REL_BASED_LOW and IMAGE_REL_BASED_HIGHLOW should be supported on win64.
by testbot＠testbot.winehq.org Aug. 21, 2010

Aug. 21, 2010

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4595 Your paranoid android. === WINEBUILD (build) === Patch failed

1 0

Re: [7/7] comctl32/imagelist: Fail to create imagelist with zero or negative image dimensions
by testbot＠testbot.winehq.org Aug. 21, 2010

Aug. 21, 2010

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4594 Your paranoid android. === WINEBUILD (build) === Patch failed

1 0

Re: [6/7] comctl32/imagelist: Fail in ImageList_GetIconSize on null parameters
by testbot＠testbot.winehq.org Aug. 21, 2010

Aug. 21, 2010

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4593 Your paranoid android. === WINEBUILD (build) === Patch failed

1 0

Re: [5/7] comctl32/tests: More imagelist tests to show broken parameter validation
by testbot＠testbot.winehq.org Aug. 21, 2010

Aug. 21, 2010

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4592 Your paranoid android. === WINEBUILD (build) === Patch failed

1 0

Re: [4/7] comctl32/imagelist: Fix failure code for IImageList_Remove()
by testbot＠testbot.winehq.org Aug. 21, 2010

Aug. 21, 2010

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4591 Your paranoid android. === WINEBUILD (build) === Patch failed

1 0

Re: [3/7] comctl32/imagelist: Fix failure code for IImageList_Draw()
by testbot＠testbot.winehq.org Aug. 21, 2010

Aug. 21, 2010

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4590 Your paranoid android. === WINEBUILD (build) === Patch failed

1 0

Re: [2/7] comctl32/tests: Use reduced IMAGELISTDRAWPARAMS structure size for tests
by testbot＠testbot.winehq.org Aug. 21, 2010

Aug. 21, 2010

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4589 Your paranoid android. === WINEBUILD (build) === Patch failed

1 0

Re: [1/7] comctl32/tests: Use better names for test functions, discover some new test failures
by testbot＠testbot.winehq.org Aug. 21, 2010

Aug. 21, 2010

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4588 Your paranoid android. === WINEBUILD (build) === Patch failed

1 0

Re: oleau32: Try both SYS_WIN64 and SYS_WIN32 syskind in QueryPathOfRegTypeLib on win64.
by testbot＠testbot.winehq.org Aug. 21, 2010

Aug. 21, 2010

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4582 Your paranoid android. === WINEBUILD (build) === Patch failed

1 0

Re: gdi32: Properly set ERROR_NOACCESS when GetObject receives invalid arguments
by testbot＠testbot.winehq.org Aug. 21, 2010

Aug. 21, 2010

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4581 Your paranoid android. === WINEBUILD (build) === Patch failed

1 0

Re: [PATCH 4/4] explorerframe: Some additional basic tests.
by testbot＠testbot.winehq.org Aug. 21, 2010

Aug. 21, 2010

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4578 Your paranoid android. === WINEBUILD (build) === Patch failed

1 0

Re: [PATCH 3/4] explorerframe: Implement EnsureItemVisible.
by testbot＠testbot.winehq.org Aug. 21, 2010

Aug. 21, 2010

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4577 Your paranoid android. === WINEBUILD (build) === Patch failed

1 0

Re: [PATCH 2/4] explorerframe: Implement HitTest
by testbot＠testbot.winehq.org Aug. 21, 2010

Aug. 21, 2010

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4576 Your paranoid android. === WINEBUILD (build) === Patch failed

1 0

Re: [PATCH] comctl32/tests: DateTimePicker and MonthCalendar controls only support Gregorian calendar.
by testbot＠testbot.winehq.org Aug. 21, 2010

Aug. 21, 2010

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4574 Your paranoid android. === WINEBUILD (build) === Patch failed

1 0

Re: [5/5] urlmon/tests: Added tests for IUriBuilder_GetFragment
by testbot＠testbot.winehq.org Aug. 21, 2010

Aug. 21, 2010

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4571 Your paranoid android. === WINEBUILD (build) === Patch failed

1 0

Re: [website]Japanese Translation for "About Wine" page
by Jeremy Newman Aug. 20, 2010

Aug. 20, 2010

I'll accept this patch when we also have a JA translation of the Front landing page. No point having other pages translated without at least that. -Newman On 08/17/2010 11:00 PM, kikuchy.h(a)gmail.com wrote: > From: Hiroshi Kikuchi<kikuchy.h(a)gmail.com> > > I want to join wine project. Nice to meet you. > Hiroshi Kikuchi > --- > templates/ja/about.template | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 templates/ja/about.template > > diff --git a/templates/ja/about.template b/templates/ja/about.template > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..b83fad7 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/templates/ja/about.template > @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ > + > + > + > +<h1 class="title">Wine について</h1> > + > +<p>Wine は、 Windows のソフトウェアを Windows 以外のOSで動作させるものです。Wine を使えば、Windows でするように Windows アプリケーションのインストールと実行が出来るようになります。</p> > + > +<p>Wine は現在活発に開発されています。まだ全てのプログラムが動作する訳ではありませんが、すでに<a href="http://wiki.winehq.org/UsageStatistics" title="Wine Usage Statistics">何人もの人たちが</a> Wine を使ってソフトウェアを動かしています。</p> > + > +<h3>オープンソース、そしてユーザーによる支援</h3> > + > +<p>Wine は未来永劫<a href="http://wiki.winehq.org/Licensing" title="Wine licensing">フリーソフト</a>です。Wine のソースコードのおよそ半分がボランティアによって書かれています。残り半分は商業的利潤のため、特にサポートがあるバージョンの Wine を発売している<a href="http://www.codeweavers.com/products/" title="Codeweavers Crossover Office">Codeweavers</a>によって支えられています。</p> > + > +<p>Wine はユーザーコミュニティに大きく頼っています。ユーザーのテストが私たちの、プログラムの動作状況を記録した<a href="http://appdb.winehq.org/" title="Wine Application Database">アプリケーションデータベース</a>を埋めてくれていますし、<a href="http://forums.winehq.org/" title="WineHQ Forums">フォーラム</a>の質問に対する答えも全てボランティアによるものです。</p> > + > +<h3>こちらもご覧ください:</h3> > +<ul> > +<li><a href="http://wiki.winehq.org/ImportanceOfWine">Wine が重要な理由</a></li> > +<li><a href="http://wiki.winehq.org/Debunking_Wine_Myths">Wine にまつわるウソ・ホント</a></li> > +<li><a href="http://wiki.winehq.org/WineHistory">Wine プロジェクトの歴史</a></li> > +<li><a href="http://wiki.winehq.org/ProjectOrganization">Organization and Leadership</a></li> > +</ul> > + > +<hr> > +<div class="link-container"> > +<p class="right-link">Wine の歴史:<a href="{$root}/history">次へ</a></p> > +</div> > > > >

1 0

RE: The Test Bot seems to be having issues
by Greg Geldorp Aug. 20, 2010

Aug. 20, 2010

Hi Thomas, > From: Thomas Mallaly > > First off, I'm not sure who should be contacted about this, but, it appears > that the test bot has got itself stuck while trying to run tests on a patch > submitted last night. Sorry, hadn't noticed it got stuck. Usually it doesn't need much baby-sitting, so I don't keep a close look on it. You can always use the "Feedback" link on the TestBot home page. > The job in question is here [1], it's been over 12 > hours since any progress has been made on it and no other submissions have > run since then. Also, the Windows 98SE has been "reverting" this whole time, > so I'm not sure if this is the culprit or not. > > I also hate to admit that the job in question is from one of my patches I > sent in last night (although I'm pretty sure it doesn't have anything to do > with the quality of the code in the patch ;-) ). The Win9x VMs are on a different (physical) machine, it appears there was a network problem between the Test Bot host and the machine hosting the Win9x VMs. The Win98SE VM getting stuck in the "reverting" state is the cause of the problems, nothing to do with your patch. > Anyways, I'm hoping that somebody in charge of the test bot might be able to > fix the traffic jam it's causing. It's back up and running again, trying to catch up. Ge.

2 1

CVS gateway down for good
by Alexandre Julliard Aug. 20, 2010

Aug. 20, 2010

Folks, The git->CVS gateway broke again, so I'm going to pull the plug on it. It doesn't make sense for me to spend more time fixing something that sees so little usage at this point. If you are still using CVS, you'll have to switch to git (or volunteer to host the gateway yourself...) Sorry about the inconvenience. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

1 0

The Test Bot seems to be having issues
by Thomas Mullaly Aug. 20, 2010

Aug. 20, 2010

Hi all, First off, I'm not sure who should be contacted about this, but, it appears that the test bot has got itself stuck while trying to run tests on a patch submitted last night. The job in question is here [1], it's been over 12 hours since any progress has been made on it and no other submissions have run since then. Also, the Windows 98SE has been "reverting" this whole time, so I'm not sure if this is the culprit or not. I also hate to admit that the job in question is from one of my patches I sent in last night (although I'm pretty sure it doesn't have anything to do with the quality of the code in the patch ;-) ). Anyways, I'm hoping that somebody in charge of the test bot might be able to fix the traffic jam it's causing. [1] https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4570 <https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4570> -- Thomas Mullaly thomas.mullaly(a)gmail.com

2 2

Re: user32/dialog.c: GetNextDlgTabItem returns hwndDlg if it does not contain controls. [try 2]
by Alexandre Julliard Aug. 20, 2010

Aug. 20, 2010

"Mikhail Maroukhine" <mikolg(a)yandex.ru> writes: > GetNextDlgTabItem returns hwndDlg if it does not contain controls and > searching next item. > GetNextDlgTabItem returns the first child if next TABSTOP control not > found. > > And returns 0 in both cases if searching prev item It breaks the tests: ../../../tools/runtest -q -P wine -M comctl32.dll -T ../../.. -p comctl32_test.exe.so propsheet.c && touch propsheet.ok propsheet.c:312: Test failed: Focus should have been set to the Next button. Expected: 12324, Found: 65535 propsheet.c:363: Test failed: Focus should have been set to the Next button. Expected: 12324, Found: 65535 make[1]: *** [propsheet.ok] Error 2 -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

1 0

Re: [PATCH] gdi32/enhmfdrv: Do not leak a HDC
by Alexandre Julliard Aug. 20, 2010

Aug. 20, 2010

Detlef Riekenberg <wine.dev(a)web.de> writes: > --- > dlls/gdi32/enhmfdrv/init.c | 14 ++++++++------ > 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) It would be cleaner to move the CreateDCW call where it's needed. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

1 0

Re: cmd: Improved a FIXME in WCMD_filesize64
by Alexandre Julliard Aug. 20, 2010

Aug. 20, 2010

"Konrad Wartke" <kwartke(a)googlemail.com> writes: > cmd: Improved a FIXME in WCMD_filesize64 by using a better algorithm. It's not much better. Anyway, this should be done by using one of the existing formatting functions, maybe VarFormatNumber. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

1 0

Re: [PATCH 7/8] msvcp90/tests: Added basic_string<char> tests
by Alexandre Julliard Aug. 20, 2010

Aug. 20, 2010

Piotr Caban <piotr(a)codeweavers.com> writes: > @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@ > +/* > + * Copyright 2010 Piotr Caban for CodeWeavers > + * > + * This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or > + * modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public > + * License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either > + * version 2.1 of the License, or (at your option) any later version. > + * > + * This library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, > + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of > + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU > + * Lesser General Public License for more details. > + * > + * You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public > + * License along with this library; if not, write to the Free Software > + * Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301, USA > + */ > + > +/* basic_string<char, char_traits<char>, allocator<char>> */ > +#define BUF_SIZE_CHAR 16 > +typedef struct _basic_string_char > +{ > + void *allocator; > + union _data { > + char buf[BUF_SIZE_CHAR]; > + char *ptr; > + } data; > + size_t size; > + size_t res; > +} basic_string_char; Unless there's going to be a ton of definitions in there used by many different files, it's better to put that sort of thing directly in the C file to make it easier to build stand-alone. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

1 0