August 2010 - Wine-Devel - list.winehq.org

Re: [PATCH 7/8] msvcp90/tests: Added basic_string<char> tests
by testbot＠testbot.winehq.org Aug. 21, 2010

Aug. 21, 2010

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4597 Your paranoid android. === WINEBUILD (build) === Patch failed

1 0

Re: [PATCH 2/2] d3dcompiler: Add D3DCreateBlob() test.
by testbot＠testbot.winehq.org Aug. 21, 2010

Aug. 21, 2010

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4596 Your paranoid android. === WINEBUILD (build) === Patch failed

1 0

Re: [PATCH try 2] ntdll: IMAGE_REL_BASED_HIGH, IMAGE_REL_BASED_LOW and IMAGE_REL_BASED_HIGHLOW should be supported on win64.
by testbot＠testbot.winehq.org Aug. 21, 2010

Aug. 21, 2010

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4595 Your paranoid android. === WINEBUILD (build) === Patch failed

1 0

Re: [7/7] comctl32/imagelist: Fail to create imagelist with zero or negative image dimensions
by testbot＠testbot.winehq.org Aug. 21, 2010

Aug. 21, 2010

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4594 Your paranoid android. === WINEBUILD (build) === Patch failed

1 0

Re: [6/7] comctl32/imagelist: Fail in ImageList_GetIconSize on null parameters
by testbot＠testbot.winehq.org Aug. 21, 2010

Aug. 21, 2010

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4593 Your paranoid android. === WINEBUILD (build) === Patch failed

1 0

Re: [5/7] comctl32/tests: More imagelist tests to show broken parameter validation
by testbot＠testbot.winehq.org Aug. 21, 2010

Aug. 21, 2010

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4592 Your paranoid android. === WINEBUILD (build) === Patch failed

1 0

Re: [4/7] comctl32/imagelist: Fix failure code for IImageList_Remove()
by testbot＠testbot.winehq.org Aug. 21, 2010

Aug. 21, 2010

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4591 Your paranoid android. === WINEBUILD (build) === Patch failed

1 0

Re: [3/7] comctl32/imagelist: Fix failure code for IImageList_Draw()
by testbot＠testbot.winehq.org Aug. 21, 2010

Aug. 21, 2010

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4590 Your paranoid android. === WINEBUILD (build) === Patch failed

1 0

Re: [2/7] comctl32/tests: Use reduced IMAGELISTDRAWPARAMS structure size for tests
by testbot＠testbot.winehq.org Aug. 21, 2010

Aug. 21, 2010

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4589 Your paranoid android. === WINEBUILD (build) === Patch failed

1 0

Re: [1/7] comctl32/tests: Use better names for test functions, discover some new test failures
by testbot＠testbot.winehq.org Aug. 21, 2010

Aug. 21, 2010

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4588 Your paranoid android. === WINEBUILD (build) === Patch failed

1 0

Re: oleau32: Try both SYS_WIN64 and SYS_WIN32 syskind in QueryPathOfRegTypeLib on win64.
by testbot＠testbot.winehq.org Aug. 21, 2010

Aug. 21, 2010

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4582 Your paranoid android. === WINEBUILD (build) === Patch failed

1 0

Re: gdi32: Properly set ERROR_NOACCESS when GetObject receives invalid arguments
by testbot＠testbot.winehq.org Aug. 21, 2010

Aug. 21, 2010

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4581 Your paranoid android. === WINEBUILD (build) === Patch failed

1 0

Re: [PATCH 4/4] explorerframe: Some additional basic tests.
by testbot＠testbot.winehq.org Aug. 21, 2010

Aug. 21, 2010

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4578 Your paranoid android. === WINEBUILD (build) === Patch failed

1 0

Re: [PATCH 3/4] explorerframe: Implement EnsureItemVisible.
by testbot＠testbot.winehq.org Aug. 21, 2010

Aug. 21, 2010

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4577 Your paranoid android. === WINEBUILD (build) === Patch failed

1 0

Re: [PATCH 2/4] explorerframe: Implement HitTest
by testbot＠testbot.winehq.org Aug. 21, 2010

Aug. 21, 2010

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4576 Your paranoid android. === WINEBUILD (build) === Patch failed

1 0

Re: [PATCH] comctl32/tests: DateTimePicker and MonthCalendar controls only support Gregorian calendar.
by testbot＠testbot.winehq.org Aug. 21, 2010

Aug. 21, 2010

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4574 Your paranoid android. === WINEBUILD (build) === Patch failed

1 0

Re: [5/5] urlmon/tests: Added tests for IUriBuilder_GetFragment
by testbot＠testbot.winehq.org Aug. 21, 2010

Aug. 21, 2010

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4571 Your paranoid android. === WINEBUILD (build) === Patch failed

1 0

Re: [website]Japanese Translation for "About Wine" page
by Jeremy Newman Aug. 20, 2010

Aug. 20, 2010

I'll accept this patch when we also have a JA translation of the Front landing page. No point having other pages translated without at least that. -Newman On 08/17/2010 11:00 PM, kikuchy.h(a)gmail.com wrote: > From: Hiroshi Kikuchi<kikuchy.h(a)gmail.com> > > I want to join wine project. Nice to meet you. > Hiroshi Kikuchi > --- > templates/ja/about.template | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 templates/ja/about.template > > diff --git a/templates/ja/about.template b/templates/ja/about.template > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..b83fad7 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/templates/ja/about.template > @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ > + > + > + > +<h1 class="title">Wine について</h1> > + > +<p>Wine は、 Windows のソフトウェアを Windows 以外のOSで動作させるものです。Wine を使えば、Windows でするように Windows アプリケーションのインストールと実行が出来るようになります。</p> > + > +<p>Wine は現在活発に開発されています。まだ全てのプログラムが動作する訳ではありませんが、すでに<a href="http://wiki.winehq.org/UsageStatistics" title="Wine Usage Statistics">何人もの人たちが</a> Wine を使ってソフトウェアを動かしています。</p> > + > +<h3>オープンソース、そしてユーザーによる支援</h3> > + > +<p>Wine は未来永劫<a href="http://wiki.winehq.org/Licensing" title="Wine licensing">フリーソフト</a>です。Wine のソースコードのおよそ半分がボランティアによって書かれています。残り半分は商業的利潤のため、特にサポートがあるバージョンの Wine を発売している<a href="http://www.codeweavers.com/products/" title="Codeweavers Crossover Office">Codeweavers</a>によって支えられています。</p> > + > +<p>Wine はユーザーコミュニティに大きく頼っています。ユーザーのテストが私たちの、プログラムの動作状況を記録した<a href="http://appdb.winehq.org/" title="Wine Application Database">アプリケーションデータベース</a>を埋めてくれていますし、<a href="http://forums.winehq.org/" title="WineHQ Forums">フォーラム</a>の質問に対する答えも全てボランティアによるものです。</p> > + > +<h3>こちらもご覧ください:</h3> > +<ul> > +<li><a href="http://wiki.winehq.org/ImportanceOfWine">Wine が重要な理由</a></li> > +<li><a href="http://wiki.winehq.org/Debunking_Wine_Myths">Wine にまつわるウソ・ホント</a></li> > +<li><a href="http://wiki.winehq.org/WineHistory">Wine プロジェクトの歴史</a></li> > +<li><a href="http://wiki.winehq.org/ProjectOrganization">Organization and Leadership</a></li> > +</ul> > + > +<hr> > +<div class="link-container"> > +<p class="right-link">Wine の歴史:<a href="{$root}/history">次へ</a></p> > +</div> > > > >

1 0

RE: The Test Bot seems to be having issues
by Greg Geldorp Aug. 20, 2010

Aug. 20, 2010

Hi Thomas, > From: Thomas Mallaly > > First off, I'm not sure who should be contacted about this, but, it appears > that the test bot has got itself stuck while trying to run tests on a patch > submitted last night. Sorry, hadn't noticed it got stuck. Usually it doesn't need much baby-sitting, so I don't keep a close look on it. You can always use the "Feedback" link on the TestBot home page. > The job in question is here [1], it's been over 12 > hours since any progress has been made on it and no other submissions have > run since then. Also, the Windows 98SE has been "reverting" this whole time, > so I'm not sure if this is the culprit or not. > > I also hate to admit that the job in question is from one of my patches I > sent in last night (although I'm pretty sure it doesn't have anything to do > with the quality of the code in the patch ;-) ). The Win9x VMs are on a different (physical) machine, it appears there was a network problem between the Test Bot host and the machine hosting the Win9x VMs. The Win98SE VM getting stuck in the "reverting" state is the cause of the problems, nothing to do with your patch. > Anyways, I'm hoping that somebody in charge of the test bot might be able to > fix the traffic jam it's causing. It's back up and running again, trying to catch up. Ge.

2 1

CVS gateway down for good
by Alexandre Julliard Aug. 20, 2010

Aug. 20, 2010

Folks, The git->CVS gateway broke again, so I'm going to pull the plug on it. It doesn't make sense for me to spend more time fixing something that sees so little usage at this point. If you are still using CVS, you'll have to switch to git (or volunteer to host the gateway yourself...) Sorry about the inconvenience. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

1 0

The Test Bot seems to be having issues
by Thomas Mullaly Aug. 20, 2010

Aug. 20, 2010

Hi all, First off, I'm not sure who should be contacted about this, but, it appears that the test bot has got itself stuck while trying to run tests on a patch submitted last night. The job in question is here [1], it's been over 12 hours since any progress has been made on it and no other submissions have run since then. Also, the Windows 98SE has been "reverting" this whole time, so I'm not sure if this is the culprit or not. I also hate to admit that the job in question is from one of my patches I sent in last night (although I'm pretty sure it doesn't have anything to do with the quality of the code in the patch ;-) ). Anyways, I'm hoping that somebody in charge of the test bot might be able to fix the traffic jam it's causing. [1] https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4570 <https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4570> -- Thomas Mullaly thomas.mullaly(a)gmail.com

2 2

Re: user32/dialog.c: GetNextDlgTabItem returns hwndDlg if it does not contain controls. [try 2]
by Alexandre Julliard Aug. 20, 2010

Aug. 20, 2010

"Mikhail Maroukhine" <mikolg(a)yandex.ru> writes: > GetNextDlgTabItem returns hwndDlg if it does not contain controls and > searching next item. > GetNextDlgTabItem returns the first child if next TABSTOP control not > found. > > And returns 0 in both cases if searching prev item It breaks the tests: ../../../tools/runtest -q -P wine -M comctl32.dll -T ../../.. -p comctl32_test.exe.so propsheet.c && touch propsheet.ok propsheet.c:312: Test failed: Focus should have been set to the Next button. Expected: 12324, Found: 65535 propsheet.c:363: Test failed: Focus should have been set to the Next button. Expected: 12324, Found: 65535 make[1]: *** [propsheet.ok] Error 2 -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

1 0

Re: [PATCH] gdi32/enhmfdrv: Do not leak a HDC
by Alexandre Julliard Aug. 20, 2010

Aug. 20, 2010

Detlef Riekenberg <wine.dev(a)web.de> writes: > --- > dlls/gdi32/enhmfdrv/init.c | 14 ++++++++------ > 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) It would be cleaner to move the CreateDCW call where it's needed. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

1 0

Re: cmd: Improved a FIXME in WCMD_filesize64
by Alexandre Julliard Aug. 20, 2010

Aug. 20, 2010

"Konrad Wartke" <kwartke(a)googlemail.com> writes: > cmd: Improved a FIXME in WCMD_filesize64 by using a better algorithm. It's not much better. Anyway, this should be done by using one of the existing formatting functions, maybe VarFormatNumber. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

1 0

Re: [PATCH 7/8] msvcp90/tests: Added basic_string<char> tests
by Alexandre Julliard Aug. 20, 2010

Aug. 20, 2010

Piotr Caban <piotr(a)codeweavers.com> writes: > @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@ > +/* > + * Copyright 2010 Piotr Caban for CodeWeavers > + * > + * This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or > + * modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public > + * License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either > + * version 2.1 of the License, or (at your option) any later version. > + * > + * This library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, > + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of > + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU > + * Lesser General Public License for more details. > + * > + * You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public > + * License along with this library; if not, write to the Free Software > + * Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301, USA > + */ > + > +/* basic_string<char, char_traits<char>, allocator<char>> */ > +#define BUF_SIZE_CHAR 16 > +typedef struct _basic_string_char > +{ > + void *allocator; > + union _data { > + char buf[BUF_SIZE_CHAR]; > + char *ptr; > + } data; > + size_t size; > + size_t res; > +} basic_string_char; Unless there's going to be a ton of definitions in there used by many different files, it's better to put that sort of thing directly in the C file to make it easier to build stand-alone. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

1 0

Re: gdi32: Properly set ERROR_NOACCESS when GetObject receives invalid arguments
by Octavian Voicu Aug. 19, 2010

Aug. 19, 2010

On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 4:56 PM, Jerome Leclanche <adys.wh(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Broken programs will crash on wine if they, for example, pass > arguments to GetObject in the wrong order. > This fixes bug #18864. > + if (buffer && ((ULONG_PTR)buffer >> 16) == 0) Wouldn't a __TRY ... __EXCEPT_PAGE_FAULT be better / safer? Octavian

2 1

PDB files generated by Intel C++ Compiler
by Peter Urbanec Aug. 19, 2010

Aug. 19, 2010

I have some x64 binaries and associated PDBs that have been generated using Intel C++ Compiler 11.1. These PDBs cause issues such as this: 1 0x00000000781cc1ba in msvcr80 (+0x9c1b9) (0x00007ff047a4c840) fixme:dbghelp_msc:codeview_fetch_type Cannot locate type 670 err:dbghelp_msc:pe_load_debug_directory Got a page fault while loading symbols 2 0x000000006189a00d in lua5.1 (+0xa00c) (0x00007ff047a4c840) Now, from a quick look at mscvpdb.h, it looks like these PDBs contain datatypes with 64-bit near pointers, however wine does not seem to understand this mode. How would one go about adding support for this type of PDB? I actually don't have access to the Intel C++ Compiler to do much testing. :-(

2 1

winepath bug without arguments?
by Jerome Leclanche Aug. 19, 2010

Aug. 19, 2010

Hi After fixing a bug in MPQEdit related to opening directories, I noticed winepath returns a different result with and without quotes: adys(a)azura:~/.wine/drive_c$ winepath -w adys(a)azura:~/.wine/drive_c$ winepath -w "" C:\ With quotes it returns the current directory. Is that intended? If not I'll open a bug... J. Leclanche

3 2

Re: [01/11] d3dx10: Add stub for d3dx10_43
by Henri Verbeet Aug. 19, 2010

Aug. 19, 2010

On 18 August 2010 23:01, Owen Rudge <orudge(a)codeweavers.com> wrote: > +BOOL WINAPI D3DX10CheckVersion(UINT d3dsdkvers, UINT d3dxsdkvers) > +{ > + if ((d3dsdkvers == D3D10_SDK_VERSION) && (d3dxsdkvers == 43)) > + return TRUE; > + > + return FALSE; > +} Is it really safe to assume D3D10_SDK_VERSION will always keep the same value? (I know d3dx9 does it as well.) For d3d9 the SDK version changed between d3d9b and d3d9c, for example.

2 2

Re: [PATCH 3/5] ddraw/tests: New CreateSurface for 3D DDSCAPS_BACKBUFFER tests. (try 5, resend)
by Stefan Dösinger Aug. 19, 2010

Aug. 19, 2010

Hi, Can you try to create a d3d device with this surface? In the first d3d version this works by querying the d3d device ID from the surface. Patch 4 looks OK. Thank you for your persistence with the patches by the way! Cheers, Stefan Am 18.08.2010 um 22:01 schrieb Oldřich Jedlička: > --- > dlls/ddraw/tests/d3d.c | 82 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/dlls/ddraw/tests/d3d.c b/dlls/ddraw/tests/d3d.c > index 53ef04b..a83b0d5 100644 > --- a/dlls/ddraw/tests/d3d.c > +++ b/dlls/ddraw/tests/d3d.c > @@ -3536,6 +3536,87 @@ static void FindDevice(void) > "Expected IDirect3D1::FindDevice to return D3D_OK, got 0x%08x\n", hr); > } > > +static void BackBuffer3DCreateSurfaceTest(void) > +{ > + DDSURFACEDESC ddsd; > + DDSURFACEDESC created_ddsd; > + DDSURFACEDESC2 ddsd2; > + IDirectDrawSurface *surf; > + IDirectDrawSurface4 *surf4; > + IDirectDrawSurface7 *surf7; > + HRESULT hr; > + IDirectDraw2 *dd2; > + IDirectDraw4 *dd4; > + IDirectDraw7 *dd7; > + DDCAPS ddcaps; > + > + const DWORD caps = DDSCAPS_BACKBUFFER | DDSCAPS_3DDEVICE; > + const DWORD expected_caps = DDSCAPS_BACKBUFFER | DDSCAPS_3DDEVICE | DDSCAPS_VIDEOMEMORY | DDSCAPS_LOCALVIDMEM; > + > + memset(&ddcaps, 0, sizeof(ddcaps)); > + ddcaps.dwSize = sizeof(DDCAPS); > + hr = IDirectDraw_GetCaps(DirectDraw1, &ddcaps, NULL); > + if (!(ddcaps.ddsCaps.dwCaps & DDSCAPS_VIDEOMEMORY)) > + { > + skip("DDraw reported no VIDEOMEMORY cap. Broken video driver? Skipping surface caps tests.\n"); > + return ; > + } > + > + memset(&ddsd, 0, sizeof(ddsd)); > + ddsd.dwSize = sizeof(ddsd); > + ddsd.dwFlags = DDSD_CAPS | DDSD_WIDTH | DDSD_HEIGHT; > + ddsd.dwWidth = 64; > + ddsd.dwHeight = 64; > + ddsd.ddsCaps.dwCaps = caps; > + memset(&ddsd2, 0, sizeof(ddsd2)); > + ddsd2.dwSize = sizeof(ddsd2); > + ddsd2.dwFlags = DDSD_CAPS | DDSD_WIDTH | DDSD_HEIGHT; > + ddsd2.dwWidth = 64; > + ddsd2.dwHeight = 64; > + ddsd2.ddsCaps.dwCaps = caps; > + memset(&created_ddsd, 0, sizeof(created_ddsd)); > + created_ddsd.dwSize = sizeof(DDSURFACEDESC); > + > + hr = IDirectDraw_CreateSurface(DirectDraw1, &ddsd, &surf, NULL); > + todo_wine ok(SUCCEEDED(hr), "IDirectDraw_CreateSurface failed: 0x%08x\n", hr); > + if (surf != NULL) > + { > + hr = IDirectDrawSurface_GetSurfaceDesc(surf, &created_ddsd); > + ok(SUCCEEDED(hr), "IDirectDraw_GetSurfaceDesc failed: 0x%08x\n", hr); > + todo_wine ok(created_ddsd.ddsCaps.dwCaps == expected_caps, > + "GetSurfaceDesc returned caps %x, expected %x\n", created_ddsd.ddsCaps.dwCaps, > + expected_caps); > + IDirectDrawSurface_Release(surf); > + } > + > + hr = IDirectDraw_QueryInterface(DirectDraw1, &IID_IDirectDraw2, (void **) &dd2); > + ok(SUCCEEDED(hr), "IDirectDraw_QueryInterface failed: 0x%08x\n", hr); > + > + hr = IDirectDraw2_CreateSurface(dd2, &ddsd, &surf, NULL); > + ok(hr == DDERR_INVALIDCAPS, "IDirectDraw2_CreateSurface didn't return %x08x, but %x08x\n", > + DDERR_INVALIDCAPS, hr); > + > + IDirectDraw2_Release(dd2); > + > + hr = IDirectDraw_QueryInterface(DirectDraw1, &IID_IDirectDraw4, (void **) &dd4); > + ok(SUCCEEDED(hr), "IDirectDraw_QueryInterface failed: 0x%08x\n", hr); > + > + hr = IDirectDraw4_CreateSurface(dd4, &ddsd2, &surf4, NULL); > + ok(hr == DDERR_INVALIDCAPS, "IDirectDraw4_CreateSurface didn't return %x08x, but %x08x\n", > + DDERR_INVALIDCAPS, hr); > + > + IDirectDraw4_Release(dd4); > + > + hr = IDirectDraw_QueryInterface(DirectDraw1, &IID_IDirectDraw7, (void **) &dd7); > + ok(SUCCEEDED(hr), "IDirectDraw_QueryInterface failed: 0x%08x\n", hr); > + > + hr = IDirectDraw7_CreateSurface(dd7, &ddsd2, &surf7, NULL); > + ok(hr == DDERR_INVALIDCAPS, "IDirectDraw7_CreateSurface didn't return %x08x, but %x08x\n", > + DDERR_INVALIDCAPS, hr); > + > + IDirectDraw7_Release(dd7); > +} > + > START_TEST(d3d) > { > init_function_pointers(); > @@ -3571,6 +3652,7 @@ START_TEST(d3d) > TextureLoadTest(); > ViewportTest(); > FindDevice(); > + BackBuffer3DCreateSurfaceTest(); > D3D1_releaseObjects(); > } > > -- > 1.7.2 > > >

1 0

Re: user32/dialog.c: GetNextDlgTabItem returns hwndDlg if it does not contain controls.
by Alexandre Julliard Aug. 19, 2010

Aug. 19, 2010

"Mikhail Maroukhine" <mikolg(a)yandex.ru> writes: > @@ -1695,7 +1696,19 @@ HWND WINAPI GetNextDlgTabItem( HWND hwndDlg, HWND hwndCtrl, > */ > if (!hwndCtrl && fPrevious) return 0; > > - return DIALOG_GetNextTabItem(hwndDlg,hwndDlg,hwndCtrl,fPrevious); > + nextItem = DIALOG_GetNextTabItem(hwndDlg,hwndDlg,hwndCtrl,fPrevious); > + > + /* if next tab item not found return the first child even if it does not have TABSTOP > + Checked on XP > + */ > + if (!nextItem && !fPrevious) nextItem = GetWindow(hwndDlg,GW_CHILD); > + > + /* if there is no controls on hwndDlg return hwndDlg > + Checked on XP > + */ > + if (!nextItem && !fPrevious) nextItem = hwndDlg; > + > + return nextItem; You should test the fPrevious case too, it's probably similar. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

1 0

Re: oleau32: Use correct sysking in QueryPathOfRegTypeLib.
by Alexandre Julliard Aug. 19, 2010

Aug. 19, 2010

Jacek Caban <jacek(a)codeweavers.com> writes: > --- > dlls/oleaut32/typelib.c | 2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) It breaks the 64-bit tests: ../../../../wine/tools/runtest -q -P wine -M oleaut32.dll -T ../../.. -p oleaut32_test.exe.so ../../../../wine/dlls/oleaut32/tests/typelib.c && touch typelib.ok typelib.c:784: Test failed: QueryPathOfRegTypeLib(3.0) returned 8002801d typelib.c:784: Test failed: QueryPathOfRegTypeLib(3.1) returned 8002801d typelib.c:784: Test failed: QueryPathOfRegTypeLib(3.22) returned 8002801d typelib.c:784: Test failed: QueryPathOfRegTypeLib(3.37) returned 8002801d typelib.c:784: Test failed: QueryPathOfRegTypeLib(3.40) returned 8002801d typelib.c:784: Test failed: QueryPathOfRegTypeLib(65535.65535) returned 8002801d make: *** [typelib.ok] Error 6 -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

1 0

Re: [PATCH 5/5] ddraw: Allow creating back buffer for DirectX 1 interfaces. (try 5, resend)
by Stefan Dösinger Aug. 19, 2010

Aug. 19, 2010

Am 18.08.2010 um 22:01 schrieb Oldřich Jedlička: > + if(DDSD->ddsCaps.dwCaps & DDSCAPS_FRONTBUFFER) { > + WARN("Application tried to create an explicit front buffer\n"); > LeaveCriticalSection(&ddraw_cs); > return DDERR_INVALIDCAPS; > } This test seems redundant now. The ddraw1 thunk removes the flag, and all other thunks check for the frontbuffer flag on their own.

1 0

have all MCI tests in winmm/tests/ or distributed across mci*/tests/?
by Joerg-Cyril.Hoehle＠t-systems.com Aug. 19, 2010

Aug. 19, 2010

Hi, although my patch creates mcicda/tests/ I'd like to query whether it would make more sense to have all mci tests grouped in winmm/tests/. Pro: + Future fixes to winmm/mci.c would affect winmm/tests/*.c only. E.g. when I'll make "stop all" work I'd have to touch mcicda/tests/mcicda.c as well to eliminate the todo_wine there. Same when I'll patch mciparse to accept [TT:]MM:SS:FF format. + When Maarten will write mciqtz tests, perhaps resources could be reused to execute mciavi tests as well (the file creation code need not be duplicated). Similar tests could be written for: "open foo.avi" (mciavi) and "open foo.avi type mpegvideo" (mciqtz) or "open foo.wav" (micwave) and "open foo.wav type mpegvideo" although there's some difference in behaviour. + The functions test_notification could be in one file only, not repeated. I can rewrite my current mcicda/tests/mcicda.c patch to live in winmm/tests/. What do you think? Jörg Höhle

2 1

Re: [1/2] user32: add a way to poll for messages on extra handles
by Alexandre Julliard Aug. 19, 2010

Aug. 19, 2010

Damjan Jovanovic <damjan.jov(a)gmail.com> writes: > diff --git a/dlls/user32/driver.c b/dlls/user32/driver.c > index f2f9892..05c83d4 100644 > --- a/dlls/user32/driver.c > +++ b/dlls/user32/driver.c > @@ -126,6 +126,7 @@ static const USER_DRIVER *load_driver(void) > GET_USER_FUNC(WindowMessage); > GET_USER_FUNC(WindowPosChanging); > GET_USER_FUNC(WindowPosChanged); > + GET_USER_FUNC(GetExtraMessageHandles); That's ugly, it doesn't correspond to anything in the Windows API. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

1 0

Re: [PATCH 2/2] ntdll/tests: Add tests for RtlIpv4AddressToString / RtlIpv4AddressToStringEx [try 4]
by Alexandre Julliard Aug. 19, 2010

Aug. 19, 2010

Detlef Riekenberg <wine.dev(a)web.de> writes: > + ok( (res == (void *)~0) || > + broken(res == (NULL + len)), /* XP and w2003 */ You can't do that. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

1 0

Re: [PATCH] comctl32/tests: DateTimePicker and MonthCalendar controls only support Gregorian calendar.
by Nikolay Sivov Aug. 19, 2010

Aug. 19, 2010

On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 9:50 AM, Austin Lund <austin.lund(a)gmail.com> wrote: > http://www.microsoft.com/middleeast/msdn/ArabicCalendar.aspx Hi, Austin. This information is outdated probably. There's a message to set a calendar for MonthCal at least, see: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb760995%28VS.85%29.aspx Not sure about DateTimePicker, it uses Monthcal internally so a calendar could still be switched. Anyway this won't work on pre-Vista and without a manifest for v6, but you could enable tests using V6 loading helpers that we have already and MCM_SETCALID message, so tests will run on Arabic or some Asian boxes.

2 1

Re: [PATCH 5/5] ddraw: Allow creating back buffer for DirectX 1 interfaces. (try 5, resend)
by testbot＠testbot.winehq.org Aug. 19, 2010

Aug. 19, 2010

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4557 Your paranoid android. === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit visual) === visual.c:1619: Test failed: Got color 000a246a, expected 00ff0040 or near visual.c:1625: Test failed: Got color 006b8bbd, expected 00ff0080 or near === W98SE (32 bit dsurface) === No test summary line found

1 0

Re: [PATCH 1/5] ddraw/tests: Add test for bad size of surface caps in CreateSurface. (try 5, resend)
by testbot＠testbot.winehq.org Aug. 19, 2010

Aug. 19, 2010

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4553 Your paranoid android. === W98SE (32 bit dsurface) === No test summary line found

1 0

Re: [PATCH 2/2] gameux/tests: verifying registry values created by GameExplorer (try 2)
by testbot＠testbot.winehq.org Aug. 19, 2010

Aug. 19, 2010

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4552 Your paranoid android. === W98SE (32 bit gameexplorer) === Failure running script in VM: Exceeded timeout limit of 315 sec === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit gameexplorer) === Timeout === WXPPROSP3 (32 bit gameexplorer) === Timeout

1 0

Re: ntdll: IMAGE_REL_BASED_HIGH, IMAGE_REL_BASED_HIGH and IMAGE_REL_BASED_HIGHLOW are supported on win64.
by testbot＠testbot.winehq.org Aug. 19, 2010

Aug. 19, 2010

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4548 Your paranoid android. === W98SE (32 bit rtl) === Failure running script in VM: Exceeded timeout limit of 315 sec

1 0

Re: [PATCH 1/3] gameux: Add definitions of resource identifiers to header file
by Vincent Povirk Aug. 18, 2010

Aug. 18, 2010

> @@ -32,7 +33,6 @@ > > #include "wine/test.h" > > - > static void test_create(BOOL* gameExplorerAvailable, BOOL* gameExplorer2Available) > { > HRESULT hr; Don't put formatting changes in functional patches, please. I think it would be helpful if you passed a string description to your _validate functions so that in case of failure, you can tell where the original call to _validateGameRegistryKey was, instead of just the line containing the ok() call.

3 3

Re: [PATCH 3/3] gameux/tests: verifying registry values created by GameExplorer
by testbot＠testbot.winehq.org Aug. 18, 2010

Aug. 18, 2010

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4540 Your paranoid android. === W98SE (32 bit gameexplorer) === Failure running script in VM: Exceeded timeout limit of 315 sec === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit gameexplorer) === Timeout === WXPPROSP3 (32 bit gameexplorer) === Timeout

4 5

Re: [PATCH 5/6] gameux: Add initial implementation of IGameExplorer2::CheckAccess method
by Mariusz Pluciński Aug. 18, 2010

Aug. 18, 2010

Hello W dniu 16.08.2010 10:00, Mariusz Pluciński pisze: > --- > dlls/gameux/gameexplorer.c | 7 +++++-- > 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > This is patch I sent to wine-patches yesterday. It was marked as "Pending". I know that what I sent is not proper solution. But as I wrote in FIXME, it's in my opinion impossible to implement it properly, cause from what I know Wine does not support parental control. So, instead of doing real check, my function simply always grants access. My question is: what should I do with it? It cannot be left stub, as there's already bug caused by this (bug #23850). And probably every game which uses Game Explorer will behave that same. Should I write test case to demonstrate that native works that same in most cases?

1 0

Re: [PATCH 1/1] d3dx9: Add tests for FVF <-> declaration conversion.
by Alexandre Julliard Aug. 18, 2010

Aug. 18, 2010

Misha Koshelev <misha680(a)gmail.com> writes: > +#define VDECL_CHECK(fcall) \ > + if(fcall != S_OK) \ > + trace(" Test failed on line #%d\n", __LINE__); > + > +#define VDECL_CHECK_FAIL(fcall) \ > + if(fcall != E_FAIL) \ > + trace(" Test failed on line #%d\n", __LINE__); That's ugly. If the goal is to print the line number, you should pass it to the test function. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

1 0

Re: [PATCH 1/2] ntdll: Implement RtlIpv4AddressToString / RtlIpv4AddressToStringEx [try 3]
by Alexandre Julliard Aug. 18, 2010

Aug. 18, 2010

Detlef Riekenberg <wine.dev(a)web.de> writes: > + in = *pin; What is this for? -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

1 0

Wine64 debugger
by Peter Urbanec Aug. 18, 2010

Aug. 18, 2010

Hi, I'm trying to get a fairly complex Win64 application to work with wine. I'm seeing crashes in FindNextFileW/FindNextFileA due to what looks like a 64 bit HANDLE value being truncated to 32 bits. I thought that I would employ winedbg to help me, but I can't get very far. I don't have any luck with winedbg even on a simple x64 Win32 app. For my simplified test, I used MSVC2005 to generate an x64 executable created from the standard MSVC2005 template Win32 application. This is a simple app that just creates an empty window. As simple as one could get for a Win32 test and it executes correctly when run as "./wine Test1.exe". When I try to execute this test app under winedbg, I get an assert failure: ./wine winedbg Test1.exe WineDbg starting on pid 001a ./programs/winedbg/memory.c:37: be_cpu_linearize: Assertion `addr->Mode == AddrModeFlat' failed. wine: Assertion failed at address 0x7fec2fa657c5 (thread 0009), starting debugger... Unhandled exception: assertion failed in 64-bit code (0x00007fec2fa657c5). Any ideas about why I can not use winedbg to run Win32 x64 code? Thanks, Peter Urbanec

4 4

Re: [PATCH] advapi32: Add magic codes to HCRYPTKEY and HCRYPTHASH.
by Hans Leidekker Aug. 18, 2010

Aug. 18, 2010

On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 10:14 +1000, Austin Lund wrote: > #define MAGIC_CRYPTPROV 0xA39E741F > +#define MAGIC_CRYPTKEY 0xA39E741F > +#define MAGIC_CRYPTHASH 0xA39E741F The app might pass a crypto handle of the wrong type, so it would be better to use different magic values.

3 4

Re: wldap32: Fix handling of zero timeout value in ldap_search_extW. (try 2)
by testbot＠testbot.winehq.org Aug. 18, 2010

Aug. 18, 2010

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4530 Your paranoid android. === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit parse) === parse.c:101: Test failed: ldap_search_extW failed 0x00000034 parse.c:105: Test failed: ldap_search_extW failed 0x00000051

2 1

Re: [4/5] msi: Handle signature filenames in short|long notation.
by testbot＠testbot.winehq.org Aug. 18, 2010

Aug. 18, 2010

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4528 Your paranoid android. === W7PROX64 (32 bit package) === package.c:8348: Test failed: Expected "C:\Program Files\VMware\VMware Tools\;C:\Windows\system32;C:\Windows;C:\Windows\System32\Wbem;C:\Windows\System32\WindowsPowerShell\v1.0\", got "C:\Program Files (x86)\VMware\VMware Tools\;C:\Windows\system32;C:\Windows;C:\Windows\System32\Wbem;C:\Windows\System32\WindowsPowerShell\v1.0\" === W7PROX64 (64 bit package) === package.c:8385: Test failed: Expected "C:\winetest\FileName1", got "" package.c:8396: Test failed: Expected "C:\winetest\", got "" package.c:8407: Test failed: Expected "C:\winetest\", got "" package.c:8457: Test failed: Expected "C:\winetest\FileName3.dll", got "" package.c:8468: Test failed: Expected "C:\winetest\FileName5.dll", got "" package.c:8477: Test failed: Expected "C:\", got "" package.c:8483: Test failed: Expected "C:\winetest\", got "" package.c:8504: Test failed: Expected "C:\winetest\FileName1", got "" package.c:8513: Test failed: Expected "C:\winetest\FileName1", got ""

1 0