November 2011 - Wine-Devel - list.winehq.org

Error handling in RpcBindingVectorFree (dlls/rpcrt4/rpc_binding.c)
by Gerald Pfeifer Nov. 22, 2020

Nov. 22, 2020

Looking at RPC_STATUS WINAPI RpcBindingVectorFree( RPC_BINDING_VECTOR** BindingVector ) { RPC_STATUS status; ULONG c; TRACE("(%p)\n", BindingVector); for (c=0; c<(*BindingVector)->Count; c++) { status = RpcBindingFree(&(*BindingVector)->BindingH[c]); } HeapFree(GetProcessHeap(), 0, *BindingVector); *BindingVector = NULL; return RPC_S_OK; } we currently always ignore the outcome of RpcBindingFree and return RPC_S_OK. However, there is one case where RpcBindingFree returns something different (which is if *Binding is null when RPC_S_INVALID_BINDING is returned). What is the proper way of handling this? Just keeping the code as is and removing the unused status variable? Breaking the loop once RpcBindingFree returns something different from RPC_S_OK? Continuing and returning the first / the last status different from RPC_S_OK? Gerald

1 1

ntoskrnl.exe: unimplemented function ntoskrnl.exe.IoGetDeviceInterfaces
by Qian Hong Sept. 28, 2018

Sept. 28, 2018

Dear all, While test another online bank with wine ActiveX, I got an unimplemented fuction of ntoskrnl: IoGetDeviceInterfaces, I found it listed in http://source.winehq.org/WineAPI/ntoskrnl.html as a stup, so I can't understand this log: wine: Unimplemented function ntoskrnl.exe.IoGetDeviceInterfaces called at address 0x7b839552 (thread 0022), starting debugger... Grateful for any explain! env: wine1.3.12 on Ubuntu 10.04 Here are the steps: 1. install an ActiveX from https://e.bank.ecitic.com/perbank5/plugs/CNCBSecPkg_EN.exe $ rm -rf ~/.wine $ winetricks -q mfc42 $ wine CNCBSecPkg_EN.exe fixme:ole:DllRegisterServer stub fixme:win:DisableProcessWindowsGhosting : stub fixme:msg:ChangeWindowMessageFilter c057 00000001 fixme:msg:ChangeWindowMessageFilter c057 00000001 fixme:msg:ChangeWindowMessageFilter c057 00000001 fixme:ole:CoCreateInstance no instance created for interface {ea1afb91-9e28-4b86-90e9-9e9f8a5eefaf} of class {56fdf344-fd6d-11d0-958a-006097c9a090}, hres is 0x80004002 fixme:sfc:SfcIsFileProtected ((nil), L"C:\\Program Files\\\4e2d\4fe1\94f6\884c\7f51\94f6\5b89\5168\63a7\4ef6\\unins000.exe") stub fixme:win:WINNLSEnableIME hUnknown1 0x1011a bUnknown2 0: stub! fixme:win:WINNLSEnableIME hUnknown1 0x1011a bUnknown2 -1: stub! fixme:win:WINNLSEnableIME hUnknown1 0x1011a bUnknown2 0: stub! wine: Call from 0x7b839552 to unimplemented function ntoskrnl.exe.IoGetDeviceInterfaces, aborting wine: Unimplemented function ntoskrnl.exe.IoGetDeviceInterfaces called at address 0x7b839552 (thread 002b), starting debugger... wine: Call from 0x7b839552 to unimplemented function ntoskrnl.exe.IoGetDeviceInterfaces, aborting wine: Call from 0x7b839552 to unimplemented function ntoskrnl.exe.IoGetDeviceInterfaces, aborting 2. open the online bank entry with wine builtin IE, then IE will crash: $ wine iexplore https://e.bank.ecitic.com/perbank5/signIn.do Please checkout the full log here: http://pastebin.com/rbAg7gwj Should I file a singel bug in ntoskrnl component , or separate bugs, one for ntoskrnl and one for the IE crashing? Generalliy what component should I switch while file a bug about IE crashing? Many thanks! -- Regards, Qian Hong - Sent from Ubuntu http://www.ubuntu.com/

5 6

ODBC Databases: Jet/Access success
by Barry Bird June 14, 2018

June 14, 2018

Good Afternoon. In section 3.3.6.2 of your User Guide you ask readers to report successes with databases other than MS SQL. Well here's one (I know Access 2000 can work with Wine, but this doesn't require Access): How to set up Wine to enable Windows programs that read and write to Jet (Access) databases using ODBC. I write such programs in C and use the API defined in ODBC API Reference http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms714562%28VS.85%29.aspx They work fine on Windows and only require Mingw to be installed to compile and link them, both for console programs and those using Windows SDK. You then can write interactive programs in C which use a full-featured SQL database which comes bundled with Windows. No need to purchase Access. With the set-up below they will also run on Linux (Kubuntu 9.04) and Wine 1.1.26. You need to update the registry to install the Access drivers. Under Windows, export from the Registry to *.reg files the registry entries - HKLM\Software\ODBC - HKLM\Software\Microsoft\Jet all subsidiary keys and values come with them. You can carefully edit these files to remove drivers and DSNs you don't need. Import these files using the registry editor in wine: wine regedit.exe. You need to bring across from Windows to Windows\System32 under wine: clbcatq.dll comres.dll expsrv.dll msjet40.dll mswstr10.dll msjter40.dll msjint40.dll msjtes40.dll msrd3x40.dll odbc32.dll odbccp32.dll odbcji32.dll odbcjt32.dll odbcad32.exe odbcint.dll odbctrac.dll vbajet32.dll Register this server in wine: wine regsvr32.exe msjtes40.dll No need to install MDAC. To use Windows ODBC drivers, you have to override Wine's odbccp32.dll and odbc32.dll with the native versions because the Wine versions are currently wired directly to Linux's unixodbc. This can be done by setting up the ODBC Data Source Administrator odbcad32.exe using winecfg: - Add the program to the Applications tab - then in the libraries tab, pick from 'New override for library' drop-down odbc32.dll and odbccp32.dll add them and edit them to be Native for Windows. Then if you do wine odbcad32.exe this brings up the ODBC Data Source Administrator window as in the Windows Control Panel If needed, set up (System) DSNs using this program. Bring across the programs and *.mdb database files from Windows. Using winecfg, you need to set up each program you want to run with overrides for odbc32.dll and odbccp32.dll (Applications and Libraries tabs) as above. The programs should then run as they did in Windows but perhaps a bit slower with: wine Odbc-prog.exe This has been tested twice on a clean .wine install. I cannot vouch for support of all API and SQL facilities however. I hope someone finds this useful. Barry Bird

5 4

IMM / IME work
by Aric Stewart June 16, 2016

June 16, 2016

Hello all, I know this will only interest a small portion of you but thought i would give a quick update on the state of IMM32 since I have brought it to a major milestone. All the main patches are in which now separate IMM32 and IMEs. There is still more work to do but the major framework is in place. X11 XIM processing should be unchanged. However wine can now begin to load native windows IMEs as well. I have tested with windows ATOK20 (a popular Japanese IME) and successfully had text processing in a fully IME aware application. There are still clear issues to resolve in many aspects of this processing but we have forward progress. ImmInstallIME does not work yet, nor does switching keyboards. So to get the native IME to work you need to add this registry key. [System\\CurrentControlSet\\Control\\Keyboard Layouts\\<keyboard layout>] "Ime File"=<IME filename> so for example for ATOK20 in Japanese i used. [System\\CurrentControlSet\\Control\\Keyboard Layouts\\e0010411] "Ime File"="ATOK20W.IME" I would love to hear how well things work. I am sure using native IMEs will quickly show us many places where IMM32 needs to be improved. One issues I am going to investigate next is that sometimes non x11drv ime initialization, if occurring too early, causes x11drv to fail to create windows. I have not investigated with the latest changes to xim.c (which may already correct this problem) but if you see this problem this patch may help and i believe the IME_UpdateAssociation(NULL) is already unneeded. diff --git a/dlls/winex11.drv/xim.c b/dlls/winex11.drv/xim.c index d4df9f7..0c98136 100644 --- a/dlls/winex11.drv/xim.c +++ b/dlls/winex11.drv/xim.c @@ -475,7 +475,6 @@ static void X11DRV_OpenIM(Display *display, XPointer ptr, XP XUnregisterIMInstantiateCallback(display, NULL, NULL, NULL, X11DRV_OpenIM, wine_tsx11_unlock(); IME_XIMPresent(TRUE); - IME_UpdateAssociation(NULL); } thanks, -aric

5 7

Re: XInput [1/4]: Implement XInputGetState
by Stefan Dösinger July 5, 2015

July 5, 2015

Am 09.07.2009 um 02:58 schrieb Michael Gruber: > This patch series implements parts of the XInput library. You can use > this to play games that support Xbox 360 Controllers. To be able to > use this you will need to have your Controller working on Linux via > the xpad kernel driver and the event interface. It will not work on > any OS other than Linux. It supports gamepads, should work with > guitars and wheels, but will not work with dance-mats. > <1-XInputGetState.patch> Is it possible to implement XInput on top of DirectInput? DirectInput already has some internal abstraction layers for differnet joystick APIs, and has basic support for OSX joysticks. Does DInput have enough capabilities to access all the Xbox controller's features? My gut says no, otherwise MS wouldn't have created a new lib. I guess its worth checking though.

5 6

What happened to the Fedora packages?
by Neal Gompa Aug. 2, 2014

Aug. 2, 2014

What happened to the Fedora packages? They have not been updated since 0.9.2!!!! Right now it is at 0.9.10!!! Nearly every other Linux distro supported has the up to date packages!!! And why does the Red Hat packages site not go to the SourceForge site as it does for SUSE packages and the others?? I have not really had the guts to ask until now, because I thought that maybe there was a slump, but now, its getting annoying!! And Fedora just released Fedora Core 5 yesterday!!! Please tell me new packages will be ready soon!!! Compiling WINE always crashes my computer, so I prefer to use the RPMs...

10 18

winspool: ERROR_INVALID_NAME in GetDefaultPrinter() ?
by Detlef Riekenberg Oct. 9, 2013

Oct. 9, 2013

Hi. >From which configuration does the "ERROR_INVALID_NAME" came from, when calling GetDefaultPrinter(NULL, &size) and no Printer is installed? This Test is Present in the current "dlls/winspool/tests/info.c". MSDN told us, that we receive an "ERROR_FILE_NOT_FOUND", if no Printer is installed: http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us/gdi/prntspol_0hma.asp I get the "ERROR_FILE_NOT_FOUND" on win98se, winme, w2k and win2003 in this Situation. -- By By ... ... Detlef

3 3

Getting Wine's PO files on Launchpad
by Francois Gouget Jan. 20, 2012

Jan. 20, 2012

Launchpad has a PO file translation website. This makes it easier for non-developpers to contribute and review translations. https://translations.launchpad.net/ So what would it take to get Wine's PO files on Launchpad? * Launchpad tracks who translated what string and if we choose the 'Closed' permissions model only approved translators can update the translations. So that means we should be able to get patches with full attribution. https://help.launchpad.net/Translations/YourProject/PermissionPolicies * Launchpad would need to pull updated PO files from Wine regularly. Ideally that would be automatic and happen daily (both to account for translations happening outside Launchpad and to take changes in the resource files into account quickly). https://help.launchpad.net/Translations/YourProject/ImportingTranslations * Conversely Launchpad should submit patches back to Wine. Ideally that would be automated as much as possible but I'm fuzzy on the details here (especially on how to preserve attribution). As for the periodicity, maybe the best would be weekly or just before Alexandre makes a release. https://help.launchpad.net/Translations/YourProject/Exports https://help.launchpad.net/Translations/YourProject/PartialPOExport -- Francois Gouget <fgouget(a)free.fr> http://fgouget.free.fr/ Any sufficiently advanced bug is indistinguishable from a feature. -- from some indian guy

8 10

crypt32: Cryptic string resources
by Francois Gouget Jan. 17, 2012

Jan. 17, 2012

Are these strings seem to be lacking spaces a bit. Are they real names or mere identifiers? Are they actually translatable? dlls/crypt32/crypt32.rc: IDS_SPC_SP_AGENCY_INFO "SpcSpAgencyInfo" IDS_SPC_FINANCIAL_CRITERIA "SpcFinancialCriteria" IDS_SPC_MINIMAL_CRITERIA "SpcMinimalCriteria" -- Francois Gouget <fgouget(a)free.fr> http://fgouget.free.fr/ Vote Electronique: Les gens qui votent ne décident rien. Ceux qui comptent les votes décident de tout.

3 3

Updated Clang static analysis results / Valgrind update
by Austin English Dec. 5, 2011

Dec. 5, 2011

Web space usage was getting a bit high, so I've uploaded a tarball to a file download service: http://www.sendspace.com/file/5hot36 austin(a)aw21 ~ $ sha1sum scan-build-2011-07-02.tar.bz2 ac3cb3920ef97641fff1f5376f8136cef01f15bf scan-build-2011-07-02.tar.bz2 to use, just extract and open in your favorite browser: $ firefox index.html this was run against Clang from svn: clang version 3.0 (trunk 134320) Please send me any false positives that you'd like me to report upstream. Cheers, Austin P.S. For those of you wanting Valgrind results, I'm currently hitting a nasty Valgrind bug, waiting on upstream to fix: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=275673 (Thanks to Andrew N for finding the faulty commit)

4 7

Re: [PATCH 2/6] appwiz.cpl: Add Catalan translation
by André Hentschel Nov. 30, 2011

Nov. 30, 2011

Am 30.11.2011 08:39, schrieb Alex Henrie: > --- > dlls/appwiz.cpl/Ca.rc | 85 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > dlls/appwiz.cpl/Makefile.in | 1 + > 2 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 dlls/appwiz.cpl/Ca.rc > > diff --git a/dlls/appwiz.cpl/Ca.rc b/dlls/appwiz.cpl/Ca.rc > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..e411bf0 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/dlls/appwiz.cpl/Ca.rc > @@ -0,0 +1,85 @@ > +/* > +* Add/Remove Programs English resources > +* > +* Copyright 2001-2002, 2008 Owen Rudge > +* Copyright 2005-2006 Jacek Caban really? :) -- Best Regards, André Hentschel

1 0

Re: [PATCH 1/5] wined3d: Don't apply fixups to converted surfaces.
by Stefan Dösinger Nov. 30, 2011

Nov. 30, 2011

Am Donnerstag, 24. November 2011, 22:52:32 schrieb Henri Verbeet: > + if (surface->flags & SFLAG_CONVERTED) > + { > + ENTER_GL(); > + glEnable(textype); > + checkGLcall("glEnable(textype)"); > + LEAVE_GL(); > + return WINED3D_OK; > + } I don't think this is correct. E.g. signed formats without GL_NV_texture_shader have load time and read time fixups and both have to be applied. What exactly are you trying to fix? I assume it is something about P8 blits, but P8->P8 blits don't enter the ARB blitting code(due to the dest fixup check), and I don't know of any app that uses P8->RGB or SNORM->UNORM blits. Stefan

3 16

Re: [PATCH 3/5] ddraw: Keep the primary surface mapped at the same address for early ddraw versions.
by Stefan Dösinger Nov. 30, 2011

Nov. 30, 2011

Am Mittwoch, 30. November 2011, 06:01:46 schrieb Henri Verbeet: > + if (flags & WINED3D_SURFACE_PIN_SYSMEM) > + surface->flags |= SFLAG_PIN_SYSMEM; The address will still change when GetDC is called. Is this intentional? > + /* Some applications assume that the primary surface will always be > + * mapped at the same address. Some of those also assume that this > + * address is valid even when the surface isn't mapped, and that > + * updates done this way will be visible on the screen. The game Nox > + * is such an application. */ I've seen ddraw applications that create systemmem primaries, and we currently allow this. What surface caps does Nox use? Does Nox expect us to magically pick up the new data, or does it map and unmap the surface to get the data onto the screen?

1 0

Re: [PATCH 2/4] jscript: Use bytecode for delete on array expression implementation
by Marvin Nov. 30, 2011

Nov. 30, 2011

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=15711 Your paranoid android. === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WXPPROSP3 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WVISTAADM (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K8SE (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PRO (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === TEST64_W7SP1 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found === TEST64_W7SP1 (64 bit) === No test summary line found

1 0

Re: [PATCH 1/5] ddraw: Resize the swapchain window on mode changes in exclusive mode.
by Marvin Nov. 30, 2011

Nov. 30, 2011

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=15710 Your paranoid android. === WVISTAADM (32 bit d3d) === Failure running script in VM: The specified guest user must be logged in interactively to perform this operation

2 1

Re: [PATCH 5/5] user32: Implement GetRawInputDeviceInfoW completely on user side. (resend)
by Marvin Nov. 29, 2011

Nov. 29, 2011

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=15692 Your paranoid android. === WVISTAADM (32 bit input) === input.c:1787: Test failed: GetRawInputDeviceInfoA should have failed: 32, 32, -559038737 === W2K8SE (32 bit input) === input.c:1787: Test failed: GetRawInputDeviceInfoA should have failed: 32, 32, -559038737 === W7PRO (32 bit input) === input.c:1787: Test failed: GetRawInputDeviceInfoA should have failed: 32, 32, -559038737 === W7PROX64 (32 bit input) === input.c:1787: Test failed: GetRawInputDeviceInfoA should have failed: 32, 32, -559038737 === TEST64_W7SP1 (32 bit input) === input.c:1787: Test failed: GetRawInputDeviceInfoA should have failed: 32, 32, -559038737 === W7PROX64 (64 bit input) === input.c:1787: Test failed: GetRawInputDeviceInfoA should have failed: 32, 32, -559038737 === TEST64_W7SP1 (64 bit input) === input.c:1787: Test failed: GetRawInputDeviceInfoA should have failed: 32, 32, -559038737

1 0

Re: [PATCH 3/5] user32: Implement GetRawInputDeviceList completely on user side. (resend)
by Marvin Nov. 29, 2011

Nov. 29, 2011

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=15691 Your paranoid android. === WVISTAADM (32 bit input) === input.c:1794: Test failed: GetRawInputDeviceInfoA should have failed: 32, 32, -559038737 === W2K8SE (32 bit input) === input.c:1794: Test failed: GetRawInputDeviceInfoA should have failed: 32, 32, -559038737 === W7PRO (32 bit input) === input.c:1794: Test failed: GetRawInputDeviceInfoA should have failed: 32, 32, -559038737 === W7PROX64 (32 bit input) === input.c:1794: Test failed: GetRawInputDeviceInfoA should have failed: 32, 32, -559038737 === TEST64_W7SP1 (32 bit input) === input.c:1794: Test failed: GetRawInputDeviceInfoA should have failed: 32, 32, -559038737 === W7PROX64 (64 bit input) === input.c:1794: Test failed: GetRawInputDeviceInfoA should have failed: 32, 32, -559038737 === TEST64_W7SP1 (64 bit input) === input.c:1794: Test failed: GetRawInputDeviceInfoA should have failed: 32, 32, -559038737

1 0

Re: [PATCH 2/5] user32: Add initial input parameter validations to RawInput functions. (resend)
by Marvin Nov. 29, 2011

Nov. 29, 2011

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=15690 Your paranoid android. === WVISTAADM (32 bit input) === input.c:1797: Test failed: GetRawInputDeviceInfoA should have failed: 32, 32, -559038737 === W2K8SE (32 bit input) === input.c:1797: Test failed: GetRawInputDeviceInfoA should have failed: 32, 32, -559038737 === W7PRO (32 bit input) === input.c:1797: Test failed: GetRawInputDeviceInfoA should have failed: 32, 32, -559038737 === W7PROX64 (32 bit input) === input.c:1797: Test failed: GetRawInputDeviceInfoA should have failed: 32, 32, -559038737 === TEST64_W7SP1 (32 bit input) === input.c:1797: Test failed: GetRawInputDeviceInfoA should have failed: 32, 32, -559038737 === W7PROX64 (64 bit input) === input.c:1797: Test failed: GetRawInputDeviceInfoA should have failed: 32, 32, -559038737 === TEST64_W7SP1 (64 bit input) === input.c:1797: Test failed: GetRawInputDeviceInfoA should have failed: 32, 32, -559038737

1 0

Re: [PATCH 1/5] user32/tests: Initial tests for RawInput functions. (try 2)
by Marvin Nov. 29, 2011

Nov. 29, 2011

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=15689 Your paranoid android. === WVISTAADM (32 bit input) === input.c:1803: Test failed: GetRawInputDeviceInfoA should have failed: 32, 32, -559038737 === W2K8SE (32 bit input) === input.c:1803: Test failed: GetRawInputDeviceInfoA should have failed: 32, 32, -559038737 === W7PRO (32 bit input) === input.c:1803: Test failed: GetRawInputDeviceInfoA should have failed: 32, 32, -559038737 === W7PROX64 (32 bit input) === input.c:1803: Test failed: GetRawInputDeviceInfoA should have failed: 32, 32, -559038737 === TEST64_W7SP1 (32 bit input) === input.c:1803: Test failed: GetRawInputDeviceInfoA should have failed: 32, 32, -559038737 === W7PROX64 (64 bit input) === input.c:1803: Test failed: GetRawInputDeviceInfoA should have failed: 32, 32, -559038737 === TEST64_W7SP1 (64 bit input) === input.c:1803: Test failed: GetRawInputDeviceInfoA should have failed: 32, 32, -559038737

1 0

Re: user32: Fix 64-bit 'msg' test hang in test_timers (try 2).
by Dmitry Timoshkov Nov. 28, 2011

Nov. 28, 2011

"Erich E. Hoover" <ehoover(a)mines.edu> wrote: > The attached patch changes the test_timers() crash function to use > RtlRaiseException (if available) rather than attempting to write to memory > address 0. This change stops the timer tests from hanging on the 64-bit VM. Why not use kernel32.RaiseException (which is always available) instead? -- Dmitry.

2 4

Re: [1/2] kernel32: Add a test for protections accepted by CreateFileMapping, make it pass under Wine.
by Alexandre Julliard Nov. 28, 2011

Nov. 28, 2011

Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)baikal.ru> writes: > @@ -350,9 +350,6 @@ HANDLE WINAPI CreateFileMappingW( HANDLE hFile, LPSECURITY_ATTRIBUTES sa, > > switch(protect) > { > - case 0: > - protect = PAGE_READONLY; /* Win9x compatibility */ > - /* fall through */ Did you try your test on Win9x? -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

3 6

Re: [3/5] cmd/tests: Tweak subsection headers so they are treated as resynchronization points.
by Marvin Nov. 28, 2011

Nov. 28, 2011

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=15676 Your paranoid android. === WINEBUILD (build) === Patch failed to apply

1 0

Re: [2/5] cmd/tests: Standardize the batch file section headers.
by Marvin Nov. 28, 2011

Nov. 28, 2011

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=15675 Your paranoid android. === WINEBUILD (build) === Patch failed to apply

1 0

Re: [2/5] cmd/tests: Standardize the batch file section headers.
by Marvin Nov. 28, 2011

Nov. 28, 2011

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=15675 Your paranoid android. === WINEBUILD (build) === Patch failed to apply

1 0

Re: [2/5] cmd/tests: Standardize the batch file section headers.
by Marvin Nov. 28, 2011

Nov. 28, 2011

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=15675 Your paranoid android. === WINEBUILD (build) === Patch failed to apply

1 0

Re: [2/5] cmd/tests: Standardize the batch file section headers.
by Marvin Nov. 28, 2011

Nov. 28, 2011

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=15675 Your paranoid android. === WINEBUILD (build) === Patch failed to apply

1 0

Re: kernel32/tests: Test deleting a timer right after creating it.
by Marvin Nov. 28, 2011

Nov. 28, 2011

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=15671 Your paranoid android. === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit sync) === sync.c:685: Test failed: DeleteTimerQueueTimer ret=1 le=997 === WXPPROSP3 (32 bit sync) === sync.c:685: Test failed: DeleteTimerQueueTimer ret=1 le=997 === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit sync) === sync.c:685: Test failed: DeleteTimerQueueTimer ret=1 le=997 === WVISTAADM (32 bit sync) === sync.c:741: Test failed: Timer callback 0 === W2K8SE (32 bit sync) === sync.c:741: Test failed: Timer callback 0 === W7PRO (32 bit sync) === sync.c:741: Test failed: Timer callback 0 === W7PROX64 (32 bit sync) === sync.c:741: Test failed: Timer callback 0 === TEST64_W7SP1 (32 bit sync) === sync.c:741: Test failed: Timer callback 0 === W7PROX64 (64 bit sync) === sync.c:741: Test failed: Timer callback 0 === TEST64_W7SP1 (64 bit sync) === sync.c:741: Test failed: Timer callback 0

1 0

Re: [PATCH] dxgi: 0 / 0 means 0 for a DXGI_RATIONAL
by Marvin Nov. 28, 2011

Nov. 28, 2011

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=15670 Your paranoid android. === WVISTAADM (32 bit swapchain) === swapchain.c:76: Test failed: Failed to create device and swapchain, hr 0x8007000e. swapchain: unhandled exception c0000005 at 004027AA === W2K8SE (32 bit swapchain) === swapchain.c:76: Test failed: Failed to create device and swapchain, hr 0x8007000e. swapchain: unhandled exception c0000005 at 004027AA === W7PRO (32 bit swapchain) === swapchain.c:76: Test failed: Failed to create device and swapchain, hr 0x8007000e. swapchain: unhandled exception c0000005 at 004027AA === W7PROX64 (32 bit swapchain) === swapchain.c:76: Test failed: Failed to create device and swapchain, hr 0x8007000e. swapchain: unhandled exception c0000005 at 004027AA === TEST64_W7SP1 (32 bit swapchain) === swapchain.c:76: Test failed: Failed to create device and swapchain, hr 0x8007000e. swapchain: unhandled exception c0000005 at 004027AA === W7PROX64 (64 bit swapchain) === swapchain.c:76: Test failed: Failed to create device and swapchain, hr 0x8007000e. Timeout === TEST64_W7SP1 (64 bit swapchain) === swapchain.c:76: Test failed: Failed to create device and swapchain, hr 0x8007000e. Timeout

1 0

Re: [PATCH 1/5] user32/tests: Initial tests for RawInput functions.
by Marvin Nov. 28, 2011

Nov. 28, 2011

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=15663 Your paranoid android. === WVISTAADM (32 bit input) === input.c:1807: Test failed: GetRawInputDeviceInfoA failed: -1, 1024, 87 === W2K8SE (32 bit input) === input.c:1807: Test failed: GetRawInputDeviceInfoA failed: -1, 1024, 87 === W7PRO (32 bit input) === input.c:1807: Test failed: GetRawInputDeviceInfoA failed: -1, 1024, 87 === W7PROX64 (32 bit input) === input.c:1807: Test failed: GetRawInputDeviceInfoA failed: -1, 1024, 87 === TEST64_W7SP1 (32 bit input) === input.c:1807: Test failed: GetRawInputDeviceInfoA failed: -1, 1024, 87 === W7PROX64 (64 bit input) === input.c:1807: Test failed: GetRawInputDeviceInfoA failed: -1, 1024, 87 === TEST64_W7SP1 (64 bit input) === input.c:1807: Test failed: GetRawInputDeviceInfoA failed: -1, 1024, 87

2 1

Re: [PATCH 5/5] user32: Implement GetRawInputDeviceInfoW completely on user side.
by Marvin Nov. 28, 2011

Nov. 28, 2011

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=15666 Your paranoid android. === WVISTAADM (32 bit input) === input.c:1791: Test failed: GetRawInputDeviceInfoA failed: -1, 1024, 87 === W2K8SE (32 bit input) === input.c:1791: Test failed: GetRawInputDeviceInfoA failed: -1, 1024, 87 === W7PRO (32 bit input) === input.c:1791: Test failed: GetRawInputDeviceInfoA failed: -1, 1024, 87 === W7PROX64 (32 bit input) === input.c:1791: Test failed: GetRawInputDeviceInfoA failed: -1, 1024, 87 === TEST64_W7SP1 (32 bit input) === input.c:1791: Test failed: GetRawInputDeviceInfoA failed: -1, 1024, 87 === W7PROX64 (64 bit input) === input.c:1791: Test failed: GetRawInputDeviceInfoA failed: -1, 1024, 87 === TEST64_W7SP1 (64 bit input) === input.c:1791: Test failed: GetRawInputDeviceInfoA failed: -1, 1024, 87

1 0

Re: [PATCH 3/5] user32: Implement GetRawInputDeviceList completely on user side.
by Marvin Nov. 28, 2011

Nov. 28, 2011

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=15665 Your paranoid android. === WVISTAADM (32 bit input) === input.c:1799: Test failed: GetRawInputDeviceInfoA failed: -1, 1024, 87 === W2K8SE (32 bit input) === input.c:1799: Test failed: GetRawInputDeviceInfoA failed: -1, 1024, 87 === W7PRO (32 bit input) === input.c:1799: Test failed: GetRawInputDeviceInfoA failed: -1, 1024, 87 === W7PROX64 (32 bit input) === input.c:1799: Test failed: GetRawInputDeviceInfoA failed: -1, 1024, 87 === TEST64_W7SP1 (32 bit input) === input.c:1799: Test failed: GetRawInputDeviceInfoA failed: -1, 1024, 87 === W7PROX64 (64 bit input) === input.c:1799: Test failed: GetRawInputDeviceInfoA failed: -1, 1024, 87 === TEST64_W7SP1 (64 bit input) === input.c:1799: Test failed: GetRawInputDeviceInfoA failed: -1, 1024, 87

1 0

Re: [PATCH 2/5] user32: Add initial input parameter validations to RawInput functions.
by Marvin Nov. 28, 2011

Nov. 28, 2011

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=15664 Your paranoid android. === WVISTAADM (32 bit input) === input.c:1801: Test failed: GetRawInputDeviceInfoA failed: -1, 1024, 87 === W2K8SE (32 bit input) === input.c:1801: Test failed: GetRawInputDeviceInfoA failed: -1, 1024, 87 === W7PRO (32 bit input) === input.c:1801: Test failed: GetRawInputDeviceInfoA failed: -1, 1024, 87 === W7PROX64 (32 bit input) === input.c:1801: Test failed: GetRawInputDeviceInfoA failed: -1, 1024, 87 === TEST64_W7SP1 (32 bit input) === input.c:1801: Test failed: GetRawInputDeviceInfoA failed: -1, 1024, 87 === W7PROX64 (64 bit input) === input.c:1801: Test failed: GetRawInputDeviceInfoA failed: -1, 1024, 87 === TEST64_W7SP1 (64 bit input) === input.c:1801: Test failed: GetRawInputDeviceInfoA failed: -1, 1024, 87

1 0

Compiling Wine without prelink
by Roger Cruz Nov. 28, 2011

Nov. 28, 2011

What is the proper way to ask the configure script not to use 'prelink' on the generated shared libraries? I don't want to remove the prelink from my development platform but just tell the configurator to ignore it. Thanks Roger R. Cruz

3 5

Re: [PATCH 2/5] d3d8/tests: Test the window and backbuffer dimensions after display mode changes.
by Marvin Nov. 27, 2011

Nov. 27, 2011

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=15656 Your paranoid android. === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit device) === Timeout

1 0

Re: [PATCH 1/5] d3d9/tests: Test the window and backbuffer dimensions after display mode changes.
by Marvin Nov. 27, 2011

Nov. 27, 2011

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=15655 Your paranoid android. === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit device) === Timeout

1 0

Re: [PATCH] dxgi: 0 / 0 means 0 for a DXGI_RATIONAL
by Henri Verbeet Nov. 27, 2011

Nov. 27, 2011

On 27 November 2011 18:15, Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu <eduard.munteanu(a)linux360.ro> wrote: > On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 05:25:08PM +0100, Henri Verbeet wrote: >> What happens for cases like "60 / 0"? Do we get an exception, or does >> the function return an error? MSDN for DXGI_RATIONAL says that whole >> numbers should be represented with a denominator of 1, is something >> like "120 / 2" valid? > > I'm wasn't sure what needed to be done for stuff like 60 / 0, so I > thought that should result in division by zero for now. Maybe it should > be NaN if we convert to a float, or maybe UINT_MAX for UINT, but the > MSDN docs for DXGI_RATIONAL don't say anything about that. > > Perhaps an ERR/WARN/FIXME is in order? > > As for 120 / 2, I took "should" as a recommendation, rather than a > definitive "must". > Possibly. The point of writing the tests is to find out what actually happens.

1 0

Re: [PATCH] dxgi: 0 / 0 means 0 for a DXGI_RATIONAL
by Henri Verbeet Nov. 27, 2011

Nov. 27, 2011

On 26 November 2011 15:52, Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu <eduard.munteanu(a)linux360.ro> wrote: > + if (!rational->Denominator && !rational->Numerator) > + return 0; That's pretty much the same as returning 0 when the numerator is 0. > C_SRCS = \ > - device.c > + device.c \ > + swapchain.c > I don't think we really need a new test file for this, you can probably just add it to device.c. > + hr = D3D10CreateDeviceAndSwapChain(NULL, D3D10_DRIVER_TYPE_HARDWARE, > + NULL, 0, D3D10_SDK_VERSION, &scdesc, swapchain, device); I suppose you can test D3D10CreateDeviceAndSwapChain() for completeness if you want, but the interesting part is testing IDXGIFactory_CreateSwapChain(). What happens for cases like "60 / 0"? Do we get an exception, or does the function return an error? MSDN for DXGI_RATIONAL says that whole numbers should be represented with a denominator of 1, is something like "120 / 2" valid?

1 0

Re: [PATCH] kernel32: implement GetLogicalProcessorInformation
by Charles Davis Nov. 26, 2011

Nov. 26, 2011

Hi, On Nov 24, 2011, at 4:21 AM, Claudio Fontana wrote: > First implementation of GetLogicalProcessorInformation. > Limitations: all logical processors are added to the same NUMA set, > and all cores are added to the same package. > Only the linux-specific helper function is implemented, so for now > everybody else gets the fallback hard-coded results only. > The fallback is also triggered when the OS-specific APIs fail. > > The linux-specific function is based on sysfs. > > The new OS-specific functions can be easily added as additional > ifdefs by following the linux example. > --- > dlls/kernel32/process.c | 350 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > dlls/kernel32/tests/Makefile.in | 1 + > dlls/kernel32/tests/glpi.c | 82 +++++++++ You should really implement this in ntdll.NtQuerySystemInformation (information class SystemLogicalProcessorInformation). In general, kernel32 forwards most of its implementation to ntdll, which reduces code duplication. > 3 files changed, 430 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 dlls/kernel32/tests/glpi.c IMO, you should add the test to dlls/ntdll/tests/info.c, and test NtQuerySystemInformation() with info class SystemLogicalProcessorInformation. > > diff --git a/dlls/kernel32/process.c b/dlls/kernel32/process.c > index b6c0b9d..de39244 100644 > --- a/dlls/kernel32/process.c > +++ b/dlls/kernel32/process.c > @@ -51,6 +51,12 @@ > > #include "ntstatus.h" > #define WIN32_NO_STATUS > + > +#include "windef.h" > +#include "winbase.h" > +#include "winerror.h" > +#include "winnt.h" > + > #include "winternl.h" > #include "kernel_private.h" > #include "psapi.h" > @@ -3705,14 +3711,352 @@ HANDLE WINAPI GetCurrentProcess(void) > return (HANDLE)~(ULONG_PTR)0; > } > > +/*************** > + * glpi_impl_fb: > + * a fallback implementation of GetLogicalProcessorInformation > + * for the systems we do not support yet, > + * or for when the OS-specific API fails. > + * Same arguments and return value as glpi. > + */ This comment should really come right before the function you're documenting. Also, it's formatted wrong. It should look more like this: /*********************************************************************************** * logical_processor_info_fallback * * Fallback implementation of NtQuerySystemInformation() with info class * SystemLogicalProcessorInfo. */ > + > +#undef SLPI > +#ifdef NONAMELESSUNION > +#define SLPI(buffer, idx) buffer[idx].DUMMYUNIONNAME > +#else > +#define SLPI(buffer, idx) buffer[idx] > +#endif /* NONAMELESSUNION */ You could avoid the ifdef if you used the U() macro. In fact, why are you defining a macro at all? Just use U(buffer[idx]). > + > +static BOOL > +glpi_impl_fb(PSYSTEM_LOGICAL_PROCESSOR_INFORMATION buffer, PDWORD pbuflen) Surely you could use a more descriptive name. (See one example in my example doc comment.) This isn't 1978, you know. > +{ > + int glpi_n = 5; > + FIXME("(%p,%p): reporting hard coded information\n", buffer, pbuflen); > + > + if (*pbuflen < sizeof(*buffer) * glpi_n) > + { > + SetLastError(ERROR_INSUFFICIENT_BUFFER); > + *pbuflen = sizeof(*buffer) * glpi_n; > + return FALSE; > + } > + > + buffer[0].ProcessorMask = (ULONG_PTR)0x01; > + buffer[1].ProcessorMask = (ULONG_PTR)0x01; > + buffer[2].ProcessorMask = (ULONG_PTR)0x01; > + buffer[3].ProcessorMask = (ULONG_PTR)0x01; > + buffer[4].ProcessorMask = (ULONG_PTR)0x01; These casts aren't necessary. > + > + buffer[0].Relationship = RelationProcessorCore; > + buffer[1].Relationship = RelationNumaNode; > + buffer[2].Relationship = RelationCache; > + buffer[3].Relationship = RelationCache; > + buffer[4].Relationship = RelationProcessorPackage; > + > + SLPI(buffer, 0).ProcessorCore.Flags = (BYTE)0x00; > + SLPI(buffer, 1).NumaNode.NodeNumber = (DWORD)0x00; Neither are these. > + > + SLPI(buffer, 2).Cache.Level = (BYTE)0x01; > + SLPI(buffer, 2).Cache.Associativity = (BYTE)0x08; > + SLPI(buffer, 2).Cache.LineSize = (WORD)64; > + SLPI(buffer, 2).Cache.Size = (DWORD)16 << 10; /* 16 KB */ Or these. > + SLPI(buffer, 2).Cache.Type = CacheData; > + > + SLPI(buffer, 3).Cache.Level = (BYTE)0x02; > + SLPI(buffer, 3).Cache.Associativity = (BYTE)0x08; > + SLPI(buffer, 3).Cache.LineSize = (WORD)64; > + SLPI(buffer, 3).Cache.Size = (DWORD)1024 << 10; /* 1024 KB */ Or these. > + SLPI(buffer, 3).Cache.Type = CacheUnified; > + /* no additional info for processor package at buffer[4] needed. */ > + > + *pbuflen = sizeof(*buffer) * glpi_n; > + return TRUE; > +} > + > +#ifdef linux > +/****************** > + * glpi_impl_linux: > + * an implementation of GetLogicalProcessorInformation > + * for linux sysfs. > + * Returns: -1 on API failure (trigger fallback), > + * otherwise see glpi. > + */ See above. > + > +#define SYS_CPU "/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu" > +#define SYS_CPU_MAX 63 I'd criticize your use of a static limit, if only Windows didn't have that limit ;). Actually, you can only have 32 processors on a 32-bit system because a ULONG_PTR is 32 bits there. > +#define SYS_CPU_COREID "/topology/core_id" > +#define SYS_CPU_PACKAGEID "/topology/physical_package_id" > +#define SYS_CPU_CACHE "/cache/index" > +#define SYS_CPU_CACHE_MAX 12 > +#define SYS_CPU_CACHE_LEVEL "/level" > +#define SYS_CPU_CACHE_SIZE "/size" > +#define SYS_CPU_CACHE_TYPE "/type" > +#define SYS_CPU_CACHE_LINE "/coherency_line_size" > +#define SYS_CPU_CACHE_ASSOC "/ways_of_associativity" > + > +static int glpi_impl_linux(SYSTEM_LOGICAL_PROCESSOR_INFORMATION *buffer, > + PDWORD pbuflen) > +{ > + /* remember the glpi results, so that subsequent calls are faster */ > + static int n_cores = 0; > + static int n_caches = 0; > + static PSYSTEM_LOGICAL_PROCESSOR_INFORMATION cores = NULL; > + static PSYSTEM_LOGICAL_PROCESSOR_INFORMATION caches = NULL; > + static SYSTEM_LOGICAL_PROCESSOR_INFORMATION numa[1]; > + static SYSTEM_LOGICAL_PROCESSOR_INFORMATION package[1]; > + > + if (!n_cores) > + { > + int n_cpus = 0; int cpu_i; > + char path[PATH_MAX]; > + > + TRACE("building new cached result.\n"); > + > + for (n_cpus = 0; n_cpus < SYS_CPU_MAX; n_cpus++) > + { > + snprintf(path, sizeof(path), SYS_CPU "%d", n_cpus); > + if (access(path, R_OK | X_OK) != 0) Don't use access(2). There's a big fat warning on the man-page telling you not to use it because of a race condition. Another way to solve the problem you're trying to solve might be to scan the "/sys/devices/system/cpu/" directory for the number of entries using the POSIX readdir(3) interface. You could scan them all up front, or you could take each one as you go, re-allocating the table for each new entry. > + break; > + } > + > + TRACE("detected %d logical cpus.\n", n_cpus); > + if (n_cpus < 1) > + { > + TRACE("requesting fallback implementation.\n"); > + return -1; > + } > + > + cores = HeapAlloc(GetProcessHeap(), HEAP_ZERO_MEMORY, sizeof(*cores) * n_cpus); > + caches = HeapAlloc(GetProcessHeap(), HEAP_ZERO_MEMORY, sizeof(*caches) * 1); > + > + for (cpu_i = 0; cpu_i < n_cpus; cpu_i++) > + { > + FILE *f; int core_id; int i; > + snprintf(path, sizeof(path), SYS_CPU "%d" SYS_CPU_COREID, cpu_i); > + cores[n_cores].ProcessorMask = (ULONG_PTR)0x01 << cpu_i; This cast might be needed if there are more than 32 CPUs, so that's OK. > + cores[n_cores].Relationship = RelationProcessorCore; > + > + if (!(f = fopen(path, "r")) || fscanf(f, "%d", &core_id) != 1) > + { > + /* topology info not available, provide default cpuid=cpu_i */ > + ERR("could not read cpu%d topology.\n", cpu_i); > + SLPI(cores, n_cores).Reserved[0] = cpu_i; > + n_cores++; > + if (f) > + fclose(f); > + continue; /* next cpu */ > + } > + > + /* normal sane case */ > + fclose(f); > + /* store the core_id to catch cpus with same core_id */ > + SLPI(cores, n_cores).Reserved[0] = core_id; > + > + /* look for this core_id in previous elements */ > + for (i = 0; i < n_cores; i++) > + if (SLPI(cores, i).Reserved[0] == SLPI(cores, n_cores).Reserved[0]) > + break; > + > + if (i < n_cores) > + { > + TRACE("found existing coreid %d for cpu%d.\n", core_id, cpu_i); > + /* add this logical processor to the existing mask */ > + cores[i].ProcessorMask |= cores[n_cores].ProcessorMask; > + /* do not advance n_cores: this element can be overwritten. */ > + } > + else > + { > + TRACE("found new coreid %d for cpu%d.\n", core_id, cpu_i); > + > + /* look for caches */ > + for (i = 0; i < SYS_CPU_CACHE_MAX; i++) > + { > + unsigned long value; > + char string[80]; > + > + snprintf(path, sizeof(path), SYS_CPU "%d" SYS_CPU_CACHE "%d", > + cpu_i, i); > + if (access(path, R_OK | X_OK) != 0) Don't use access(2). > + break; /* no more caches found. */ > + > + caches = HeapReAlloc(GetProcessHeap(), HEAP_ZERO_MEMORY, > + caches, sizeof(*caches) * (n_caches + 1)); > + > + /* we keep the index into the cores array to set > + the right value at the end. */ > + caches[n_caches].ProcessorMask = (ULONG_PTR)n_cores; This cast, however, is definitely not needed. > + caches[n_caches].Relationship = RelationCache; > + > + snprintf(path, sizeof(path), SYS_CPU "%d" SYS_CPU_CACHE "%d" > + SYS_CPU_CACHE_LEVEL, cpu_i, i); > + if (!(f = fopen(path, "r")) || fscanf(f, "%lu", &value) != 1) > + SLPI(caches, n_caches).Cache.Level = (BYTE)0x01; Neither is this. > + else > + SLPI(caches, n_caches).Cache.Level = (BYTE)value; > + if (f) > + fclose(f); > + > + snprintf(path, sizeof(path), SYS_CPU "%d" SYS_CPU_CACHE "%d" > + SYS_CPU_CACHE_ASSOC, cpu_i, i); > + if (!(f = fopen(path, "r")) || fscanf(f, "%lu", &value) != 1) > + SLPI(caches, n_caches).Cache.Associativity = 0x08; > + else > + SLPI(caches, n_caches).Cache.Associativity = (BYTE)value; > + if (f) > + fclose(f); > + > + snprintf(path, sizeof(path), SYS_CPU "%d" SYS_CPU_CACHE "%d" > + SYS_CPU_CACHE_LINE, cpu_i, i); > + if (!(f = fopen(path, "r")) || fscanf(f, "%lu", &value) != 1) > + SLPI(caches, n_caches).Cache.LineSize = (WORD)64; This cast is not needed. > + else > + SLPI(caches, n_caches).Cache.LineSize = (WORD)value; > + if (f) > + fclose(f); > + > + snprintf(path, sizeof(path), SYS_CPU "%d" SYS_CPU_CACHE "%d" > + SYS_CPU_CACHE_SIZE, cpu_i, i); > + if (!(f = fopen(path, "r")) || fscanf(f, "%lu", &value) != 1) > + SLPI(caches, n_caches).Cache.Size = (DWORD)16 << 10; This cast isn't needed unless an int is less than 32 bits in size. > + else > + SLPI(caches, n_caches).Cache.Size = (DWORD)value << 10; > + if (f) > + fclose(f); > + > + snprintf(path, sizeof(path), SYS_CPU "%d" SYS_CPU_CACHE "%d" > + SYS_CPU_CACHE_TYPE, cpu_i, i); > + if (!(f = fopen(path, "r")) || !fgets(string, sizeof(string), f)) > + SLPI(caches, n_caches).Cache.Type = CacheData; > + else switch (string[0]) > + { > + case 'D': > + SLPI(caches, n_caches).Cache.Type = CacheData; break; > + case 'I': > + SLPI(caches, n_caches).Cache.Type = CacheInstruction; break; > + case 'U': default: > + SLPI(caches, n_caches).Cache.Type = > + string[2] == 'i' ? CacheUnified : CacheTrace; break; > + } > + > + if (f) > + fclose(f); > + > + n_caches++; > + } > + n_cores++; > + TRACE("detected %d caches for coreid %d\n", i, core_id); > + } > + } > + > + if (n_caches < 1) > + { > + HeapFree(GetProcessHeap(), 0, caches); > + caches = NULL; > + } > + > + /* trim leftovers */ > + cores = HeapReAlloc(GetProcessHeap(), HEAP_ZERO_MEMORY, > + cores, sizeof(*cores) * n_cores); > + > + if (1) /* final cleanup work */ Why the if (1)? > + { > + int i; > + /* set the real processor mask in the caches. */ > + for (i = 0; i < n_caches; i++) > + { > + int cores_i; > + cores_i = caches[i].ProcessorMask; > + caches[i].ProcessorMask = cores[cores_i].ProcessorMask; > + } > + > + /* remove the reserved values from the cores, set flags, > + build numa and package. */ > + > + numa[0].ProcessorMask = 0x00; > + numa[0].Relationship = RelationNumaNode; > + SLPI(numa, 0).NumaNode.NodeNumber = 0x00; > + package[0].Relationship = RelationProcessorPackage; > + > + for (i = 0; i < n_cores; i++) > + { > + SLPI(cores, i).Reserved[0] = 0; > + SLPI(cores, i).ProcessorCore.Flags = 0x00; /* ?unclear */ > + numa[0].ProcessorMask |= cores[i].ProcessorMask; > + } > + > + package[0].ProcessorMask = numa[0].ProcessorMask; > + } > + } > + > + TRACE("getting cached result.\n"); > + > + if (1) /* final check for required size, final result */ Same here. > + { > + DWORD required; required = sizeof(*cores) * (n_cores + n_caches + 2); > + if (*pbuflen < required) > + { > + TRACE("return with failure (ERROR_INSUFFICIENT_BUFFER).\n"); > + SetLastError(ERROR_INSUFFICIENT_BUFFER); > + *pbuflen = required; > + return 0; > + } > + > + *pbuflen = required; > + > + /* beware: buffer is SYSTEM_LOGICAL_PROCESSOR_INFORMATION *buffer; */ > + memcpy(buffer, cores, sizeof(*cores) * n_cores); > + buffer += n_cores; > + > + if (n_caches > 0) > + { > + memcpy(buffer, caches, sizeof(*caches) * n_caches); > + buffer += n_caches; > + } > + > + *buffer++ = package[0]; > + *buffer++ = numa[0]; > + } > + > + TRACE("return success!\n"); Is this really necessary? IMO it's generally better to be quiet if you have nothing interesting to say (in typical Unix fashion). And a function succeeding isn't interesting. > + return 1; > +} > + > +#undef SYS_CPU > +#undef SYS_CPU_MAX > +#undef SYS_CPU_COREID > +#undef SYS_CPU_PACKAGEID > +#undef SYS_CPU_CACHE > +#undef SYS_CPU_CACHE_MAX > +#undef SYS_CPU_CACHE_LEVEL > +#undef SYS_CPU_CACHE_SIZE > +#undef SYS_CPU_CACHE_TYPE > +#undef SYS_CPU_CACHE_LINE > +#undef SYS_CPU_CACHE_ASSOC > + > +#endif /* linux */ > + > /*********************************************************************** > * GetLogicalProcessorInformation (KERNEL32.@) > */ > BOOL WINAPI GetLogicalProcessorInformation(PSYSTEM_LOGICAL_PROCESSOR_INFORMATION buffer, PDWORD pBufLen) > { > - FIXME("(%p,%p): stub\n", buffer, pBufLen); > - SetLastError(ERROR_CALL_NOT_IMPLEMENTED); > - return FALSE; > + int rv; > + > + if (pBufLen == NULL || buffer == NULL) > + { > + SetLastError(ERROR_BAD_ARGUMENTS); > + return FALSE; > + } > + > +#if defined linux > + rv = glpi_impl_linux(buffer, pBufLen); > +#else /* no supported OS found */ > + rv = -1; > +#endif > + > + /* fallback hard-coded result */ > + if (rv < 0) > + rv = glpi_impl_fb(buffer, pBufLen); > + > + return rv; > } > > /*********************************************************************** > diff --git a/dlls/kernel32/tests/Makefile.in b/dlls/kernel32/tests/Makefile.in > index dce27db..1505944 100644 > --- a/dlls/kernel32/tests/Makefile.in > +++ b/dlls/kernel32/tests/Makefile.in > @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ C_SRCS = \ > file.c \ > format_msg.c \ > generated.c \ > + glpi.c \ > heap.c \ > loader.c \ > locale.c \ > diff --git a/dlls/kernel32/tests/glpi.c b/dlls/kernel32/tests/glpi.c > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..a81d1d5 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/dlls/kernel32/tests/glpi.c Like I said, this should be integrated into ntdll:info instead of being its own test in kernel32. Note that the style of reporting errors is different between ntdll and kernel32. In kernel32, the function returns a BOOL, and if it's false, you have to check the LastError. In ntdll, however, functions simply return the status code directly. Also, ntdll functions return an NTSTATUS instead of a constant from <winerror.h>. > @@ -0,0 +1,82 @@ > +#include <stdarg.h> > +#include <stdlib.h> > +#include <time.h> > +#include <stdio.h> > + > +#include "wine/test.h" > +#include "windef.h" > +#include "winbase.h" > +#include "winerror.h" > + > +static void test_glpi(void) > +{ > + SYSTEM_LOGICAL_PROCESSOR_INFORMATION buffer[200]; > + DWORD buflen = sizeof(buffer); > + BOOL ret; int i, n; > + > + ret = GetLogicalProcessorInformation(NULL, &buflen); > + ok(!ret, "Passing NULL as buffer should not be ok.\n"); > + > + ret = GetLogicalProcessorInformation(buffer, NULL); > + ok(!ret, "Passing NULL as pbuflen should not be ok.\n"); > + > + ret = GetLogicalProcessorInformation(buffer, &buflen); > + ok(ret, "Normal glpi call (%d)\n", GetLastError()); Don't call GetLastError() inside an ok(). (Actually, that's moot, because this test belongs in ntdll:process, but in general, you shouldn't call GetLastError() inside an ok().) > + > + ret = GetLogicalProcessorInformation(buffer, &buflen); > + ok(ret, "glpi call with the resulting buflen (%d)\n", buflen); Showing the last error (ntdll: return status) here might help diagnosing any problems with this test. (But don't call GetLastError() inside the ok().) > + > + buflen--; > + > + ret = GetLogicalProcessorInformation(buffer, &buflen); > + ok(!ret, "glpi call with insufficient buflen (%d)\n", buflen); Here you should make sure the LastError is ERROR_INSUFFICIENT_BUFFER (corresponding NTSTATUS: STATUS_BUFFER_TOO_SMALL, or possibly STATUS_INVALID_BUFFER_SIZE), and not some other error. > + > + ret = GetLogicalProcessorInformation(buffer, &buflen); > + ok(ret, "glpi call with resulting buflen (%d)\n", buflen); Trace the LastError (ntdll: return status) here, too. > + > + n = buflen / sizeof(SYSTEM_LOGICAL_PROCESSOR_INFORMATION); > + > + printf("glpi result: %d array elements.\n", n); Don't use printf(3); use trace(). > + > +#ifdef NONAMELESSUNION > +#define BUFFER_I buffer[i].u > +#else > +#define BUFFER_I buffer[i] > +#endif /* NONAMELESSUNION */ Like I said above, just use U(buffer[i]). > + > + for (i = 0; i < n; i++) > + { > + switch (buffer[i].Relationship) > + { > + case RelationProcessorCore: > + printf("ProcessorCore idx=%03d mask=%lxh flags=%u\n", > + i, buffer[i].ProcessorMask, BUFFER_I.ProcessorCore.Flags); > + break; > + case RelationNumaNode: > + printf("NumaNode idx=%03d mask=%lxh noden=%u\n", > + i, buffer[i].ProcessorMask, BUFFER_I.NumaNode.NodeNumber); > + break; > + case RelationCache: > + printf("Cache idx=%03d mask=%lxh " > + "l=%u, a=%u, ls=%u, sz=%u, ty=%u\n", > + i, buffer[i].ProcessorMask, > + BUFFER_I.Cache.Level, BUFFER_I.Cache.Associativity, > + BUFFER_I.Cache.LineSize, BUFFER_I.Cache.Size, > + BUFFER_I.Cache.Type); > + break; > + case RelationProcessorPackage: > + printf("ProcessorPack idx=%03d mask=%lxh\n", > + i, buffer[i].ProcessorMask); For all of these, use trace() instead of printf(3). > + break; > + default: > + ok(0, "invalid relationship %d", buffer[i].Relationship); > + } > + } > +#undef BUFFER_I > +} > + > +START_TEST(glpi) > +{ > + test_glpi(); > +} > + > -- > 1.6.4 > > > One general note about your patch: use spaces, not tabs. The rest of the file only uses tabs in doc comments. Chip

4 7

Re: dinput: Stub IDirectInputJoyConfig8 interface. (try 2)
by Jacek Caban Nov. 25, 2011

Nov. 25, 2011

Hi Vitaliy, On 11/25/11 04:17, Vitaliy Margolen wrote: > Fix QueryInterface, simplify use of AddRef, and replace "LPDIRECTINPUTJOYCONFIG8" > with "IDirectInputJoyConfig8 *". > --- > dlls/dinput/dinput_main.c | 7 ++ > dlls/dinput/dinput_private.h | 2 + > dlls/dinput/joystick.c | 196 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > include/dinputd.h | 243 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 4 files changed, 448 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 include/dinputd.h > + if (IsEqualGUID(&IID_IDirectInputJoyConfig8, riid )) + { + return create_joy_config( riid, ppobj ); + } This has the same problem as we discussed about msxml3 lately: http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2011-November/093279.html Are you sure native is broken the same way? +static const IDirectInputJoyConfig8Vtbl JoyConfig8vt; + +HRESULT create_joy_config(REFIID riid, LPVOID *object) +{ + IDirectInputJoyConfig8Impl *new_joy_config; + + TRACE("(%s, %p)\n", debugstr_guid(riid), object); + + new_joy_config = HeapAlloc(GetProcessHeap(), HEAP_ZERO_MEMORY, sizeof(*new_joy_config)); + if (!new_joy_config) return DIERR_OUTOFMEMORY; + + new_joy_config->IDirectInputJoyConfig8_iface.lpVtbl =&JoyConfig8vt; + *object = new_joy_config; + + return DI_OK; +} If you moved create_joy_config to the bottom of the file, you wouldn't need JoyConfig8vt forward declaration. +static HRESULT WINAPI JoyConfig8Impl_QueryInterface(IDirectInputJoyConfig8 *iface, REFIID riid, void** object) +{ + IDirectInputJoyConfig8Impl *This = impl_from_IDirectInputJoyConfig8(iface); + + TRACE("(%p)->(%s, %p)\n", iface, debugstr_guid(riid), object); + + if (IsEqualGUID(&IID_IUnknown, riid) || + IsEqualGUID(&IID_IDirectInput8W, riid)) Here is a typo, it should be IID_IDirectInputJoyConfig8. Jacek

2 1

Re: [PATCH] server: assert on failure to open /dev/null (Coverity)
by Eric Pouech Nov. 25, 2011

Nov. 25, 2011

Marcus, IMO,fatal_error() should be preferred over assert() (hoping that fatal_error() is actually marked as no_return) A+ 2011/11/25 Marcus Meissner <meissner(a)suse.de> > Hi, > > if we cannot open /dev/null something is really broken. > CID 5470 > > Ciao, Marcus > --- > server/request.c | 1 + > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/server/request.c b/server/request.c > index 05c7464..06fdbe8 100644 > --- a/server/request.c > +++ b/server/request.c > @@ -760,6 +760,7 @@ void open_master_socket(void) > > /* make sure the stdio fds are open */ > fd = open( "/dev/null", O_RDWR ); > + assert (fd != -1); > while (fd >= 0 && fd <= 2) fd = dup( fd ); > > if (!server_dir) fatal_error( "directory %s cannot be accessed\n", > config_dir ); > -- > 1.7.1 > > > > -- -- Eric Pouech

2 1

Re: [PATCH 1/2] kernel32: implement GetLogicalProcessorInformation
by Marvin Nov. 25, 2011

Nov. 25, 2011

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=15626 Your paranoid android. === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit glpi) === Timeout === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit glpi) === Timeout

1 0

Re: cmd: Use WCMD_output_asis*() for strings that are not supposed to contain formating directives.
by Frédéric Delanoy Nov. 24, 2011

Nov. 24, 2011

On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 00:30, Francois Gouget <fgouget(a)free.fr> wrote: > Using WCMD_output*() instead could cause crashes. > --- > > For instance if a filename is '%s'. > This patch should not interfere with the previous one. > - WCMD_output(newline); > + WCMD_output_asis(newline); ... > static const WCHAR newLine2[] = {'\n','\n','\0'}; > - if (!bare) WCMD_output (newLine2); > + if (!bare) WCMD_output_asis (newLine2); ... > - WCMD_output(anykey); > + WCMD_output_asis(anykey); No need to change those, since we control those strings, and those are generic strings with no '%' directive. > - WCMD_output (version_string); > + WCMD_output_asis (version_string); This one does contain a %s ( WCMD_VERSION,"CMD Version %s\n"), but we control the version string as well (currently Wine version), so shouldn't probably be changed. > @@ -430,13 +430,13 @@ static DIRECTORY_STACK *WCMD_list_directory (DIRECTORY_STACK *inputparms, int le > strcatW(&temp[toWrite], space); > toWrite++; > if (toWrite > 99) { > - WCMD_output(temp); > + WCMD_output_asis(temp); > toWrite = 0; > strcpyW(temp, nullW); > } > padding--; > } > - WCMD_output(temp); > + WCMD_output_asis(temp); > } It's just doing padding with plain spaces, so no changes needed here. The remaining hunks should be OK. Frédéric

2 2

Re: winhttp: Resolve the server name only on the first request.
by Alexandre Julliard Nov. 24, 2011

Nov. 24, 2011

Hans Leidekker <hans(a)codeweavers.com> writes: > - send_callback( &request->hdr, WINHTTP_CALLBACK_STATUS_RESOLVING_NAME, connect->servername, strlenW(connect->servername) + 1 ); > + if (connect->sockaddr.ss_family == 0xffff) > + { This won't work on Mac OS, ss_family is a byte: gcc -m32 -c -I. -I. -I../../include -I../../include -D__WINESRC__ -D_REENTRANT -fPIC -Wall -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wempty-body -Wstrict-prototypes -Wwrite-strings -fno-omit-frame-pointer -Wpointer-arith -I/sw/include/freetype2 -I/sw/include -I/sw/include -g -O2 -o request.o request.c request.c: In function 'open_connection': request.c:931: warning: comparison is always false due to limited range of data type -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

1 0

Re: dinput: Stub IDirectInputJoyConfig8 interface.
by Michael Stefaniuc Nov. 24, 2011

Nov. 24, 2011

Hello Vitaliy, On 11/24/2011 06:28 PM, Vitaliy Margolen wrote: > --- > dlls/dinput/dinput_main.c | 7 ++ > dlls/dinput/dinput_private.h | 2 + > dlls/dinput/joystick.c | 195 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > include/dinputd.h | 243 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 4 files changed, 447 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 include/dinputd.h we are trying to get rid off the LPJUNK, IDirectInputJoyConfig8 * is so much more nicer than LPDIRECTINPUTJOYCONFIG8. While the above is more of a nit-pick (and an easy search and replace patch for me) the QueryInterface implementation is not correct: - Query for IID_IUnknown is not supported. - Use IDirectInputJoyConfig8_AddRef() on the interface without the cast - You can save the round trip over impl_from_IDirectInputJoyConfig8() as iface and &This->IDirectInputJoyConfig8_iface are the exact same thing. bye michael

2 2

Sugestion about wine
by Kane Jade Nov. 24, 2011

Nov. 24, 2011

Perhaps the program Zynamics BinNavi is useful to analyze the win32 applications, etc: Zynamics BinNavi is the primary binary code reverse engineering tool based on graph visualization Description BinNavi is a binary code reverse engineering tool that was built to assist vulnerability researchers who look for vulnerabilities in disassembled code. With BinNavi you can analyze disassembled x86, ARM, PowerPC, and MIPS code using the powerful built-in static code analysis techniques. In cases where static code analysis is not enough, you can use the built-in debuggers to get a live view on the program you are analyzing. Use Cases - Do *control flow based code analysis* of disassembled x86, ARM, MIPS, and PowerPC code - *Cut down on complexity* by removing unimportant code from functions - Use *powerful remote debuggers* to debug programs on different operating systems - Use Differential Debugging to *quickly locate relevant code* - Create and assign user-defined tags to *mark important functions and basic blocks* - Use *advanced code analysis algorithms* to keep track of data and code - Manage all your reverse engineering projects in *one central database* - Write *scripts and plugins to extend BinNavi* to meet your specific goals - Rename and *annotate variables and functions* to make them self-explanatory - Use the REIL meta-language to *write platform-independent program analysis code* To learn more about the features and use cases of BinNavi please take a look at the BinNavi manual<http://www.zynamics.com/binnavi/manual/index.htm> . I think that it is easier to see how they are running operations on files connected with the BinNavi program. Since is a transparent, simpler and interesting debugger. link http://www.zynamics.com/binnavi.html Forgive this text is translated by translatica.pl.

2 1

Re: [PATCH] kernel32: implement GetLogicalProcessorInformation
by Marvin Nov. 24, 2011

Nov. 24, 2011

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=15612 Your paranoid android. === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit glpi) === Timeout === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit glpi) === Timeout

1 0

Re: cmd: Print error messages on stderr, not on stdout.
by Frédéric Delanoy Nov. 24, 2011

Nov. 24, 2011

On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 00:29, Francois Gouget <fgouget(a)free.fr> wrote: > --- > > I consider messages like 'Not Yet Implemented' and 'No Argument' to be > errors so that they should go to stderr. But maybe there's a strong > argument for not doing it that way. Your point is valid. I changed some/most of those myself some time ago. However the test suite fails with your patch applied (e.g. for the incomplete "for" construct). Some of the hunks might be applied though, but you'd have to run the test suite to be sure. Frédéric

1 0

Re: [PATCH] wininet: Initialize netconn_stream's content_length
by Jacek Caban Nov. 23, 2011

Nov. 23, 2011

Hi Andy, On 11/22/11 5:49 AM, Andy Clayton wrote: > The size that net_conn_read reads is limited by netconn_stream's > remaining content_length, so if the content_length is zero it reads > nothing. It also means that the read size it returns is 0, which > typically indicates that the socket was closed. As a result of the > change from 193da884ad9b982d9b740b15453aa8d3c19b054f, > HTTP_ReceiveRequestData acts on the read size of 0 and closes the > connection. HttpSendRequest calls HTTP_ReceiveRequestData if there is no > post data, closing the connection with none of the response data ever > being read. > > This patch fixes this case by initializing netconn_stream's > content_length to ~0. > > Fixes http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27816 > This doesn't seem right. At the point where we call HTTP_ReceiveRequestData, content_length is supposed to be set based on response header. The bug must be somewhere else. Jacek

2 3

Re: po: Update French translation (try 2)
by Frédéric Delanoy Nov. 22, 2011

Nov. 22, 2011

2011/11/22 Frédéric Delanoy <frederic.delanoy(a)gmail.com>: > try 2: xB -> xO > --- > po/fr.po | 52 +++++++++++++++++++--------------------------------- > 1 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-) Seems you have committed the initial version. I'll change 'bytes' to 'octets' on next po update round, therefore you may forget about this patch. Frédéric

1 0

Re: po: Update French translation
by Francois Gouget Nov. 22, 2011

Nov. 22, 2011

On Mon, 21 Nov 2011, Frédéric Delanoy wrote: [...] > msgid "%1!u!MB used, %2!u!MB available" > -msgstr "%u MB utilisés, %u MB disponibles" > +msgstr "%1!u! MB utilisés, %2!u! MB disponibles" [...] > msgctxt "unit kilobyte" > msgid "kB" > -msgstr "" > +msgstr "kB" > > #: winefile.rc:122 > msgctxt "unit megabyte" > msgid "MB" > -msgstr "" > +msgstr "MB" > > #: winefile.rc:123 > msgctxt "unit gigabyte" > msgid "GB" > -msgstr "" > +msgstr "GB" kB, MB and GB should be translated to ko, Mo and Go respectively. -- Francois Gouget <fgouget(a)free.fr> http://fgouget.free.fr/ Linux: the choice of a GNU generation

2 3

Re: [PATCH 1/2] jscript: Added tests of unary '+' on not existent property
by Marvin Nov. 22, 2011

Nov. 22, 2011

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=15587 Your paranoid android. === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WXPPROSP3 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WVISTAADM (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K8SE (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PRO (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === TEST64_W7SP1 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found === TEST64_W7SP1 (64 bit) === No test summary line found

1 0

Re: [4/5] ntdll: Remove an invalid test.
by Alexandre Julliard Nov. 22, 2011

Nov. 22, 2011

Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)baikal.ru> writes: > The test initializers that call GetProcAddress() do write to the same section > where the static buffer resides, which leads to the image section protection > change. That doesn't make the test invalid. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

2 3

Re: [PATCH] dxgi: 0 / 0 means 0 for a DXGI_RATIONAL
by Henri Verbeet Nov. 22, 2011

Nov. 22, 2011

On 22 November 2011 00:42, Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu <eduard.munteanu(a)linux360.ro> wrote: > This fixes a division by zero generated in Unigine Tropics in D3D10 > mode. It also adds a helper to handle such conversions, which takes the > form of a macro so we don't need to worry about the result's type. > I'd prefer an actual function. A small test for this probably wouldn't hurt either.

1 0

Re: winefile: Make it possible to translate the disk size units.
by Francois Gouget Nov. 22, 2011

Nov. 22, 2011

On Sat, 19 Nov 2011, Francois Gouget wrote: [...] > - static const WCHAR sFmtGB[] = {'%', '.', '1', 'f', ' ', 'G', 'B', '\0'}; > - static const WCHAR sFmtMB[] = {'%', '.', '1', 'f', ' ', 'M', 'B', '\0'}; > - static const WCHAR sFmtkB[] = {'%', '.', '1', 'f', ' ', 'k', 'B', '\0'}; To be totally correct these should actually be 'GiB', 'MiB' and 'kiB' (the code divides by powers of 1024). However that may be too geeky for regular users so I'm not sure we want to do that. But now is probably a good time to debate this. Here are two reference points: * On Windows winefile and explorer use 'KB' & co for the disk space although they divide by '1024'. * Nautilus uses 'kiB' & co. Another point is that we always display the exact byte count for file sizes instead of converting it to 'KB', 'MB', etc. That actually matches winfile but seems pretty cubersome. On Windows Explorer does show file sizes as 'KB', 'MB', etc. so that's what users would expect and I think it's a place where we could follow suite. -- Francois Gouget <fgouget(a)free.fr> http://fgouget.free.fr/ If you think the whole world revolves around you, quit staring at the GPS display while driving.

3 2

regression bisected to commit: gdi32: Implement nulldrv_StretchDIBits using the PutImage gdi driver function.
by Wolfgang Walter Nov. 21, 2011

Nov. 21, 2011

Hello, I just tested version 1.3.33. With this version an application we use shows its icons with wrong colors. The background of the icons is wrong, too. I bisected it to commit c9a7bb715d2db1512db30deb11e4676e76791a07. I then checked that by replacing nulldrv_StretchDIBits in 1.3.33 with its older implementation. c9a7bb715d2db1512db30deb11e4676e76791a07 is the first bad commit commit c9a7bb715d2db1512db30deb11e4676e76791a07 Author: Huw Davies <huw(a)codeweavers.com> Date: Mon Oct 17 15:46:07 2011 +0100 gdi32: Implement nulldrv_StretchDIBits using the PutImage gdi driver function. :040000 040000 e4cfeee3adcb0fe2c0502909c87b2740a8de08e5 00851b246b095bdf4cafd3e6f9965c811d1c87a4 M dlls Regards, -- Wolfgang Walter Studentenwerk München Anstalt des öffentlichen Rechts Abteilungsleiter IT Leopoldstraße 15 80802 München

2 1

Question about messages and the windows these need.
by Joerg-Cyril.Hoehle＠t-systems.com Nov. 21, 2011

Nov. 21, 2011

Hi, Alexandre Julliard wrote in http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2011-July/090969.html >If you are going to wait for a reply it would be better to create a >HWND_MESSAGE window and do a SendMessage to it, then you get all the >synchronization for free. MMSYSTEM_MidiStream_Player needs a patch to fix bug #28388. Such a patch will likely introduce sending Suspend & Resume messages to the MIDI player (to be able to wait for the resume signal). So I believe this same advice applies. MMSYSTEM_MidiStream_PostMessage already contains a PostThreadMessage + MsgWait pair that looks like it should be replaced, correct? OTOH, I'm unsettled whether MidiStreamSuspend & -Restart should wait for a reply to the message, so PostThreadMessage may be enough. Furthermore, I'm unsure about the implications of adding a dummy window and message queue. The MSDN blogs contain repeated warnings about the obligation to pump the message queue and GUI apps hanging when some random app fails to do so in all situations. Won't that window receive all kinds of broadcast messages? No, says MSDN http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ms632599%28v=vs.85%… The MIDI sequencer uses simplistic timing based on GetTickCount. Won't that allow arbitrary foreign window callbacks to disturb the timing of the MIDI sequencer? Instead of inventing message names like #define WINE_MSM_STOP (WM_USER+1) Why not re-use message names like MCI_STOP even if it's not in MCI format? (sounds like a hack...) Thank you for your help, Jörg Höhle

1 0

Re: [PATCH 1/1] user32: Fix 64-bit 'msg' test hang in test_timers.
by Alexandre Julliard Nov. 21, 2011

Nov. 21, 2011

"Erich E. Hoover" <ehoover(a)mines.edu> writes: > Real Name: > Erich Hoover > > Description: > The TestBot ran into a hanging issue (noticed with, but unrelated > to, my previous user32 patch) and I took some time today to track the > problem down. Currently, on the 64-bit test system the test_timers() > tests hang waiting for PeekMessage() to clear the message queue. The > attached patch kills the timer just prior to the PeekMessage() call, > thereby keeping the test from hanging indefinitely. > > Changelog: > user32: Fix 64-bit 'msg' test hang in test_timers. That defeats the purpose of the test. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

2 1

Re: [1/4] msxml3: Added common ISupportErrorInfo implementation
by Jacek Caban Nov. 21, 2011

Nov. 21, 2011

Hi Nikolay, On 11/21/11 08:24, Nikolay Sivov wrote: > Added common ISupportErrorInfo implementation +/* common ISupportErrorInfo implementation */ +typedef struct { + ISupportErrorInfo ISupportErrorInfo_iface; + LONG ref; + + const tid_t* iids; +} SupportErrorInfo; + +static inline SupportErrorInfo *impl_from_ISupportErrorInfo(ISupportErrorInfo *iface) +{ + return CONTAINING_RECORD(iface, SupportErrorInfo, ISupportErrorInfo_iface); +} + +static HRESULT WINAPI SupportErrorInfo_QueryInterface(ISupportErrorInfo *iface, REFIID riid, void **obj) +{ + SupportErrorInfo *This = impl_from_ISupportErrorInfo(iface); + TRACE("(%p)->(%s %p)\n", This, debugstr_guid(riid), obj); + + *obj = NULL; + + if (IsEqualGUID(riid,&IID_IUnknown) || IsEqualGUID(riid,&IID_ISupportErrorInfo)) { + *obj = iface; + ISupportErrorInfo_AddRef(iface); + return S_OK; + } + + return E_NOINTERFACE; +} This doesn't seem to be the right approach. You need to return here interfaces of an object that inherits your ISupportErrorInfo implementation - that's the COM rule. Also you probably don't want to create new SupportErrorInfo instance on each QI call. I'd suggest DispatchEx-like approach in this case (or even abuse DispatchEx object and add ISupportErrorInfo there). Jacek

2 5

Re: [PATCH 1/2] jscript: Use bytecode for binary negation implementation
by Marvin Nov. 21, 2011

Nov. 21, 2011

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=15559 Your paranoid android. === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WXPPROSP3 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WVISTAADM (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K8SE (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PRO (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === TEST64_W7SP1 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found === TEST64_W7SP1 (64 bit) === No test summary line found

1 0

Re: qedit/tests: Add SampleGrabber COM aggregation test.
by Marvin Nov. 21, 2011

Nov. 21, 2011

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=15558 Your paranoid android. === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit mediadet) === mediadet.c:147: Test failed: CoCreateInstance failed with 80040154 mediadet.c:148: Test failed: pM is NULL mediadet: unhandled exception c0000005 at 004015A2 === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit mediadet) === mediadet.c:147: Test failed: CoCreateInstance failed with 80040154 mediadet.c:148: Test failed: pM is NULL mediadet: unhandled exception c0000005 at 004015A2 === W2K8SE (32 bit mediadet) === mediadet.c:147: Test failed: CoCreateInstance failed with 80040154 mediadet.c:148: Test failed: pM is NULL mediadet: unhandled exception c0000005 at 004015A2

2 1

Re: user32/tests: Drop superfluous function pointer casts.
by Marvin Nov. 21, 2011

Nov. 21, 2011

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=15553 Your paranoid android. === W7PROX64 (64 bit msg) === Timeout === TEST64_W7SP1 (64 bit msg) === Timeout

2 1

re: ID3DXEffect test on win
by Dan Kegel Nov. 20, 2011

Nov. 20, 2011

Hi Rico, I compiled the 32 bit wine tests on win7 64 bit using cygwin, and sure enough, there are 40 test failures there. You should probably avoid doing direct equality tests on floats; see e.g. compare() at line 47 of d3dx9_36/tests/mesh.c. You may have to tweak the slop value. (Google floating point comparison if you want the gory details of how tools like google test and boost's test_tools do it right.) effect.c:894: Test failed: 0 - f3: GetValue value[2] failed, got 0x3e50d0d2, expected 0x3e50d0d1 effect.c:1142: Test failed: 0 - f3: GetFloatArray favalue[2] failed, got 0.203922, expected 0.203922 effect.c:1211: Test failed: 0 - f3: GetVector fvalue[2] failed, got 0.203922, expected 0.203922 effect.c:1461: Test failed: 0 - f3: GetMatrixTranspose fvalue[2] failed, got 0.203922, expected 0.203922 effect.c:894: Test failed: 0 - f4: GetValue value[2] failed, got 0x3e50d0d2, expected 0x3e50d0d1 effect.c:894: Test failed: 0 - f4: GetValue value[3] failed, got 0x3df8f8fa, expected 0x3df8f8f9 effect.c:1142: Test failed: 0 - f4: GetFloatArray favalue[2] failed, got 0.203922, expected 0.203922 effect.c:1142: Test failed: 0 - f4: GetFloatArray favalue[3] failed, got 0.121569, expected 0.121569 effect.c:1211: Test failed: 0 - f4: GetVector fvalue[2] failed, got 0.203922, expected 0.203922 effect.c:1211: Test failed: 0 - f4: GetVector fvalue[3] failed, got 0.121569, expected 0.121569 effect.c:1461: Test failed: 0 - f4: GetMatrixTranspose fvalue[2] failed, got 0.203922, expected 0.203922 effect.c:1461: Test failed: 0 - f4: GetMatrixTranspose fvalue[3] failed, got 0.121569, expected 0.121569 effect.c:894: Test failed: 0 - f31: GetValue value[2] failed, got 0x3e50d0d2, expected 0x3e50d0d1 effect.c:1142: Test failed: 0 - f31: GetFloatArray favalue[2] failed, got 0.203922, expected 0.203922 effect.c:1321: Test failed: 0 - f31: GetMatrix fvalue[8] failed, got 0.203922, expected 0.203922 effect.c:1438: Test failed: 0 - f31: GetMatrixTranspose fvalue[2] failed, got 0.203922, expected 0.203922 effect.c:894: Test failed: 0 - f41: GetValue value[2] failed, got 0x3e50d0d2, expected 0x3e50d0d1 effect.c:894: Test failed: 0 - f41: GetValue value[3] failed, got 0x3df8f8fa, expected 0x3df8f8f9 effect.c:1142: Test failed: 0 - f41: GetFloatArray favalue[2] failed, got 0.203922, expected 0.203922 effect.c:1142: Test failed: 0 - f41: GetFloatArray favalue[3] failed, got 0.121569, expected 0.121569 effect.c:1321: Test failed: 0 - f41: GetMatrix fvalue[8] failed, got 0.203922, expected 0.203922 effect.c:1321: Test failed: 0 - f41: GetMatrix fvalue[12] failed, got 0.121569, expected 0.121569 effect.c:1438: Test failed: 0 - f41: GetMatrixTranspose fvalue[2] failed, got 0.203922, expected 0.203922 effect.c:1438: Test failed: 0 - f41: GetMatrixTranspose fvalue[3] failed, got 0.121569, expected 0.121569 effect.c:894: Test failed: 3 - f3: GetValue value[2] failed, got 0x3e50d0d2, expected 0x3e50d0d1 effect.c:1142: Test failed: 3 - f3: GetFloatArray favalue[2] failed, got 0.203922, expected 0.203922 effect.c:1211: Test failed: 3 - f3: GetVector fvalue[2] failed, got 0.203922, expected 0.203922 effect.c:1461: Test failed: 3 - f3: GetMatrixTranspose fvalue[2] failed, got 0.203922, expected 0.203922 effect.c:894: Test failed: 3 - f3min: GetValue value[2] failed, got 0x3e50d0d2, expected 0x3e50d0d1 effect.c:1142: Test failed: 3 - f3min: GetFloatArray favalue[2] failed, got 0.203922, expected 0.203922 effect.c:1211: Test failed: 3 - f3min: GetVector fvalue[2] failed, got 0.203922, expected 0.203922 effect.c:1461: Test failed: 3 - f3min: GetMatrixTranspose fvalue[2] failed, got 0.203922, expected 0.203922 effect.c:894: Test failed: 3 - f3max: GetValue value[2] failed, got 0x3e50d0d2, expected 0x3e50d0d1 effect.c:1142: Test failed: 3 - f3max: GetFloatArray favalue[2] failed, got 0.203922, expected 0.203922 effect.c:1211: Test failed: 3 - f3max: GetVector fvalue[2] failed, got 0.203922, expected 0.203922 effect.c:1461: Test failed: 3 - f3max: GetMatrixTranspose fvalue[2] failed, got 0.203922, expected 0.203922 effect.c:894: Test failed: 3 - f4: GetValue value[2] failed, got 0x3e50d0d2, expected 0x3e50d0d1 effect.c:894: Test failed: 3 - f4: GetValue value[3] failed, got 0x3df8f8fa, expected 0x3df8f8f9 effect.c:1142: Test failed: 3 - f4: GetFloatArray favalue[2] failed, got 0.203922, expected 0.203922 effect.c:1142: Test failed: 3 - f4: GetFloatArray favalue[3] failed, got 0.121569, expected 0.121569 effect.c:1211: Test failed: 3 - f4: GetVector fvalue[2] failed, got 0.203922, expected 0.203922 effect.c:1211: Test failed: 3 - f4: GetVector fvalue[3] failed, got 0.121569, expected 0.121569 effect.c:1461: Test failed: 3 - f4: GetMatrixTranspose fvalue[2] failed, got 0.203922, expected 0.203922 effect.c:1461: Test failed: 3 - f4: GetMatrixTranspose fvalue[3] failed, got 0.121569, expected 0.121569 effect.c:894: Test failed: 3 - f4min: GetValue value[2] failed, got 0x3e50d0d2, expected 0x3e50d0d1 effect.c:894: Test failed: 3 - f4min: GetValue value[3] failed, got 0x3df8f8fa, expected 0x3df8f8f9 effect.c:1142: Test failed: 3 - f4min: GetFloatArray favalue[2] failed, got 0.203922, expected 0.203922 effect.c:1142: Test failed: 3 - f4min: GetFloatArray favalue[3] failed, got 0.121569, expected 0.121569 effect.c:1211: Test failed: 3 - f4min: GetVector fvalue[2] failed, got 0.203922, expected 0.203922 effect.c:1211: Test failed: 3 - f4min: GetVector fvalue[3] failed, got 0.121569, expected 0.121569 effect.c:1461: Test failed: 3 - f4min: GetMatrixTranspose fvalue[2] failed, got 0.203922, expected 0.203922 effect.c:1461: Test failed: 3 - f4min: GetMatrixTranspose fvalue[3] failed, got 0.121569, expected 0.121569 effect.c:894: Test failed: 3 - f4max: GetValue value[2] failed, got 0x3e50d0d2, expected 0x3e50d0d1 effect.c:894: Test failed: 3 - f4max: GetValue value[3] failed, got 0x3df8f8fa, expected 0x3df8f8f9 effect.c:1142: Test failed: 3 - f4max: GetFloatArray favalue[2] failed, got 0.203922, expected 0.203922 effect.c:1142: Test failed: 3 - f4max: GetFloatArray favalue[3] failed, got 0.121569, expected 0.121569 effect.c:1211: Test failed: 3 - f4max: GetVector fvalue[2] failed, got 0.203922, expected 0.203922 effect.c:1211: Test failed: 3 - f4max: GetVector fvalue[3] failed, got 0.121569, expected 0.121569 effect.c:1461: Test failed: 3 - f4max: GetMatrixTranspose fvalue[2] failed, got 0.203922, expected 0.203922 effect.c:1461: Test failed: 3 - f4max: GetMatrixTranspose fvalue[3] failed, got 0.121569, expected 0.121569 effect: 1222410 tests executed (0 marked as todo, 60 failures), 0 skipped.

2 1

Re: [3/4] winemaker: Be less picky when detecting the target type (try 2)
by Vitaliy Margolen Nov. 20, 2011

Nov. 20, 2011

On 11/19/2011 11:42 AM, André Hentschel wrote: > this catches more than one 0 after the space and possible 0s after the x > + if (/[[:space:]]0+x0*101$/) { For more then one you should use "+" not "*". "*" means any number, including 0. Vitaliy

2 1

Re: added moethod stub for HttpPrepareUrl in dlls/httpapi/httpapi_main.c
by Bruno Jesus Nov. 20, 2011

Nov. 20, 2011

You have to use your full name (as advised before). See http://wiki.winehq.org/SubmittingPatches for more information. Also, gmail is breaking your patch, attach the patch file instead of pasting it to the email body. Best wishes, Bruno On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 09:24, ArasH <arash.cordi(a)gmail.com> wrote: > --- > dlls/httpapi/httpapi_main.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/dlls/httpapi/httpapi_main.c b/dlls/httpapi/httpapi_main.c > index 3375cb6..c5c8cda 100644 > --- a/dlls/httpapi/httpapi_main.c > +++ b/dlls/httpapi/httpapi_main.c > @@ -85,6 +85,27 @@ ULONG WINAPI HttpTerminate( ULONG flags, PVOID reserved ) > } > > /*********************************************************************** > + * HttpPrepareUrl (HTTPAPI.@) > + * parses, analyzes, and normalizes a non-normalized Unicode or punycode URL > + * so it is safe and valid to use in other HTTP functions. > + * > + * PARAMS > + * reserved [IO] reserved, must be NULL > + * flags [ I] reserved. must be zero > + * url [ I] a pointer to a string that represents the > non-normalized URL > + * prepared_url [ O] on success, a pointer to a string > representing the normalized URL. > + * > + * RETURNS > + * ERROR_SUCCESS if function succeeds, or error code if function fails > + * > + */ > +ULONG WINAPI HttpPrepareUrl( PVOID reserved, ULONG flags, PCWSTR url, > PWSTR *prepared_url) > +{ > + FIXME( "(%p, 0x%x, %p): stub!\n", reserved, flags, url ); > + return ERROR_SUCCESS; > +} > + > +/*********************************************************************** > * HttpDeleteServiceConfiguration (HTTPAPI.@) > * > * Remove configuration record from HTTP Server API configuration store > -- > 1.6.2.2 > > >

1 0

ID3DXEffect test on win
by Rico Schüller Nov. 19, 2011

Nov. 19, 2011

Hi, I've written some tests for the ID3DXEffect interface. The test is attached as source. What I'd like to know is if there are some rounding issues on some win versions. The test needs d3dx9_36.dll. I tried it on wine with native d3dx9_36.dll and got around 60 rounding errors (only on the combination SetInt() and GetValue/FloatArray/Vector/Matrix/MatrixTranspose). It would be nice if there is anyone interested in running those and would report the result. I'm looking for results on XP/W7/Vista. If you don't have a cross compiler and like to try the test, I could send the executable. Cheers Rico

1 0

Re: ntdll: Revert 33b0f0edffa0c8a06b4ee8831c92fdc373f83ece.
by Alexandre Julliard Nov. 18, 2011

Nov. 18, 2011

Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)baikal.ru> writes: > The tests clearly show that this commit is wrong. If there is an application > or a test case which fails because of this, it would be helpful to at least > mention it. It fixes the test for .bss protection, in ntdll:info.c. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

4 8

Translations strangeness
by Luca Bennati Nov. 18, 2011

Nov. 18, 2011

Hi all, I would like to clarify some doubts I have about Wine translations and its po/rc files: 1- Are the following highlighted strings errors from the script converting from rc to po or due to malformatted po files (seems not to recognize msgctx lines)? http://source.winehq.org/transl/resource.php?branch=master&lang=009%3A01&re… http://source.winehq.org/transl/resource.php?branch=master&lang=009%3A01&re… 2- Are the following highlighted strings (and similar) translatable or they were wrongly recognized by script? http://source.winehq.org/transl/resource.php?branch=master&lang=010%3A00&re… http://source.winehq.org/transl/resource.php?branch=master&lang=010%3A00&re… http://source.winehq.org/transl/resource.php?branch=master&lang=010%3A00&re… 3- How is it that the following highlighted strings are translated in po files but seems not to be taken in consideration from script? http://source.winehq.org/transl/resource.php?branch=master&lang=010%3A00&re… http://source.winehq.org/transl/resource.php?branch=master&lang=010%3A00&re… http://source.winehq.org/transl/resource.php?branch=master&lang=010%3A00&re… http://source.winehq.org/transl/resource.php?branch=master&lang=010%3A00&re… None here) I took the italian translations as example because I'm its actual volunteer maintainer and I know them. In summary, is it our (the translators) or my fault or is the script lacking? Nonetheless, how can we solve those issues?

2 1

Re: [5/5]usp10: Itemize numbers outside of the basic ascii set in a seperate script.
by Marvin Nov. 18, 2011

Nov. 18, 2011

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=15519 Your paranoid android. === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit usp10) === usp10.c:400: Test failed: 0:Wrong fRTL(1) usp10.c:400: Test failed: 0:Wrong fLayoutRTL(1) usp10.c:400: Test failed: 0:Wrong BidiLevel(1) usp10.c:431: Test failed: 0:Wrong fRTL(1) usp10.c:431: Test failed: 0:Wrong fLayoutRTL(1) usp10.c:431: Test failed: 0:Wrong BidiLevel(1) usp10.c:433: Test failed: Wrong number of items usp10.c:433: Test failed: 1:Wrong CharPos (3) usp10.c:433: Test failed: 1:Wrong fRTL(1) usp10.c:433: Test failed: 1:Wrong fLayoutRTL(1) usp10.c:433: Test failed: 1:Wrong BidiLevel(1) usp10.c:433: Test failed: 2:Wrong CharPos === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit usp10) === usp10.c:400: Test failed: 0:Wrong fRTL(1) usp10.c:400: Test failed: 0:Wrong fLayoutRTL(1) usp10.c:400: Test failed: 0:Wrong BidiLevel(1) usp10.c:431: Test failed: 0:Wrong fRTL(1) usp10.c:431: Test failed: 0:Wrong fLayoutRTL(1) usp10.c:431: Test failed: 0:Wrong BidiLevel(1) usp10.c:433: Test failed: Wrong number of items usp10.c:433: Test failed: 1:Wrong CharPos (3) usp10.c:433: Test failed: 1:Wrong fRTL(1) usp10.c:433: Test failed: 1:Wrong fLayoutRTL(1) usp10.c:433: Test failed: 1:Wrong BidiLevel(1) usp10.c:433: Test failed: 2:Wrong CharPos === WXPPROSP3 (32 bit usp10) === usp10.c:433: Test failed: Wrong number of items usp10.c:433: Test failed: 1:Wrong CharPos (3) usp10.c:433: Test failed: 1:Wrong fRTL(1) usp10.c:433: Test failed: 1:Wrong fLayoutRTL(1) usp10.c:433: Test failed: 1:Wrong BidiLevel(1) usp10.c:433: Test failed: 2:Wrong CharPos === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit usp10) === usp10.c:433: Test failed: Wrong number of items usp10.c:433: Test failed: 1:Wrong CharPos (3) usp10.c:433: Test failed: 1:Wrong fRTL(1) usp10.c:433: Test failed: 1:Wrong fLayoutRTL(1) usp10.c:433: Test failed: 1:Wrong BidiLevel(1) usp10.c:433: Test failed: 2:Wrong CharPos

1 0

Re: [4/5]usp10: Windows breaks punctuation into 2 different script types.
by Marvin Nov. 18, 2011

Nov. 18, 2011

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=15518 Your paranoid android. === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit usp10) === usp10.c:393: Test failed: 0:Wrong fRTL(1) usp10.c:393: Test failed: 0:Wrong fLayoutRTL(1) usp10.c:393: Test failed: 0:Wrong BidiLevel(1) usp10.c:423: Test failed: 0:Wrong fRTL(1) usp10.c:423: Test failed: 0:Wrong fLayoutRTL(1) usp10.c:423: Test failed: 0:Wrong BidiLevel(1) usp10.c:425: Test failed: Wrong number of items usp10.c:425: Test failed: 1:Wrong CharPos (3) usp10.c:425: Test failed: 1:Wrong fRTL(1) usp10.c:425: Test failed: 1:Wrong fLayoutRTL(1) usp10.c:425: Test failed: 1:Wrong BidiLevel(1) usp10.c:425: Test failed: 2:Wrong CharPos (6) usp10.c:425: Test failed: 2:Wrong fRTL usp10.c:425: Test failed: 2:Wrong fLayoutRTL usp10.c:425: Test failed: 2:Wrong BidiLevel === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit usp10) === usp10.c:393: Test failed: 0:Wrong fRTL(1) usp10.c:393: Test failed: 0:Wrong fLayoutRTL(1) usp10.c:393: Test failed: 0:Wrong BidiLevel(1) usp10.c:423: Test failed: 0:Wrong fRTL(1) usp10.c:423: Test failed: 0:Wrong fLayoutRTL(1) usp10.c:423: Test failed: 0:Wrong BidiLevel(1) usp10.c:425: Test failed: Wrong number of items usp10.c:425: Test failed: 1:Wrong CharPos (3) usp10.c:425: Test failed: 1:Wrong fRTL(1) usp10.c:425: Test failed: 1:Wrong fLayoutRTL(1) usp10.c:425: Test failed: 1:Wrong BidiLevel(1) usp10.c:425: Test failed: 2:Wrong CharPos (6) usp10.c:425: Test failed: 2:Wrong fRTL usp10.c:425: Test failed: 2:Wrong fLayoutRTL usp10.c:425: Test failed: 2:Wrong BidiLevel === WXPPROSP3 (32 bit usp10) === usp10.c:425: Test failed: Wrong number of items usp10.c:425: Test failed: 1:Wrong CharPos (3) usp10.c:425: Test failed: 1:Wrong fRTL(1) usp10.c:425: Test failed: 1:Wrong fLayoutRTL(1) usp10.c:425: Test failed: 1:Wrong BidiLevel(1) usp10.c:425: Test failed: 2:Wrong CharPos (6) usp10.c:425: Test failed: 2:Wrong fRTL usp10.c:425: Test failed: 2:Wrong fLayoutRTL usp10.c:425: Test failed: 2:Wrong BidiLevel === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit usp10) === usp10.c:425: Test failed: Wrong number of items usp10.c:425: Test failed: 1:Wrong CharPos (3) usp10.c:425: Test failed: 1:Wrong fRTL(1) usp10.c:425: Test failed: 1:Wrong fLayoutRTL(1) usp10.c:425: Test failed: 1:Wrong BidiLevel(1) usp10.c:425: Test failed: 2:Wrong CharPos (6) usp10.c:425: Test failed: 2:Wrong fRTL usp10.c:425: Test failed: 2:Wrong fLayoutRTL usp10.c:425: Test failed: 2:Wrong BidiLevel

1 0

Re: [3/5]usp10: handle Combining Diacritical Marks
by Marvin Nov. 18, 2011

Nov. 18, 2011

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=15517 Your paranoid android. === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit usp10) === usp10.c:384: Test failed: 0:Wrong fRTL(1) usp10.c:384: Test failed: 0:Wrong fLayoutRTL(1) usp10.c:384: Test failed: 0:Wrong BidiLevel(1) usp10.c:413: Test failed: 0:Wrong fRTL(1) usp10.c:413: Test failed: 0:Wrong fLayoutRTL(1) usp10.c:413: Test failed: 0:Wrong BidiLevel(1) === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit usp10) === usp10.c:384: Test failed: 0:Wrong fRTL(1) usp10.c:384: Test failed: 0:Wrong fLayoutRTL(1) usp10.c:384: Test failed: 0:Wrong BidiLevel(1) usp10.c:413: Test failed: 0:Wrong fRTL(1) usp10.c:413: Test failed: 0:Wrong fLayoutRTL(1) usp10.c:413: Test failed: 0:Wrong BidiLevel(1)

1 0

Re: [PATCH 5/5] jscript: Use bytecode interpreter for logical negation expression
by Marvin Nov. 18, 2011

Nov. 18, 2011

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=15516 Your paranoid android. === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WXPPROSP3 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WVISTAADM (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K8SE (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PRO (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === TEST64_W7SP1 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found === TEST64_W7SP1 (64 bit) === No test summary line found

1 0

Re: ieframe: Fixed tests on IE9
by Marvin Nov. 18, 2011

Nov. 18, 2011

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=15514 Your paranoid android. === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit webbrowser) === webbrowser.c:3089: Test failed: Creating WebBrowser object failed: 80040154 webbrowser.c:3089: Test failed: Creating WebBrowser object failed: 80040154 webbrowser.c:3089: Test failed: Creating WebBrowser object failed: 80040154 webbrowser.c:3089: Test failed: Creating WebBrowser object failed: 80040154 webbrowser.c:3165: Test failed: Creating WebBrowser object failed: 80040154 === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit webbrowser) === webbrowser.c:2473: Test failed: expected GetOverridesKeyPath webbrowser.c:2477: Test failed: expected Invoke_SETSECURELOCKICON webbrowser.c:2478: Test failed: expected Invoke_FILEDOWNLOAD webbrowser.c:2087: Test failed: put_Resizable failed: 80004001 webbrowser.c:2088: Test failed: expected Invoke_WINDOWSETRESIZABLE webbrowser.c:2092: Test failed: put_Resizable failed: 80004001 webbrowser.c:2093: Test failed: expected Invoke_WINDOWSETRESIZABLE webbrowser.c:2473: Test failed: expected GetOverridesKeyPath webbrowser.c:2477: Test failed: expected Invoke_SETSECURELOCKICON webbrowser.c:2478: Test failed: expected Invoke_FILEDOWNLOAD webbrowser.c:405: Test failed: unexpected call Exec_SETDOWNLOADSTATE_0 webbrowser.c:2087: Test failed: put_Resizable failed: 80004001 webbrowser.c:2088: Test failed: expected Invoke_WINDOWSETRESIZABLE webbrowser.c:2092: Test failed: put_Resizable failed: 80004001 webbrowser.c:2093: Test failed: expected Invoke_WINDOWSETRESIZABLE webbrowser.c:2473: Test failed: expected GetOverridesKeyPath webbrowser.c:2477: Test failed: expected Invoke_SETSECURELOCKICON webbrowser.c:2478: Test failed: expected Invoke_FILEDOWNLOAD webbrowser.c:461: Test failed: unexpected nCmdID 29 webbrowser.c:959: Test failed: unexpected call GetContainer webbrowser.c:509: Test failed: unexpected call webbrowser.c:959: Test failed: unexpected call GetContainer webbrowser.c:509: Test failed: unexpected call webbrowser.c:2630: Test failed: expected Invoke_SETSECURELOCKICON webbrowser.c:2750: Test failed: expected TranslateUrl webbrowser.c:2751: Test failed: expected Invoke_BEFORENAVIGATE2 webbrowser.c:2752: Test failed: expected Invoke_PROPERTYCHANGE webbrowser.c:2758: Test failed: ReadyState = 1, expected 4 webbrowser.c:2582: Test failed: ReadyState = 1, expected 4 webbrowser.c:791: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_PROPERTYCHANGE webbrowser.c:807: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_BEFORENAVIGATE2 webbrowser.c:814: Test failed: ReadyState = 1, expected 4 webbrowser.c:606: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_AMBIENT_USERMODE webbrowser.c:606: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_AMBIENT_USERMODE webbrowser.c:609: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_AMBIENT_DLCONTROL webbrowser.c:613: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_AMBIENT_USERAGENT webbrowser.c:617: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_AMBIENT_PALETTE webbrowser.c:1509: Test failed: unexpected call GetOptionKeyPath webbrowser.c:354: Test failed: unexpected call QueryStatus_SETPROGRESSTEXT webbrowser.c:791: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_PROPERTYCHANGE webbrowser.c:791: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_PROPERTYCHANGE webbrowser.c:791: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_PROPERTYCHANGE webbrowser.c:791: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_PROPERTYCHANGE webbrowser.c:461: Test failed: unexpected nCmdID 26 webbrowser.c:461: Test failed: unexpected nCmdID 29 webbrowser.c:959: Test failed: unexpected call GetContainer webbrowser.c:509: Test failed: unexpected call webbrowser.c:892: Test failed: ReadyState = 1, expected 4 webbrowser.c:1520: Test failed: unexpected call GetDropTarget webbrowser.c:959: Test failed: unexpected call GetContainer webbrowser.c:509: Test failed: unexpected call webbrowser.c:2630: Test failed: expected Invoke_SETSECURELOCKICON webbrowser.c:3125: Test failed: doc != doc2 webbrowser.c:606: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_AMBIENT_USERMODE webbrowser.c:606: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_AMBIENT_USERMODE webbrowser.c:609: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_AMBIENT_DLCONTROL webbrowser.c:613: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_AMBIENT_USERAGENT webbrowser.c:617: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_AMBIENT_PALETTE webbrowser.c:1509: Test failed: unexpected call GetOptionKeyPath webbrowser.c:354: Test failed: unexpected call QueryStatus_SETPROGRESSTEXT webbrowser.c:461: Test failed: unexpected nCmdID 26 webbrowser.c:461: Test failed: unexpected nCmdID 29 webbrowser.c:959: Test failed: unexpected call GetContainer webbrowser.c:509: Test failed: unexpected call webbrowser.c:1520: Test failed: unexpected call GetDropTarget webbrowser.c:959: Test failed: unexpected call GetContainer webbrowser.c:509: Test failed: unexpected call webbrowser.c:2623: Test failed: expected TranslateUrl webbrowser.c:2630: Test failed: expected Invoke_SETSECURELOCKICON webbrowser.c:2843: Test failed: expected RequestUIActivate webbrowser.c:2935: Test failed: Got 0x80004002 webbrowser.c:3132: Test failed: doc != doc2 webbrowser.c:3030: Test failed: QueryService failed: 80004002 webbrowser: unhandled exception c0000005 at 0040C9B2

2 1

Using native msvc*.dll: all or nothing?
by Dan Kegel Nov. 18, 2011

Nov. 18, 2011

Given errors like err:module:find_forwarded_export function not found for forward 'msvcrt.__CxxFrameHandler3' used by L"C:\\windows\\system32\\msvcr90.dll". If you are using builtin L"msvcr90.dll", try using the native one instead. I'm starting to get the feeling that, if you're going to install any flavor of Microsoft C++ runtime libraries, you should install them all. Is that more or less correct? i.e. should winetricks add a verb that installs all of vcrun6, vcrun2003, vcrun2005, vcrun2008, and maybe vcrun2010 and encourage users to do that instead of installing the individual libraries?

2 1

Re: Re: Re: added remaining functions, data structures, definitions required by http api to include/
by Juan Lang Nov. 18, 2011

Nov. 18, 2011

Hi Arash, >> I'm also concerned whether this was the product of copy/paste, which >> isn't allowed. Was it? > about that copy/paste stuff, > well I guess we eventually produce an almost identical header file with one > in the SDK > I mean everything in the header file is already exposed to the user and "IS" > part of API > am I not right? I might agree with you, but lawyers might not. As a result, we don't allow copy/paste code in Wine, even in headers. > just one more question if you don't mind! > should I use winsock for socket programming or native linux's? and > for some library I may need (regex for example) is there any restriction or > convection or something like that or I can use any third party lib? Native linux sockets are typically used, unless there's good reason for them not to be. 3rd party libraries are harder to work with. You typically have to choose something which you expect will be installed on every common platform, built appropriate configure checks to determine if the library is present at compile time, make your code fail gracefully if not, and dynamically load the library at runtime. Static linking is also viable, if you expect the library is commonly available, and if the license is compatible: LGPL and BSD are, GPL is not, just to give a few examples. It'd help more if we knew precisely what you're working on, and what you need e.g. regex for. --Juan

1 0

FOSDEM 2012 - CrossDesktop DevRoom Call for Talks
by Pau Garcia i Quiles Nov. 18, 2011

Nov. 18, 2011

Hi, FOSDEM is one of the largest gatherings of Free Software contributors in the world and happens each February in Brussels (Belgium). One of the tracks will be the CrossDesktop DevRoom, which will host Desktop-related talks. We are now inviting proposals for talks about Free/Libre/Open-source Software on the topics of Desktop development, Desktop applications and interoperativity amongst Desktop Environments. This is a unique opportunity to show novel ideas and developments to a wide technical audience. Topics accepted include, but are not limited to: Enlightenment, Gnome, KDE, XFCE, Windows, Mac OS X, general desktop matters, applications that enhance desktops and web (when related to desktop). Talks can be very specific, such as developing mobile applications with Qt Quick; or as general as predictions for the fusion of Desktop and web in 5 years time. Topics that are of interest to the users and developers of all desktop environments are especially welcome. The FOSDEM 2011 schedule might give you some inspiration: http://archive.fosdem.org/2011/schedule/track/crossdesktop_devroom Please include the following information when submitting a proposal: your name, the title of your talk (please be descriptive, as titles will be listed with around 250 from other projects) and a short abstract of one or two paragraphs. The deadline for submissions is December 20th 2011. FOSDEM will be held on the weekend of 4-5 February 2012. Please submit your proposals to: crossdesktop-devroom(a)lists.fosdem.org ( https://lists.fosdem.org/listinfo/crossdesktop-devroom ) -- Pau Garcia i Quiles http://www.elpauer.org (Due to my workload, I may need 10 days to answer)

1 0

Re: mshtml: fix MSVC build in htmllocation.c
by Nikolay Sivov Nov. 17, 2011

Nov. 17, 2011

On 11/17/2011 15:18, Thomas Faber wrote: > This removes the use of two Variable Length Arrays. > Instead of filling a local buffer, then allocating a new one using > SysAllocString[Len], the strings are now directly written to the latter > buffer. > Note that the 'len' variable in hunk 2 does not need to count in the > terminating null in this case because SysAllocStringLen automatically > adds one. > - WCHAR buf[url.dwSchemeLength + 1]; > + WCHAR *buf; > + buf = *p = SysAllocStringLen(NULL, url.dwSchemeLength + 1); > memcpy(buf, url.lpszScheme, url.dwSchemeLength * sizeof(WCHAR)); > buf[url.dwSchemeLength] = ':'; > - *p = SysAllocStringLen(buf, url.dwSchemeLength + 1); You don't need 'buf' variable after that.

1 0

Antw.: ntdll: Revert 33b0f0edffa0c8a06b4ee8831c92fdc373f83ece.
by André Hentschel Nov. 17, 2011

Nov. 17, 2011

I would love to see such a tool, i could use it for some actctx tests in ntdll Gesendet mit meinem HTC ----- Reply message ----- Von: "Saulius Krasuckas" <saulius2(a)ar.fi.lt> An: "Alexandre Julliard" <julliard(a)winehq.org> Cc: <wine-devel(a)winehq.org> Betreff: ntdll: Revert 33b0f0edffa0c8a06b4ee8831c92fdc373f83ece. Datum: Do., Nov. 17, 2011 18:49 On Thu, 17 Nov 2011, Alexandre Julliard wrote: > > The test requires a PE binary because obviously we can't test PE > protections on Unix binaries. That doesn't mean it doesn't exist. Just > build a crosstest: > > $ wine ntdll_crosstest.exe info.c > info.c:1296: Test failed: mbi.Protect is 0x8, expected 0x4 IIRC, some of tests already craft minimal PE binaries in manual way. So it would be nice to have some tool inside the tree to generate PEs independetly, no? Several years ago I've tried testing GetStdHandle() from within two PE binaries with different header flags set (IMAGE_SUBSYSTEM_WINDOWS_[GC]UI). For a start I have copied some code of manual PE crafting to build PE header. Then there came .text section's order. I realized it's sufficient to write small assembler file, run it through the gas crosscompiler, disasm it and parse the results to have _not only_ binary data for rebuilding PE, but also symbolic one. I wrote some awk-script then to convert .S file into C-function this way. With it it was easy to adjust options for crosscompiling gas/ld tools to get PE with needed structure. But maybe there is point in creating some universal in-tree tool? Or integrate the functionality into winegcc (or else) so as not to depend on a crosscompiling suite but still have readable and easy changeable source. Guys, what do you think? S.

1 0

Re: Re: added remaining functions, data structures, definitions required by http api to include/http
by Juan Lang Nov. 17, 2011

Nov. 17, 2011

> can you be more specific please? Yes: +#ifndef __HTTP_H__ +#define __HTTP_H__ Don't do that, it's already #ifdef protected. +/*#if _WIN32_WINNT >= 0x0501*/ Dead code, just leave it out. +typedef struct _HTTP_REQUEST_V2 +{ + /* TODO : anonymous structure is not supported by C standard */ + /* struct HTTP_REQUEST_V1; */ For one thing, that's what the DUMMYSTRUCTNAME macro is for. For another, by omitting it, you've made the structure binary incompatible with the PSDK one for C code. Clearly that's wrong. I stopped reviewing here, you have many examples of the above error. I'm also concerned whether this was the product of copy/paste, which isn't allowed. Was it? --Juan

1 0

Re: [PATCH 1/1] ws2_32: Selectively bind UDP sockets to interfaces while still allowing broadcast packets (try 2, resend).
by Juan Lang Nov. 17, 2011

Nov. 17, 2011

Hi Erich, + * Bind the given socket exclusively to a specific interface. I know the style around here is to comment minimally, but I didn't find it clear what the behavior of this function is. For one thing, +static int interface_bind( int fd, struct sockaddr *addr ) (snip) + int ret = FALSE; (snip) + ret = TRUE; You're using #defines used with BOOL, so a BOOL return value would be a little clearer IMO. int, in the context of socket functions, often uses 0 => success, -1 => failure. Still, even with that change, + if (in_sock->sin_addr.s_addr == htonl(WS_INADDR_ANY)) + { + /* Not binding to specific interface, use default route */ + goto cleanup; + } + optlen = sizeof(sock_type); + if (getsockopt(fd, SOL_SOCKET, SO_TYPE, &sock_type, &optlen) == -1 + || sock_type != SOCK_DGRAM) + { + /* Not a UDP socket, interface-specific bind is irrelevant. */ + goto cleanup; These two blocks will use the default return value, FALSE, and it wasn't clear to me from the function name or comment that it should return FALSE in this case. Not that doing so is incorrect: just that it isn't obvious that that's the way it should behave. In this case, I feel a comment indicating that the function returns TRUE iff the function bound to a specific device, and that FALSE doesn't necessarily mean failure, is merited. Also, + /* Obtain the size of the IPv4 adapter list and allocate structure memory */ + if (GetAdaptersInfo(NULL, &adap_size) != ERROR_BUFFER_OVERFLOW) Why do all this outside the #ifdef SO_BINDTODEVICE guard? I'd rather you just had a different implementation of the function when SO_BINDTODEVICE isn't present that issues the warning and does nothing else. I'll let Alexandre comment on whether the approach itself is appropriate. Thanks, --Juan

2 1

Re: [PATCH 2/2] mshtml: Added tests of handling ActiveX objects without IQuickActivate interface implemented
by Alexandre Julliard Nov. 17, 2011

Nov. 17, 2011

Jacek Caban <jacek(a)codeweavers.com> writes: > --- > dlls/mshtml/tests/activex.c | 133 > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------ > 1 files changed, 95 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-) It doesn't work here: ../../../tools/runtest -q -P wine -M mshtml.dll -T ../../.. -p mshtml_test.exe.so activex.c && touch activex.ok wine: Unhandled page fault on read access to 0x00000008 at address 0x6a76d2a6 (thread 0009), starting debugger... Unhandled exception: page fault on read access to 0x00000008 in 32-bit code (0x6a76d2a6). Register dump: CS:0023 SS:002b DS:002b ES:002b FS:0063 GS:006b EIP:6a76d2a6 ESP:0032fab0 EBP:0032fac8 EFLAGS:00010206( R- -- I - -P- ) EAX:01824650 EBX:00000000 ECX:00000008 EDX:00000000 ESI:01824650 EDI:00000000 Stack dump: 0x0032fab0: 01824650 6ad31584 0182459c 018244c8 0x0032fac0: 018244c8 00000000 0032faf8 6a45f2cd 0x0032fad0: 018244c8 00000003 6ad316db 00000000 0x0032fae0: 018244c8 0032fb28 001ab708 01828bd8 0x0032faf0: 0171af60 00000000 0032fb48 6a4b7d29 0x0032fb00: 018244c8 00000000 0032fb28 6a617b0f Backtrace: =>0 0x6a76d2a6 in xul (+0xb2d2a6) (0x0032fac8) 1 0x6a45f2cd in xul (+0x81f2cc) (0x0032faf8) 2 0x6a4b7d29 in xul (+0x877d28) (0x0032fb48) 3 0x6a4b9648 in xul (+0x879647) (0x0032fb98) 4 0x6a4b73db in xul (+0x8773da) (0x0032fbc8) 5 0x555e04e7 NSContainer_Release+0x76(This=0x17978b8) [/home/julliard/wine/wine/dlls/mshtml/nsembed.c:1886] in mshtml (0x0032fbf8) 6 0x55585435 CustomDoc_Release+0x1c4(iface=0x135c8c) [/home/julliard/wine/wine/dlls/mshtml/htmldoc.c:2315] in mshtml (0x0032fc38) 7 0x5557f2e4 HTMLDocument_Release+0x13(iface=0x135b78) [/home/julliard/wine/wine/dlls/mshtml/mshtml_private.h:433] in mshtml (0x0032fc58) 8 0x687657a4 release_doc+0x23(doc=0x135b78) [/home/julliard/wine/wine/dlls/mshtml/tests/activex.c:1945] in mshtml_test (0x0032fc78) 9 0x6876a445 func_activex+0x18b4() [/home/julliard/wine/wine/dlls/mshtml/tests/activex.c:2060] in mshtml_test (0x0032fd58) 10 0x68763202 main+0x3a1(argc=*** Invalid address 0x00000008 *** , argv=*** Invalid address 0x0000000c *** Internal symbol error: unable to access memory location 0xc) [/home/julliard/wine/wine/dlls/mshtml/tests/../../../include/wine/test.h:556] in mshtml_test (0x0032fe28) 11 0x687becf5 __wine_spec_exe_entry+0x74(peb=0x7ffdf000) [/home/julliard/wine/wine/dlls/winecrt0/exe_entry.c:36] in mshtml_test (0x0032fe70) 12 0x6848858c call_process_entry+0xb() in kernel32 (0x0032fe88) 13 0x6848953f start_process+0x5e(peb=0x7ffdf000) [/home/julliard/wine/wine/dlls/kernel32/process.c:1090] in kernel32 (0x0032fec8) 14 0x68375dd0 call_thread_func_wrapper+0xb() in ntdll (0x0032fed8) 15 0x68378abd call_thread_func+0x7c(entry=0x684894e0, arg=0x7ffdf000, frame=0x32ffc8) [/home/julliard/wine/wine/dlls/ntdll/signal_i386.c:2532] in ntdll (0x0032ffa8) 16 0x68375dae call_thread_entry_point+0x11() in ntdll (0x0032ffc8) 17 0x6834dece start_process+0x1d(kernel_start=0x684894e0) [/home/julliard/wine/wine/dlls/ntdll/loader.c:2612] in ntdll (0x0032ffe8) 18 0x68028a9d wine_call_on_stack+0x1c() in libwine.so.1 (0x00000000) 0x6a76d2a6: call *0x8(%edx) -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

2 1

Re: dinput: Delete the static critical section when unloading the dll.
by Vitaliy Margolen Nov. 17, 2011

Nov. 17, 2011

On 11/16/2011 08:31 AM, Francois Gouget wrote: > --- > > I moved DllMain() to the end of the file so it comes after the variable > declaration. It's already forward declared few lines after DllMain(). So you should move that declaration instead. Hm... it seems this patch already committed. Alexadre, would you please give people at least 24 hours to review all patches sent to wine-patches before committing them? Vitaliy.

3 3

re: added remaining functions, data structures, definitions required by http api to include/http.h
by Dan Kegel Nov. 17, 2011

Nov. 17, 2011

That's a lot of stuff. What needs it? Also, please avoid trivial whitespace changes.

2 1

Re: added remaining functions, data structures, definitions required by http api to include/http.h
by Frédéric Delanoy Nov. 16, 2011

Nov. 16, 2011

On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 14:15, ArasH <arash.cordi(a)gmail.com> wrote: > --- > include/http.h | 1266 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > 1 files changed, 1251 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) The patch should show your full name. See http://wiki.winehq.org/SubmittingPatches for more information.

1 0

Re: mshtml: Fixed some htmldoc.c tests on IE9
by Marvin Nov. 16, 2011

Nov. 16, 2011

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=15467 Your paranoid android. === TEST64_W7SP1 (32 bit htmldoc) === htmldoc.c:2890: Test failed: unexpected cmd 109 of CGID_Explorer htmldoc.c:2709: Test failed: unexpected call Exec_ShellDocView_37 htmldoc.c:2709: Test failed: unexpected call Exec_ShellDocView_37 === TEST64_W7SP1 (64 bit htmldoc) === htmldoc.c:2890: Test failed: unexpected cmd 109 of CGID_Explorer htmldoc.c:2709: Test failed: unexpected call Exec_ShellDocView_37

2 1

Re: [PATCH 1/1] user32: Prioritize focus for dialog owner on EndDialog (resend).
by Marvin Nov. 16, 2011

Nov. 16, 2011

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=15456 Your paranoid android. === TEST64_W7SP1 (64 bit msg) === Timeout

1 0

Re: [PATCH 2/5] d3d10: Implement D3D10StateBlockMaskDisableCapture().
by Matteo Bruni Nov. 15, 2011

Nov. 15, 2011

2011/11/15 Henri Verbeet <hverbeet(a)codeweavers.com>: > --- > + UINT end = start_idx + count; > + start_idx += 7; > + memset(&field[start_idx >> 3], 0, (end >> 3) - (start_idx >> 3)); Isn't that dangerous if count is < 7 (assuming that is a valid value)?

1 0

Re: [2/4] ddraw: Add more tests and fixes for SetSurfaceDesc
by Henri Verbeet Nov. 15, 2011

Nov. 15, 2011

On 15 November 2011 00:12, Stefan Dösinger <stefan(a)codeweavers.com> wrote: > + /* Tests show that only LPSURFACE and PIXELFORMAT can be set, and LPSURFACE is required > + * for PIXELFORMAT to work */ This may be ok, but note that the test doesn't actually test this. (E.g. does calling SetSurfaceDesc() with the original surface desc work? What about bits not in DDSD_ALL? Etc.) Also, as a general principle, I'd be happier about the ddraw tests if they actually tested all the different interface versions.

2 4

RFH: Solaris users with IPv6
by Juan Lang Nov. 15, 2011

Nov. 15, 2011

Hi all, in the tidy up I've been doing to iphlpapi, I notice that on Solaris it's possible to enumerate IPv6 addresses using SIOCGIFCONF. I've got a patch written that does that, but I have no way to test it myself. If anyone here has some version of Solaris with a machine with IPv6 addresses, even autoconfigured ones, and feels like testing a patch, please let me know. I'll send the patch and a small test program. Thanks, --Juan

2 1

Re: (resend)[5/6]usp10: Devanagari danda and double danda are use for all Indic scripts
by Henri Verbeet Nov. 15, 2011

Nov. 15, 2011

That's a fair amount of magic constants in there. The ones in is_indic() are probably Script_Devanagari and Script_Malayalam_Numeric, I didn't look at the other two.

2 1

Re: [4/6] msxml3/dom: Properly return node prefix from get_prefix()
by Jacek Caban Nov. 15, 2011

Nov. 15, 2011

Hi Nikolay, On 11/15/11 07:19, Nikolay Sivov wrote: > - if ((ns = xmlGetNsList(This->node->doc, This->node))) > + switch (This->node->type) > { > - if (ns[0]->prefix) *prefix = bstr_from_xmlChar( ns[0]->prefix ); > - xmlFree(ns); > + case XML_ELEMENT_NODE: > + case XML_ATTRIBUTE_NODE: > + { > + xmlNsPtr ns = This->node->ns; > + if (ns&& ns->prefix) > + *prefix = bstr_from_xmlChar(ns->prefix); > + break; > } > + default: > + FIXME("unsupported type %d\n", This->node->type); > + }; The idea behind node inheritance rewrite was to avoid such switches. If other node types should be handled differently, they simply shouldn't use node_get_prefix or the differences should be moved to child objects. Jacek

2 1

Re: msvcrt: Don't hold FILE critical section in some functions
by Alexandre Julliard Nov. 15, 2011

Nov. 15, 2011

Piotr Caban <piotr(a)codeweavers.com> writes: > @@ -3117,25 +3098,20 @@ int CDECL MSVCRT_fputc(int c, MSVCRT_FILE* file) > */ > int CDECL MSVCRT__flsbuf(int c, MSVCRT_FILE* file) > { > - MSVCRT__lock_file(file); > - > /* Flush output buffer */ > if(file->_bufsiz == 0 && !(file->_flag & MSVCRT__IONBF)) { > msvcrt_alloc_buffer(file); > } > if(!(file->_flag & MSVCRT__IOWRT)) { > - if(file->_flag & MSVCRT__IORW) { > + if(file->_flag & MSVCRT__IORW) > file->_flag |= MSVCRT__IOWRT; > - } else { > - MSVCRT__unlock_file(file); > + else That doesn't look safe. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

2 2

Re: wininet: Give a name to the critical sections, make them static and delete them when unloading the dll.
by Marvin Nov. 15, 2011

Nov. 15, 2011

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=15430 Your paranoid android. === WINEBUILD (build) === Make failed

1 0

Re: [4/4] ddraw: Size handling fixes for IDirect3DDevice::GetDesc
by Henri Verbeet Nov. 15, 2011

Nov. 15, 2011

On 15 November 2011 00:13, Stefan Dösinger <stefan(a)codeweavers.com> wrote: > + if (!HWDesc) > + { > + WARN("HWDesc is NULL, returning DDERR_INVALIDPARAMS.\n"); > + return DDERR_INVALIDPARAMS; > + } > + else if(!check_d3ddevicedesc_size(HWDesc->dwSize)) > + { > + WARN("HWDesc->dwSize is %u, returning DDERR_INVALIDPARAMS.\n", HWDesc->dwSize); > + return DDERR_INVALIDPARAMS; > + } > + else if (!HelDesc) > + { > + WARN("HelDesc is NULL, returning DDERR_INVALIDPARAMS.\n"); > + return DDERR_INVALIDPARAMS; > + } > + else if(!check_d3ddevicedesc_size(HelDesc->dwSize)) > + { > + WARN("HelDesc->dwSize is %u, returning DDERR_INVALIDPARAMS.\n", HelDesc->dwSize); > + return DDERR_INVALIDPARAMS; > + } The "else" is redundant here. Please use consistent formatting. > + hw_caps.dwSize = sizeof(hel_caps) + 1; Strictly speaking that should be "sizeof(hw_caps) + 1". > + case 172: /* DirectX 3, IDirect3DDevice1 */ > + ok(hw_caps.dwMaxTextureRepeat == 0xfefefefe, "dwMaxTextureRepeat was modified: %#x.\n", > + hw_caps.dwMaxTextureRepeat); > + ok(hel_caps.dwMaxTextureRepeat == 0xfefefefe, "dwMaxTextureRepeat was modified: %#x.\n", > + hel_caps.dwMaxTextureRepeat); > + /* drop through */ > + case 204: /* DirectX 5, IDirect3DDevice2 */ > + ok(hw_caps.dwMaxTextureRepeat == 0xfefefefe, "dwMaxTextureRepeat was modified: %#x.\n", > + hw_caps.dwMaxTextureRepeat); > + ok(hel_caps.dwMaxTextureRepeat == 0xfefefefe, "dwMaxTextureRepeat was modified: %#x.\n", > + hel_caps.dwMaxTextureRepeat); This doesn't make a lot of sense, both cases are the same.

1 0

Re: wined3d: Disable WINED3DFMT_B8G8R8_UNORM.
by Stefan Dösinger Nov. 15, 2011

Nov. 15, 2011

On Tuesday 15 November 2011 14:21:09 Matteo Bruni wrote: > + case WINED3DFMT_B8G8R8_UNORM: /* Usable in <=dx7 but not > enumerated in any case */ > + TRACE_(d3d_caps)("[FAILED] - Not enumerated on Windows\n"); > + return FALSE; The comment "Usable in <=dx7" is misleading. If I remember correctly your attempts at writing a test showed that systemmem surfaces can be created, but not video memory surfaces. I wouldn't be surprised if d3d8/9 also allow systemmem or scratch B8G8R8 surfaces. You can also remove the special handling for D3DFMT_R8G8B8 from d3d8/9's CheckDeviceFormat handling implementation now that wined3d doesn't report it as supported.

1 0

Re: [PATCH 1/2] ntdll: windows refuses to load an image, if sections overlap the header size as given in the SizeOfHeaders field (resend)
by Alexandre Julliard Nov. 15, 2011

Nov. 15, 2011

Bernhard Loos <bernhardloos(a)googlemail.com> writes: > --- > dlls/kernel32/tests/loader.c | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > dlls/ntdll/virtual.c | 5 +++ > 2 files changed, 84 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/dlls/kernel32/tests/loader.c b/dlls/kernel32/tests/loader.c > index 4d420ea..bcef492 100644 > --- a/dlls/kernel32/tests/loader.c > +++ b/dlls/kernel32/tests/loader.c > @@ -692,9 +692,88 @@ static void test_section_access(void) > } > } > > +static void test_section_mapping(void) > +{ > + static const char filler[0x2000]; > + static const char section_data[] = "section data 1234567890"; > + DWORD total, written; > + HANDLE hfile; > + HMODULE hlib; > + SYSTEM_INFO si; > + char temp_path[MAX_PATH]; > + char dll_name[MAX_PATH]; > + BOOL ret; > + > + GetSystemInfo(&si); > + > + /* prevent displaying of the "Unable to load this DLL" message box */ > + SetErrorMode(SEM_FAILCRITICALERRORS); > + > + GetTempPath(MAX_PATH, temp_path); > + > + GetTempFileName(temp_path, "ldr", 0, dll_name); Please merge that test case into the existing loader tests instead of adding a new function to do the same thing. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

1 0

Re: [PATCH 11/12] mshtml: Added more navigation tests
by Marvin Nov. 15, 2011

Nov. 15, 2011

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=15423 Your paranoid android. === TEST64_W7SP1 (32 bit htmldoc) === htmldoc.c:2883: Test failed: unexpected cmd 109 of CGID_Explorer htmldoc.c:2692: Test failed: unexpected command 6058 htmldoc.c:4725: Test failed: expected Invoke_AMBIENT_PALETTE htmldoc.c:4726: Test failed: expected GetOptionKeyPath htmldoc.c:2702: Test failed: unexpected call Exec_ShellDocView_37 htmldoc.c:2883: Test failed: unexpected cmd 109 of CGID_Explorer htmldoc.c:2789: Test failed: unexpected command 143 htmldoc.c:1704: Test failed: unexpected call SetStatusText === TEST64_W7SP1 (64 bit htmldoc) === htmldoc.c:2883: Test failed: unexpected cmd 109 of CGID_Explorer htmldoc.c:2692: Test failed: unexpected command 6058 htmldoc.c:4725: Test failed: expected Invoke_AMBIENT_PALETTE htmldoc.c:4726: Test failed: expected GetOptionKeyPath htmldoc.c:2702: Test failed: unexpected call Exec_ShellDocView_37 htmldoc.c:2883: Test failed: unexpected cmd 109 of CGID_Explorer htmldoc.c:2789: Test failed: unexpected command 143 htmldoc.c:1704: Test failed: unexpected call SetStatusText

2 1

Re: [PATCH 1/2] userenv: Improved CreateEnvironmentBlock implementation (try3)
by Marvin Nov. 15, 2011

Nov. 15, 2011

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=15426 Your paranoid android. === WVISTAADM (32 bit userenv) === Failure running script in VM: The specified guest user must be logged in interactively to perform this operation

1 0

Re: [PATCH 1/2] userenv: Improved CreateEnvironmentBlock implementation (try2)
by Alexandre Julliard Nov. 15, 2011

Nov. 15, 2011

Piotr Caban <piotr(a)codeweavers.com> writes: > +static void set_wow64_environment(WCHAR **env) > +{ > + static const WCHAR archW[] = {'P','R','O','C','E','S','S','O','R','_','A','R','C','H','I','T','E','C','T','U','R','E',0}; > + static const WCHAR arch6432W[] = {'P','R','O','C','E','S','S','O','R','_','A','R','C','H','I','T','E','W','6','4','3','2',0}; This stuff needs to be done depending on the 32/64 architecture of the child process, so it probably shouldn't be done here. The variables will be reset on every process startup anyway. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

2 1

Re: [PATCH] urlmon: Improve parsing of SCHEME_MK URIs
by Jacek Caban Nov. 15, 2011

Nov. 15, 2011

Hi Andrew, On 11/14/11 21:12, Andrew Eikum wrote: > --- > dlls/urlmon/tests/uri.c | 81 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > dlls/urlmon/uri.c | 15 +++++++-- > 2 files changed, 93 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) The patch looks good to me, but could you please add a simpler test using CreateUri (using uri_tests array) as follow up. Thanks, Jacek

1 0

Re: ws2_32: Fix handling of NULL and empty hostname in getaddrinfo/GetAddrInfoW.
by Marvin Nov. 15, 2011

Nov. 15, 2011

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=15418 Your paranoid android. === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit sock) === Timeout === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit sock) === Timeout

1 0