February 2011 - Wine-Devel - list.winehq.org

CD-ROM ioctl support on MacOS?
by Joerg-Cyril.Hoehle＠t-systems.com June 6, 2011

June 6, 2011

Hi, what's the state of CD-ROM support on the Mac? ntdll/cdrom.c contains quite a few #ifdef apple. I'm asking because the mcicda currently uses these ioctl: 1. READ_RAW 2. READ_TOC 3. READ_Q -> POSITION MCICDA could be changed to avoid the third one entirely -- when using the dsound output. Would that be enough to use mcicda on MacOS to play music? Thanks for your help, Jörg Höhle

2 3

Re: comctl32/tests: Add casts to avoid comparison of different int types. [take 2]
by Alexandre Julliard May 22, 2011

May 22, 2011

Gerald Pfeifer <gerald(a)pfeifer.com> writes: > This is the first hunk of a patch a few days ago; testbot.winehq.org > thinks it's fine: https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=9291 You don't need casts. If the variable has the wrong type you can change that. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

2 1

Please help me with document extraction.
by Max TenEyck Woodbury March 3, 2011

March 3, 2011

As my previous efforts have probably informed you, I am interested in documentation. My initial efforts were _not_ on target and had missed the existing 'c2man.pl' tool. I am in the process of correcting my failure on that. I've picked up Perl in the last couple weeks. An interesting language with lots of adopted features. It's been easy to learn, so I think I will _not_ need help with the language itself, but I will listen to any advice. The c2man.pl code is extensive and sparsely commented. In order to understand what it does, I've made a transcription of it with a more compact style and lots more comments. I check the rewrite against the source code so there should not be any serious errors. There are also a number of what I believe to be defects in the original and places where my comments may be inappropriate or my style may be very objectionable. _This_ is what I need help with. Would someone be willing to review my rewrite? If so, send me e-mail so I can arrange to get a copy of it to you. P.S. to AJ et al. There is a _lot_ of documentation embedded in the wine code, but it is hard to find at the moment. I'd like to see it indexed and this is the program that does the extraction and indexing. Advice on making this new version available and active are in order. Max

4 11

Fwd: Applications for Mentoring Organizations Now Being Accepted
by Dan Kegel March 1, 2011

March 1, 2011

So, shall I do the honors? ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Carol Smith <carols(a)google.com> Date: Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 12:35 PM Subject: Applications for Mentoring Organizations Now Being Accepted To: Google Summer of Code Announce <google-summer-of-code-announce(a)googlegroups.com> Hi all, We're pleased to announce the applications for mentoring organizations for Google Summer of Code 2011 are now being accepted [1]. Please go Melange [2] to apply on behalf of your organization. Please note that the application period [3] closes on 11 March at 23:00 UTC [4]. [1] - http://google-opensource.blogspot.com/2011/02/mentoring-organization-applic… [2] - http://www.google-melange.com [3] - http://www.google-melange.com/document/show/gsoc_program/google/gsoc2011/ti… [4] - http://goo.gl/paMZU Cheers, Carol -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Summer of Code Announce" group. To post to this group, send email to google-summer-of-code-announce(a)googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-summer-of-code-announce+unsubscribe(a)googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-summer-of-code-announce?hl=en.

2 1

Re: shlwapi/tests: remove win9x hacks (try 2)
by Nikolay Sivov Feb. 28, 2011

Feb. 28, 2011

On 3/1/2011 01:28, Austin English wrote: > Apparently it's flaky on win2k...cleared WTB: > https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=9585 > - /* shlwapi on Win98 SE does not appear to apply delimiters to the output > - * and does not correctly handle extremely large values. */ > - ok(!strcmp(result->kb_size, szBuff) || > - (result->kb_size_broken&& !strcmp(result->kb_size2, szBuff)), > - "Formatted %x%08x wrong: got %s, expected %s\n", > + ok(!strcmp(result->kb_size, szBuff), "Formatted %x%08x wrong: got %s, expected %s\n", > (LONG)(result->value>> 32), (LONG)result->value, szBuff, result->kb_size); I think it's better to keep comments that describe version dependent behaviour even if it's not tested by default now.

1 0

Re: ntprint/tests: remove win9x hacks
by Marvin Feb. 28, 2011

Feb. 28, 2011

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=9577 Your paranoid android. === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit ntprint) === ntprint: unhandled exception c0000005 at 00000000 === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit ntprint) === ntprint: unhandled exception c0000005 at 00000000 === WXPPROSP3 (32 bit ntprint) === ntprint: unhandled exception c0000005 at 00000000 === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit ntprint) === ntprint: unhandled exception c0000005 at 00000000 === WVISTAADM (32 bit ntprint) === ntprint: unhandled exception c0000005 at 00000000 === W2K8SE (32 bit ntprint) === ntprint: unhandled exception c0000005 at 00000000 === W7PRO (32 bit ntprint) === ntprint: unhandled exception c0000005 at 00000000 === W7PROX64 (32 bit ntprint) === ntprint: unhandled exception c0000005 at 00000000 === W7PROX64 (64 bit ntprint) === Timeout

1 0

Re: shlwapi/tests: remove win9x hacks
by Marvin Feb. 28, 2011

Feb. 28, 2011

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=9576 Your paranoid android. === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit string) === string: unhandled exception c0000005 at 77C84DD7

1 0

Re: gdi32: Fixes GetDIBits for top-down destination bitmaps (Bug #26236).
by Alexandre Julliard Feb. 28, 2011

Feb. 28, 2011

John Edmonds <pocketcookies2(a)gmail.com> writes: > Resolves Bug #26236. Please update the test cases to catch this. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

1 0

Re: d3dx9_36: Stub ID3DXRenderToSurface, with tests
by Henri Verbeet Feb. 28, 2011

Feb. 28, 2011

On 27 February 2011 20:22, Misha Koshelev <misha680(a)gmail.com> wrote: > +static HRESULT WINAPI ID3DXRenderToSurfaceImpl_QueryInterface(ID3DXRenderToSurface *iface, REFIID riid, void **ppobj) > +{ > + ID3DXRenderToSurfaceImpl *This = impl_from_ID3DXRenderToSurface(iface); You don't actually need "This" here. > + return D3D_OK; S_OK is more appropriate for QueryInterface. > + WARN("(%p)->(%s,%p),not found\n", This, debugstr_guid(riid), ppobj); > + return E_NOINTERFACE; > +} You should set "*ppobj" to NULL here, unless there's a reason not to.

1 0

Re: jscript: Fixed corner cases in parseInt implementation
by Marvin Feb. 28, 2011

Feb. 28, 2011

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=9558 Your paranoid android. === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WXPPROSP3 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WVISTAADM (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K8SE (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PRO (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found

1 0