May 2011 - Wine-Devel - list.winehq.org

Re: kernel32/toolhelp: PROCESSENTRY32::szExeFile is the full path in Win9x.
by Saulius Krasuckas May 26, 2011

May 26, 2011

* On Wed, 25 May 2011, Adam Martinson wrote: > > Dragon NaturallySpeaking 7 expects this in Win98 mode. > --- > dlls/kernel32/tests/toolhelp.c | 19 +++++++++++++++- > dlls/kernel32/toolhelp.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- > 2 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) I am not sure you do it right (now that new testing strategy is taken): * On Tue, 30 Nov 2010, Alexandre Julliard wrote: > > The value of running tests on Win9x these days is certainly > questionable. We don't try to emulate the Win9x behavior anyway, except > in a very few cases (which most likely don't have tests...) so it only > serves to document historical behavior that nobody cares about any > longer. WRT doesn't test win9x any longer, so what's the point of putting such check in the test? > --- a/dlls/kernel32/tests/toolhelp.c > +++ b/dlls/kernel32/tests/toolhelp.c ... > @@ -106,6 +108,10 @@ static void test_process(DWORD curr_pid, DWORD sub_pcs_pid) > unsigned found = 0; > int num = 0; > int childpos = -1; > + OSVERSIONINFO osver; > + > + osver.dwOSVersionInfoSize = sizeof(osver); > + pGetVersionEx(&osver); > > hSnapshot = pCreateToolhelp32Snapshot( TH32CS_SNAPPROCESS, 0 ); > ok(hSnapshot != NULL, "Cannot create snapshot\n"); > @@ -116,10 +122,15 @@ static void test_process(DWORD curr_pid, DWORD sub_pcs_pid) > { > do > { > + TCHAR* bslash = strchr(pe.szExeFile, '\\'); > if (pe.th32ProcessID == curr_pid) found++; > if (pe.th32ProcessID == sub_pcs_pid) { childpos = num; found++; } > trace("PID=%x %s\n", pe.th32ProcessID, pe.szExeFile); > num++; > + if (osver.dwMajorVersion < 5) > + ok(bslash != NULL, "szExeFile is not a full path: %s\n", pe.szExeFile); > + else > + ok(bslash == NULL, "szExeFile is a full path: %s\n", pe.szExeFile); > } while (pProcess32Next( hSnapshot, &pe )); > } > ok(found == 2, "couldn't find self and/or sub-process in process list\n"); Now such check is pointless, IMHO. Here goes question to Alexandre: what about (testing in) such cases? S.

2 1

Re: ole32/ole2: Don't call IDropTarget::QueryInterface() in RegisterDragDrop(). [whitespace fixed]
by Huw Davies May 26, 2011

May 26, 2011

> +static IDropTarget* WrapDropTarget(IDropTarget* inner) > +{ > + DropTargetWrapper* This = HeapAlloc(GetProcessHeap(), 0, sizeof(*This)); > + > + if (This) > + { > + This->iface = (IDropTarget){ &DropTargetWrapper_VTbl }; This->iface.lpVtbl = &DropTargetWrapper_VTbl; > - hr = CoMarshalInterface(stream, &IID_IDropTarget, unk, MSHCTX_LOCAL, NULL, MSHLFLAGS_TABLESTRONG); > - IUnknown_Release(unk); > + hr = CoMarshalInterface(stream, &IID_IDropTarget, (IUnknown*)wrapper, MSHCTX_LOCAL, NULL, MSHLFLAGS_TABLESTRONG); > > if(SUCCEEDED(hr)) > { > hr = create_map_from_stream(stream, &map); > if(SUCCEEDED(hr)) > { > - IDropTarget_AddRef(pDropTarget); > SetPropW(hwnd, prop_oledroptarget, pDropTarget); You probably want to set the window prop to the wrapper here. Either way you still need the AddRef (on the wrapper if you set that), it gets released in RevokeDragDrop. Huw.

2 6

extern char **environ and msvc
by Stefan Dösinger May 25, 2011

May 25, 2011

Hi, This is one of the last remaining hacks needed to compile the d3d parts of Wine with Visual Studio. Our definition of **environ is conflicting with one already in the Windows SDK headers: 1>..\..\wine\libs\wine\loader.c(54): warning C4273: '_environ': Inkonsistente DLL-Bindung. 1> C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio 10.0\VC\include\stdlib.h(299): Siehe vorherige Definition von '_environ' I'm sorry for the German, I don't know how to change this. Google finds only other clueless people. Either way it says something like "Inconsistent DLL binding" The line in stdlib.h declares _environ as _CRTIMP extern char ** _environ; /* pointer to environment table */ The compiler just writes a warning, but afterwards linking fails: 1>loader.obj : error LNK2001: Nicht aufgelöstes externes Symbol "__environ". The linker complains about an "unresolved external symbol __environ". Removing our declaration of environ fixes the warning, link error and libwine seems to work OK. I don't know what the proper fix is, please advise. Maybe this code shouldn't be compiled at all? I don't think I need the loader code on Windows. Stefan

2 2

Re: [2/2] user32: Add message test for hotkeys.
by Marvin May 25, 2011

May 25, 2011

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=11184 Your paranoid android. === W7PROX64 (64 bit msg) === Timeout

1 0

Re: [1/2] user32: Add test for RegisterHotKey/UnregisterHotKey.
by Marvin May 25, 2011

May 25, 2011

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=11183 Your paranoid android. === W7PROX64 (64 bit msg) === Timeout

1 0

re: Hans Leidekker : msi: Support rollback of failed uninstalls.
by Dan Kegel May 25, 2011

May 25, 2011

wow, msi has really come a long way!

2 1

Re: USB Device Support
by Scott May 25, 2011

May 25, 2011

Hi, I've been working through my Dell Inspiron 1545 with Linux/Ubuntu 10.04 LTS experiences with ongoing reviews. I'd like to provide some help to others considering making the transition from Windows to Linux. I'm trying to get my Garmin GPS to talk to its Mapsource (running under WINE) application through a USB port. This allows tracks to be read from and written to the GPS itself. So far no luck. Can someone there please provide some advice? If this functionality isn't available yet then so be it. The Mapsource application runs fine it's just the USB communication that isn't working. Many thanks. Best - Scott

1 0

Re: [PATCH 1/2] ddraw: COM cleanup for IDirectDrawSurface3 iface
by Stefan Dösinger May 25, 2011

May 25, 2011

On Wednesday 25 May 2011 00:39:46 Ričardas Barkauskas wrote: > My first try for COM cleanup. Please donėt be too harsh :) > If this is too large for one patch, please suggest how to split it. > > This is not automatic clean up so I don't really expect it to be good on > first try. I can't find anything wrong with it on first sight, but I don't really know how to manually review a patch that large with many repetitions. I guess I could print them on a *lot* of paper and read them at the pool or something like that. I don't see an easy way to split them up either :-/ . I guess we'll have to trust Puk's script verification. Just one thing: in unsafe_impl_from_IDirectDrawSurface*: > + if (iface->lpVtbl != &ddraw_surface7_vtbl) return NULL; I don't think apps can pass in their own ddraw object implementations. I've never seen an app that does that or any document that suggests this is possible and achives something. So I'd recommend to add a FIXME() or ERR() to that case. An ERR because the most likely cause for such a behavior is that our own ddrawex.dll screws up. This is the only other place where we have a IDirectDrawSurface* implementation. Or we could just remove the check and see if we ever crash because trying to read surface implementation fields returns odd values.

2 1

re: [2/5] d3dx9: Generate effect instances from materials for mesh loading.
by Dan Kegel May 25, 2011

May 25, 2011

+ static const char diffuse_paramname[] = "Diffuse"; + static const char power_paramname[] = "Power"; + static const char specular_paramname[] = "Specular"; + static const char emissive_paramname[] = "Emissive"; + static const char ambient_paramname[] = "Ambient"; + static const DWORD basic_paramname_sizes = sizeof(diffuse_paramname) + + sizeof(power_paramname) + + sizeof(specular_paramname) + + sizeof(emissive_paramname) + + sizeof(ambient_paramname); ... It might be more readable to define material_effects[] up next to where those paramnames are defined, since it kind of clutters the loop, and it's nicer to keep the whole table definition together. (Also, at least conceptually, basic_paramname_sizes could be computed by a loop over the table. Then you wouldn't need those five _paramname variables, you could just use string constants. But if the strlen's would be expensive, I guess that's ok.) A comment or two about the layout of the output buffer might be nice. Can materials and material_ptr be const pointers? - Dan

2 2

Re: [PATCH] version: mark internal function with hidden visibility
by Alexandre Julliard May 25, 2011

May 25, 2011

Marcus Meissner <meissner(a)suse.de> writes: > @@ -348,7 +348,7 @@ static BOOL find_pe_resource( HFILE lzfd, DWORD *resLen, DWORD *resOff ) > /*********************************************************************** > * find_version_resource [internal] > */ > -DWORD find_version_resource( HFILE lzfd, DWORD *reslen, DWORD *offset ) > +DECLSPEC_HIDDEN DWORD find_version_resource( HFILE lzfd, DWORD *reslen, DWORD *offset ) > { This should be in a header. It's not very useful to make it hidden if callers are not aware of the fact. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

1 0