September 2011 - Wine-Devel

Re: [PATCH] cmd: Avoid rereading batch file for every call/goto executed (try 3)
by Dan Kegel Sept. 18, 2011

Sept. 18, 2011

2011/9/18 Dan Kegel <dank(a)kegel.com>: > Don't let this one languish - it makes a huge difference for me! I should mention: with your latest additions to the cmd tests, time to run the cmd tests is starting to go off the cliff, and is now above four minutes... but with your efficiency patch, it only takes four seconds.

3 2

Unimplemented function?
by Luis Carlos Busquets Pérez Sept. 18, 2011

Sept. 18, 2011

It seems that there is a regression in wine 1.3.28. Before bi-secting, I woul dlike to understand how that can happen. Apparently PlaChessV5.exe crashes due to: wine: Call from 0x68215ca8 to unimplemented function msvcrt.dll._snwprintf_s, aborting but when I look at the spec file, the function is defined: @ varargs _snwprintf_s(ptr long long wstr) MSVCRT__snwprintf_s and it exists in wcs.c How is it that them it results as undefined? Luis

2 2

Creating register Resource.
by Alistair Leslie-Hughes Sept. 18, 2011

Sept. 18, 2011

Hi, I'm attempting to create a RES file from the xmlparser.idl file. After I modify the Makefile with IDL_R_SRCS = xmlparser.idl The .res file is created, but no register information is generated. Have I missed something? Best Regards Alistair Leslie-Hughes

1 0

Re: [PATCH 17/19] vbscript: Added support for exit do statement
by Octavian Voicu Sept. 18, 2011

Sept. 18, 2011

On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 2:30 PM, Jacek Caban <jacek(a)codeweavers.com> wrote: > --- a/dlls/vbscript/compile.c > +++ b/dlls/vbscript/compile.c > static HRESULT compile_while_statement(compile_ctx_t *ctx, while_statement_t *stat) > { > - unsigned start_addr; > + unsigned start_addr, prev_label; ... > + if(stat->stat.type != STAT_WHILE) { > + prev_label = ctx->while_end_label; > + if((ctx->while_end_label = alloc_label(ctx)) == -1) > + return E_OUTOFMEMORY; > + } ... > + if(stat->stat.type != STAT_WHILE) { > + label_set_addr(ctx, ctx->while_end_label); > + ctx->while_end_label = prev_label; > + } Hello, This patch introduces a compile warning (gcc 4.5.2, both x86 and amd64): ../compile.c:489:26: warning: ‘prev_label’ may be used uninitialized in this function While I can see there's no actual problem, how can we shut the compiler's mouth? It may even be the case that if we just put a prev_label = 0 initializer, static analyzers will start complaining it's a useless assignment. Octavian

1 0

re: Where is the best place to report a fscanf bug found under wine-1.3.27?
by Dan Kegel Sept. 18, 2011

Sept. 18, 2011

> Today I discovered .. that the scanf family of functions was > introducing float (32-bit floating-point) noise into double (64-bit > floating-point) results. I see it here, too: $ sudo apt-get install mingw32 $ i586-mingw32msvc-gcc test_fscanf.c $ echo "1.1e+01 1.1e+00 1.1e-01 1.1e-02 1.1e-03 1.1e-04" | ~/wine-git/wine a.exe 1.10000000000000000e+001 1.10000000000000009e+000 1.10000001639127737e-001 1.10000003278255491e-002 1.10000004917383261e-003 1.10000006556511075e-004 You can work around it with 'winetricks vcrun6', after which the test program outputs: 1.10000000000000000e+001 1.10000000000000010e+000 1.10000000000000000e-001 1.09999999999999990e-002 1.10000000000000010e-003 1.10000000000000000e-004 So the problem is in wine's msvcrt.dll. You could narrow it down further by printing out the raw byte strings for the numbers and then sprinking that printout through the path from when scanf is called to where printf returns. (Or, I suppose, step through it with a debugger instead.) But the best place to report the bug is http://bugs.winehq.org - Dan

2 2

Re: [po]updated korean resource(2011-09-16)
by Francois Gouget Sept. 17, 2011

Sept. 17, 2011

> #: attrib.rc:47 > -#, fuzzy > msgid "" > "ATTRIB - Displays or changes file attributes.\n" > "\n" The reason why this one was fuzzy is that the indentation changed. However the translation's indentation has not be updated (which might possibly be ok for Korean), and it also seems to be pretty inconsistent (e.g. between the +/- lines and the R/A/etc ones. Also the '[drive:]' should probably really be indented. #: cmd.rc:288 -#, fuzzy msgid "" "CMD built-in commands are:\n" "ASSOC\t\tShow or modify file extension associations\n" The translation is missing the XCOPY line (it's hard to spot in the middle of all these lines). Maybe I should add translator comments when I mark a translation as fuzzy. This way the real translator would not have to puzzle over what caused the string to be marked as fuzzy. I have not been doing it because I worry they may be tricky to remove with some PO editors (but maybe my fears are unfounded). -- Francois Gouget <fgouget(a)free.fr> http://fgouget.free.fr/ Linux, WinNT, MS-DOS - also known as the Good, the Bad and the Ugly.

1 0

re: Severe startup latencies for Windows applications run under wine
by Dan Kegel Sept. 17, 2011

Sept. 17, 2011

Try oprofile instead. ( A really old intro is at http://www.winehq.org/wwn/249#oprofile%20&%20Wine )

4 4

Proof of concept - The crashbot
by Bruno Jesus Sept. 17, 2011

Sept. 17, 2011

Hi, I would like your opinion about a project I may start based on BuildBot (if the Dan/license allows). It's named crashbot because it's intended to automate testing of applications that crash in wine. The main goal is reduce the amount of time wasted on retesting bugzilla applications that authors abandoned. It's intented to be as easy as this: 1 - Add a new application by setting it's name, bug number and direct download url; 2 - Add requirements to run using winetricks; 3 - Set the test schedule (interval in days/weeks between repetitions); 4 - See the results in a web page which will automatically update; 5 - Auto send an email if the application starts successfully. The crashbot will run in a tmpfs to avoid disk burning and will ever run applications in a clean prefix. It would extract the downloaded program if necessary. Wine would be recompiled daily based on latest git. In the future I would like to add support to some sort of window scripting with keyboard and mouse input so it can be used not only to test startup crashs but any other kind of test (including the program installation before run). I'm not targeting it to test games for now because it would run in a very basic computer with an embedded video board. Thanks in advance and apologies if this already exists or was discussed previously. Best wishes, Bruno -- universe* god::bigbang (void); //and then it all began...

4 3

amd processors seem slow at running configure?
by Dan Kegel Sept. 17, 2011

Sept. 17, 2011

My new AMD a8-3850 takes 77 seconds to run wine's configure script. (Using -C cuts the time by 40 seconds.) Austin's Phenom II X4 940 takes 61 seconds. My i7 takes 32 seconds... but even the lowly e7300 only takes 38 seconds. The same seems to hold for doing builds with ccache; AMD fares poorly there somehow compared to similar intel chips. Does anyone have an AMD-based system that can run configure in under 40 seconds?

5 6

re: Proof of concept - The crashbot
by Dan Kegel Sept. 16, 2011

Sept. 16, 2011

Hi Bruno, it would of course be great. Check out http://code.google.com/p/winetricks/source/browse/trunk/tests/winetricks-te… for starters, we could just run that (or a subset of it) daily. It's fairly reliable, as I ran it manually every week for a while and weeded out a lot of flaky bits. When I get a chance, I'll try integrating that into buildbot. - Dan p.s. As Henri mentioned, it's been on people's minds for years. The graveyard is littered with previous attempts, e.g. http://web.archive.org/web/20070209153523/http://www.cxtest.org/ I think it's important to do the easy part first and not do anything fancy.

2 1

"make test" redux 2
by Dan Kegel Sept. 16, 2011

Sept. 16, 2011

Wine's test suite is now nine years old, and thanks in large part to Ge's testbot, new tests tend to actually work on windows. There's a lot of passing tests at http://test.winehq.org, which is awesome. Wine developers routinely use it to avoid sending bad patches. And yet, some bad patches do get sent. Running all the incoming patches from wine-patches though the reliable subset of the tests automatically has been finding about one real bug a day. Sometimes I can warn the author soon enough that he can send a revised patch before the bad one is committed. Automated testing ftw! But sometimes bad patches don't fail during the few test runs currently done, get committed, and then start causing unrelated patches to fail randomly, poisoning future test runs until it the bug is fixed or the bad patch reverted. It would be nice if Alexandre reverted bad patches as soon as the buildbot started going red, without waiting for his usual daily batch of commits, and without waiting for someone to fix the bad patch. (Maybe this can be discussed at wineconf.) Right, so that's the story for keeping new bugs out of the tree. And then there are all the old bugs. Getting them fixed sometime would be nice; until then, the buildbot just skips known bad tests. Here are the tests that fail or crash sometimes for me when run normally on 32 bit systems. (This list is a lot bigger than the one I posted back in 2009, mostly because I'm running the tests a lot more, and noticing ones that only fail occasionally.) http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28301 dlls/ddraw/tests/visual.ok http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28257 dlls/kernel32/tests/pipe.ok http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28220 dlls/kernel32/tests/process.ok http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28295 dlls/mshtml/tests/htmldoc.ok http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28290 dlls/shell32/tests/shelllink.ok http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28323 dlls/urlmon/tests/protocol.ok http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28108 dlls/urlmon/tests/url.ok http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20149 dlls/user32/tests/static.ok http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28038 dlls/wininet/tests/urlcache.ok http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28102 dlls/ws2_32/tests/sock.ok And another handful that fail or crash sometimes for me when run with WINEDEBUG=warn+heap: http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28260 dlls/dsound/tests/ds3d8.ok http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28260 dlls/dsound/tests/ds3d.ok http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28316 dlls/kernel32/tests/debugger.ok http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28257 dlls/kernel32/tests/pipe.ok http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28262 dlls/mshtml/tests/style.ok http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28258 programs/cmd/tests/batch.ok There are also tests I don't run on the buildbot because they only pass on other systems with particular window managers or sound hardware or software: http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8668 dlls/dsound/tests/ds3d8.ok http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8668 dlls/dsound/tests/ds3d.ok http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8668 dlls/dsound/tests/dsound8.ok http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8668 dlls/dsound/tests/dsound.ok http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28216 dlls/shell32/tests/shlfolder.ok http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12053 dlls/user32/tests/input.ok http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12053 dlls/user32/tests/msg.ok http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12053 dlls/user32/tests/win.ok http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28267 dlls/winhttp/tests/winhttp.ok http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28109 dlls/winmm/tests/capture.ok http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28071 dlls/winmm/tests/mci.ok http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28048 dlls/winmm/tests/wave.ok More info at http://wiki.winehq.org/BuildBot - Dan

3 4

re: [2/3] pdh/tests: Make the test pass on Windows 2000.
by Dan Kegel Sept. 16, 2011

Sept. 16, 2011

Build fails here? ccache gcc -c -I. -I. -I../../../include -I../../../include -DWINE_STRICT_PROTOTYPES -DWINE_NO_NAMELESS_EXTENSION -D_REENTRANT -fPIC -Wall -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wempty-body -Wstrict-prototypes -Wtype-limits -Wwrite-strings -Wpointer-arith -Wlogical-op -g -O0 -Werror -o propsys.o propsys.c pdh.c: In function ‘test_PdhAddCounterA’: pdh.c:134: error: ‘PDH_INVALID_PATH’ undeclared (first use in this function) pdh.c:134: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once pdh.c:134: error: for each function it appears in.) pdh.c: In function ‘test_PdhAddCounterW’: pdh.c:183: error: ‘PDH_INVALID_PATH’ undeclared (first use in this function) ../../../tools/make_ctests -o testlist.c propsys.c make[1]: *** [pdh.o] Error 1

2 1

Re: ieframe/tests: Some tests require that the user interface be in English. (resend)
by Marvin Sept. 16, 2011

Sept. 16, 2011

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14330 Your paranoid android. === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit webbrowser) === webbrowser.c:3070: Test failed: Creating WebBrowser object failed: 80040154 webbrowser.c:3070: Test failed: Creating WebBrowser object failed: 80040154 webbrowser.c:3070: Test failed: Creating WebBrowser object failed: 80040154 webbrowser.c:3070: Test failed: Creating WebBrowser object failed: 80040154 webbrowser.c:3146: Test failed: Creating WebBrowser object failed: 80040154 === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit webbrowser) === webbrowser.c:2463: Test failed: expected GetOverridesKeyPath webbrowser.c:2467: Test failed: expected Invoke_SETSECURELOCKICON webbrowser.c:2468: Test failed: expected Invoke_FILEDOWNLOAD webbrowser.c:2077: Test failed: put_Resizable failed: 80004001 webbrowser.c:2078: Test failed: expected Invoke_WINDOWSETRESIZABLE webbrowser.c:2082: Test failed: put_Resizable failed: 80004001 webbrowser.c:2083: Test failed: expected Invoke_WINDOWSETRESIZABLE webbrowser.c:2463: Test failed: expected GetOverridesKeyPath webbrowser.c:2467: Test failed: expected Invoke_SETSECURELOCKICON webbrowser.c:2468: Test failed: expected Invoke_FILEDOWNLOAD webbrowser.c:402: Test failed: unexpected call Exec_SETDOWNLOADSTATE_0 webbrowser.c:2077: Test failed: put_Resizable failed: 80004001 webbrowser.c:2078: Test failed: expected Invoke_WINDOWSETRESIZABLE webbrowser.c:2082: Test failed: put_Resizable failed: 80004001 webbrowser.c:2083: Test failed: expected Invoke_WINDOWSETRESIZABLE webbrowser.c:2463: Test failed: expected GetOverridesKeyPath webbrowser.c:2467: Test failed: expected Invoke_SETSECURELOCKICON webbrowser.c:2468: Test failed: expected Invoke_FILEDOWNLOAD webbrowser.c:455: Test failed: unexpected nCmdID 29 webbrowser.c:953: Test failed: unexpected call GetContainer webbrowser.c:503: Test failed: unexpected call webbrowser.c:953: Test failed: unexpected call GetContainer webbrowser.c:503: Test failed: unexpected call webbrowser.c:2613: Test failed: expected Invoke_SETSECURELOCKICON webbrowser.c:2733: Test failed: expected TranslateUrl webbrowser.c:2734: Test failed: expected Invoke_BEFORENAVIGATE2 webbrowser.c:2735: Test failed: expected Invoke_PROPERTYCHANGE webbrowser.c:2741: Test failed: ReadyState = 1, expected 4 webbrowser.c:2565: Test failed: ReadyState = 1, expected 4 webbrowser.c:785: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_PROPERTYCHANGE webbrowser.c:801: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_BEFORENAVIGATE2 webbrowser.c:808: Test failed: ReadyState = 1, expected 4 webbrowser.c:600: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_AMBIENT_USERMODE webbrowser.c:600: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_AMBIENT_USERMODE webbrowser.c:603: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_AMBIENT_DLCONTROL webbrowser.c:607: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_AMBIENT_USERAGENT webbrowser.c:611: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_AMBIENT_PALETTE webbrowser.c:1503: Test failed: unexpected call GetOptionKeyPath webbrowser.c:351: Test failed: unexpected call QueryStatus_SETPROGRESSTEXT webbrowser.c:785: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_PROPERTYCHANGE webbrowser.c:785: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_PROPERTYCHANGE webbrowser.c:785: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_PROPERTYCHANGE webbrowser.c:785: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_PROPERTYCHANGE webbrowser.c:455: Test failed: unexpected nCmdID 26 webbrowser.c:455: Test failed: unexpected nCmdID 29 webbrowser.c:953: Test failed: unexpected call GetContainer webbrowser.c:503: Test failed: unexpected call webbrowser.c:886: Test failed: ReadyState = 1, expected 4 webbrowser.c:1514: Test failed: unexpected call GetDropTarget webbrowser.c:953: Test failed: unexpected call GetContainer webbrowser.c:503: Test failed: unexpected call webbrowser.c:2613: Test failed: expected Invoke_SETSECURELOCKICON webbrowser.c:3106: Test failed: doc != doc2 webbrowser.c:600: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_AMBIENT_USERMODE webbrowser.c:600: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_AMBIENT_USERMODE webbrowser.c:603: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_AMBIENT_DLCONTROL webbrowser.c:607: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_AMBIENT_USERAGENT webbrowser.c:611: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_AMBIENT_PALETTE webbrowser.c:1503: Test failed: unexpected call GetOptionKeyPath webbrowser.c:351: Test failed: unexpected call QueryStatus_SETPROGRESSTEXT webbrowser.c:455: Test failed: unexpected nCmdID 26 webbrowser.c:455: Test failed: unexpected nCmdID 29 webbrowser.c:953: Test failed: unexpected call GetContainer webbrowser.c:503: Test failed: unexpected call webbrowser.c:1514: Test failed: unexpected call GetDropTarget webbrowser.c:953: Test failed: unexpected call GetContainer webbrowser.c:503: Test failed: unexpected call webbrowser.c:2606: Test failed: expected TranslateUrl webbrowser.c:2613: Test failed: expected Invoke_SETSECURELOCKICON webbrowser.c:2826: Test failed: expected RequestUIActivate webbrowser.c:2918: Test failed: Got 0x80004002 webbrowser.c:3113: Test failed: doc != doc2 webbrowser.c:3013: Test failed: QueryService failed: 80004002 webbrowser: unhandled exception c0000005 at 0040C9B2

1 0

Re: ieframe/tests: Don't crash if IWebBrowser2_get_LocationURL() fails.
by Marvin Sept. 16, 2011

Sept. 16, 2011

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14329 Your paranoid android. === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit webbrowser) === webbrowser.c:3049: Test failed: Creating WebBrowser object failed: 80040154 webbrowser.c:3049: Test failed: Creating WebBrowser object failed: 80040154 webbrowser.c:3049: Test failed: Creating WebBrowser object failed: 80040154 webbrowser.c:3049: Test failed: Creating WebBrowser object failed: 80040154 webbrowser.c:3125: Test failed: Creating WebBrowser object failed: 80040154 === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit webbrowser) === webbrowser.c:2442: Test failed: expected GetOverridesKeyPath webbrowser.c:2446: Test failed: expected Invoke_SETSECURELOCKICON webbrowser.c:2447: Test failed: expected Invoke_FILEDOWNLOAD webbrowser.c:2056: Test failed: put_Resizable failed: 80004001 webbrowser.c:2057: Test failed: expected Invoke_WINDOWSETRESIZABLE webbrowser.c:2061: Test failed: put_Resizable failed: 80004001 webbrowser.c:2062: Test failed: expected Invoke_WINDOWSETRESIZABLE webbrowser.c:2442: Test failed: expected GetOverridesKeyPath webbrowser.c:2446: Test failed: expected Invoke_SETSECURELOCKICON webbrowser.c:2447: Test failed: expected Invoke_FILEDOWNLOAD webbrowser.c:381: Test failed: unexpected call Exec_SETDOWNLOADSTATE_0 webbrowser.c:2056: Test failed: put_Resizable failed: 80004001 webbrowser.c:2057: Test failed: expected Invoke_WINDOWSETRESIZABLE webbrowser.c:2061: Test failed: put_Resizable failed: 80004001 webbrowser.c:2062: Test failed: expected Invoke_WINDOWSETRESIZABLE webbrowser.c:2442: Test failed: expected GetOverridesKeyPath webbrowser.c:2446: Test failed: expected Invoke_SETSECURELOCKICON webbrowser.c:2447: Test failed: expected Invoke_FILEDOWNLOAD webbrowser.c:434: Test failed: unexpected nCmdID 29 webbrowser.c:932: Test failed: unexpected call GetContainer webbrowser.c:482: Test failed: unexpected call webbrowser.c:932: Test failed: unexpected call GetContainer webbrowser.c:482: Test failed: unexpected call webbrowser.c:2592: Test failed: expected Invoke_SETSECURELOCKICON webbrowser.c:2712: Test failed: expected TranslateUrl webbrowser.c:2713: Test failed: expected Invoke_BEFORENAVIGATE2 webbrowser.c:2714: Test failed: expected Invoke_PROPERTYCHANGE webbrowser.c:2720: Test failed: ReadyState = 1, expected 4 webbrowser.c:2544: Test failed: ReadyState = 1, expected 4 webbrowser.c:764: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_PROPERTYCHANGE webbrowser.c:780: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_BEFORENAVIGATE2 webbrowser.c:787: Test failed: ReadyState = 1, expected 4 webbrowser.c:579: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_AMBIENT_USERMODE webbrowser.c:579: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_AMBIENT_USERMODE webbrowser.c:582: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_AMBIENT_DLCONTROL webbrowser.c:586: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_AMBIENT_USERAGENT webbrowser.c:590: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_AMBIENT_PALETTE webbrowser.c:1482: Test failed: unexpected call GetOptionKeyPath webbrowser.c:330: Test failed: unexpected call QueryStatus_SETPROGRESSTEXT webbrowser.c:764: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_PROPERTYCHANGE webbrowser.c:764: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_PROPERTYCHANGE webbrowser.c:764: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_PROPERTYCHANGE webbrowser.c:764: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_PROPERTYCHANGE webbrowser.c:434: Test failed: unexpected nCmdID 26 webbrowser.c:434: Test failed: unexpected nCmdID 29 webbrowser.c:932: Test failed: unexpected call GetContainer webbrowser.c:482: Test failed: unexpected call webbrowser.c:865: Test failed: ReadyState = 1, expected 4 webbrowser.c:1493: Test failed: unexpected call GetDropTarget webbrowser.c:932: Test failed: unexpected call GetContainer webbrowser.c:482: Test failed: unexpected call webbrowser.c:2592: Test failed: expected Invoke_SETSECURELOCKICON webbrowser.c:3085: Test failed: doc != doc2 webbrowser.c:579: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_AMBIENT_USERMODE webbrowser.c:579: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_AMBIENT_USERMODE webbrowser.c:582: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_AMBIENT_DLCONTROL webbrowser.c:586: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_AMBIENT_USERAGENT webbrowser.c:590: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_AMBIENT_PALETTE webbrowser.c:1482: Test failed: unexpected call GetOptionKeyPath webbrowser.c:330: Test failed: unexpected call QueryStatus_SETPROGRESSTEXT webbrowser.c:434: Test failed: unexpected nCmdID 26 webbrowser.c:434: Test failed: unexpected nCmdID 29 webbrowser.c:932: Test failed: unexpected call GetContainer webbrowser.c:482: Test failed: unexpected call webbrowser.c:1493: Test failed: unexpected call GetDropTarget webbrowser.c:932: Test failed: unexpected call GetContainer webbrowser.c:482: Test failed: unexpected call webbrowser.c:2585: Test failed: expected TranslateUrl webbrowser.c:2592: Test failed: expected Invoke_SETSECURELOCKICON webbrowser.c:2805: Test failed: expected RequestUIActivate webbrowser.c:2897: Test failed: Got 0x80004002 webbrowser.c:3092: Test failed: doc != doc2 webbrowser.c:2992: Test failed: QueryService failed: 80004002 webbrowser: unhandled exception c0000005 at 0040C9B2

1 0

Re: ieframe/tests: Skip some tests on Windows if WebBrowser is not supported.
by Marvin Sept. 16, 2011

Sept. 16, 2011

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14328 Your paranoid android. === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit webbrowser) === webbrowser.c:2442: Test failed: expected GetOverridesKeyPath webbrowser.c:2446: Test failed: expected Invoke_SETSECURELOCKICON webbrowser.c:2447: Test failed: expected Invoke_FILEDOWNLOAD webbrowser.c:2056: Test failed: put_Resizable failed: 80004001 webbrowser.c:2057: Test failed: expected Invoke_WINDOWSETRESIZABLE webbrowser.c:2061: Test failed: put_Resizable failed: 80004001 webbrowser.c:2062: Test failed: expected Invoke_WINDOWSETRESIZABLE webbrowser.c:2442: Test failed: expected GetOverridesKeyPath webbrowser.c:2446: Test failed: expected Invoke_SETSECURELOCKICON webbrowser.c:2447: Test failed: expected Invoke_FILEDOWNLOAD webbrowser.c:381: Test failed: unexpected call Exec_SETDOWNLOADSTATE_0 webbrowser.c:2056: Test failed: put_Resizable failed: 80004001 webbrowser.c:2057: Test failed: expected Invoke_WINDOWSETRESIZABLE webbrowser.c:2061: Test failed: put_Resizable failed: 80004001 webbrowser.c:2062: Test failed: expected Invoke_WINDOWSETRESIZABLE webbrowser.c:2442: Test failed: expected GetOverridesKeyPath webbrowser.c:2446: Test failed: expected Invoke_SETSECURELOCKICON webbrowser.c:2447: Test failed: expected Invoke_FILEDOWNLOAD webbrowser.c:434: Test failed: unexpected nCmdID 29 webbrowser.c:932: Test failed: unexpected call GetContainer webbrowser.c:482: Test failed: unexpected call webbrowser.c:932: Test failed: unexpected call GetContainer webbrowser.c:482: Test failed: unexpected call webbrowser.c:2592: Test failed: expected Invoke_SETSECURELOCKICON webbrowser.c:2712: Test failed: expected TranslateUrl webbrowser.c:2713: Test failed: expected Invoke_BEFORENAVIGATE2 webbrowser.c:2714: Test failed: expected Invoke_PROPERTYCHANGE webbrowser.c:2720: Test failed: ReadyState = 1, expected 4 webbrowser.c:2544: Test failed: ReadyState = 1, expected 4 webbrowser.c:764: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_PROPERTYCHANGE webbrowser.c:780: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_BEFORENAVIGATE2 webbrowser.c:787: Test failed: ReadyState = 1, expected 4 webbrowser.c:579: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_AMBIENT_USERMODE webbrowser.c:579: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_AMBIENT_USERMODE webbrowser.c:582: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_AMBIENT_DLCONTROL webbrowser.c:586: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_AMBIENT_USERAGENT webbrowser.c:590: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_AMBIENT_PALETTE webbrowser.c:1482: Test failed: unexpected call GetOptionKeyPath webbrowser.c:330: Test failed: unexpected call QueryStatus_SETPROGRESSTEXT webbrowser.c:764: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_PROPERTYCHANGE webbrowser.c:764: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_PROPERTYCHANGE webbrowser.c:764: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_PROPERTYCHANGE webbrowser.c:764: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_PROPERTYCHANGE webbrowser.c:434: Test failed: unexpected nCmdID 26 webbrowser.c:434: Test failed: unexpected nCmdID 29 webbrowser.c:932: Test failed: unexpected call GetContainer webbrowser.c:482: Test failed: unexpected call webbrowser.c:865: Test failed: ReadyState = 1, expected 4 webbrowser.c:1493: Test failed: unexpected call GetDropTarget webbrowser.c:932: Test failed: unexpected call GetContainer webbrowser.c:482: Test failed: unexpected call webbrowser.c:2592: Test failed: expected Invoke_SETSECURELOCKICON webbrowser.c:3085: Test failed: doc != doc2 webbrowser.c:579: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_AMBIENT_USERMODE webbrowser.c:579: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_AMBIENT_USERMODE webbrowser.c:582: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_AMBIENT_DLCONTROL webbrowser.c:586: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_AMBIENT_USERAGENT webbrowser.c:590: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_AMBIENT_PALETTE webbrowser.c:1482: Test failed: unexpected call GetOptionKeyPath webbrowser.c:330: Test failed: unexpected call QueryStatus_SETPROGRESSTEXT webbrowser.c:434: Test failed: unexpected nCmdID 26 webbrowser.c:434: Test failed: unexpected nCmdID 29 webbrowser.c:932: Test failed: unexpected call GetContainer webbrowser.c:482: Test failed: unexpected call webbrowser.c:1493: Test failed: unexpected call GetDropTarget webbrowser.c:932: Test failed: unexpected call GetContainer webbrowser.c:482: Test failed: unexpected call webbrowser.c:2585: Test failed: expected TranslateUrl webbrowser.c:2592: Test failed: expected Invoke_SETSECURELOCKICON webbrowser.c:2805: Test failed: expected RequestUIActivate webbrowser.c:2897: Test failed: Got 0x80004002 webbrowser.c:3092: Test failed: doc != doc2 webbrowser.c:2992: Test failed: QueryService failed: 80004002 webbrowser: unhandled exception c0000005 at 0040C9E2

1 0

Re: [PATCH 19/19] vbscript: Added do..while and do..until statements implementation
by Marvin Sept. 16, 2011

Sept. 16, 2011

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14325 Your paranoid android. === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WXPPROSP3 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WVISTAADM (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K8SE (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PRO (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found

1 0

Re: [PATCH 18/19] vbscript: Added do until..loop statement implementation
by Marvin Sept. 16, 2011

Sept. 16, 2011

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14324 Your paranoid android. === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WXPPROSP3 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WVISTAADM (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K8SE (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PRO (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found

1 0

Re: [PATCH 17/19] vbscript: Added support for exit do statement
by Marvin Sept. 16, 2011

Sept. 16, 2011

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14323 Your paranoid android. === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WXPPROSP3 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WVISTAADM (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K8SE (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PRO (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found

1 0

Re: [PATCH 16/19] vbscript: Added do while..loop statement implementation
by Marvin Sept. 16, 2011

Sept. 16, 2011

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14322 Your paranoid android. === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WXPPROSP3 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WVISTAADM (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K8SE (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PRO (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found

1 0

Re: [PATCH 15/19] vbscript: Added while..wend statement implementation
by Marvin Sept. 16, 2011

Sept. 16, 2011

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14321 Your paranoid android. === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WXPPROSP3 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WVISTAADM (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K8SE (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PRO (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found

1 0

Re: [PATCH 13/19] vbscript: Added class_terminate support
by Marvin Sept. 16, 2011

Sept. 16, 2011

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14319 Your paranoid android. === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WXPPROSP3 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WVISTAADM (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K8SE (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PRO (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found

1 0

Re: [PATCH 12/19] vbscript: Added class_initializer support
by Marvin Sept. 16, 2011

Sept. 16, 2011

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14317 Your paranoid android. === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WXPPROSP3 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WVISTAADM (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K8SE (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PRO (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found

1 0

Re: [PATCH 13/19 try2] vbscript: Added class functions parser implementation
by Marvin Sept. 16, 2011

Sept. 16, 2011

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14318 Your paranoid android. === WINEBUILD (build) === Patch failed to apply

1 0

Re: [PATCH 10/19] vbscript: Use default object value for objets in stack_pop_val
by Marvin Sept. 16, 2011

Sept. 16, 2011

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14315 Your paranoid android. === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WXPPROSP3 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WVISTAADM (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K8SE (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PRO (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found

1 0

Re: [PATCH 09/19] vbscript: Added support for default getters
by Marvin Sept. 16, 2011

Sept. 16, 2011

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14314 Your paranoid android. === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WXPPROSP3 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WVISTAADM (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K8SE (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PRO (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found

1 0