September 2011 - Wine-Devel

Re: [PATCH] cmd: Avoid rereading batch file for every call/goto executed (try 3)
by Dan Kegel Sept. 18, 2011

Sept. 18, 2011

2011/9/18 Dan Kegel <dank(a)kegel.com>: > Don't let this one languish - it makes a huge difference for me! I should mention: with your latest additions to the cmd tests, time to run the cmd tests is starting to go off the cliff, and is now above four minutes... but with your efficiency patch, it only takes four seconds.

3 2

Unimplemented function?
by Luis Carlos Busquets Pérez Sept. 18, 2011

Sept. 18, 2011

It seems that there is a regression in wine 1.3.28. Before bi-secting, I woul dlike to understand how that can happen. Apparently PlaChessV5.exe crashes due to: wine: Call from 0x68215ca8 to unimplemented function msvcrt.dll._snwprintf_s, aborting but when I look at the spec file, the function is defined: @ varargs _snwprintf_s(ptr long long wstr) MSVCRT__snwprintf_s and it exists in wcs.c How is it that them it results as undefined? Luis

2 2

Creating register Resource.
by Alistair Leslie-Hughes Sept. 18, 2011

Sept. 18, 2011

Hi, I'm attempting to create a RES file from the xmlparser.idl file. After I modify the Makefile with IDL_R_SRCS = xmlparser.idl The .res file is created, but no register information is generated. Have I missed something? Best Regards Alistair Leslie-Hughes

1 0

Re: [PATCH 17/19] vbscript: Added support for exit do statement
by Octavian Voicu Sept. 18, 2011

Sept. 18, 2011

On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 2:30 PM, Jacek Caban <jacek(a)codeweavers.com> wrote: > --- a/dlls/vbscript/compile.c > +++ b/dlls/vbscript/compile.c > static HRESULT compile_while_statement(compile_ctx_t *ctx, while_statement_t *stat) > { > - unsigned start_addr; > + unsigned start_addr, prev_label; ... > + if(stat->stat.type != STAT_WHILE) { > + prev_label = ctx->while_end_label; > + if((ctx->while_end_label = alloc_label(ctx)) == -1) > + return E_OUTOFMEMORY; > + } ... > + if(stat->stat.type != STAT_WHILE) { > + label_set_addr(ctx, ctx->while_end_label); > + ctx->while_end_label = prev_label; > + } Hello, This patch introduces a compile warning (gcc 4.5.2, both x86 and amd64): ../compile.c:489:26: warning: ‘prev_label’ may be used uninitialized in this function While I can see there's no actual problem, how can we shut the compiler's mouth? It may even be the case that if we just put a prev_label = 0 initializer, static analyzers will start complaining it's a useless assignment. Octavian

1 0

re: Where is the best place to report a fscanf bug found under wine-1.3.27?
by Dan Kegel Sept. 18, 2011

Sept. 18, 2011

> Today I discovered .. that the scanf family of functions was > introducing float (32-bit floating-point) noise into double (64-bit > floating-point) results. I see it here, too: $ sudo apt-get install mingw32 $ i586-mingw32msvc-gcc test_fscanf.c $ echo "1.1e+01 1.1e+00 1.1e-01 1.1e-02 1.1e-03 1.1e-04" | ~/wine-git/wine a.exe 1.10000000000000000e+001 1.10000000000000009e+000 1.10000001639127737e-001 1.10000003278255491e-002 1.10000004917383261e-003 1.10000006556511075e-004 You can work around it with 'winetricks vcrun6', after which the test program outputs: 1.10000000000000000e+001 1.10000000000000010e+000 1.10000000000000000e-001 1.09999999999999990e-002 1.10000000000000010e-003 1.10000000000000000e-004 So the problem is in wine's msvcrt.dll. You could narrow it down further by printing out the raw byte strings for the numbers and then sprinking that printout through the path from when scanf is called to where printf returns. (Or, I suppose, step through it with a debugger instead.) But the best place to report the bug is http://bugs.winehq.org - Dan

2 2

Re: [po]updated korean resource(2011-09-16)
by Francois Gouget Sept. 17, 2011

Sept. 17, 2011

> #: attrib.rc:47 > -#, fuzzy > msgid "" > "ATTRIB - Displays or changes file attributes.\n" > "\n" The reason why this one was fuzzy is that the indentation changed. However the translation's indentation has not be updated (which might possibly be ok for Korean), and it also seems to be pretty inconsistent (e.g. between the +/- lines and the R/A/etc ones. Also the '[drive:]' should probably really be indented. #: cmd.rc:288 -#, fuzzy msgid "" "CMD built-in commands are:\n" "ASSOC\t\tShow or modify file extension associations\n" The translation is missing the XCOPY line (it's hard to spot in the middle of all these lines). Maybe I should add translator comments when I mark a translation as fuzzy. This way the real translator would not have to puzzle over what caused the string to be marked as fuzzy. I have not been doing it because I worry they may be tricky to remove with some PO editors (but maybe my fears are unfounded). -- Francois Gouget <fgouget(a)free.fr> http://fgouget.free.fr/ Linux, WinNT, MS-DOS - also known as the Good, the Bad and the Ugly.

1 0

re: Severe startup latencies for Windows applications run under wine
by Dan Kegel Sept. 17, 2011

Sept. 17, 2011

Try oprofile instead. ( A really old intro is at http://www.winehq.org/wwn/249#oprofile%20&%20Wine )

4 4

Proof of concept - The crashbot
by Bruno Jesus Sept. 17, 2011

Sept. 17, 2011

Hi, I would like your opinion about a project I may start based on BuildBot (if the Dan/license allows). It's named crashbot because it's intended to automate testing of applications that crash in wine. The main goal is reduce the amount of time wasted on retesting bugzilla applications that authors abandoned. It's intented to be as easy as this: 1 - Add a new application by setting it's name, bug number and direct download url; 2 - Add requirements to run using winetricks; 3 - Set the test schedule (interval in days/weeks between repetitions); 4 - See the results in a web page which will automatically update; 5 - Auto send an email if the application starts successfully. The crashbot will run in a tmpfs to avoid disk burning and will ever run applications in a clean prefix. It would extract the downloaded program if necessary. Wine would be recompiled daily based on latest git. In the future I would like to add support to some sort of window scripting with keyboard and mouse input so it can be used not only to test startup crashs but any other kind of test (including the program installation before run). I'm not targeting it to test games for now because it would run in a very basic computer with an embedded video board. Thanks in advance and apologies if this already exists or was discussed previously. Best wishes, Bruno -- universe* god::bigbang (void); //and then it all began...

4 3

amd processors seem slow at running configure?
by Dan Kegel Sept. 17, 2011

Sept. 17, 2011

My new AMD a8-3850 takes 77 seconds to run wine's configure script. (Using -C cuts the time by 40 seconds.) Austin's Phenom II X4 940 takes 61 seconds. My i7 takes 32 seconds... but even the lowly e7300 only takes 38 seconds. The same seems to hold for doing builds with ccache; AMD fares poorly there somehow compared to similar intel chips. Does anyone have an AMD-based system that can run configure in under 40 seconds?

5 6

re: Proof of concept - The crashbot
by Dan Kegel Sept. 16, 2011

Sept. 16, 2011

Hi Bruno, it would of course be great. Check out http://code.google.com/p/winetricks/source/browse/trunk/tests/winetricks-te… for starters, we could just run that (or a subset of it) daily. It's fairly reliable, as I ran it manually every week for a while and weeded out a lot of flaky bits. When I get a chance, I'll try integrating that into buildbot. - Dan p.s. As Henri mentioned, it's been on people's minds for years. The graveyard is littered with previous attempts, e.g. http://web.archive.org/web/20070209153523/http://www.cxtest.org/ I think it's important to do the easy part first and not do anything fancy.

2 1

"make test" redux 2
by Dan Kegel Sept. 16, 2011

Sept. 16, 2011

Wine's test suite is now nine years old, and thanks in large part to Ge's testbot, new tests tend to actually work on windows. There's a lot of passing tests at http://test.winehq.org, which is awesome. Wine developers routinely use it to avoid sending bad patches. And yet, some bad patches do get sent. Running all the incoming patches from wine-patches though the reliable subset of the tests automatically has been finding about one real bug a day. Sometimes I can warn the author soon enough that he can send a revised patch before the bad one is committed. Automated testing ftw! But sometimes bad patches don't fail during the few test runs currently done, get committed, and then start causing unrelated patches to fail randomly, poisoning future test runs until it the bug is fixed or the bad patch reverted. It would be nice if Alexandre reverted bad patches as soon as the buildbot started going red, without waiting for his usual daily batch of commits, and without waiting for someone to fix the bad patch. (Maybe this can be discussed at wineconf.) Right, so that's the story for keeping new bugs out of the tree. And then there are all the old bugs. Getting them fixed sometime would be nice; until then, the buildbot just skips known bad tests. Here are the tests that fail or crash sometimes for me when run normally on 32 bit systems. (This list is a lot bigger than the one I posted back in 2009, mostly because I'm running the tests a lot more, and noticing ones that only fail occasionally.) http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28301 dlls/ddraw/tests/visual.ok http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28257 dlls/kernel32/tests/pipe.ok http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28220 dlls/kernel32/tests/process.ok http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28295 dlls/mshtml/tests/htmldoc.ok http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28290 dlls/shell32/tests/shelllink.ok http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28323 dlls/urlmon/tests/protocol.ok http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28108 dlls/urlmon/tests/url.ok http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20149 dlls/user32/tests/static.ok http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28038 dlls/wininet/tests/urlcache.ok http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28102 dlls/ws2_32/tests/sock.ok And another handful that fail or crash sometimes for me when run with WINEDEBUG=warn+heap: http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28260 dlls/dsound/tests/ds3d8.ok http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28260 dlls/dsound/tests/ds3d.ok http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28316 dlls/kernel32/tests/debugger.ok http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28257 dlls/kernel32/tests/pipe.ok http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28262 dlls/mshtml/tests/style.ok http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28258 programs/cmd/tests/batch.ok There are also tests I don't run on the buildbot because they only pass on other systems with particular window managers or sound hardware or software: http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8668 dlls/dsound/tests/ds3d8.ok http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8668 dlls/dsound/tests/ds3d.ok http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8668 dlls/dsound/tests/dsound8.ok http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8668 dlls/dsound/tests/dsound.ok http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28216 dlls/shell32/tests/shlfolder.ok http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12053 dlls/user32/tests/input.ok http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12053 dlls/user32/tests/msg.ok http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12053 dlls/user32/tests/win.ok http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28267 dlls/winhttp/tests/winhttp.ok http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28109 dlls/winmm/tests/capture.ok http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28071 dlls/winmm/tests/mci.ok http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28048 dlls/winmm/tests/wave.ok More info at http://wiki.winehq.org/BuildBot - Dan

3 4

re: [2/3] pdh/tests: Make the test pass on Windows 2000.
by Dan Kegel Sept. 16, 2011

Sept. 16, 2011

Build fails here? ccache gcc -c -I. -I. -I../../../include -I../../../include -DWINE_STRICT_PROTOTYPES -DWINE_NO_NAMELESS_EXTENSION -D_REENTRANT -fPIC -Wall -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wempty-body -Wstrict-prototypes -Wtype-limits -Wwrite-strings -Wpointer-arith -Wlogical-op -g -O0 -Werror -o propsys.o propsys.c pdh.c: In function ‘test_PdhAddCounterA’: pdh.c:134: error: ‘PDH_INVALID_PATH’ undeclared (first use in this function) pdh.c:134: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once pdh.c:134: error: for each function it appears in.) pdh.c: In function ‘test_PdhAddCounterW’: pdh.c:183: error: ‘PDH_INVALID_PATH’ undeclared (first use in this function) ../../../tools/make_ctests -o testlist.c propsys.c make[1]: *** [pdh.o] Error 1

2 1

Re: ieframe/tests: Some tests require that the user interface be in English. (resend)
by Marvin Sept. 16, 2011

Sept. 16, 2011

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14330 Your paranoid android. === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit webbrowser) === webbrowser.c:3070: Test failed: Creating WebBrowser object failed: 80040154 webbrowser.c:3070: Test failed: Creating WebBrowser object failed: 80040154 webbrowser.c:3070: Test failed: Creating WebBrowser object failed: 80040154 webbrowser.c:3070: Test failed: Creating WebBrowser object failed: 80040154 webbrowser.c:3146: Test failed: Creating WebBrowser object failed: 80040154 === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit webbrowser) === webbrowser.c:2463: Test failed: expected GetOverridesKeyPath webbrowser.c:2467: Test failed: expected Invoke_SETSECURELOCKICON webbrowser.c:2468: Test failed: expected Invoke_FILEDOWNLOAD webbrowser.c:2077: Test failed: put_Resizable failed: 80004001 webbrowser.c:2078: Test failed: expected Invoke_WINDOWSETRESIZABLE webbrowser.c:2082: Test failed: put_Resizable failed: 80004001 webbrowser.c:2083: Test failed: expected Invoke_WINDOWSETRESIZABLE webbrowser.c:2463: Test failed: expected GetOverridesKeyPath webbrowser.c:2467: Test failed: expected Invoke_SETSECURELOCKICON webbrowser.c:2468: Test failed: expected Invoke_FILEDOWNLOAD webbrowser.c:402: Test failed: unexpected call Exec_SETDOWNLOADSTATE_0 webbrowser.c:2077: Test failed: put_Resizable failed: 80004001 webbrowser.c:2078: Test failed: expected Invoke_WINDOWSETRESIZABLE webbrowser.c:2082: Test failed: put_Resizable failed: 80004001 webbrowser.c:2083: Test failed: expected Invoke_WINDOWSETRESIZABLE webbrowser.c:2463: Test failed: expected GetOverridesKeyPath webbrowser.c:2467: Test failed: expected Invoke_SETSECURELOCKICON webbrowser.c:2468: Test failed: expected Invoke_FILEDOWNLOAD webbrowser.c:455: Test failed: unexpected nCmdID 29 webbrowser.c:953: Test failed: unexpected call GetContainer webbrowser.c:503: Test failed: unexpected call webbrowser.c:953: Test failed: unexpected call GetContainer webbrowser.c:503: Test failed: unexpected call webbrowser.c:2613: Test failed: expected Invoke_SETSECURELOCKICON webbrowser.c:2733: Test failed: expected TranslateUrl webbrowser.c:2734: Test failed: expected Invoke_BEFORENAVIGATE2 webbrowser.c:2735: Test failed: expected Invoke_PROPERTYCHANGE webbrowser.c:2741: Test failed: ReadyState = 1, expected 4 webbrowser.c:2565: Test failed: ReadyState = 1, expected 4 webbrowser.c:785: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_PROPERTYCHANGE webbrowser.c:801: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_BEFORENAVIGATE2 webbrowser.c:808: Test failed: ReadyState = 1, expected 4 webbrowser.c:600: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_AMBIENT_USERMODE webbrowser.c:600: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_AMBIENT_USERMODE webbrowser.c:603: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_AMBIENT_DLCONTROL webbrowser.c:607: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_AMBIENT_USERAGENT webbrowser.c:611: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_AMBIENT_PALETTE webbrowser.c:1503: Test failed: unexpected call GetOptionKeyPath webbrowser.c:351: Test failed: unexpected call QueryStatus_SETPROGRESSTEXT webbrowser.c:785: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_PROPERTYCHANGE webbrowser.c:785: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_PROPERTYCHANGE webbrowser.c:785: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_PROPERTYCHANGE webbrowser.c:785: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_PROPERTYCHANGE webbrowser.c:455: Test failed: unexpected nCmdID 26 webbrowser.c:455: Test failed: unexpected nCmdID 29 webbrowser.c:953: Test failed: unexpected call GetContainer webbrowser.c:503: Test failed: unexpected call webbrowser.c:886: Test failed: ReadyState = 1, expected 4 webbrowser.c:1514: Test failed: unexpected call GetDropTarget webbrowser.c:953: Test failed: unexpected call GetContainer webbrowser.c:503: Test failed: unexpected call webbrowser.c:2613: Test failed: expected Invoke_SETSECURELOCKICON webbrowser.c:3106: Test failed: doc != doc2 webbrowser.c:600: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_AMBIENT_USERMODE webbrowser.c:600: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_AMBIENT_USERMODE webbrowser.c:603: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_AMBIENT_DLCONTROL webbrowser.c:607: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_AMBIENT_USERAGENT webbrowser.c:611: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_AMBIENT_PALETTE webbrowser.c:1503: Test failed: unexpected call GetOptionKeyPath webbrowser.c:351: Test failed: unexpected call QueryStatus_SETPROGRESSTEXT webbrowser.c:455: Test failed: unexpected nCmdID 26 webbrowser.c:455: Test failed: unexpected nCmdID 29 webbrowser.c:953: Test failed: unexpected call GetContainer webbrowser.c:503: Test failed: unexpected call webbrowser.c:1514: Test failed: unexpected call GetDropTarget webbrowser.c:953: Test failed: unexpected call GetContainer webbrowser.c:503: Test failed: unexpected call webbrowser.c:2606: Test failed: expected TranslateUrl webbrowser.c:2613: Test failed: expected Invoke_SETSECURELOCKICON webbrowser.c:2826: Test failed: expected RequestUIActivate webbrowser.c:2918: Test failed: Got 0x80004002 webbrowser.c:3113: Test failed: doc != doc2 webbrowser.c:3013: Test failed: QueryService failed: 80004002 webbrowser: unhandled exception c0000005 at 0040C9B2

1 0

Re: ieframe/tests: Don't crash if IWebBrowser2_get_LocationURL() fails.
by Marvin Sept. 16, 2011

Sept. 16, 2011

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14329 Your paranoid android. === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit webbrowser) === webbrowser.c:3049: Test failed: Creating WebBrowser object failed: 80040154 webbrowser.c:3049: Test failed: Creating WebBrowser object failed: 80040154 webbrowser.c:3049: Test failed: Creating WebBrowser object failed: 80040154 webbrowser.c:3049: Test failed: Creating WebBrowser object failed: 80040154 webbrowser.c:3125: Test failed: Creating WebBrowser object failed: 80040154 === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit webbrowser) === webbrowser.c:2442: Test failed: expected GetOverridesKeyPath webbrowser.c:2446: Test failed: expected Invoke_SETSECURELOCKICON webbrowser.c:2447: Test failed: expected Invoke_FILEDOWNLOAD webbrowser.c:2056: Test failed: put_Resizable failed: 80004001 webbrowser.c:2057: Test failed: expected Invoke_WINDOWSETRESIZABLE webbrowser.c:2061: Test failed: put_Resizable failed: 80004001 webbrowser.c:2062: Test failed: expected Invoke_WINDOWSETRESIZABLE webbrowser.c:2442: Test failed: expected GetOverridesKeyPath webbrowser.c:2446: Test failed: expected Invoke_SETSECURELOCKICON webbrowser.c:2447: Test failed: expected Invoke_FILEDOWNLOAD webbrowser.c:381: Test failed: unexpected call Exec_SETDOWNLOADSTATE_0 webbrowser.c:2056: Test failed: put_Resizable failed: 80004001 webbrowser.c:2057: Test failed: expected Invoke_WINDOWSETRESIZABLE webbrowser.c:2061: Test failed: put_Resizable failed: 80004001 webbrowser.c:2062: Test failed: expected Invoke_WINDOWSETRESIZABLE webbrowser.c:2442: Test failed: expected GetOverridesKeyPath webbrowser.c:2446: Test failed: expected Invoke_SETSECURELOCKICON webbrowser.c:2447: Test failed: expected Invoke_FILEDOWNLOAD webbrowser.c:434: Test failed: unexpected nCmdID 29 webbrowser.c:932: Test failed: unexpected call GetContainer webbrowser.c:482: Test failed: unexpected call webbrowser.c:932: Test failed: unexpected call GetContainer webbrowser.c:482: Test failed: unexpected call webbrowser.c:2592: Test failed: expected Invoke_SETSECURELOCKICON webbrowser.c:2712: Test failed: expected TranslateUrl webbrowser.c:2713: Test failed: expected Invoke_BEFORENAVIGATE2 webbrowser.c:2714: Test failed: expected Invoke_PROPERTYCHANGE webbrowser.c:2720: Test failed: ReadyState = 1, expected 4 webbrowser.c:2544: Test failed: ReadyState = 1, expected 4 webbrowser.c:764: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_PROPERTYCHANGE webbrowser.c:780: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_BEFORENAVIGATE2 webbrowser.c:787: Test failed: ReadyState = 1, expected 4 webbrowser.c:579: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_AMBIENT_USERMODE webbrowser.c:579: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_AMBIENT_USERMODE webbrowser.c:582: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_AMBIENT_DLCONTROL webbrowser.c:586: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_AMBIENT_USERAGENT webbrowser.c:590: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_AMBIENT_PALETTE webbrowser.c:1482: Test failed: unexpected call GetOptionKeyPath webbrowser.c:330: Test failed: unexpected call QueryStatus_SETPROGRESSTEXT webbrowser.c:764: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_PROPERTYCHANGE webbrowser.c:764: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_PROPERTYCHANGE webbrowser.c:764: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_PROPERTYCHANGE webbrowser.c:764: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_PROPERTYCHANGE webbrowser.c:434: Test failed: unexpected nCmdID 26 webbrowser.c:434: Test failed: unexpected nCmdID 29 webbrowser.c:932: Test failed: unexpected call GetContainer webbrowser.c:482: Test failed: unexpected call webbrowser.c:865: Test failed: ReadyState = 1, expected 4 webbrowser.c:1493: Test failed: unexpected call GetDropTarget webbrowser.c:932: Test failed: unexpected call GetContainer webbrowser.c:482: Test failed: unexpected call webbrowser.c:2592: Test failed: expected Invoke_SETSECURELOCKICON webbrowser.c:3085: Test failed: doc != doc2 webbrowser.c:579: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_AMBIENT_USERMODE webbrowser.c:579: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_AMBIENT_USERMODE webbrowser.c:582: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_AMBIENT_DLCONTROL webbrowser.c:586: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_AMBIENT_USERAGENT webbrowser.c:590: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_AMBIENT_PALETTE webbrowser.c:1482: Test failed: unexpected call GetOptionKeyPath webbrowser.c:330: Test failed: unexpected call QueryStatus_SETPROGRESSTEXT webbrowser.c:434: Test failed: unexpected nCmdID 26 webbrowser.c:434: Test failed: unexpected nCmdID 29 webbrowser.c:932: Test failed: unexpected call GetContainer webbrowser.c:482: Test failed: unexpected call webbrowser.c:1493: Test failed: unexpected call GetDropTarget webbrowser.c:932: Test failed: unexpected call GetContainer webbrowser.c:482: Test failed: unexpected call webbrowser.c:2585: Test failed: expected TranslateUrl webbrowser.c:2592: Test failed: expected Invoke_SETSECURELOCKICON webbrowser.c:2805: Test failed: expected RequestUIActivate webbrowser.c:2897: Test failed: Got 0x80004002 webbrowser.c:3092: Test failed: doc != doc2 webbrowser.c:2992: Test failed: QueryService failed: 80004002 webbrowser: unhandled exception c0000005 at 0040C9B2

1 0

Re: ieframe/tests: Skip some tests on Windows if WebBrowser is not supported.
by Marvin Sept. 16, 2011

Sept. 16, 2011

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14328 Your paranoid android. === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit webbrowser) === webbrowser.c:2442: Test failed: expected GetOverridesKeyPath webbrowser.c:2446: Test failed: expected Invoke_SETSECURELOCKICON webbrowser.c:2447: Test failed: expected Invoke_FILEDOWNLOAD webbrowser.c:2056: Test failed: put_Resizable failed: 80004001 webbrowser.c:2057: Test failed: expected Invoke_WINDOWSETRESIZABLE webbrowser.c:2061: Test failed: put_Resizable failed: 80004001 webbrowser.c:2062: Test failed: expected Invoke_WINDOWSETRESIZABLE webbrowser.c:2442: Test failed: expected GetOverridesKeyPath webbrowser.c:2446: Test failed: expected Invoke_SETSECURELOCKICON webbrowser.c:2447: Test failed: expected Invoke_FILEDOWNLOAD webbrowser.c:381: Test failed: unexpected call Exec_SETDOWNLOADSTATE_0 webbrowser.c:2056: Test failed: put_Resizable failed: 80004001 webbrowser.c:2057: Test failed: expected Invoke_WINDOWSETRESIZABLE webbrowser.c:2061: Test failed: put_Resizable failed: 80004001 webbrowser.c:2062: Test failed: expected Invoke_WINDOWSETRESIZABLE webbrowser.c:2442: Test failed: expected GetOverridesKeyPath webbrowser.c:2446: Test failed: expected Invoke_SETSECURELOCKICON webbrowser.c:2447: Test failed: expected Invoke_FILEDOWNLOAD webbrowser.c:434: Test failed: unexpected nCmdID 29 webbrowser.c:932: Test failed: unexpected call GetContainer webbrowser.c:482: Test failed: unexpected call webbrowser.c:932: Test failed: unexpected call GetContainer webbrowser.c:482: Test failed: unexpected call webbrowser.c:2592: Test failed: expected Invoke_SETSECURELOCKICON webbrowser.c:2712: Test failed: expected TranslateUrl webbrowser.c:2713: Test failed: expected Invoke_BEFORENAVIGATE2 webbrowser.c:2714: Test failed: expected Invoke_PROPERTYCHANGE webbrowser.c:2720: Test failed: ReadyState = 1, expected 4 webbrowser.c:2544: Test failed: ReadyState = 1, expected 4 webbrowser.c:764: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_PROPERTYCHANGE webbrowser.c:780: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_BEFORENAVIGATE2 webbrowser.c:787: Test failed: ReadyState = 1, expected 4 webbrowser.c:579: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_AMBIENT_USERMODE webbrowser.c:579: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_AMBIENT_USERMODE webbrowser.c:582: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_AMBIENT_DLCONTROL webbrowser.c:586: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_AMBIENT_USERAGENT webbrowser.c:590: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_AMBIENT_PALETTE webbrowser.c:1482: Test failed: unexpected call GetOptionKeyPath webbrowser.c:330: Test failed: unexpected call QueryStatus_SETPROGRESSTEXT webbrowser.c:764: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_PROPERTYCHANGE webbrowser.c:764: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_PROPERTYCHANGE webbrowser.c:764: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_PROPERTYCHANGE webbrowser.c:764: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_PROPERTYCHANGE webbrowser.c:434: Test failed: unexpected nCmdID 26 webbrowser.c:434: Test failed: unexpected nCmdID 29 webbrowser.c:932: Test failed: unexpected call GetContainer webbrowser.c:482: Test failed: unexpected call webbrowser.c:865: Test failed: ReadyState = 1, expected 4 webbrowser.c:1493: Test failed: unexpected call GetDropTarget webbrowser.c:932: Test failed: unexpected call GetContainer webbrowser.c:482: Test failed: unexpected call webbrowser.c:2592: Test failed: expected Invoke_SETSECURELOCKICON webbrowser.c:3085: Test failed: doc != doc2 webbrowser.c:579: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_AMBIENT_USERMODE webbrowser.c:579: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_AMBIENT_USERMODE webbrowser.c:582: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_AMBIENT_DLCONTROL webbrowser.c:586: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_AMBIENT_USERAGENT webbrowser.c:590: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_AMBIENT_PALETTE webbrowser.c:1482: Test failed: unexpected call GetOptionKeyPath webbrowser.c:330: Test failed: unexpected call QueryStatus_SETPROGRESSTEXT webbrowser.c:434: Test failed: unexpected nCmdID 26 webbrowser.c:434: Test failed: unexpected nCmdID 29 webbrowser.c:932: Test failed: unexpected call GetContainer webbrowser.c:482: Test failed: unexpected call webbrowser.c:1493: Test failed: unexpected call GetDropTarget webbrowser.c:932: Test failed: unexpected call GetContainer webbrowser.c:482: Test failed: unexpected call webbrowser.c:2585: Test failed: expected TranslateUrl webbrowser.c:2592: Test failed: expected Invoke_SETSECURELOCKICON webbrowser.c:2805: Test failed: expected RequestUIActivate webbrowser.c:2897: Test failed: Got 0x80004002 webbrowser.c:3092: Test failed: doc != doc2 webbrowser.c:2992: Test failed: QueryService failed: 80004002 webbrowser: unhandled exception c0000005 at 0040C9E2

1 0

Re: [PATCH 19/19] vbscript: Added do..while and do..until statements implementation
by Marvin Sept. 16, 2011

Sept. 16, 2011

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14325 Your paranoid android. === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WXPPROSP3 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WVISTAADM (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K8SE (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PRO (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found

1 0

Re: [PATCH 18/19] vbscript: Added do until..loop statement implementation
by Marvin Sept. 16, 2011

Sept. 16, 2011

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14324 Your paranoid android. === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WXPPROSP3 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WVISTAADM (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K8SE (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PRO (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found

1 0

Re: [PATCH 17/19] vbscript: Added support for exit do statement
by Marvin Sept. 16, 2011

Sept. 16, 2011

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14323 Your paranoid android. === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WXPPROSP3 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WVISTAADM (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K8SE (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PRO (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found

1 0

Re: [PATCH 16/19] vbscript: Added do while..loop statement implementation
by Marvin Sept. 16, 2011

Sept. 16, 2011

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14322 Your paranoid android. === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WXPPROSP3 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WVISTAADM (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K8SE (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PRO (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found

1 0

Re: [PATCH 15/19] vbscript: Added while..wend statement implementation
by Marvin Sept. 16, 2011

Sept. 16, 2011

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14321 Your paranoid android. === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WXPPROSP3 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WVISTAADM (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K8SE (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PRO (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found

1 0

Re: [PATCH 13/19] vbscript: Added class_terminate support
by Marvin Sept. 16, 2011

Sept. 16, 2011

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14319 Your paranoid android. === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WXPPROSP3 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WVISTAADM (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K8SE (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PRO (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found

1 0

Re: [PATCH 12/19] vbscript: Added class_initializer support
by Marvin Sept. 16, 2011

Sept. 16, 2011

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14317 Your paranoid android. === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WXPPROSP3 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WVISTAADM (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K8SE (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PRO (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found

1 0

Re: [PATCH 13/19 try2] vbscript: Added class functions parser implementation
by Marvin Sept. 16, 2011

Sept. 16, 2011

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14318 Your paranoid android. === WINEBUILD (build) === Patch failed to apply

1 0

Re: [PATCH 10/19] vbscript: Use default object value for objets in stack_pop_val
by Marvin Sept. 16, 2011

Sept. 16, 2011

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14315 Your paranoid android. === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WXPPROSP3 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WVISTAADM (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K8SE (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PRO (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found

1 0

Re: [PATCH 09/19] vbscript: Added support for default getters
by Marvin Sept. 16, 2011

Sept. 16, 2011

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14314 Your paranoid android. === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WXPPROSP3 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WVISTAADM (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K8SE (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PRO (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found

1 0

Re: [PATCH 08/19] vbscript: Added interp_set_member implementation
by Marvin Sept. 16, 2011

Sept. 16, 2011

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14313 Your paranoid android. === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WXPPROSP3 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WVISTAADM (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K8SE (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PRO (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found

1 0

Re: [PATCH 07/19] vbscript: Added support for exit property statement
by Marvin Sept. 16, 2011

Sept. 16, 2011

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14312 Your paranoid android. === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WXPPROSP3 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WVISTAADM (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K8SE (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PRO (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found

1 0

Re: [PATCH 06/19] vbscript: Added compiler/runtime support for property getters/letters
by Marvin Sept. 16, 2011

Sept. 16, 2011

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14311 Your paranoid android. === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WXPPROSP3 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WVISTAADM (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K8SE (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PRO (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found

1 0

Re: [PATCH 05/19] vbscript: Added getters/setters parser implementation
by Marvin Sept. 16, 2011

Sept. 16, 2011

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14310 Your paranoid android. === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WXPPROSP3 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WVISTAADM (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K8SE (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PRO (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found

1 0

Re: [PATCH 01/19] vbscript: Added class property parser implementation
by Marvin Sept. 16, 2011

Sept. 16, 2011

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14307 Your paranoid android. === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WXPPROSP3 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WVISTAADM (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K8SE (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PRO (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found

2 1

Re: [PATCH 2/5] ddraw: Use offscreen backbuffers.
by Stefan Dösinger Sept. 16, 2011

Sept. 16, 2011

On Thursday 15 September 2011 20:01:50 Henri Verbeet wrote: > In principle this allows us to use more than one backbuffer in ddraw. It's > also a requirement for the next patch. I think this, and the next patch should be implemented in wined3d by handling D3DSWAPEFFECT_FLIP in essentially the same way you're handling them in ddraw in your patches. d3d8 and d3d9 apps can request multiple backbuffers and access them explicitly just like ddraw apps can. In patch 3 I'm not sure what happens when the app draws to the frontbuffer directly. Maybe I'm a bit too tired to see it, but doesn't that result in a blit of the surface onto itself?

2 3

ubuntu ppa -- nice to have on development version too
by Susan Cragin Sept. 16, 2011

Sept. 16, 2011

There was discussion about putting a daily wine build on the ubuntu ppa. I'd like to put in a word for having it on the development version (currently oneiric) as well as the stable version (natty). Right now wine only seems to have a natty ppa.

2 2

Re: [PATCH] rpcrt4/rpc_transport.c: the named pipe can be used for multiple operations at the same time, so use overlapped operations for ReadFile and WriteFile
by Jérôme Gardou Sept. 15, 2011

Sept. 15, 2011

Le 14/09/2011 14:19, Bernhard Loos a écrit : > --- > dlls/rpcrt4/rpc_transport.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------------- > 1 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) > > Hi! I had a quite similar patch, but you beat me! Anyway, aren't those funtions susceptible to be called in a multithreaded environment? If so, having an unique event for all the read or write operations seems dangerous to me. Regards. Jérôme.

1 0

Re: [PATCH] oleaut32: OLEPictureImpl_Load uses Seek(STREAM_SEEK_END) to find the stream length
by Bernhard Loos Sept. 15, 2011

Sept. 15, 2011

On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 08:28:53AM, Marcus Meissner wrote: > On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 02:09:56PM +0200, Bernhard Loos wrote: > > --- > > dlls/oleaut32/olepicture.c | 148 +++++++++++++------------------------- > > dlls/oleaut32/tests/olepicture.c | 16 ++--- > > 2 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 110 deletions(-) > > Did make check work for you even? Marvin does not like it at least. > > This will break NonStatable streams, also seekability of streams can > not be assumed. > > Ciao, Marcus Windows never calls Stat on the stream, and it bails out, if Seek doesn't work, it certainly never reads until the end of the stream. Thats at least what happens on XP. This only breaks on jpeg images, so I suspect the difference is in the actual image rendering code. Wine always reads the complete image into memory and then creates the image from this memory buffer with IWICStream_InitializeFromMemory for example, while windows probably calls IWICStream_InitializeFromIStream. And this method reads a 4096 bytes chunk at first and depends on Read checking for the end of the stream. Bernhard

1 0

Re: msxml3: Move and Register xmlparser.idl in msxml3
by Austin English Sept. 15, 2011

Sept. 15, 2011

On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 07:35, Alistair Leslie-Hughes <leslie_alistair(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > > Changelog: > msxml3: Move and Register xmlparser.idl in msxml3 > > > Best Regards > Alistair Leslie-Hughes Howdy Alistair, You forgot to remove the include from include/Makefile.in, causing a build failure here: make[1]: Entering directory `/home/austin/wine-git/include' ../tools/makedep -C. -S.. -T.. activaut.idl activdbg.idl activscp.idl amstream.idl amvideo.idl asptlb.idl atliface.idl audioclient.idl audiopolicy.idl austream.idl bits.idl bits1_5.idl comcat.idl commoncontrols.idl control.idl cor.idl ctfutb.idl ctxtcall.idl d3d10.idl d3d10_1.idl d3d11.idl d3dcommon.idl ddstream.idl devicetopology.idl dimm.idl dispex.idl docobj.idl docobjectservice.idl downloadmgr.idl dxgi.idl endpointvolume.idl exdisp.idl fusion.idl gameux.idl hlink.idl htiframe.idl httprequest.idl iads.idl icftypes.idl iextag.idl imnact.idl imnxport.idl indexsrv.idl mediaobj.idl metahost.idl mimeinfo.idl mimeole.idl mlang.idl mmdeviceapi.idl mmstream.idl mscoree.idl msctf.idl msdadc.idl mshtmhst.idl mshtml.idl msinkaut.idl mstask.idl msxml.idl msxml2.idl msxml6.idl netcon.idl netfw.idl oaidl.idl objectarray.idl objidl.idl objsafe.idl ocidl.idl ocmm.idl oleacc.idl oledb.idl oleidl.idl optary.idl perhist.idl propidl.idl propsys.idl pstore.idl qedit.idl richole.idl sensevts.idl servprov.idl shdeprecated.idl shldisp.idl shobjidl.idl shtypes.idl strmif.idl structuredquerycondition.idl textstor.idl tom.idl unknwn.idl urlhist.idl urlmon.idl vmr9.idl wbemcli.idl wia_lh.idl wia_xp.idl wincodec.idl wine/itss.idl wine/svcctl.idl winsxs.idl wpcapi.idl wtypes.idl wuapi.idl xmllite.idl xmlparser.idl wine/winedxgi.idl stdole2.idl stdole2.tlb xmlparser.idl: No such file or directory make[1]: *** [depend] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/austin/wine-git/include' -- -Austin

1 0

re: [PATCH 13/19] vbscript: Added class functions parser implementation
by Dan Kegel Sept. 15, 2011

Sept. 15, 2011

Fails here under WINEDEBUG=warn-heap: ../../../tools/runtest -q -P wine -M vbscript.dll -T ../../.. -p vbscript_test.exe.so run.c && touch run.ok wine: Unhandled page fault on read access to 0x55555555 at address 0x4004c1e4 (thread 0019), starting debugger... Backtrace: =>0 0x4004c1e4 add_class_function+0x29(ctx=0x33fad8, class_decl=0x151dd4, decl=0x151dbc) [dlls/vbscript/parser.y:638] 1 0x4004b63e parser_parse+0xee6(ctx=0x33fad8) [dlls/vbscript/parser.y:294] 2 0x4004c3a2 parse_script+0xae(ctx=0x33fad8, code="...", ret=0x33fbe8) [dlls/vbscript/compile.c:961] 4 0x40049685 VBScriptParse_ParseScriptText+0x12d(iface=0x125e5c, pstrCode="...", pstrItemName=0x0(nil), punkContext=(nil), pstrDelimiter=0x0(nil), dwSourceContextCookie=0, ulStartingLine=0, dwFlags=0, pvarResult=(nil), pexcepinfo=(nil)) [dlls/vbscript/vbscript.c:554] 5 0x684b796d parse_script+0x32c(flags=0x8, script_str="...") [dlls/vbscript/tests/run.c:683] 6 0x684b7e99 run_from_res+0x15b(name="lang.vbs") [dlls/vbscript/tests/run.c:784] 7 0x684b845c run_tests+0x4eb() [dlls/vbscript/tests/run.c:841] 8 0x684b854c func_run+0x7a() [dlls/vbscript/tests/run.c:871] 9 0x684bb2d3 run_test+0x9e(name="run.c") [dlls/vbscript/tests/../../../include/wine/test.h:556] 0x4004c1e4 add_class_function+0x29 [dlls/vbscript/parser.y:638] in vbscript: movl 0x0(%eax),%eax 638 if(!strcmpiW(iter->name, decl->name)) { On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 8:16 AM, <buildbot(a)kegel.com> wrote: > This is an experimental automated build and test service. > Please feel free to ignore this email while we work the kinks out. > > For more info about this message, see http://wiki.winehq.org/BuildBot > > The Buildbot has detected a failed build on builder runtests-heaptest while building Wine. > Full details are available at: http://buildbot.kegel.com/builders/runtests-heaptest/builds/92 (though maybe not for long, as I'm still reinstalling the buildbot periodically while experimenting) > BUILD FAILED: failed shell_3 > > Errors: > make: *** [run.ok] Error 5 > >

2 1

Re: ole32/tests: Fix compilation on systems that don't support nameless unions.
by Alexandre Julliard Sept. 15, 2011

Sept. 15, 2011

Dan Kegel <dank(a)kegel.com> writes: > Also be a bit more uniform about using U() instead of .u when accessing LowPart. .u is better. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

1 0

Re: [PATCH] oleaut32: OLEPictureImpl_Load uses Seek(STREAM_SEEK_END) to find the stream length
by Marcus Meissner Sept. 15, 2011

Sept. 15, 2011

On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 02:09:56PM +0200, Bernhard Loos wrote: > --- > dlls/oleaut32/olepicture.c | 148 +++++++++++++------------------------- > dlls/oleaut32/tests/olepicture.c | 16 ++--- > 2 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 110 deletions(-) Did make check work for you even? Marvin does not like it at least. This will break NonStatable streams, also seekability of streams can not be assumed. Ciao, Marcus > diff --git a/dlls/oleaut32/olepicture.c b/dlls/oleaut32/olepicture.c > index 8081785..725207f 100644 > --- a/dlls/oleaut32/olepicture.c > +++ b/dlls/oleaut32/olepicture.c > @@ -1324,15 +1324,13 @@ static HRESULT OLEPictureImpl_LoadAPM(OLEPictureImpl *This, > */ > static HRESULT WINAPI OLEPictureImpl_Load(IPersistStream* iface, IStream *pStm) { > HRESULT hr; > - BOOL headerisdata; > - BOOL statfailed = FALSE; > - ULONG xread, toread; > - ULONG headerread; > + ULONG xread, toread = 0; > BYTE *xbuf; > DWORD header[2]; > WORD magic; > - STATSTG statstg; > OLEPictureImpl *This = impl_from_IPersistStream(iface); > + ULARGE_INTEGER end, start; > + LARGE_INTEGER offset; > > TRACE("(%p,%p)\n",This,pStm); > > @@ -1348,104 +1346,56 @@ static HRESULT WINAPI OLEPictureImpl_Load(IPersistStream* iface, IStream *pStm) > * At least in Visual Basic 6, resource streams, valid headers are > * header[0] == "lt\0\0", > * header[1] == length_of_stream. > - * > - * Also handle streams where we do not have a working "Stat" method by > - * reading all data until the end of the stream. > */ > - hr = IStream_Stat(pStm,&statstg,STATFLAG_NONAME); > - if (hr != S_OK) { > - TRACE("stat failed with hres %x, proceeding to read all data.\n",hr); > - statfailed = TRUE; > - /* we will read at least 8 byte ... just right below */ > - statstg.cbSize.QuadPart = 8; > - } > + offset.QuadPart = 0; > > - toread = 0; > - headerread = 0; > - headerisdata = FALSE; > do { > - hr = IStream_Read(pStm, header, 8, &xread); > - if (hr != S_OK || xread!=8) { > - ERR("Failure while reading picture header (hr is %x, nread is %d).\n",hr,xread); > - return (hr?hr:E_FAIL); > - } > - headerread += xread; > - xread = 0; > - > - if (!memcmp(&(header[0]),"lt\0\0", 4) && (statfailed || (header[1] + headerread <= statstg.cbSize.QuadPart))) { > - if (toread != 0 && toread != header[1]) > - FIXME("varying lengths of image data (prev=%u curr=%u), only last one will be used\n", > - toread, header[1]); > - toread = header[1]; > - if (toread == 0) break; > - } else { > - if (!memcmp(&(header[0]), "GIF8", 4) || /* GIF header */ > - !memcmp(&(header[0]), "BM", 2) || /* BMP header */ > - !memcmp(&(header[0]), "\xff\xd8", 2) || /* JPEG header */ > - (header[0] == EMR_HEADER) || /* EMF header */ > - (header[1] > statstg.cbSize.QuadPart)|| /* invalid size */ > - (header[1]==0) > - ) {/* Found start of bitmap data */ > - headerisdata = TRUE; > - if (toread == 0) > - toread = statstg.cbSize.QuadPart-8; > - else toread -= 8; > - xread = 8; > - } else { > - FIXME("Unknown stream header magic: %08x\n", header[0]); > - toread = header[1]; > - } > - } > - } while (!headerisdata); > - > - if (statfailed) { /* we don't know the size ... read all we get */ > - int sizeinc = 4096; > - int origsize = sizeinc; > - ULONG nread = 42; > - > - TRACE("Reading all data from stream.\n"); > - xbuf = HeapAlloc (GetProcessHeap(), HEAP_ZERO_MEMORY, origsize); > - if (headerisdata) > - memcpy (xbuf, header, 8); > - while (1) { > - while (xread < origsize) { > - hr = IStream_Read(pStm,xbuf+xread,origsize-xread,&nread); > - xread += nread; > - if (hr != S_OK || !nread) > - break; > - } > - if (!nread || hr != S_OK) /* done, or error */ > - break; > - if (xread == origsize) { > - origsize += sizeinc; > - sizeinc = 2*sizeinc; /* exponential increase */ > - xbuf = HeapReAlloc (GetProcessHeap(), HEAP_ZERO_MEMORY, xbuf, origsize); > - } > - } > - if (hr != S_OK) > - TRACE("hr in no-stat loader case is %08x\n", hr); > - TRACE("loaded %d bytes.\n", xread); > - This->datalen = xread; > - This->data = xbuf; > - } else { > - This->datalen = toread+(headerisdata?8:0); > - xbuf = This->data = HeapAlloc (GetProcessHeap(), HEAP_ZERO_MEMORY, This->datalen); > - if (!xbuf) > - return E_OUTOFMEMORY; > - > - if (headerisdata) > - memcpy (xbuf, header, 8); > - > - while (xread < This->datalen) { > - ULONG nread; > - hr = IStream_Read(pStm,xbuf+xread,This->datalen-xread,&nread); > - xread += nread; > - if (hr != S_OK || !nread) > - break; > - } > - if (xread != This->datalen) > - ERR("Could only read %d of %d bytes out of stream?\n",xread,This->datalen); > + hr = IStream_Seek(pStm, offset, STREAM_SEEK_CUR, &start); > + if (FAILED(hr)) > + return hr; > + > + hr = IStream_Read(pStm, header, 8, &xread); > + if (FAILED(hr) || xread!=8) { > + ERR("Failure while reading picture header (hr is %x, nread is %d).\n",hr,xread); > + return (FAILED(hr)?hr:E_FAIL); > + } > + > + if (memcmp(&(header[0]),"lt", 2)) { > + if (!toread) { > + hr = IStream_Seek(pStm, offset, STREAM_SEEK_END, &end); > + if (FAILED(hr)) > + return hr; > + toread = end.QuadPart - start.QuadPart; > + } > + offset.QuadPart = start.QuadPart; > + hr = IStream_Seek(pStm, offset, STREAM_SEEK_SET, NULL); > + if (FAILED(hr)) > + return hr; > + break; > + } > + else { > + toread = header[1]; > + if (toread == 0) > + break; > + } > + } while (1); > + > + This->datalen = toread; > + xbuf = This->data = HeapAlloc (GetProcessHeap(), HEAP_ZERO_MEMORY, This->datalen); > + if (!xbuf) > + return E_OUTOFMEMORY; > + > + xread = 0; > + while (xread < This->datalen) { > + ULONG nread; > + hr = IStream_Read(pStm,xbuf+xread,This->datalen-xread,&nread); > + xread += nread; > + if (FAILED(hr) || !nread) > + break; > } > + if (xread != This->datalen) > + ERR("Could only read %d of %d bytes out of stream?\n",xread,This->datalen); > + > if (This->datalen == 0) { /* Marks the "NONE" picture */ > This->desc.picType = PICTYPE_NONE; > return S_OK; > diff --git a/dlls/oleaut32/tests/olepicture.c b/dlls/oleaut32/tests/olepicture.c > index 54de1cb..b1fad94 100644 > --- a/dlls/oleaut32/tests/olepicture.c > +++ b/dlls/oleaut32/tests/olepicture.c > @@ -1063,20 +1063,14 @@ static HRESULT WINAPI NoStatStreamImpl_Read( > { > NoStatStreamImpl* const This = impl_from_IStream(iface); > void* supportBuffer; > - ULONG bytesReadBuffer; > - ULONG bytesToReadFromBuffer; > > - if (pcbRead==0) > - pcbRead = &bytesReadBuffer; > - bytesToReadFromBuffer = min( This->streamSize.u.LowPart - This->currentPosition.u.LowPart, cb); > supportBuffer = GlobalLock(This->supportHandle); > - memcpy(pv, (char *) supportBuffer+This->currentPosition.u.LowPart, bytesToReadFromBuffer); > - This->currentPosition.u.LowPart+=bytesToReadFromBuffer; > - *pcbRead = bytesToReadFromBuffer; > + memcpy(pv, (char *) supportBuffer+This->currentPosition.u.LowPart, cb); > + This->currentPosition.u.LowPart+=cb; > GlobalUnlock(This->supportHandle); > - if(*pcbRead == cb) > - return S_OK; > - return S_FALSE; > + if(pcbRead) > + *pcbRead = cb; > + return S_OK; > } > > static HRESULT WINAPI NoStatStreamImpl_Write( > -- Working, but not speaking, for the following german company: SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, HRB 16746 (AG Nuernberg) Geschaeftsfuehrer: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendoerffer

1 0

Re: [PATCH 19/19] vbscript: Added stop statement semi-stub implementation
by Marvin Sept. 15, 2011

Sept. 15, 2011

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14271 Your paranoid android. === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WXPPROSP3 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WVISTAADM (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K8SE (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PRO (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found

1 0

Re: [PATCH 18/19] vbscript: Added this object to identifier lookup chanin
by Marvin Sept. 15, 2011

Sept. 15, 2011

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14270 Your paranoid android. === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WXPPROSP3 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WVISTAADM (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K8SE (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PRO (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found

1 0

Re: [PATCH 17/19] vbscript: Added interp_mcall implementation
by Marvin Sept. 15, 2011

Sept. 15, 2011

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14269 Your paranoid android. === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WXPPROSP3 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WVISTAADM (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K8SE (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PRO (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found

1 0

Re: [PATCH 13/19] vbscript: Added class functions parser implementation
by Marvin Sept. 15, 2011

Sept. 15, 2011

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14266 Your paranoid android. === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WXPPROSP3 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WVISTAADM (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K8SE (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PRO (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found

1 0

Re: [PATCH 12/19] vbscript: Added function storage specifiers support
by Marvin Sept. 15, 2011

Sept. 15, 2011

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14265 Your paranoid android. === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WXPPROSP3 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WVISTAADM (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K8SE (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PRO (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found

1 0

Re: [PATCH 06/19] vbscript: Added interp_new implementation
by Marvin Sept. 15, 2011

Sept. 15, 2011

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14262 Your paranoid android. === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WXPPROSP3 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WVISTAADM (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K8SE (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PRO (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found

1 0

Re: [PATCH 04/19] vbscript: Added interp_set_ident implementation
by Marvin Sept. 15, 2011

Sept. 15, 2011

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14261 Your paranoid android. === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WXPPROSP3 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WVISTAADM (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K8SE (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PRO (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found

1 0

Re: [PATCH 01/19] vbscript: Added class parser implementation
by Marvin Sept. 15, 2011

Sept. 15, 2011

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14260 Your paranoid android. === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WXPPROSP3 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WVISTAADM (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K8SE (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PRO (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found

1 0

Re: [PATCH] oleaut32: OLEPictureImpl_Load uses Seek(STREAM_SEEK_END) to find the stream length
by Marvin Sept. 15, 2011

Sept. 15, 2011

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14259 Your paranoid android. === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit olepicture) === olepicture: unhandled exception c0000005 at 780109B3 === WXPPROSP3 (32 bit olepicture) === olepicture: unhandled exception c0000005 at 77C46FA3 === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit olepicture) === olepicture: unhandled exception c0000005 at 77BD7E23 === WVISTAADM (32 bit olepicture) === olepicture: unhandled exception c0000005 at 76F29B2B === W2K8SE (32 bit olepicture) === olepicture: unhandled exception c0000005 at 76149F09 === W7PRO (32 bit olepicture) === olepicture: unhandled exception c0000005 at 75CA9B60 === W7PROX64 (32 bit olepicture) === olepicture: unhandled exception c0000005 at 777A9B60 === W7PROX64 (64 bit olepicture) === Timeout

1 0

Re: pdh/tests: Some tests require that the user interface be in English. (try 2)
by Marvin Sept. 15, 2011

Sept. 15, 2011

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14256 Your paranoid android. === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit pdh) === pdh.c:157: Test failed: PdhAddCounterA failed 0xc0000bc4 pdh.c:204: Test failed: PdhAddCounterW failed 0xc0000bc4

1 0

Re: msi: Improve parsing of the package platform.
by Marvin Sept. 15, 2011

Sept. 15, 2011

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14255 Your paranoid android. === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit install) === install.c:6000: Test failed: Per-user icon file isn't where it's expected (C:\WINNT\Profiles\Default User\Application Data\Microsoft\Installer\{7DF88A49-996F-4EC8-A022-BF956F9B2CBB}\testicon)

1 0

Re: cmd/tests: Add RENAME tests
by Marvin Sept. 14, 2011

Sept. 14, 2011

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14246 Your paranoid android. === WVISTAADM (32 bit) === Failure running script in VM: The specified guest user must be logged in interactively to perform this operation

1 0