September 2011 - Wine-Devel

Re: [PATCH 17/19] vbscript: Added interp_mcall implementation
by Marvin Sept. 15, 2011

Sept. 15, 2011

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14269 Your paranoid android. === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WXPPROSP3 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WVISTAADM (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K8SE (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PRO (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found

1 0

Re: [PATCH 13/19] vbscript: Added class functions parser implementation
by Marvin Sept. 15, 2011

Sept. 15, 2011

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14266 Your paranoid android. === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WXPPROSP3 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WVISTAADM (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K8SE (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PRO (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found

1 0

Re: [PATCH 12/19] vbscript: Added function storage specifiers support
by Marvin Sept. 15, 2011

Sept. 15, 2011

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14265 Your paranoid android. === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WXPPROSP3 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WVISTAADM (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K8SE (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PRO (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found

1 0

Re: [PATCH 06/19] vbscript: Added interp_new implementation
by Marvin Sept. 15, 2011

Sept. 15, 2011

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14262 Your paranoid android. === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WXPPROSP3 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WVISTAADM (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K8SE (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PRO (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found

1 0

Re: [PATCH 04/19] vbscript: Added interp_set_ident implementation
by Marvin Sept. 15, 2011

Sept. 15, 2011

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14261 Your paranoid android. === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WXPPROSP3 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WVISTAADM (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K8SE (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PRO (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found

1 0

Re: [PATCH 01/19] vbscript: Added class parser implementation
by Marvin Sept. 15, 2011

Sept. 15, 2011

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14260 Your paranoid android. === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WXPPROSP3 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WVISTAADM (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K8SE (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PRO (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found

1 0

Re: [PATCH] oleaut32: OLEPictureImpl_Load uses Seek(STREAM_SEEK_END) to find the stream length
by Marvin Sept. 15, 2011

Sept. 15, 2011

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14259 Your paranoid android. === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit olepicture) === olepicture: unhandled exception c0000005 at 780109B3 === WXPPROSP3 (32 bit olepicture) === olepicture: unhandled exception c0000005 at 77C46FA3 === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit olepicture) === olepicture: unhandled exception c0000005 at 77BD7E23 === WVISTAADM (32 bit olepicture) === olepicture: unhandled exception c0000005 at 76F29B2B === W2K8SE (32 bit olepicture) === olepicture: unhandled exception c0000005 at 76149F09 === W7PRO (32 bit olepicture) === olepicture: unhandled exception c0000005 at 75CA9B60 === W7PROX64 (32 bit olepicture) === olepicture: unhandled exception c0000005 at 777A9B60 === W7PROX64 (64 bit olepicture) === Timeout

1 0

Re: pdh/tests: Some tests require that the user interface be in English. (try 2)
by Marvin Sept. 15, 2011

Sept. 15, 2011

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14256 Your paranoid android. === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit pdh) === pdh.c:157: Test failed: PdhAddCounterA failed 0xc0000bc4 pdh.c:204: Test failed: PdhAddCounterW failed 0xc0000bc4

1 0

Re: msi: Improve parsing of the package platform.
by Marvin Sept. 15, 2011

Sept. 15, 2011

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14255 Your paranoid android. === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit install) === install.c:6000: Test failed: Per-user icon file isn't where it's expected (C:\WINNT\Profiles\Default User\Application Data\Microsoft\Installer\{7DF88A49-996F-4EC8-A022-BF956F9B2CBB}\testicon)

1 0

Re: cmd/tests: Add RENAME tests
by Marvin Sept. 14, 2011

Sept. 14, 2011

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=14246 Your paranoid android. === WVISTAADM (32 bit) === Failure running script in VM: The specified guest user must be logged in interactively to perform this operation

1 0