May 2012 - Wine-Devel - list.winehq.org

Re: [PATCH 5/9] jscript: Better handling of to_integer result in String.lastIndexOf
by Marvin May 3, 2012

May 3, 2012

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=18203 Your paranoid android. === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WXPPROSP3 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WVISTAADM (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K8SE (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PRO (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === TEST64_W7SP1 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found === TEST64_W7SP1 (64 bit) === No test summary line found

1 0

Re: [PATCH 4/9] jscript: Bettter handling of to_number result in String.indexOf
by Marvin May 3, 2012

May 3, 2012

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=18202 Your paranoid android. === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WXPPROSP3 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WVISTAADM (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K8SE (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PRO (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === TEST64_W7SP1 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found === TEST64_W7SP1 (64 bit) === No test summary line found

1 0

Re: [PATCH 3/9] jscript: Better handling of to_integer result in String.charCodeAt
by Marvin May 3, 2012

May 3, 2012

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=18201 Your paranoid android. === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WXPPROSP3 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WVISTAADM (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K8SE (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PRO (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === TEST64_W7SP1 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found === TEST64_W7SP1 (64 bit) === No test summary line found

1 0

Re: [PATCH 2/9] jscript: Better handling of to_integer result in String.charAt
by Marvin May 3, 2012

May 3, 2012

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=18200 Your paranoid android. === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WXPPROSP3 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WVISTAADM (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K8SE (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PRO (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === TEST64_W7SP1 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found === TEST64_W7SP1 (64 bit) === No test summary line found

1 0

Re: [PATCH 1/9] jscript: Better handling of to_integer result in Array.splice
by Marvin May 3, 2012

May 3, 2012

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=18199 Your paranoid android. === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WXPPROSP3 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WVISTAADM (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K8SE (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PRO (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === TEST64_W7SP1 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found === TEST64_W7SP1 (64 bit) === No test summary line found

1 0

Re: [PATCH 2/2] d3drm: Implement IDirect3DRMFrameX_GetChildren method and IDirect3DRMFrameArray interface. (try 2) (resend)
by Marvin May 3, 2012

May 3, 2012

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=18196 Your paranoid android. === WINEBUILD (build) === Patch failed to apply

1 0

Building 64 & 32 bit wine on Ubuntu 12.10?
by Dan Kegel May 3, 2012

May 3, 2012

What's the standard procedure for building both 32 and 64 bit wine together on Ubuntu 12.10? Sadly, it seems you can't install both 32 and 64 bit development files at the same time. And trying to use a 32 bit chroot is awkward because wine's build system tries to use the 64 bit makedep from inside the 32 bit chroot (which fails because the 64 bit shared libraries aren't present).

2 1

GSOC 2012 has started
by Austin English May 2, 2012

May 2, 2012

Howdy, Google Summer of Code 2012 has started, and we have 5 students this year: Józef Kucia - Implement missing functions in D3DX9, mentored by Stefan Dösinger - https://google-melange.appspot.com/gsoc/project/google/gsoc2012/jos/58002 Lucas Fialho Zawacki, mentored by Joystick configuration and testing applet Marcus Meissner - https://google-melange.appspot.com/gsoc/project/google/gsoc2012/lfzawacki/3… Magdalena Nowak - Control Panel, mentored by Owen Rudge - https://google-melange.appspot.com/gsoc/project/google/gsoc2012/magdalena/1… Marek K Chmiel - Encryption – digital signature security, mentored by Juan Lang - https://google-melange.appspot.com/gsoc/project/google/gsoc2012/mkchmiel/16… Qian Hong - GSoC project: Improve CJK font support, mentored by Aric Stewart - https://google-melange.appspot.com/gsoc/project/google/gsoc2012/fracting/11… Good luck everyone! -- -Austin

3 3

Re: [PATCH] include: Add definition of IKsControl interface in dmksctrl.h.
by Alexandre Julliard May 2, 2012

May 2, 2012

Christian Costa <titan.costa(a)gmail.com> writes: > +typedef struct { > + union { > + struct { > + GUID Set; > + ULONG Id; > + ULONG Flags; > + }; > + LONGLONG Alignment; > + }; > +} KSIDENTIFIER, *PKSIDENTIFIER; Check how anonymous unions/structs are done in other headers. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

1 0

Re: [PATCH] dmusic: Midi message takes 4 bytes space but only 3 are relevant + add tests to check buffer content.
by Alexandre Julliard May 2, 2012

May 2, 2012

Christian Costa <titan.costa(a)gmail.com> writes: > +static inline char* debugstr_longlong(LONGLONG val) > +{ > + static char string[17]; > + sprintf(string, "%08x%08x", *((DWORD*)&val + 1), *(DWORD*)&val); > + return string; Check how this is done in other places. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

1 0

Re: kernel32/tests: Add tests for K32GetModuleFileNameEx (try 2)
by Alexandre Julliard May 2, 2012

May 2, 2012

Bruno Jesus <00cpxxx(a)gmail.com> writes: > try2: > Based on latest git > > Tests intended as complement for the buffer overflow fix from > > http://source.winehq.org/git/wine.git/commitdiff/fd11023e4b44b18af7f9d44b21… This should be merged with the existing psapi tests. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

1 0

Re: [1/5] d3dx9: Implement mapping from WICPixelFormat GUIDs to D3DFORMATs.
by Stefan Dösinger May 2, 2012

May 2, 2012

It looks like patch 2 is missing

2 1

Re: [1/5] d3dx9: Implement mapping from WICPixelFormat GUIDs to D3DFORMATs.
by Stefan Dösinger May 2, 2012

May 2, 2012

Am Mittwoch, 2. Mai 2012, 14:55:35 schrieb Józef Kucia: > +static const struct > +{ > + const GUID *wic_guid; > + D3DFORMAT d3dformat; > +} wic_pixel_formats[] = { Wouldn't it make sense to include this info in PixelFormatDesc?

2 1

Re: [PATCH 2/2] mshtml: Added IHTMLWindow2::get_history implementation
by Marvin May 2, 2012

May 2, 2012

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=18178 Your paranoid android. === WXPPROSP3 (32 bit dom) === dom.c:4490: Test failed: unexpected guid {FECEAAA2-8405-11CF-8BA1-00AA00476DA6} === WVISTAADM (32 bit dom) === dom.c:4490: Test failed: unexpected guid {FECEAAA2-8405-11CF-8BA1-00AA00476DA6} === W2K8SE (32 bit dom) === dom.c:4490: Test failed: unexpected guid {FECEAAA2-8405-11CF-8BA1-00AA00476DA6}

1 0

Find Wine software installer
by Shanuka Wijekoon May 1, 2012

May 1, 2012

haiiii I have a problem that i need to track the software installation.that means I need to keep the location where the files are installed. Are there any place in wine source code to get help for my problem. thank you.

2 1

Re: kernel32/tests: Add tests for K32GetModuleFileNameEx
by Bruno Jesus May 1, 2012

May 1, 2012

On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 02:34, Bruno Jesus <00cpxxx(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Add some tests required for http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30543 Please, ignore this patch. It was based on old git. Apologies, Bruno

1 0

Re: [PATCH 4/4] amstream: Add stubbed implementation of AudioStreamSample. (try 2) (resend)
by Marvin May 1, 2012

May 1, 2012

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=18153 Your paranoid android. === WINEBUILD (build) === Patch failed to apply

1 0

Re: [PATCH 3/4] amstream: Add stubbed implementation of DirectDrawStreamSample. (try 2) (resend)
by Marvin May 1, 2012

May 1, 2012

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=18152 Your paranoid android. === WINEBUILD (build) === Patch failed to apply

1 0

Re: [PATCH 1/4] dmusic: Add tests to enumerate master clocks.
by Marvin May 1, 2012

May 1, 2012

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=18151 Your paranoid android. === WINEBUILD (build) === Patch failed to apply

1 0

Fwd: Ubuntu 12.04 (version#2, drop previous mail)
by Eric Pouech May 1, 2012

May 1, 2012

for the devels having upgraded their boxes to ubuntu 12.04, here's a couple of stuff I had to do, especially to get 32bit wine compile This could be useful if you want to have a dual x86_64 : i386 setup this is an updated version to what I already sent to scott ritchie of course this is not a step by step installation, just hints if you want to take that road (version #3) (I'm using a multiarch x86_64/i386) now wine compiles and runs in 32bit while compiled on 64bit machine here's the summary of the pain getting it right after upgrade in response to https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wine1.4/+bug/944321 I was able to compile 32bit-wine on 64bit as I always, and without a chroot or anything similar Problem #1 ---------- an old (11.10 according to the dates) directory was left over after migration, whereas it should have been removed /usr/include/i386-linux-gnu Problem #2 ---------- a ton of symlinks are missing in /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu for example [root:/usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu]# ls -l /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libfree* lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 20 avril 3 10:54 /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libfreetype.so.6 -> libfreetype.so.6.8.0 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 624084 avril 3 10:54 /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libfreetype.so.6.8.0 and it misses lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 avril 28 21:30 /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libfreetype.so -> libfreetype.so.6 the same applies for a lot libraries libXcursor.so libXi.so libXxf86vm.so libxrandr.so libxinerama.so libxcomposite.so libGLU.so libdbus-1.so (libdbus-1.so lies in /lib/i386-linux-gnu, not /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu) libgnutls.so libsane.so libv4l1.so libgphoto2.so libgphoto2_port.so libgstreamer-0.10.so (***) libcapi20.so libcups.so libfontconfig.so libtiff.so libmpg123.so libopenal.so libxrender.so libGL.so (libGL.so is in mesa subdir!!!) libxml2.so libxslt.so libssl.so libcrypto.so libjpeg.so (***) libpng.so.0 (libpng12.so.0 lies in /lib/i386-linux-gnu, not /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu) libXext.so the ones marked (***) means that the symlink is missing but it doesn't solve fully the issue from a wine perspective (see below) Problem #3 (jpeg) ----------------- Fails to open<jconfig.h>. which only lies in /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/jconfig.h, and couldn't be accessed from 32bit build Creating the /usr/include/i386-linux-gnu/ directory and creating a symlink for jconfig.h to /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/jconfig.h just works (I checked the contents of jconfig.h and it looks reasonable to do so) Problem #4 (gstreamer) ---------------------- it doesn't work as only /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/glib-2.0/include/glibconfig.h is installed (/usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/glib-2.0/include/glibconfig.h doesn't exist, dpkg -S doesn't find it) and /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/glib-2.0/include/glibconfig.h defines gint64 as long, which is correct on 64bit targets one wrong on 32 bit ones... one should craft a decent /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/glib-2.0/include/glibconfig.h, or grab one out of pure i386 install (I haven't had time to look further into those, my main interest was to have a 32bit setup up& running) List of potentially installed i386 packages ------------------------------------------- fixed by installing i386 packages (not exhaustive, unfortunately, as I didn't note all the :i386 packages I've manually installed) libldap2.so alternatively, if I do a [eric:~]$ dpkg -l | grep i386 | grep -- -dev ii libc6-dev-i386 2.15-0ubuntu10 Embedded GNU C Library: 32-bit development libraries for AMD64 ii libldap2-dev:i386 2.4.28-1.1ubuntu4 OpenLDAP development libraries ii libpthread-stubs0-dev:i386 0.3-3 pthread stubs not provided by native libc, development files ii libx11-dev:i386 2.1.4.99.1-0ubuntu2 X11 client-side library (development headers) ii libxau-dev:i386 1:1.0.6-4 X11 authorisation library (development headers) ii libxcb1-dev:i386 1.8.1-1 X C Binding, development files ii libxdmcp-dev:i386 1:1.1.0-4 X11 authorisation library (development headers) tends to ask for libc6-dev:i386, libldap2-dev:i386, libx11-dev:i386, libxau-dev:i386, libxcb1-dev:i386, libxdmcp-dev:i386 as dedicated installations of dev:i386 packages but strangely enough, when looking at details, libx11-dev (for example) cannot be installed with libx11-dev:i386 according to manifest, but I have both installed (and both install the same files in /usr/include for example) this looks very strange indeed List of stuff that won't work ----------------------------- won't be supported (just to note them, as those are the left overs from the configure failing list) compiled without multiarch support: libhal, libgsm Warning at compilation ---------------------- when compiling, some warnings still have to be worked upon /home/eric/work/wine/dlls/winex11.drv/keyboard.c:1109:5: warning: 'XKeycodeToKeysym' is deprecated (declared at /usr/include/X11/Xlib.h:1695) [-Wdeprecated-declarations] this one can be forgotten for now (it's just being marked deprecated in precise, so warning doesn't come from misconfiguration) debugging (32bit and 64bit) is broken ------------------------------------- the debugging is broken it turns out that ptrace and prctl (which had to be added in 11.10) work fine when tracing, only the first started process get correct pid out of wineserver in socket SCM_CREDENTIALS info. the later get 0 I tried to force the pid without requiring the recvmsg stuff and it works just fine I've not found yet the change that broke this more to come if get any futher on the remaining topics A+ -- Eric Pouech "The problem with designing something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of a complete idiot." (Douglas Adams)

5 7

Re: [PATCH 4/4] ws2_32/tests: Test for IOCP behavior without AcceptEx call (resend).
by Marvin May 1, 2012

May 1, 2012

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=18138 Your paranoid android. === W7PROX64 (64 bit sock) === sock.c:5628: Test failed: Internal status is c0000120 === TEST64_W7SP1 (64 bit sock) === sock.c:5628: Test failed: Internal status is c0000120

1 0

Re: [PATCH 3/4] ws2_32/tests: Test for AcceptEx IOCP behavior for a duplicated handle (try 2).
by Marvin May 1, 2012

May 1, 2012

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=18137 Your paranoid android. === W7PROX64 (64 bit sock) === sock.c:5628: Test failed: Internal status is c0000120 === TEST64_W7SP1 (64 bit sock) === sock.c:5628: Test failed: Internal status is c0000120

1 0

Re: [PATCH 4/4] ws2_32/tests: Test for IOCP behavior without AcceptEx call.
by Marvin May 1, 2012

May 1, 2012

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=18134 Your paranoid android. === WVISTAADM (32 bit sock) === sock.c:5628: Test failed: Internal status is c0000120 === W2K8SE (32 bit sock) === sock.c:5628: Test failed: Internal status is c0000120 === W7PRO (32 bit sock) === sock.c:5628: Test failed: Internal status is c0000120 === W7PROX64 (32 bit sock) === sock.c:5628: Test failed: Internal status is c0000120 === TEST64_W7SP1 (32 bit sock) === sock.c:5628: Test failed: Internal status is c0000120 === W7PROX64 (64 bit sock) === sock.c:5628: Test failed: Internal status is c0000120 === TEST64_W7SP1 (64 bit sock) === sock.c:5628: Test failed: Internal status is c0000120

1 0

Re: [PATCH 3/4] ws2_32/tests: Test for AcceptEx IOCP behavior for a duplicated handle.
by Marvin May 1, 2012

May 1, 2012

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=18133 Your paranoid android. === WVISTAADM (32 bit sock) === sock.c:5628: Test failed: Internal status is c0000120 === W2K8SE (32 bit sock) === sock.c:5628: Test failed: Internal status is c0000120 === W7PRO (32 bit sock) === sock.c:5628: Test failed: Internal status is c0000120 === W7PROX64 (32 bit sock) === sock.c:5628: Test failed: Internal status is c0000120 === TEST64_W7SP1 (32 bit sock) === sock.c:5628: Test failed: Internal status is c0000120 === W7PROX64 (64 bit sock) === sock.c:5628: Test failed: Internal status is c0000120 === TEST64_W7SP1 (64 bit sock) === sock.c:5628: Test failed: Internal status is c0000120

1 0