May 2012 - Wine-Devel - list.winehq.org

Re: [PATCH 5/9] jscript: Better handling of to_integer result in String.lastIndexOf
by Marvin May 3, 2012

May 3, 2012

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=18203 Your paranoid android. === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WXPPROSP3 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WVISTAADM (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K8SE (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PRO (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === TEST64_W7SP1 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found === TEST64_W7SP1 (64 bit) === No test summary line found

1 0

Re: [PATCH 4/9] jscript: Bettter handling of to_number result in String.indexOf
by Marvin May 3, 2012

May 3, 2012

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=18202 Your paranoid android. === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WXPPROSP3 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WVISTAADM (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K8SE (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PRO (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === TEST64_W7SP1 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found === TEST64_W7SP1 (64 bit) === No test summary line found

1 0

Re: [PATCH 3/9] jscript: Better handling of to_integer result in String.charCodeAt
by Marvin May 3, 2012

May 3, 2012

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=18201 Your paranoid android. === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WXPPROSP3 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WVISTAADM (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K8SE (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PRO (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === TEST64_W7SP1 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found === TEST64_W7SP1 (64 bit) === No test summary line found

1 0

Re: [PATCH 2/9] jscript: Better handling of to_integer result in String.charAt
by Marvin May 3, 2012

May 3, 2012

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=18200 Your paranoid android. === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WXPPROSP3 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WVISTAADM (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K8SE (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PRO (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === TEST64_W7SP1 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found === TEST64_W7SP1 (64 bit) === No test summary line found

1 0

Re: [PATCH 1/9] jscript: Better handling of to_integer result in Array.splice
by Marvin May 3, 2012

May 3, 2012

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=18199 Your paranoid android. === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WXPPROSP3 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WVISTAADM (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K8SE (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PRO (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === TEST64_W7SP1 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found === TEST64_W7SP1 (64 bit) === No test summary line found

1 0

Re: [PATCH 2/2] d3drm: Implement IDirect3DRMFrameX_GetChildren method and IDirect3DRMFrameArray interface. (try 2) (resend)
by Marvin May 3, 2012

May 3, 2012

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=18196 Your paranoid android. === WINEBUILD (build) === Patch failed to apply

1 0

Building 64 & 32 bit wine on Ubuntu 12.10?
by Dan Kegel May 2, 2012

May 2, 2012

What's the standard procedure for building both 32 and 64 bit wine together on Ubuntu 12.10? Sadly, it seems you can't install both 32 and 64 bit development files at the same time. And trying to use a 32 bit chroot is awkward because wine's build system tries to use the 64 bit makedep from inside the 32 bit chroot (which fails because the 64 bit shared libraries aren't present).

2 1

GSOC 2012 has started
by Austin English May 2, 2012

May 2, 2012

Howdy, Google Summer of Code 2012 has started, and we have 5 students this year: Józef Kucia - Implement missing functions in D3DX9, mentored by Stefan Dösinger - https://google-melange.appspot.com/gsoc/project/google/gsoc2012/jos/58002 Lucas Fialho Zawacki, mentored by Joystick configuration and testing applet Marcus Meissner - https://google-melange.appspot.com/gsoc/project/google/gsoc2012/lfzawacki/3… Magdalena Nowak - Control Panel, mentored by Owen Rudge - https://google-melange.appspot.com/gsoc/project/google/gsoc2012/magdalena/1… Marek K Chmiel - Encryption – digital signature security, mentored by Juan Lang - https://google-melange.appspot.com/gsoc/project/google/gsoc2012/mkchmiel/16… Qian Hong - GSoC project: Improve CJK font support, mentored by Aric Stewart - https://google-melange.appspot.com/gsoc/project/google/gsoc2012/fracting/11… Good luck everyone! -- -Austin

3 3

Re: [PATCH] include: Add definition of IKsControl interface in dmksctrl.h.
by Alexandre Julliard May 2, 2012

May 2, 2012

Christian Costa <titan.costa(a)gmail.com> writes: > +typedef struct { > + union { > + struct { > + GUID Set; > + ULONG Id; > + ULONG Flags; > + }; > + LONGLONG Alignment; > + }; > +} KSIDENTIFIER, *PKSIDENTIFIER; Check how anonymous unions/structs are done in other headers. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

1 0

Re: [PATCH] dmusic: Midi message takes 4 bytes space but only 3 are relevant + add tests to check buffer content.
by Alexandre Julliard May 2, 2012

May 2, 2012

Christian Costa <titan.costa(a)gmail.com> writes: > +static inline char* debugstr_longlong(LONGLONG val) > +{ > + static char string[17]; > + sprintf(string, "%08x%08x", *((DWORD*)&val + 1), *(DWORD*)&val); > + return string; Check how this is done in other places. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

1 0