January 2013 - Wine-Devel - list.winehq.org

Re: [7/7] wmiutils: Add tests.
by Marvin Jan. 2, 2013

Jan. 2, 2013

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=23686 Your paranoid android. === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit path) === path.c:102: Test failed: got 80040154 path: unhandled exception c0000005 at 00401303 === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit path) === path.c:102: Test failed: got 80040154 path: unhandled exception c0000005 at 00401303

1 0

Re: [PATCH] ddraw: Don't discard buffers that haven't been used in draws
by Henri Verbeet Jan. 2, 2013

Jan. 2, 2013

On 2 January 2013 12:26, Stefan Dösinger <stefan(a)codeweavers.com> wrote: > Fixes bug 32485. I'm sure we've had this discussion wrt. commit messages before, but this tells me just about nothing about what problem this patch is supposed to fix, or why this is the correct solution. Also, do you have tests for this?

2 1

Re: [11/12] kernel32: Add support for {Get|Set}NamedPipeHandleState().
by Marvin Jan. 2, 2013

Jan. 2, 2013

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=23681 Your paranoid android. === WINEBUILD (build) === Patch failed to apply

1 0

Re: xbox 360 emulation with logitech cordless and dinput joy disable
by Stefan Dösinger Jan. 1, 2013

Jan. 1, 2013

Hi, The patch needs a few improvements before it can be accepted into Wine. I can't comment on the dinput / xinput specifics of the patch, so this is a non- exhaustive list of general suggestions. Concerning the big picture, this patch needs a few discussions about xinput.dll design. There have been some discussions about that in the past, and I hope that some dinput devs can help out. Am Dienstag, 12. Juni 2012, 23:48:53 schrieb Giovanni Ongaro: > From: root <root(a)joe.(none)> Please configure git correctly, see http://wiki.winehq.org/GitWine section 3.3. Also consider using a non-root user, but that's your personal setup, so not really my business. > + if (getenv("LINIXFORCENOJOY") != NULL) return FALSE; /*JoeFix disable joystick*/ The problem with dinput vs xinput conflicts should probably be solved in a different manner. That aside, such configurations are usually done via registry keys. Also comments like /* I changed this here */ are useless, the git history stores this information anyway. > + <...> //JoeFix DEAD ZONE This is a C++ comment and not allowed in Wine. See http://wiki.winehq.org/SubmittingPatches > + fdJoy=open("/dev/input/js0",O_RDONLY | O_NONBLOCK); Xinput.dll should not open joystick devices directy, and definitely not a hardcoded one. I don't know if there's consensus about how xinput should be implemented, but basing it on top of dinput might be a start. A good start would be to write a few tests to test how Windows announces(or doesn't announce) Xbox gamepads and other gamepads/joysticks to games. My understanding is that xinput.dll only works for Xbox gamepads. Do those show up in dinput on Windows? > +#define DEAD_ZONE 4096 > ... > + if (e.number == 4) { > + if (e.value == 1) { > + FIXME("TRIGGER LEFT PRESSED\n"); > + pState->Gamepad.bLeftTrigger=32767; > + } > + else { > + pState->Gamepad.bLeftTrigger=0; > + } > ... > +#define JOYMAX 30000 > +#define JOYMIN -30000 The hardcoded numbers look questionable. The 4 and 1 are probably specific to the joystick, the 32767 might have a symbolic name like XINPUT_MAX or something. A part of this seems to be needed due to the attempt to emulate an xbox gamepad with a different device. Personally I'm not opposed to doing that, and you might need some device specific tricks to pull this off. However, this needs a more structured approach than hardcoding the values needed for one specific Logitech device in the code. Best regards, Stefan

3 2

Re: [PATCH] dsound: rework ugly mixer logic
by Andrew Eikum Jan. 1, 2013

Jan. 1, 2013

On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 01:24:03AM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > + if(!maxq){ > + /* nothing to do! */ > + LeaveCriticalSection(&device->mixlock); > + return; > } This was removed in 8ba4090fc304993. It breaks starting the device in some situations (write primary mode iirc). > + if (native) { > + void *buffer = NULL; > + > + hr = IAudioRenderClient_GetBuffer(device->render, maxq / block, (void*)&buffer); > + if(FAILED(hr)){ > + WARN("GetBuffer failed: %08x\n", hr); > + LeaveCriticalSection(&device->mixlock); > + return; > + } I think this (mixing directly to RenderClient and skipping WaveQueue) could be split into a separate patch. > hres = IAudioClient_Initialize(device->client, > AUDCLNT_SHAREMODE_SHARED, AUDCLNT_STREAMFLAGS_NOPERSIST | > - AUDCLNT_STREAMFLAGS_EVENTCALLBACK, prebuf_rt, 0, device->pwfx, NULL); > + AUDCLNT_STREAMFLAGS_EVENTCALLBACK, 800000, 0, device->pwfx, NULL); ... > + frames = (UINT64)device->pwfx->nSamplesPerSec * 800000 / 10000000; Could you #define the 800000? Anyway, I gave it a test on ALSA+Pulse and didn't find any issues. I'll test the other backends when you resubmit. Andrew

2 3