October 2013 - Wine-Devel - list.winehq.org

Re: [02/23] user32/tests: Fix class tests compilation with __WINESRC__ defined.
by Marvin Oct. 23, 2013

Oct. 23, 2013

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2950 Your paranoid android. === w864 (32 bit class) === class.c:692: Test failed: Windows should be Unicode

1 0

Re: [01/23] user32/tests: Fix broadcast tests compilation with __WINESRC__ defined.
by Marvin Oct. 23, 2013

Oct. 23, 2013

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2949 Your paranoid android. === w864 (64 bit broadcast) === The test timed out

1 0

Re: comdlg32/tests: Use BOOL type where appropriate
by Marvin Oct. 22, 2013

Oct. 22, 2013

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2943 Your paranoid android. === w2008s64 (64 bit filedlg) === No test summary line found

1 0

Re: [PATCH 5/6] user32/tests: Test SetUserObjectInformation for invisible winstation.
by Marvin Oct. 22, 2013

Oct. 22, 2013

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2941 Your paranoid android. === w2008s64 (32 bit winstation) === winstation.c:927: Test failed: unexpected foreground window 0001004E

1 0

Mono Update
by Alistair Leslie-Hughes Oct. 22, 2013

Oct. 22, 2013

Hi, wine-mono hasn't been updated in nearly a year. Should it be time to consider a new release? Thoughts. Best Regards Alistair Leslie-Hughes

2 2

Re: comctl32/tests: Preparation for switching __WINESRC__ on
by Marvin Oct. 22, 2013

Oct. 22, 2013

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2934 Your paranoid android. === wvista (32 bit listview) === listview.c:5043: Test failed: NM_HOVER allow test: the msg sequence is not complete: expected 0087 - actual 0000 listview.c:5048: Test failed: NM_HOVER block test: the msg sequence is not complete: expected 0087 - actual 0000 === w2008s64 (32 bit listview) === listview.c:5043: Test failed: NM_HOVER allow test: the msg sequence is not complete: expected 0087 - actual 0000 listview.c:5048: Test failed: NM_HOVER block test: the msg sequence is not complete: expected 0087 - actual 0000 === w7pro64 (32 bit listview) === listview.c:5043: Test failed: NM_HOVER allow test: the msg sequence is not complete: expected 0087 - actual 0000 listview.c:5048: Test failed: NM_HOVER block test: the msg sequence is not complete: expected 0087 - actual 0000 === w864 (32 bit listview) === listview.c:5043: Test failed: NM_HOVER allow test: the msg sequence is not complete: expected 0087 - actual 0000 listview.c:5048: Test failed: NM_HOVER block test: the msg sequence is not complete: expected 0087 - actual 0000 === w2008s64 (64 bit listview) === listview.c:5043: Test failed: NM_HOVER allow test: the msg sequence is not complete: expected 0087 - actual 0000 listview.c:5048: Test failed: NM_HOVER block test: the msg sequence is not complete: expected 0087 - actual 0000 === w7pro64 (64 bit listview) === listview.c:5043: Test failed: NM_HOVER allow test: the msg sequence is not complete: expected 0087 - actual 0000 listview.c:5048: Test failed: NM_HOVER block test: the msg sequence is not complete: expected 0087 - actual 0000

1 0

Re: [PATCH 3/3] msvcrt: Don't output __ptr64 when UNDNAME_NO_MS_KEYWORDS is used
by Marvin Oct. 22, 2013

Oct. 22, 2013

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2929 Your paranoid android. === build (build) === Patch failed to apply

1 0

Re: [PATCH 2/3] msvcrt: Output ptr64 when UNDNAME_NO_LEADING_UNDERSCORES flag is used
by Marvin Oct. 22, 2013

Oct. 22, 2013

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2928 Your paranoid android. === build (build) === Patch failed to apply

1 0

Re: [PATCH 1/3] msvcrt: Add support for UNDNAME_NO_THISTYPE flag in __unDName
by Marvin Oct. 22, 2013

Oct. 22, 2013

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2927 Your paranoid android. === build (build) === Patch failed to apply

1 0

Re: oleaut32: Added a preliminary test, for scale overflow, in VarDecCmp. (try 2) (resend)
by Marvin Oct. 22, 2013

Oct. 22, 2013

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2926 Your paranoid android. === build (build) === Patch failed to apply

1 0

Re: oleaut32: Added a preliminary test, for scale overflow, in VarDecCmp. (resend)
by Dmitry Timoshkov Oct. 21, 2013

Oct. 21, 2013

Christopher Cope <ccope3(a)utk.edu> wrote: > --- a/dlls/oleaut32/vartype.c > +++ b/dlls/oleaut32/vartype.c > @@ -5836,7 +5836,9 @@ HRESULT WINAPI VarDecRound(const DECIMAL* pDecIn, int cDecimals, DECIMAL* pDecOu > HRESULT WINAPI VarDecCmp(const DECIMAL* pDecLeft, const DECIMAL* pDecRight) > { > HRESULT hRet; > - DECIMAL result; > + static DECIMAL scaleFactor; Is there a reason to make this variable static? -- Dmitry.

1 0

Re: shlwapi: Test and fix the behaviour of the CopyTo method for file sizes not multiple of the internal buffer size, on SHCreateStreamOnFileEx-returned IStreams.
by Vincent Povirk Oct. 21, 2013

Oct. 21, 2013

We should probably still exit the loop if fewer bytes were read than requested, rather than do another read at the end of the file.

1 0

Re: msvcrt: Make first call to fwrite bufferred
by Piotr Caban Oct. 21, 2013

Oct. 21, 2013

Please ignore this patch, it slows down fwrite on unbuffered FILE's. On 10/21/13 15:43, Piotr Caban wrote: > Without this patch fwrite allocates the buffer on first call and doesn't > use it. > --- > dlls/msvcrt/file.c | 125 > +++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------------ > 1 file changed, 54 insertions(+), 71 deletions(-) > > > > >

1 0

Re: [02/02] d3d8: update locked_rect only if wined3d_surface_map succeeds
by Marvin Oct. 21, 2013

Oct. 21, 2013

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2910 Your paranoid android. === w864 (32 bit device) === device.c:2481: Test failed: Expected foreground window 000401A4, got 00010084. device.c:3174: Test failed: Expected wndproc 0x4107a0, got 0x4107a0. device.c:4029: Test failed: pBits changed on double lock. device.c:4030: Test failed: Pitch changed on double lock.

1 0

Re: [23/23] kernel32/tests: Enable kernel32 tests compilation with __WINESRC__ defined.
by Marvin Oct. 21, 2013

Oct. 21, 2013

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2908 Your paranoid android. === wxppro (32 bit) === No test summary line found === wvista (32 bit) === No test summary line found === w2008s64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === w7pro64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === w864 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === w2008s64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found === w7pro64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found === w864 (64 bit) === No test summary line found

1 0

Re: [01/02] d3d9: update locked_rect only if wined3d_surface_map succeeds
by Henri Verbeet Oct. 21, 2013

Oct. 21, 2013

On 21 October 2013 10:46, Lasse Rasinen <lrasinen(a)iki.fi> wrote: > diff --git a/dlls/d3d9/tests/device.c b/dlls/d3d9/tests/device.c > index 02b4174..51835c8 100644 > --- a/dlls/d3d9/tests/device.c > +++ b/dlls/d3d9/tests/device.c > @@ -5402,8 +5402,12 @@ static void test_lockrect_invalid(void) > > hr = IDirect3DSurface9_LockRect(surface, &locked_rect, NULL, 0); > ok(SUCCEEDED(hr), "Failed to lock surface with rect NULL, hr %#x.\n", hr); > + locked_rect.pBits = 0xdeadbeef; > + locked_rect.Pitch = 1; > hr = IDirect3DSurface9_LockRect(surface, &locked_rect, NULL, 0); > ok(hr == D3DERR_INVALIDCALL, "Got unexpected hr %#x.\n", hr); > + ok(locked_rect.pBits == 0xdeadbeef, "pBits changed on double lock.\n"); > + ok(locked_rect.Pitch == 1, "Pitch changed on double lock.\n"); > hr = IDirect3DSurface9_UnlockRect(surface); > ok(SUCCEEDED(hr), "Failed to unlock surface, hr %#x.\n", hr); > This introduces warnings: device.c: In function ‘test_lockrect_invalid’: device.c:5405:23: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast [enabled by default] device.c:5409:26: warning: comparison between pointer and integer [enabled by default] Also applies to the d3d8 test.

1 0

Re: [03/23] kernel32/tests: Fix console tests compilation with __WINESRC__ defined.
by Marvin Oct. 21, 2013

Oct. 21, 2013

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2889 Your paranoid android. === w864 (32 bit console) === console.c:1113: Test failed: Expected OpenConsoleW to return INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE for index 18, got 00000138 console.c:1113: Test failed: Expected OpenConsoleW to return INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE for index 20, got 0000013C console.c:1113: Test failed: Expected OpenConsoleW to return INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE for index 21, got 0000014C console.c:1113: Test failed: Expected OpenConsoleW to return INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE for index 22, got 00000148 console.c:1113: Test failed: Expected OpenConsoleW to return INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE for index 23, got 00000144 console.c:1113: Test failed: Expected OpenConsoleW to return INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE for index 24, got 00000150 console.c:1113: Test failed: Expected OpenConsoleW to return INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE for index 25, got 00000154 console.c:1113: Test failed: Expected OpenConsoleW to return INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE for index 26, got 00000158 console.c:1113: Test failed: Expected OpenConsoleW to return INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE for index 28, got 0000015C console.c:1113: Test failed: Expected OpenConsoleW to return INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE for index 29, got 00000160 console.c:1113: Test failed: Expected OpenConsoleW to return INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE for index 30, got 00000164 console.c:1113: Test failed: Expected OpenConsoleW to return INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE for index 31, got 00000168 console.c:1113: Test failed: Expected OpenConsoleW to return INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE for index 32, got 0000016C console.c:1113: Test failed: Expected OpenConsoleW to return INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE for index 33, got 00000170 console.c:1421: Test failed: [13] Expected output count to be 0, got 1987557047 console.c:1421: Test failed: [15] Expected output count to be 0, got 1987557047 console.c:1421: Test failed: [18] Expected output count to be 3735928559, got 1987557047 console.c:1664: Test failed: [13] Expected output count to be 0, got 1987557047 console.c:1664: Test failed: [15] Expected output count to be 0, got 1987557047 console.c:1664: Test failed: [18] Expected output count to be 3735928559, got 1987557047 === w864 (64 bit console) === console.c:1113: Test failed: Expected OpenConsoleW to return INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE for index 18, got 0000000000000054 console.c:1113: Test failed: Expected OpenConsoleW to return INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE for index 20, got 0000000000000058 console.c:1113: Test failed: Expected OpenConsoleW to return INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE for index 23, got 0000000000000060

1 0

Re: server: Implement job objects (try 3)
by Alexandre Julliard Oct. 21, 2013

Oct. 21, 2013

Andrew Cook <ariscop(a)gmail.com> writes: > It's been another 3 weeks with zero response. You keep sending more and more versions of the same patches, so it seems clear that this stuff is not ready yet. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

1 0

Re: [02/23] kernel32/tests: Fix file change notification tests compilation with __WINESRC__ defined.
by Marvin Oct. 21, 2013

Oct. 21, 2013

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2888 Your paranoid android. === wvista (32 bit change) === change.c:81: Test failed: Missed notification

1 0

Clang Static analysis
by C.W. Betts Oct. 21, 2013

Oct. 21, 2013

I have been doing a Clang static analysis of Wine on OS X using the one provided at http://clang-analyzer.llvm.org and storing the results on my PogoPlug drive. If someone wants to see the results, please tell me and I'll set up your e-mail. You will need a free PogoPlug account to view them. While the contents are zipped, they expand to about 1.2 GB. They are displayed as basic HTML pages, so you don't need anything special other than a web browser to see the results. Or you could click on this link for the analysis of 1.7.4: http://ppl.ug/ND-7PZ3cSzM/

2 1

Re: shell32: Avoid leaks and add parameter checks in SHCreateShellFolderView[Ex]. (try 2)
by Marvin Oct. 20, 2013

Oct. 20, 2013

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2885 Your paranoid android. === w864 (64 bit shlfolder) === shlfolder: unhandled exception c0000005 at 000007F851EBABDC

2 1

Re: shell32: Avoid leaks and add parameter checks in SHCreateShellFolderView[Ex].
by Marvin Oct. 20, 2013

Oct. 20, 2013

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2880 Your paranoid android. === w864 (64 bit shlfolder) === shlfolder: unhandled exception c0000005 at 000007F851EBABDC

1 0

Re: shell32: Avoid leaks and add parameter checks in SHCreateShellFolderView[Ex].
by Nikolay Sivov Oct. 20, 2013

Oct. 20, 2013

On 10/20/2013 21:01, Thomas Faber wrote: > + if (0) > + { > + // crash on win7 > + pSHCreateShellFolderViewEx(NULL, NULL); > + pSHCreateShellFolderViewEx(NULL, &psv); > + pSHCreateShellFolderViewEx(&csfv, NULL); > + } Please no cpp comments. > + MAKEFUNC_ORD(SHCreateShellFolderViewEx, 174); > + MAKEFUNC_ORD(SHCreateShellFolderView, 256); These call are exported by name at least on XP, probably 2000 too, so it makes no sense to use ordinals here. > + if (!pSHCreateShellFolderView || !pSHCreateShellFolderViewEx) > + { > + win_skip("SHCreateShellFolderView or SHCreateShellFolderViewEx missing.\n"); > + return; > + } I don't think it's really possible to have *Ex version without non-Ex one. > + hr = SHGetDesktopFolder(&desktop); > + ok(hr == S_OK, "got (0x%08x)\n", hr); > + if (FAILED(hr)) > + { > + skip("No desktop folder\n"); > + return; > + } It's not going to fail, so a ok() test is enough. > + memset(&sfvc, 0, sizeof(sfvc)); > + sfvc.cbSize = sizeof(sfvc); > + sfvc.pshf = desktop; > + psv = (void *)0xdeadbeef; > + hr = pSHCreateShellFolderView(&sfvc, &psv); > + ok(hr == S_OK, "Got 0x%08x\n", hr); > + ok(psv != NULL, "psv = %p\n", psv); > + if (psv && psv != (void *)0xdeadbeef) > + { > + refCount = IShellView_Release(psv); > + ok(refCount == 0, "refCount = %u\n", refCount); > + } It's simpler than that. Set 'psv' to NULL and test for it being set after a call. > + test_SHCreateShellFolderView(); You're testing two calls here, so they probably deserve two separate test functions.

1 0

Re: shell32/tests: Use BOOL type where appropriate
by Marvin Oct. 19, 2013

Oct. 19, 2013

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2879 Your paranoid android. === wxppro (32 bit shlexec) === shlexec.c:1197: Test failed: expected 1 args, got 4 shlexec.c:1538: Test failed: argvA4 expected 'C:\DOCUME~1\winetest\LOCALS~1\Temp\wt1.tmp\test file.shlexec', got 'C:\DOCUME~1\winetest\LOCALS~1\Temp\wt1.tmp\TESTFI~1.SHL' shlexec.c:1538: Test failed: argvA4 expected 'C:\DOCUME~1\winetest\LOCALS~1\Temp\wt1.tmp\test file.shlexec.', got 'C:\DOCUME~1\winetest\LOCALS~1\Temp\wt1.tmp\TESTFI~1.SHL' shlexec.c:1538: Test failed: argvA4 expected 'C:\DOCUME~1\winetest\LOCALS~1\Temp\wt1.tmp\%nasty% $file.shlexec', got 'C:\DOCUME~1\winetest\LOCALS~1\Temp\wt1.tmp\%NASTY~1.SHL' shlexec.c:1538: Test failed: argvA4 expected 'C:/DOCUME~1/winetest/LOCALS~1/Temp/wt1.tmp/test file.shlexec', got 'C:\DOCUME~1\winetest\LOCALS~1\Temp\wt1.tmp\TESTFI~1.SHL' shlexec.c:1538: Test failed: argvA4 expected 'C:\DOCUME~1\winetest\LOCALS~1\Temp\wt1.tmp\test file.noassoc.shlexec', got 'C:\DOCUME~1\winetest\LOCALS~1\Temp\wt1.tmp\TESTFI~2.SHL' shlexec.c:1538: Test failed: argvA4 expected 'C:\DOCUME~1\winetest\LOCALS~1\Temp\wt1.tmp\masked file.shlexec', got 'C:\DOCUME~1\winetest\LOCALS~1\Temp\wt1.tmp\MASKED~1.SHL' shlexec.c:1538: Test failed: argvA4 expected 'C:\DOCUME~1\winetest\LOCALS~1\Temp\wt1.tmp\masked file.shlexec', got 'C:\DOCUME~1\winetest\LOCALS~1\Temp\wt1.tmp\MASKED~1.SHL' shlexec.c:1631: Test failed: argvA4 expected 'C:\DOCUME~1\winetest\LOCALS~1\Temp\wt1.tmp\test file.shlexec', got 'C:\DOCUME~1\winetest\LOCALS~1\Temp\wt1.tmp\TESTFI~1.SHL' shlexec.c:1939: Test failed: argvA4 expected 'C:\Documents and Settings\winetest\Local Settings\Temp\wt1.tmp\test file.shlexec', got 'C:\DOCUME~1\winetest\LOCALS~1\Temp\wt1.tmp\TESTFI~1.SHL' shlexec.c:1947: Test failed: argvA4 expected 'C:\Documents and Settings\winetest\Local Settings\Temp\wt1.tmp\test file.shlexec', got 'C:\DOCUME~1\winetest\LOCALS~1\Temp\wt1.tmp\TESTFI~1.SHL' shlexec.c:2250: Test failed: argvA3 expected 'C:\DOCUME~1\winetest\LOCALS~1\Temp\wt1.tmp\test file.sde', got 'C:\DOCUME~1\winetest\LOCALS~1\Temp\wt1.tmp\TESTFI~1.SDE' shlexec.c:2250: Test failed: argvA3 expected 'C:\DOCUME~1\winetest\LOCALS~1\Temp\wt1.tmp\test file.sde', got 'C:\DOCUME~1\winetest\LOCALS~1\Temp\wt1.tmp\TESTFI~1.SDE' shlexec.c:2240: Test failed: argcA expected 5, but got 4 === wvista (32 bit shlexec) === shlexec.c:137: Test failed: ShellExecute(file="C:\Users\winetest\AppData\Local\Temp\wtC34E.tmp\test file.noassoc") WaitForSingleObject returned 258 shlexec.c:1506: Test failed: ShellExecute(file="C:\Users\winetest\AppData\Local\Temp\wtC34E.tmp\test file.noassoc") failed: rc=33 err=2 shlexec.c:1530: Test failed: argvA3 expected 'Open', but key not found or empty shlexec.c:1538: Test failed: argvA4 expected 'C:\Users\winetest\AppData\Local\Temp\wtC34E.tmp\test file.noassoc', but key not found or empty === w2008s64 (32 bit shlexec) === shlexec.c:1538: Test failed: argvA4 expected 'C:/Users/ADMINI~1/AppData/Local/Temp/wt9F4A.tmp/test file.shlexec', got 'C:\Users\Administrator\AppData\Local\Temp\wt9F4A.tmp\test file.shlexec' shlexec.c:2606: Test failed: longPath expected 'C:\Users\ADMINI~1\AppData\Local\Temp\wt9F4A.tmp\test2.exe', got 'C:\Users\Administrator\AppData\Local\Temp\wt9F4A.tmp\test2.exe' shlexec.c:2619: Test failed: longPath expected 'C:\Users\ADMINI~1\AppData\Local\Temp\wt9F4A.tmp\test2.exe', got 'C:\Users\Administrator\AppData\Local\Temp\wt9F4A.tmp\test2.exe' shlexec.c:2631: Test failed: longPath expected 'C:\Users\ADMINI~1\AppData\Local\Temp\wt9F4A.tmp\test2.exe', got 'C:\Users\Administrator\AppData\Local\Temp\wt9F4A.tmp\test2.exe' === w864 (32 bit shlexec) === shlexec.c:137: Test failed: ShellExecute(verb="", file="C:\Users\winetest\AppData\Local\Temp\wt4E1F.tmp\test file.noassoc") WaitForSingleObject returned 258 shlexec.c:137: Test failed: ShellExecute(file="C:\Users\winetest\AppData\Local\Temp\wt4E1F.tmp\test file.noassoc") WaitForSingleObject returned 258 shlexec.c:1506: Test failed: ShellExecute(file="C:\Users\winetest\AppData\Local\Temp\wt4E1F.tmp\test file.noassoc") failed: rc=33 err=2 shlexec.c:1538: Test failed: argvA4 expected 'C:\Users\winetest\AppData\Local\Temp\wt4E1F.tmp\test file.noassoc', but key not found or empty shlexec.c:137: Test failed: ShellExecute(verb="", file="C:\Users\winetest\AppData\Local\Temp\wt4E1F.tmp\test file.shlexec.noassoc") WaitForSingleObject returned 258 shlexec.c:137: Test failed: ShellExecute(file="C:\Users\winetest\AppData\Local\Temp\wt4E1F.tmp\test file.shlexec.noassoc") WaitForSingleObject returned 258 shlexec.c:1506: Test failed: ShellExecute(file="C:\Users\winetest\AppData\Local\Temp\wt4E1F.tmp\test file.shlexec.noassoc") failed: rc=33 err=2 shlexec.c:1538: Test failed: argvA4 expected 'C:\Users\winetest\AppData\Local\Temp\wt4E1F.tmp\test file.shlexec.noassoc', but key not found or empty shlexec.c:137: Test failed: ShellExecute(verb="", file="C:\Users\winetest\AppData\Local\Temp\wt4E1F.tmp\test file.noassoc", params="shlexec "C:\Users\winetest\AppData\Local\Temp\wt4E1F.tmp\wt4E20.tmp" Exec") WaitForSingleObject returned 258 shlexec.c:137: Test failed: ShellExecute(file="C:\Users\winetest\AppData\Local\Temp\wt4E1F.tmp\test file.noassoc", params="shlexec "C:\Users\winetest\AppData\Local\Temp\wt4E1F.tmp\wt4E20.tmp" Exec") WaitForSingleObject returned 258 shlexec.c:2059: Test failed: ShellExecute(file="C:\Users\winetest\AppData\Local\Temp\wt4E1F.tmp\test file.noassoc", params="shlexec "C:\Users\winetest\AppData\Local\Temp\wt4E1F.tmp\wt4E20.tmp" Exec") succeeded: rc=42 === w2008s64 (64 bit shlexec) === shlexec.c:1538: Test failed: argvA4 expected 'C:/Users/ADMINI~1/AppData/Local/Temp/wtDF85.tmp/test file.shlexec', got 'C:\Users\Administrator\AppData\Local\Temp\wtDF85.tmp\test file.shlexec' shlexec.c:2606: Test failed: longPath expected 'C:\Users\ADMINI~1\AppData\Local\Temp\wtDF85.tmp\test2.exe', got 'C:\Users\Administrator\AppData\Local\Temp\wtDF85.tmp\test2.exe' shlexec.c:2619: Test failed: longPath expected 'C:\Users\ADMINI~1\AppData\Local\Temp\wtDF85.tmp\test2.exe', got 'C:\Users\Administrator\AppData\Local\Temp\wtDF85.tmp\test2.exe' shlexec.c:2631: Test failed: longPath expected 'C:\Users\ADMINI~1\AppData\Local\Temp\wtDF85.tmp\test2.exe', got 'C:\Users\Administrator\AppData\Local\Temp\wtDF85.tmp\test2.exe' === w864 (64 bit shlexec) === shlexec.c:137: Test failed: ShellExecute(verb="", file="C:\Users\winetest\AppData\Local\Temp\wt9DA5.tmp\test file.noassoc") WaitForSingleObject returned 258 shlexec.c:137: Test failed: ShellExecute(file="C:\Users\winetest\AppData\Local\Temp\wt9DA5.tmp\test file.noassoc") WaitForSingleObject returned 258 shlexec.c:1506: Test failed: ShellExecute(file="C:\Users\winetest\AppData\Local\Temp\wt9DA5.tmp\test file.noassoc") failed: rc=33 err=2 shlexec.c:1538: Test failed: argvA4 expected 'C:\Users\winetest\AppData\Local\Temp\wt9DA5.tmp\test file.noassoc', but key not found or empty shlexec.c:137: Test failed: ShellExecute(verb="", file="C:\Users\winetest\AppData\Local\Temp\wt9DA5.tmp\test file.shlexec.noassoc") WaitForSingleObject returned 258 shlexec.c:137: Test failed: ShellExecute(file="C:\Users\winetest\AppData\Local\Temp\wt9DA5.tmp\test file.shlexec.noassoc") WaitForSingleObject returned 258 shlexec.c:1506: Test failed: ShellExecute(file="C:\Users\winetest\AppData\Local\Temp\wt9DA5.tmp\test file.shlexec.noassoc") failed: rc=33 err=2 shlexec.c:1538: Test failed: argvA4 expected 'C:\Users\winetest\AppData\Local\Temp\wt9DA5.tmp\test file.shlexec.noassoc', but key not found or empty shlexec.c:137: Test failed: ShellExecute(verb="", file="C:\Users\winetest\AppData\Local\Temp\wt9DA5.tmp\test file.noassoc", params="shlexec "C:\Users\winetest\AppData\Local\Temp\wt9DA5.tmp\wt9DA6.tmp" Exec") WaitForSingleObject returned 258 shlexec.c:137: Test failed: ShellExecute(file="C:\Users\winetest\AppData\Local\Temp\wt9DA5.tmp\test file.noassoc", params="shlexec "C:\Users\winetest\AppData\Local\Temp\wt9DA5.tmp\wt9DA6.tmp" Exec") WaitForSingleObject returned 258 shlexec.c:2059: Test failed: ShellExecute(file="C:\Users\winetest\AppData\Local\Temp\wt9DA5.tmp\test file.noassoc", params="shlexec "C:\Users\winetest\AppData\Local\Temp\wt9DA5.tmp\wt9DA6.tmp" Exec") succeeded: rc=42 === w864 (64 bit shlfolder) === shlfolder: unhandled exception c0000005 at 000007F851EBABDC

1 0

Re: server: Implement job objects (try 2)
by Andrew Cook Oct. 18, 2013

Oct. 18, 2013

On 17/10/13 15:11, Andrew Cook wrote: > --- > dlls/kernel32/tests/process.c | 172 ++++++++++++++++++++++- > dlls/ntdll/sync.c | 127 +++++++++++++++-- > server/process.c | 313 > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > server/process.h | 3 + > server/protocol.def | 33 +++++ > 5 files changed, 636 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > > Is there something wrong with this patch?

1 0