October 2013 - Wine-Devel - list.winehq.org

Re: mscoree: Add support for ICLRMetaHostPolicy interface
by Dmitry Timoshkov Oct. 13, 2013

Oct. 13, 2013

Alistair Leslie-Hughes <leslie_alistair(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > +static HRESULT WINAPI metahostpolicy_QueryInterface(ICLRMetaHostPolicy *iface, REFIID riid, void **ppvObject) > +{ > + TRACE("%s %p\n", debugstr_guid(riid), ppvObject); > + > + if ( IsEqualGUID( riid, &IID_ICLRMetaHostPolicy ) || > + IsEqualGUID( riid, &IID_IUnknown ) ) > + { > + *ppvObject = iface; > + } > + else > + { > + FIXME("Unsupported interface %s\n", debugstr_guid(riid)); > + return E_NOINTERFACE; > + } > + > + ICLRMetaHostPolicy_AddRef( iface ); > + > + return S_OK; > +} I think that a common COM convention is to set the object pointer to NULL in case of an unsupported interface. Also you're doing pretty good job in avoiding hungarian notation except for ppvObject. Another nitpick is the choice for if/else construct (although I understand that other places also use this sub-optimal one). A more elegant way of implementing QueryInterface would be IMHO: static HRESULT WINAPI xxx_QueryInterface(IFace *iface, REFIID riid, void **object) { if (IsEqualGUID(riid, &IID_IUnknown) || IsEqualGUID(riid, &IID_IAnotherSupported) { xxx_AddRef(iface); *object = iface; return S_OK; } *object = NULL; return E_NOINTERFACE; } -- Dmitry.

1 0

Re: winmm/tests: Use BOOL type where appropriate
by Marvin Oct. 11, 2013

Oct. 11, 2013

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2721 Your paranoid android. === wxppro (32 bit wave) === wave.c:498: Test failed: waveOutGetPosition(WAVE_MAPPER): returned 13211 bytes, should be 13230 wave.c:498: Test failed: waveOutGetPosition(WAVE_MAPPER): returned 13229 bytes, should be 13230 wave.c:498: Test failed: waveOutGetPosition(WAVE_MAPPER): returned 13075 bytes, should be 13230 wave.c:509: Test failed: waveOutGetPosition(WAVE_MAPPER): returned 13091 samples (13091 bytes), should be 13230 (13230 bytes) wave.c:522: Test failed: waveOutGetPosition(WAVE_MAPPER): returned 594 ms, (13108 bytes), should be 600 (13230 bytes) wave.c:498: Test failed: waveOutGetPosition(WAVE_MAPPER): returned 13220 bytes, should be 13230 wave.c:498: Test failed: waveOutGetPosition(WAVE_MAPPER): returned 17621 bytes, should be 17640 wave.c:509: Test failed: waveOutGetPosition(WAVE_MAPPER): returned 17634 samples (17634 bytes), should be 17640 (17640 bytes) wave.c:498: Test failed: waveOutGetPosition(WAVE_MAPPER): returned 22016 bytes, should be 22050 wave.c:509: Test failed: waveOutGetPosition(WAVE_MAPPER): returned 22027 samples (22027 bytes), should be 22050 (22050 bytes) wave.c:522: Test failed: waveOutGetPosition(WAVE_MAPPER): returned 999 ms, (22044 bytes), should be 1000 (22050 bytes)

1 0

Re: wined3d: Use BOOL type where appropriate
by Henri Verbeet Oct. 11, 2013

Oct. 11, 2013

On 11 October 2013 22:51, Frédéric Delanoy <frederic.delanoy(a)gmail.com> wrote: > - DWORD onesided_enable = FALSE; > - DWORD twosided_enable = FALSE; > + DWORD onesided_enable = 0; > + DWORD twosided_enable = 0; Actually, all of those initializations are redundant.

1 0

Fwd: Re: kernel32/tests: Add tests for job objects (try 7)
by Andrew Cook Oct. 11, 2013

Oct. 11, 2013

(no idea why my client sent this to wine-patches) On 10/10/13 15:23, Andrew Cook wrote: > --- > dlls/kernel32/tests/process.c | 159 > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > include/winbase.h | 1 + > include/winnt.h | 90 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 3 files changed, 249 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > there appears to be a window between the all processes leaving a job and the job actually being considered empty, and no apparent way to wait for this. I can't reproduce this locally either. Is there an accepted way to wait for some inaccessible kernel-side event? reordering some calls would likely hide the issue but i'd rather avoid that. https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2687 failure on w8 https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2709 failure on w864 https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2685 same patch, success on w864

1 0

Re: xmllite: Use BOOL type where appropriate
by Nikolay Sivov Oct. 10, 2013

Oct. 10, 2013

On 10/10/2013 00:36, Frédéric Delanoy wrote: > --- > dlls/xmllite/reader.c | 16 ++++++++-------- > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/dlls/xmllite/reader.c b/dlls/xmllite/reader.c > index 0a4423c..a216951 100644 > --- a/dlls/xmllite/reader.c > +++ b/dlls/xmllite/reader.c > @@ -726,7 +726,7 @@ static void readerinput_grow(xmlreaderinput *readerinput, int length) > } > } > > -static inline int readerinput_is_utf8(xmlreaderinput *readerinput) > +static inline BOOL readerinput_is_utf8(xmlreaderinput *readerinput) > { > static char startA[] = {'<','?'}; > static char commentA[] = {'<','!'}; > @@ -953,7 +953,7 @@ static void reader_skipn(xmlreader *reader, int n) > } > } > > -static inline int is_wchar_space(WCHAR ch) > +static inline BOOL is_wchar_space(WCHAR ch) > { > return ch == ' ' || ch == '\t' || ch == '\r' || ch == '\n'; > } > @@ -1055,7 +1055,7 @@ static HRESULT reader_parse_versioninfo(xmlreader *reader) > } > > /* ([A-Za-z0-9._] | '-') */ > -static inline int is_wchar_encname(WCHAR ch) > +static inline BOOL is_wchar_encname(WCHAR ch) > { > return ((ch >= 'A' && ch <= 'Z') || > (ch >= 'a' && ch <= 'z') || > @@ -1269,7 +1269,7 @@ static HRESULT reader_parse_comment(xmlreader *reader) > } > > /* [2] Char ::= #x9 | #xA | #xD | [#x20-#xD7FF] | [#xE000-#xFFFD] | [#x10000-#x10FFFF] */ > -static inline int is_char(WCHAR ch) > +static inline BOOL is_char(WCHAR ch) > { > return (ch == '\t') || (ch == '\r') || (ch == '\n') || > (ch >= 0x20 && ch <= 0xd7ff) || > @@ -1279,7 +1279,7 @@ static inline int is_char(WCHAR ch) > } > > /* [13] PubidChar ::= #x20 | #xD | #xA | [a-zA-Z0-9] | [-'()+,./:=?;!*#@$_%] */ > -static inline int is_pubchar(WCHAR ch) > +static inline BOOL is_pubchar(WCHAR ch) > { > return (ch == ' ') || > (ch >= 'a' && ch <= 'z') || > @@ -1292,7 +1292,7 @@ static inline int is_pubchar(WCHAR ch) > (ch == '_') || (ch == '\r') || (ch == '\n'); > } > > -static inline int is_namestartchar(WCHAR ch) > +static inline BOOL is_namestartchar(WCHAR ch) > { > return (ch == ':') || (ch >= 'A' && ch <= 'Z') || > (ch == '_') || (ch >= 'a' && ch <= 'z') || > @@ -1312,7 +1312,7 @@ static inline int is_namestartchar(WCHAR ch) > } > > /* [4 NS] NCName ::= Name - (Char* ':' Char*) */ > -static inline int is_ncnamechar(WCHAR ch) > +static inline BOOL is_ncnamechar(WCHAR ch) > { > return (ch >= 'A' && ch <= 'Z') || > (ch == '_') || (ch >= 'a' && ch <= 'z') || > @@ -1336,7 +1336,7 @@ static inline int is_ncnamechar(WCHAR ch) > (ch >= 0xfdf0 && ch <= 0xfffd); > } > > -static inline int is_namechar(WCHAR ch) > +static inline BOOL is_namechar(WCHAR ch) > { > return (ch == ':') || is_ncnamechar(ch); > } I don't actually see what this will achieve, but I see such patches are accepted. Is it a new style rule?

3 2

Re: mshtml: Compile tests with __WINESRC__ define.
by Marvin Oct. 10, 2013

Oct. 10, 2013

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2689 Your paranoid android. === w864 (64 bit activex) === activex.c:1346: Test failed: unexpected call SetObjectRects === wxppro (32 bit htmldoc) === htmldoc.c:2898: Test failed: mon(0026BFD0) != exmon(00269670) htmldoc.c:7601: Test failed: mon(0026BFD0) != exmon(00269670) htmldoc.c:5978: Test failed: mon(0026BFD0) != exmon(00269670) htmldoc.c:2898: Test failed: mon(0029CA28) != exmon(00286FF8) htmldoc.c:7601: Test failed: mon(0029CA28) != exmon(00286FF8) htmldoc.c:5978: Test failed: mon(0029CA28) != exmon(00286FF8) === wvista (32 bit htmldoc) === No test summary line found === w7pro64 (32 bit htmldoc) === No test summary line found

1 0

Re: ieframe: Compile tests with __WINESRC__ define.
by Marvin Oct. 10, 2013

Oct. 10, 2013

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2688 Your paranoid android. === wxppro (32 bit webbrowser) === webbrowser.c:792: Test failed: ReadyState = 1, expected 4

1 0

Re: wmvcore: Stub implementation of IWMMetadataEditor interface
by Nikolay Sivov Oct. 10, 2013

Oct. 10, 2013

On 10/10/2013 14:58, Jeff Latimer wrote: > --- > dlls/wmvcore/Makefile.in | 2 +- > dlls/wmvcore/wmvcore_main.c | 100 > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > include/wmsdkidl.idl | 11 ++--- > 3 files changed, 105 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > +typedef struct MetadataEditorImpl { > + IWMMetadataEditor MetadataEditor_iface; > + LONG ref; > +} MetadataEditorImpl; > +static inline MetadataEditorImpl *impl_from_MetadataEditor(IWMMetadataEditor *iface) Please follow naming convetions for interfaces. > +HRESULT WINAPI WMCreateEditor_close(IWMMetadataEditor *iface) > +{ > + FIXME("iface=%p\n", iface); > + HeapFree(GetProcessHeap(), 0, iface); > + return S_OK; > +} > +HRESULT WINAPI WMCreateEditor_flush(IWMMetadataEditor *iface) > +{ > + FIXME("iface=%p\n", iface); > + HeapFree(GetProcessHeap(), 0, iface); > + return S_OK; > +} This looks totally wrong. Also please keep implementation functions order and interface methods order the same.

1 0

Re: [PATCH 5/5] user32: Implement better stub of OpenInputDesktop.
by Qian Hong Oct. 10, 2013

Oct. 10, 2013

Hello, this patch is in pending status, is there any way I can improve it? IMO there is no way to 'correctly' implement OpenInputDesktop before implementing SwitchDesktop, as far as SwitchDesktop is a stub, it is safe to assume that OpenInputDesktop will always return either NULL or Winsta0/Default, that is what the patch does and what the tests in [PATCH 3/5] shows.. It is not trivial to implement SwitchDesktop, also I don't know any real world app needing SwitchDesktop except some virtual desktop manager, so I'm not sure it is worth to spend time on implementing SwitchDesktop. However, OpenInputDesktop is needed by multiple apps (TeamViewer, QQ International, Inspect tool from Windows Platform SDK as bug 12067), is it acceptable to submit such a 'better stub' to Wine and leaving SwitchDesktop as a stub? Any comment is great appreciated! On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Qian Hong <qhong(a)codeweavers.com> wrote: > Fixed http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12067 , let QQ users happy :) > > --- > dlls/user32/tests/winstation.c | 22 ---------------------- > dlls/user32/winstation.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++--- > 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) > > -- Regards, Qian Hong - http://www.codeweavers.com

2 2

Re: Fix text rotation problem in GM_ADVANCED graphics mode caused by incorrect implementation of GetTextExtentPointW().
by Alexandre Julliard Oct. 10, 2013

Oct. 10, 2013

Ralf Habacker <ralf.habacker(a)freenet.de> writes: > With other patches i have been told to implement such stuff in the dib > driver. Unfortunally this do not works in this case, because in the top > level function it looks like having driver specific stuff using display > coordinates. It would still most likely have to be in the driver, though maybe the driver would not be calling that exact entry point. In any case, you can't change the DC transform like this. and you'll need test cases. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

3 5

Re: kernel32/tests: Add tests for job objects (try 7)
by Marvin Oct. 10, 2013

Oct. 10, 2013

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2683 Your paranoid android. === w864 (64 bit process) === process.c:2092: Test failed: Unexpected completion event: 6, 0000000000000158, 00000000000002F0

1 0

Re: ddraw/tests: Use BOOL type where appropriate
by Marvin Oct. 9, 2013

Oct. 9, 2013

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2682 Your paranoid android. === wxppro (32 bit d3d) === d3d.c:1261: Test failed: Homogeneous output was generated despite UNCLIPPED flag === wvista (32 bit d3d) === d3d.c:1261: Test failed: Homogeneous output was generated despite UNCLIPPED flag === w2008s64 (32 bit d3d) === d3d.c:1261: Test failed: Homogeneous output was generated despite UNCLIPPED flag === w7pro64 (32 bit d3d) === d3d.c:1261: Test failed: Homogeneous output was generated despite UNCLIPPED flag

1 0

Re: [PATCH] d3dx9: Move object initialization into a separate function.
by Matteo Bruni Oct. 9, 2013

Oct. 9, 2013

Hi Rico, 2013/10/8 Rico Schüller <kgbricola(a)web.de>: > Hi, > > this moves the object initialization into a separate function, so it could > be used for strings and resources. It also removes the STATE_TYPE as we > could distinguish the types at the object level. > > 1. When an object has a destination, it points to another shader variable. > This was state ST_PARAMETER. > > 2. If a variable has something in data, it is fxlc, shader (preshader) or a > string. This was state ST_CONSTANT and ST_FXLC. > > 3. If it has both (destination and data), it points to an array of shader > variables. The name is in the destination, the index could be calculated > with the data. This will be added in a later patch. > There's still the issue of distinguishing between ST_CONSTANT and ST_FXLC, checking object_id and type might cover that though. > Also saving the destination parameter in the object gains some speed when we > need to access the variable as we don't need to run get_parameter_by_name() > each time we need the variable ... > I'm not sure storing additional info into the objects is the right thing to do. Take a look at the D3DXFX_NOT_CLONEABLE flag from http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/bb172855%28v=vs.85%…. Notice that GetPassDesc() doesn't return the shader data if the object was created with the flag. What I've been thinking is that it simply can't because the original shader data, stored in an object, were freed after parsing. While nothing forces us to do the same (except probably avoiding to use more memory than strictly necessary) I think it's better not to put additional stuff into the objects or generally assume that the objects are still available after parsing. That means creating the shaders and the strings at parse time or right after that and storing any additional required information (e.g. preshader) in the parameter. So, directly storing the referenced parameter is a good idea but I'd prefer that pointer to be in d3dx_parameter. > Cheers > Rico > > --- > dlls/d3dx9_36/effect.c | 98 > ++++++++++++++++++-------------------------------- > 1 Datei geändert, 34 Zeilen hinzugefügt(+), 64 Zeilen entfernt(-) > Cheers, Matteo

2 2

winspool: ERROR_INVALID_NAME in GetDefaultPrinter() ?
by Detlef Riekenberg Oct. 9, 2013

Oct. 9, 2013

Hi. >From which configuration does the "ERROR_INVALID_NAME" came from, when calling GetDefaultPrinter(NULL, &size) and no Printer is installed? This Test is Present in the current "dlls/winspool/tests/info.c". MSDN told us, that we receive an "ERROR_FILE_NOT_FOUND", if no Printer is installed: http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us/gdi/prntspol_0hma.asp I get the "ERROR_FILE_NOT_FOUND" on win98se, winme, w2k and win2003 in this Situation. -- By By ... ... Detlef

3 3

Re: [PATCH 4/5] d3drm: Compare with the correct IID in IDirect3DRMVisualArrayImpl_QueryInterface().
by Dmitry Timoshkov Oct. 9, 2013

Oct. 9, 2013

Henri Verbeet <hverbeet(a)codeweavers.com> wrote: > +static HRESULT WINAPI IDirect3DRMVisualArrayImpl_QueryInterface(IDirect3DRMVisualArray *iface, REFIID riid, void **out) > { > - TRACE("(%p)->(%s, %p)\n", iface, debugstr_guid(riid), ret_iface); > + TRACE("iface %p, riid %s, out %p.\n", iface, debugstr_guid(riid), out); > > - if (IsEqualGUID(riid, &IID_IUnknown) || > - IsEqualGUID(riid, &IID_IDirect3DRMFrameArray)) > + if (IsEqualGUID(riid, &IID_IDirect3DRMVisualArray) > + || IsEqualGUID(riid, &IID_IUnknown)) > { > - *ret_iface = iface; > IDirect3DRMVisualArray_AddRef(iface); > + *out = iface; > return S_OK; > } Although this is existing code the assignment '*out = iface' is wrong, especially since next patch introduces impl_from_IDirect3DRMVisualArray() helper. Looks like that file needs a bit of COM clean up. -- Dmitry.

2 1

Re: ws2_32/tests: Use BOOL type where appropriate
by Marvin Oct. 9, 2013

Oct. 9, 2013

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2674 Your paranoid android. === wxppro (32 bit sock) === sock.c:519: Test failed: oob_server (bc): unexpectedly at the OOB mark: 0 sock: unhandled exception c0000005 at 71AB8D62 === w2008s64 (32 bit sock) === sock.c:519: Test failed: oob_server (2c8): unexpectedly at the OOB mark: 0 === w7pro64 (32 bit sock) === sock.c:509: Test failed: oob_server (8a4): unexpectedly at the OOB mark: 0 sock.c:519: Test failed: oob_server (8a4): unexpectedly at the OOB mark: 0 === w864 (32 bit sock) === sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for domain: 11004 sock.c:1740: Test failed: getservbyname could not retrieve information for telnet: 11004 === w2008s64 (64 bit sock) === sock.c:519: Test failed: oob_server (118): unexpectedly at the OOB mark: 0

1 0

Wrong status of gdi32
by Akira Nakagawa Oct. 8, 2013

Oct. 8, 2013

I found this page <http://www.nirsoft.net/dll_information/windows8/gdi32_dll.html> shows that gdi32 dll has more than 800 functions,but the spec file has only 500 .

3 2

RE: binfmt support
by xantares 09 Oct. 8, 2013

Oct. 8, 2013

From: xantares09(a)hotmail.com To: hverbeet(a)gmail.com Subject: RE: binfmt support Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2013 11:47:05 +0000 > Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2013 12:23:30 +0200 > Subject: Re: binfmt support > From: hverbeet(a)gmail.com > To: xantares09(a)hotmail.com > CC: wine-devel(a)winehq.org > > On 7 October 2013 12:06, xantares 09 <xantares09(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > ... I don't see a reason why to not include it at the wine level instead of > > every linux distros, see: > > https://github.com/xantares/wine/commit/76ebd5d29effaf4b6b39ceecb689f7008bf… > > > > What do you think ? > > > Ignoring the discussion if we want this or not for the moment, I'd > guess this would break as soon as you pass something other than /usr > for --prefix to configure. Yes, It'll only work when prefix=/usr, which is always what happens when building packaging. This is what we want ; we still want to honor the prefix var. x.

1 0

Re: gdi32/tests: Skip linked font like SimSun-ExtB in fixed-pitch font selection.
by Marvin Oct. 8, 2013

Oct. 8, 2013

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2669 Your paranoid android. === wvista (32 bit font) === The test timed out === w2008s64 (32 bit font) === Timeout Failure running script in VM: network read timed out

1 0

Re: (try 6)[3/5] imm32: use thread data from target HWND
by Alexandre Julliard Oct. 8, 2013

Oct. 8, 2013

Aric Stewart <aric(a)codeweavers.com> writes: > @@ -1597,7 +1612,9 @@ BOOL WINAPI ImmGetConversionStatus( > HWND WINAPI ImmGetDefaultIMEWnd(HWND hWnd) > { > HWND ret; > - IMMThreadData* thread_data = IMM_GetThreadData(0); > + IMMThreadData* thread_data = IMM_GetThreadDataForWindow(hWnd); > + if (!thread_data) > + return NULL; > if (thread_data->hwndDefault == NULL) > thread_data->hwndDefault = CreateWindowExW( WS_EX_TOOLWINDOW, > szwIME, NULL, WS_POPUP, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0); It doesn't seem right to create the default window from a different thread. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

1 0

Re: [PATCH 3/5] wined3d: Handle sRGB_decode when reading the sampler state.
by Henri Verbeet Oct. 8, 2013

Oct. 8, 2013

On 8 October 2013 00:27, Stefan Dösinger <stefan(a)codeweavers.com> wrote: > diff --git a/dlls/wined3d/surface.c b/dlls/wined3d/surface.c > index 52eac16..eb8ca7e 100644 > --- a/dlls/wined3d/surface.c > +++ b/dlls/wined3d/surface.c > @@ -5608,8 +5608,6 @@ HRESULT surface_load_location(struct wined3d_surface *surface, DWORD location, c > } > } > > - if (location == SFLAG_INSRGBTEX && gl_info->supported[EXT_TEXTURE_SRGB_DECODE]) > - location = SFLAG_INTEXTURE; > > if (surface->flags & location) > { > @@ -5671,12 +5669,6 @@ HRESULT surface_load_location(struct wined3d_surface *surface, DWORD location, c > surface_evict_sysmem(surface); > } > > - if (surface->flags & (SFLAG_INTEXTURE | SFLAG_INSRGBTEX) > - && gl_info->supported[EXT_TEXTURE_SRGB_DECODE]) > - { > - surface->flags |= (SFLAG_INTEXTURE | SFLAG_INSRGBTEX); > - } > - > return WINED3D_OK; > } > This change seems good on its own, as far as I can tell all callers already handle this correctly. I'm less sure about the other changes, the texture code seems like the right place to handle EXT_texture_sRGB_decode.

2 2

Re: [1/3] xmllite: Use buffer offset instead of pointers
by Nikolay Sivov Oct. 8, 2013

Oct. 8, 2013

On 10/6/2013 19:06, Nikolay Sivov wrote: > It's normal to grow destination buffer, in this case all stored > pointers will be trashed. This patch uses offsets from start of a > buffer instead. > Hi, Alexandre. Patches list shows a build failure for this one, and I don't see any failures on testbot for it so assuming something it fails on your machine. So what's the exact failure you get?

2 2

Re: riched20: Set control content in WM_CREATE message
by Akihiro Sagawa Oct. 8, 2013

Oct. 8, 2013

On Sat, 05 Oct 2013 14:54:07 +0200, Piotr Caban wrote: > + if (!(editor->styleFlags & ES_MULTILINE)) > + { > + len = 0; > + while(textW[len] != '0' && textW[len] != '\r' && textW[len] != '\n') > + len++; > + } Although this patch has been committed as e660bf676c111ce20d9e868280094f1c5bb81c79, I doubt that it works properly. Did you mean '\0' or 0? Regards, Akihiro Sagawa

2 1

winemac.drv: add fullscreen mode support for Mac OS X 10.7+
by Kevin Eaves Oct. 8, 2013

Oct. 8, 2013

Attached patch is a proof-of-concept for the fullscreen APIs provided in OS X 10.7+, which allows applications to enter fullscreen in a separate desktop space. The fullscreen button appears if a main window is resizable. Basically this feature is the zoom button on crack. It doesn't actually go fullscreen 'natively' but simply resizes the window fullscreen, and automatically moves it to its own space. As far as Wine is concerned the window resized — just like clicking the zoom button and manually assigning the window to its own space. I doubled the MaxTrackSize in user32/winpos.c, but it only needs +15 for the height.

2 2

Re: msi/tests: Use BOOL type where appropriate (resend)
by Marvin Oct. 8, 2013

Oct. 8, 2013

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2667 Your paranoid android. === wvista (32 bit msi) === Timeout === w2008s64 (32 bit msi) === Timeout Failure running script in VM: network read timed out === w2008s64 (64 bit msi) === Timeout

1 0

Re: msi/tests: Use BOOL type where appropriate
by Marvin Oct. 7, 2013

Oct. 7, 2013

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2660 Your paranoid android. === wvista (32 bit msi) === The test timed out === w2008s64 (32 bit msi) === The test timed out === w7pro64 (32 bit msi) === No test summary line found Failure running script in VM: network read timed out === w2008s64 (64 bit msi) === Timeout === w7pro64 (64 bit msi) === Timeout

1 0

Re: mscoree: Partial implement ICLRMetaHost RequestRuntimeLoadedNotification (try 2)
by Vincent Povirk Oct. 7, 2013

Oct. 7, 2013

HRESULT CLRMetaHost_CreateInstance(REFIID riid, void **ppobj) { + GlobalCLRMetaHost.callback = NULL; return ICLRMetaHost_QueryInterface(&GlobalCLRMetaHost.ICLRMetaHost_iface, riid, ppobj); } I don't think we should be changing global state every time someone creates an instance of this object. We can't assume it only happens once.

1 0

Re: riched20: Set control content in WM_CREATE message
by Alexandre Julliard Oct. 7, 2013

Oct. 7, 2013

Piotr Caban <piotr(a)codeweavers.com> writes: > --- > dlls/riched20/editor.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++ > dlls/riched20/tests/editor.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 59 insertions(+) It doesn't work: ../../../tools/runtest -q -P wine -M riched20.dll -T ../../.. -p riched20_test.exe.so txtsrv.c && touch txtsrv.ok wine: Unhandled page fault on read access to 0x00000024 at address 0x7ac23e94 (thread 0009), starting debugger... Unhandled exception: page fault on read access to 0x00000024 in 32-bit code (0x7ac23e94). Register dump: CS:0023 SS:002b DS:002b ES:002b FS:0063 GS:006b EIP:7ac23e94 ESP:0032f290 EBP:0032fb98 EFLAGS:00010246( R- -- I Z- -P- ) EAX:00000000 EBX:7ac58c00 ECX:0032fc80 EDX:003338e8 ESI:003338e8 EDI:00000001 Stack dump: 0x0032f290: 0032fc80 00000000 00000000 00000000 0x0032f2a0: 00000001 00000000 00000000 00333428 0x0032f2b0: 4d430002 00000008 00000004 7bc3c8e3 0x0032f2c0: 00333558 00333550 00000000 7bc3c8e3 0x0032f2d0: 00000780 000004b0 0032f300 6890a34c 0x0032f2e0: 00000000 0000001f 0032f318 688bd210 Backtrace: =>0 0x7ac23e94 ME_HandleMessage+0x32d4(editor=0x3338e8, msg=0x1, wParam=0, lParam=0, unicode=0x1, phresult=0x32fbdc) [/home/julliard/wine/wine/dlls/riched20/editor.c:4029] in riched20 (0x0032fb98) 1 0x7ac3d3ab CreateTextServices+0x11a(pUnkOuter=<couldn't compute location>, pITextHost=<couldn't compute location>, ppUnk=<couldn't compute location>) [/home/julliard/wine/wine/dlls/riched20/txtsrv.c:417] in riched20 (0x0032fbf8) 2 0x686569cb func_txtsrv+0x2fa() [/home/julliard/wine/wine/dlls/riched20/tests/txtsrv.c:864] in riched20_test (0x0032fd38) 3 0x6862a5a7 main+0x386(argc=<is not available>, argv=<is not available>) [/home/julliard/wine/wine/dlls/riched20/tests/../../../include/wine/test.h:570] in riched20_test (0x0032fe08) 4 0x68657e30 __wine_spec_exe_entry+0x7f(peb=<couldn't compute location>) [/home/julliard/wine/wine/dlls/winecrt0/exe_entry.c:36] in riched20_test (0x0032fe58) 5 0x7b85f36c call_process_entry+0xb() in kernel32 (0x0032fe78) 6 0x7b86054b start_process+0x6a(peb=<couldn't compute location>) [/home/julliard/wine/wine/dlls/kernel32/process.c:1085] in kernel32 (0x0032feb8) 7 0x7bc7fe70 call_thread_func_wrapper+0xb() in ntdll (0x0032fed8) 8 0x7bc82d7d call_thread_func+0x7c(entry=0x7b8604e0, arg=0x7ffdf000, frame=0x32ffc8) [/home/julliard/wine/wine/dlls/ntdll/signal_i386.c:2602] in ntdll (0x0032ffa8) 9 0x7bc7fe4e call_thread_entry_point+0x11() in ntdll (0x0032ffc8) 10 0x7bc54a1e start_process+0x1d(kernel_start=0x7b8604e0) [/home/julliard/wine/wine/dlls/ntdll/loader.c:2694] in ntdll (0x0032ffe8) 11 0x6803128d wine_call_on_stack+0x1c() in libwine.so.1 (0x00000000) 12 0x6803134b wine_switch_to_stack+0x2a(func=0x7bc54a00, arg=0x7b8604e0, stack=0x330000) [/home/julliard/wine/wine/libs/wine/port.c:59] in libwine.so.1 (0xff8b7288) 13 0x7bc5a557 LdrInitializeThunk+0x3a6(kernel_start=<couldn't compute location>, unknown2=<couldn't compute location>, unknown3=<couldn't compute location>, unknown4=<couldn't compute location>) [/home/julliard/wine/wine/dlls/ntdll/loader.c:2750] in ntdll (0xff8b72f8) 14 0x7b866ac0 __wine_kernel_init+0xbbf() [/home/julliard/wine/wine/dlls/kernel32/process.c:1257] in kernel32 (0xff8b8208) 15 0x7bc5ac23 __wine_process_init+0x182() [/home/julliard/wine/wine/dlls/ntdll/loader.c:2959] in ntdll (0xff8b8298) 16 0x6802eeda wine_init+0x2b9(argc=0x3, argv=0xff8b87d4, error="", error_size=0x400) [/home/julliard/wine/wine/libs/wine/loader.c:952] in libwine.so.1 (0xff8b82f8) 17 0x7bf00d3b main+0x7a(argc=<is not available>, argv=<is not available>) [/home/julliard/wine/wine/loader/main.c:237] in <wine-loader> (0xff8b8738) 18 0x682518c5 __libc_start_main+0xf4() in libc.so.6 (0x00000000) 0x7ac23e94 ME_HandleMessage+0x32d4 [/home/julliard/wine/wine/dlls/riched20/editor.c:4029] in riched20: movl 0x24(%eax),%eax 4029 : (void*)((CREATESTRUCTA*)lParam)->lpszName); -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

1 0

Re: [PATCH 2/3] msvcrt: Add support for vcall thunks demangling (try2)
by Marvin Oct. 7, 2013

Oct. 7, 2013

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2651 Your paranoid android. === wxppro (32 bit cpp) === cpp.c:1329: Test failed: 125: Got name "?_dispatch(a)_impl_Engine@SalomeApp@@$R4CE(a)BA@PPPPPPPM(a)7AE_NAAVomniCallHandle@@@Z" cpp.c:1332: Test failed: 125: Expected "[thunk]:public: virtual bool __thiscall SalomeApp::_impl_Engine::_dispatch`vtordispex{36,16,4294967292,8}' (class omniCallHandle &)"

1 0

Re: [PATCH 3/3] msvcrt: Add support for vtordispex demangling
by Marvin Oct. 7, 2013

Oct. 7, 2013

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2650 Your paranoid android. === wxppro (32 bit cpp) === cpp.c:1328: Test failed: 124: Got name "[thunk]: __thiscall CView::`vcall'{392,{flat}}' " cpp.c:1331: Test failed: 124: Expected "[thunk]: __thiscall CView::`vcall'{392,{flat}}' }'" cpp.c:1328: Test failed: 125: Got name "?_dispatch(a)_impl_Engine@SalomeApp@@$R4CE(a)BA@PPPPPPPM(a)7AE_NAAVomniCallHandle@@@Z" cpp.c:1331: Test failed: 125: Expected "[thunk]:public: virtual bool __thiscall SalomeApp::_impl_Engine::_dispatch`vtordispex{36,16,4294967292,8}' (class omniCallHandle &)"

1 0

Re: [PATCH 2/3] msvcrt: Add support for vcall thunks demangling
by Marvin Oct. 7, 2013

Oct. 7, 2013

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2649 Your paranoid android. === wxppro (32 bit cpp) === cpp.c:1326: Test failed: 124: Got name "[thunk]: __thiscall CView::`vcall'{392,{flat}}' " cpp.c:1329: Test failed: 124: Expected "[thunk]: __thiscall CView::`vcall'{392,{flat}}' }'"

1 0

Re: msvcrt: add support for _chsize_s (try #2)
by Piotr Caban Oct. 7, 2013

Oct. 7, 2013

Hi, On 10/06/13 00:45, morphiend wrote: > + * _chsize_s (MSVCRT.@) > + */ > +int CDECL MSVCRT__chsize_s(int fd, __int64 size) > +{ > + LARGE_INTEGER cur, pos; > + LARGE_INTEGER temp = { 0 }; This causes compilation warnings. There's also a trailing space in this line. > + TRACE("(fd=%d, size=%lld)\n", fd, size); You can't print 64-bit numbers this way, it's not portable. You can use wine_dbgstr_longlong function. > + handle = msvcrt_fdtoh(fd); > + if (!MSVCRT_CHECK_PMT_ERR(handle == INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE, MSVCRT_EBADF) || > + !MSVCRT_CHECK_PMT_ERR(size < 0, MSVCRT_EINVAL)) You're validating parameters incorrectly. Did you test this patch? > + { > + ret = SetEndOfFile(handle); > + if (!ret) > + { > + msvcrt_set_errno(GetLastError()); > + ret = *MSVCRT__errno(); > + } This causes the _chsize_s function to return TRUE in case of success. > + /* restore the file pointer */ > + MSVCRT__lseek(fd, cur.QuadPart, SEEK_SET); MSVCRT__lseek takes LONG as second argument. Cheers, Piotr

1 0

binfmt support
by xantares 09 Oct. 7, 2013

Oct. 7, 2013

Hello, I made a patch to add a configuration file to be picked up by binfmt to allow to associate windows executables to wine. As binfmt is now a part of systemd in most linux disttributions: http://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/systemd-binfmt.service.html ... I don't see a reason why to not include it at the wine level instead of every linux distros, see: https://github.com/xantares/wine/commit/76ebd5d29effaf4b6b39ceecb689f7008bf… What do you think ? x.

2 1

Re: msvcrt: add support for _chsize_s (try #2)
by Frédéric Delanoy Oct. 6, 2013

Oct. 6, 2013

On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 12:45 AM, morphiend <morphiend(a)gmail.com> wrote: > This patch adds the _chsize_s() to the mscvrt and corresponding mscvr*s. > This was tested on Ubuntu 12.10 using IDA 6.4 as a test application. Without > the implementation of _chsize_s(), certain binaries caused an internal crash > of IDA. This patch fixed that crash. > You need to use your real name when sending patches. -- Frédéric Delanoy

2 1

Re: mshtml/tests: Fix compilation on systems that don't support nameless unions.
by Marvin Oct. 5, 2013

Oct. 5, 2013

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2637 Your paranoid android. === wxppro (32 bit htmldoc) === htmldoc.c:2898: Test failed: mon(0026BF78) != exmon(00269670) htmldoc.c:7601: Test failed: mon(0026BF78) != exmon(00269670) htmldoc.c:5978: Test failed: mon(0026BF78) != exmon(00269670) htmldoc.c:2898: Test failed: mon(002ADFE8) != exmon(00265FE8) htmldoc.c:7601: Test failed: mon(002ADFE8) != exmon(00265FE8) htmldoc.c:5978: Test failed: mon(002ADFE8) != exmon(00265FE8) === wvista (32 bit htmldoc) === No test summary line found === w7pro64 (32 bit htmldoc) === No test summary line found

1 0

Re: kernel32/tests: Fix compilation on systems that don't support nameless unions.
by Marvin Oct. 5, 2013

Oct. 5, 2013

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2634 Your paranoid android. === w7pro64 (64 bit comm) === comm.c:861: Test failed: WaitCommEvent failed with a timeout comm.c:872: recovering after WAIT_TIMEOUT... comm.c:883: Test failed: WaitCommEvent error 0 comm.c:885: Test failed: WaitCommEvent: expected EV_TXEMPTY, got 0 comm.c:889: WaitCommEvent for EV_TXEMPTY took 1014 ms (timeout 1000) comm.c:891: Test failed: WaitCommEvent used 1014 ms for waiting

1 0

BiDi, Unicode 6.3 and Wine.
by Aric Stewart Oct. 4, 2013

Oct. 4, 2013

Hello, So Unicode 6.3 was just recently released. One of the things it features is an updated BIDI (Bidirectional) algorithm. This is revision 29 to the algorithm. (http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr9/tr9-29.html#Modifications) Looking at the code I moved from gdi32 to usp10, it looks like the existing code is based off of revision 17. This implementation was originally by Shachar and Maarten. I simply integrated it into uniscribe. I am tempted to update our code to match the revision 29 version of the algorithm. But this raises a question. Right now our code mostly correctly mimics Windows. It may be that I am not testing the correct edge cases that would reveal if windows is coded to a later version of the algorithm or not. But if we update to revision 29 then we will almost assuredly be using a later version of the algorithm. What is more important to us in this regard? Do we want to have the latest algorithm based on the unicode standard, or do we want to try to match the algorithm that Windows makes use of? Thanks! -aric

3 2

Re: [3/3] ntdll: Add support for FILE_APPEND_DATA to NtWriteFile. Take 2.
by Alexandre Julliard Oct. 4, 2013

Oct. 4, 2013

Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)baikal.ru> writes: > @@ -979,6 +986,12 @@ NTSTATUS WINAPI NtWriteFile(HANDLE hFile, HANDLE hEvent, > goto done; > } > > + if (append_write) > + { > + offset_eof.QuadPart = (LONGLONG)-1; /* FILE_WRITE_TO_END_OF_FILE */ > + offset = &offset_eof; > + } > + Please add a test for the file position after the write, to show that this is the correct behavior. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

1 0

Re: [PATCH 1/5] wined3d: Don't bother about client storage in wined3d_surface_set_mem.
by Henri Verbeet Oct. 4, 2013

Oct. 4, 2013

On 4 October 2013 15:02, Stefan Dösinger <stefandoesinger(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Client storage only applies to GL textures, which won't be created for sysmem surfaces. > I don't think that's necessarily true at the moment. In particular, ddraw blits can in principle cause a texture to be created for sysmem surfaces. There might be restrictions in the ddraw API that prevent this from happening in practice, but even if there are, we certainly don't enforce them.

2 4

Re: [PATCH 5/5] wininet: Added InternetLockRequestFile tests.
by Marvin Oct. 4, 2013

Oct. 4, 2013

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2625 Your paranoid android. === w2008s64 (64 bit http) === http.c:3521: Test failed: HttpQueryInfo failed 0 === w7pro64 (64 bit http) === http.c:3521: Test failed: HttpQueryInfo failed 0

1 0

Re: d3d9: update locked_rect only if wined3d_surface_map succeeded
by Henri Verbeet Oct. 4, 2013

Oct. 4, 2013

On 3 October 2013 21:16, Lasse Rasinen <lrasinen(a)iki.fi> wrote: > According to debugging output, Artemis Spaceship Bridge Simulator 2.0 > calls LockRect twice on the same texture (for whatever reason) and crashes. > > http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34271 > > This change prevents the locked_rect being overwritten with garbage in > that case, and the game no longer crashes. > I think this patch makes sense, but could you please add a test case as well? Ideally we'd also have similar tests for other resources (i.e., textures, volumes, vertex buffers, index buffers) and D3D versions (ddraw, d3d8), but that's not a strict requirement. > + if (hr == WINED3D_OK) { > + locked_rect->Pitch = map_desc.row_pitch; > + locked_rect->pBits = map_desc.data; > + } > Minor style issue, this should be: if (SUCCEEDED(hr)) { ... }

3 2

Re: [PATCH 2/2] advapi32: Don't cache HKCR if WOW64 redirection flags are set
by Marvin Oct. 4, 2013

Oct. 4, 2013

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2624 Your paranoid android. === wxppro (32 bit registry) === Timeout

1 0

Re: [PATCH 1/5] wined3d: Don't bother about client storage in wined3d_surface_set_mem.
by Henri Verbeet Oct. 4, 2013

Oct. 4, 2013

On 4 October 2013 00:03, Stefan Dösinger <stefan(a)codeweavers.com> wrote: > @@ -2883,10 +2886,6 @@ HRESULT CDECL wined3d_surface_set_mem(struct wined3d_surface *surface, void *mem > /* Now the surface memory is most up do date. Invalidate drawable and texture. */ > surface_validate_location(surface, SFLAG_INSYSMEM); > surface_invalidate_location(surface, ~SFLAG_INSYSMEM); > - > - /* For client textures OpenGL has to be notified. */ > - if (surface->flags & SFLAG_CLIENT) > - surface_release_client_storage(surface); > } > else if (surface->flags & SFLAG_USERPTR) > { > @@ -2899,9 +2898,6 @@ HRESULT CDECL wined3d_surface_set_mem(struct wined3d_surface *surface, void *mem > surface->resource.allocatedMemory = NULL; > surface->flags &= ~(SFLAG_USERPTR | SFLAG_INSYSMEM); > > - if (surface->flags & SFLAG_CLIENT) > - surface_release_client_storage(surface); > - > surface_prepare_system_memory(surface); > } > What makes this safe, and why is it needed?

1 0

Re: [PATCH 3/3] winemac: Tell Wine when Cocoa has brought a window to the front.
by Ken Thomases Oct. 4, 2013

Oct. 4, 2013

On Oct 4, 2013, at 12:17 AM, Ken Thomases wrote: > --- > dlls/winemac.drv/cocoa_app.m | 8 ++++++-- > dlls/winemac.drv/cocoa_window.h | 1 + > dlls/winemac.drv/cocoa_window.m | 16 +++++++++++++--- > dlls/winemac.drv/event.c | 5 +++++ > dlls/winemac.drv/macdrv.h | 1 + > dlls/winemac.drv/macdrv_cocoa.h | 1 + > dlls/winemac.drv/window.c | 12 ++++++++++++ > 7 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > <0003-winemac-Tell-Wine-when-Cocoa-has-brought-a-window-to.patch> Don't commit this one. It has caused some strange behavior on Mavericks. The other two in the series are OK and useful independently of this one. -Ken

1 0

Re: [PATCH 1/5] wined3d: Store valid locations in the resource.
by Henri Verbeet Oct. 3, 2013

Oct. 3, 2013

On 3 October 2013 13:08, Stefan Dösinger <stefan(a)codeweavers.com> wrote: > --- > dlls/wined3d/volume.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------------- > dlls/wined3d/wined3d_private.h | 6 ++++-- > 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) > What about surfaces and buffers?

2 5

Re: kernel32: Add tests for job objects (try 4)
by Alexandre Julliard Oct. 3, 2013

Oct. 3, 2013

Andrew Cook <ariscop(a)gmail.com> writes: > + sprintf(buffer, "\"%s\" tests/process.c ignored \"%s\"", selfname, "wait"); > + > + IOPort = CreateIoCompletionPort(INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE, NULL, 0, 1); > + ok(IOPort != INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE, "CreateIoCompletionPort (%d)", GetLastError()); > + > + JobObject = pCreateJobObjectW(NULL, NULL); > + ok(JobObject != INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE, "CreateJobObject (%d)\n", GetLastError()); These functions don't return INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

1 0

Looking for an icon for the Mac driver: generic program running under Wine
by Ken Thomases Oct. 3, 2013

Oct. 3, 2013

Hi, I have a need for a new icon in Wine and I'm hoping somebody with some graphics-design skills might be able to create it. The Mac driver attempts to extract an icon from the executable to use for the Dock icon of its process. This is also the icon that appears in the Command-Tab application switcher. This often works, but not always. When it doesn't, the Dock just uses the generic "Unix executable" icon from Mac OS X. You can see that here: <http://i.imgur.com/b1JrMDJ.png>. It's not very nice. I would prefer to have a Wine-specific generic program icon. Any graphic designer care to take on the task of creating such an icon? I'm told Wine has been using the Tango icons as the template for its. Tango provides application-x-executable.svg at <http://cgit.freedesktop.org/tango/tango-icon-theme/tree/svg> that might be suitable. That could be badged with the Wine glass logo to produce an icon for a program running under Wine. On the other hand, if this icon were to be used only by the Mac driver, it might be more appropriate to use a Mac-themed icon. Some time back, Jeremiah posted an archive of icons. <http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2013-February/098783.html> That included one which had a miniature Mac window badged with the Wine glass logo. I'm not sure of the copyright/licensing situation with that icon. It's bitmap-only, not vector, but that might be fine for a Mac-only icon. It does have some issues with rough edges around the window, rather than a smooth alpha-blended edge. Although Mac app icons can go up to 1024x1024 pixels (512x512 "points" at 2x resolution for Retina displays), this icon would only appear in the Dock and the application switcher. So, it needn't be larger than 256x256 pixels (128x128(a)2x). Thanks, Ken

2 1

Re: rpcss: Convert to a service
by Andrew Cook Oct. 3, 2013

Oct. 3, 2013

Ignore this, for some reason this randomly forks a huge number of rpcss instances, and decided to not do so while i was testing it On 03/10/13 14:00, Andrew Cook wrote: > --- > dlls/rpcrt4/rpc_epmap.c | 40 ++++++++----------- > programs/rpcss/Makefile.in | 2 +- > programs/rpcss/rpcss_main.c | 97 > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- > tools/wine.inf.in | 11 +++++ > 4 files changed, 104 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-) > >

1 0

Re: server: Set the unix file write mode bit also for FILE_APPEND_DATA access.
by Dmitry Timoshkov Oct. 3, 2013

Oct. 3, 2013

Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)baikal.ru> wrote: > diff --git a/server/file.c b/server/file.c > index 2ecf97c..94d3060 100644 > --- a/server/file.c > +++ b/server/file.c > @@ -459,7 +459,7 @@ static mode_t file_access_to_mode( unsigned int access ) > > access = generic_file_map_access( access ); > if (access & FILE_READ_DATA) mode |= 4; > - if (access & FILE_WRITE_DATA) mode |= 2; > + if (access & (FILE_WRITE_DATA|FILE_APPEND_DATA)) mode |= 2; > if (access & FILE_EXECUTE) mode |= 1; > return mode; > } I don't think that this patch should be in 'superseded' state. -- Dmitry.

1 0

Re: [5/5] ws2_32: Always return the source address from WSAAccept.
by Marvin Oct. 2, 2013

Oct. 2, 2013

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2610 Your paranoid android. === wxppro (32 bit sock) === sock.c:519: Test failed: oob_server (c8): unexpectedly at the OOB mark: 0 === w2008s64 (32 bit sock) === sock.c:519: Test failed: oob_server (618): unexpectedly at the OOB mark: 0 sock: unhandled exception c0000005 at 74AA9799 === w2008s64 (64 bit sock) === sock.c:519: Test failed: oob_server (600): unexpectedly at the OOB mark: 0 sock: unhandled exception c0000005 at 0000000000000000

1 0