August 2013 - Wine-Devel - list.winehq.org

Wine Gecko 2.24-beta1
by Jacek Caban Sept. 25, 2013

Sept. 25, 2013

Hi all, It's time to do another update of Wine Gecko, so I prepared a new beta build. It's already on Sourceforge [1]. Until server-side support for auto install of the package is committed [2], its manual installation is required [3]. I attached a patch to Wine that is required for the new Gecko. Anything that uses MSHTML is worth testing. All help with testing is appreciated! Cheers, Jacek [1] https://sourceforge.net/projects/wine/files/Wine%20Gecko/2.24-beta1/ [2] http://source.winehq.org/patches/data/97881 [3] http://wiki.winehq.org/Gecko

2 2

Embedding a HWND window into an X11 window
by Alexandre Bique Sept. 10, 2013

Sept. 10, 2013

Hi, How could I embed a HWND window created with CreateWindow() into an X11 window? Thanks! :-) -- Alexandre Bique

5 8

Re: gdi32: Fixed Rectangle() rotation problem with GM_ADVANCED graphics mode.
by Alexandre Julliard Sept. 3, 2013

Sept. 3, 2013

Ralf Habacker <ralf(a)habacker.de> writes: > see http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34381 > --- > dlls/gdi32/painting.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++-- > 1 Datei geändert, 16 Zeilen hinzugefügt(+), 2 Zeilen entfernt(-) This would have to be done in the drivers. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

2 1

Re: iphlpapi: Add AllocateAndGetTcpExTableFromStack().
by Bruno Jesus Aug. 31, 2013

Aug. 31, 2013

On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 9:16 AM, Ralf Habacker <ralf.habacker(a)freenet.de> wrote: > new > - add doc for family parameter > - add doc for additional return code > - sorting in c file fixed > > Signed-off-by: Ralf Habacker <ralf.habacker(a)freenet.de> I guess the patch was marked as pending because you didn't add any tests. You are also missing the (try X) at the end of the subject. Regards, Bruno

1 0

Re: [PATCH 3/3] ws2_32: Implement get socket option SO_PROTOCOL_INFO
by Marvin Aug. 30, 2013

Aug. 30, 2013

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=1945 Your paranoid android. === wxppro (32 bit sock) === sock: unhandled exception c0000005 at 00000000

1 0

Re: [PATCH] widl: Limit recursion deepth within structs to 1 for checking for full-pointers.
by Paul Chitescu Aug. 30, 2013

Aug. 30, 2013

Hi! It would help to attach the patch, not your editor's swap file. Paul On Friday 30 August 2013 10:57:26 pm Kai Tietz wrote: > Hello, > > attached patch limits recursion in type_has_full_pointer-function to a > deeth of 1. By this all necessary checks should be possible, but > endless-recursion due diamond/cycle type-declarations are avoided. > I was finding this issue by working on propidl.idl rework, and hit > such an endless recursion. > > Regards, > Kai

2 1

Re: [PATCH 5/5] wined3d: Enforce volume texture block restrictions
by Henri Verbeet Aug. 30, 2013

Aug. 30, 2013

On 30 August 2013 00:19, Stefan Dösinger <stefan(a)codeweavers.com> wrote: > + if (format->flags & WINED3DFMT_FLAG_BLOCKS) > + { > + UINT width_mask = format->block_width - 1; > + UINT height_mask = format->block_height - 1; > + if (desc->width & width_mask || desc->height & height_mask) > + { > + WARN("(%p) : Texture cannot be created - width or height not block size aligned.\n", texture); > + return WINED3DERR_INVALIDCALL; > + } > + } > + Is this different from surfaces? IIRC surfaces are padded up to the next multiple of the block size, although I may have that wrong. Not a fan of the "(%p) : " trace formatting.

2 3

Re: [PATCH 3/5] d3d9/tests: Add a DXT5 volume test
by Henri Verbeet Aug. 30, 2013

Aug. 30, 2013

On 30 August 2013 00:19, Stefan Dösinger <stefan(a)codeweavers.com> wrote: > + /* A 8x4x2 texture consisting of 4 4x4 blocks. The colors of the blocks are red, green, blue and white. */ > + 0xff, 0xff, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0xF8, 0x00, 0xF8, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, > + 0xff, 0xff, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0xE0, 0x07, 0xE0, 0x07, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, > + 0xff, 0xff, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x1F, 0x00, 0x1F, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, > + 0xff, 0xff, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00 In general we're using lower-case hex in wined3d, but I think it should at least be consistent within the same test.

2 1

Sequences in a loop
by matyapiro31 Aug. 30, 2013

Aug. 30, 2013

I found many wine sources use not a pointer,but a sequence . for example: krnl386.exe16/dma.c: for(i=0,p=(char*)DMA_CurrentBaseAddress[channel];i<ret*size;i++) msdaps/usrmarshal.c: for(prop = 0; prop < rgPropertySets[prop_set].cProperties; prop++) I know in some cases to use sequences are wiser way than pointers, but so many of them are used in loops. Should I change them?

3 2

Help to create a server request
by Bruno Jesus Aug. 30, 2013

Aug. 30, 2013

Hi all, I need some help to continue my current wine work. In order to implement SO_PROTOCOL_INFO for getsockopt I need to retrieve some information from the socket like its family and protocol. I have searched for a few days and ended up with a solution I dislike so I had a better idea (at least I hope I did). Instead of using non-portable SO_DOMAIN and SO_PROTOCOL/SO_PROTOTYPE to retrieve the socket family and protocol or using non-reliable guessing using only the socket type I thought it would be better to ask the server for this information. Using a request just like is used for several other information in ws2_32 (operation which will work on every OS). So, all I need is a server request that based on the socket fd will return the socket family, type and protocol. I tried to understand how requests work but I failed completely. Maybe this request can be later improved to return the connection time so we can finally fix SO_CONNECT_TIME option. The current solution is attached, since I sent the tests separated and they were commited the patch will not apply, it's only for reference. The idea is to remove the functions get_sock_[family|protocol|type] to a single server request. So, is this a good idea? If yes, how can I create and use the request? If not I'm all ears. Best wishes and thanks in advance, Bruno

2 2