August 2014 - Wine-Devel - list.winehq.org

Tesing list, ignore
by Jeremy Newman Aug. 21, 2014

Aug. 21, 2014

I'm a test post. Move along....

1 1

Re: [PATCH 5/5] wined3d: Use rendertarget views for color output instead of surfaces.
by Stefan Dösinger Aug. 21, 2014

Aug. 21, 2014

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Am 2014-08-21 09:55, schrieb Henri Verbeet: > + if (swapchain_desc->backbuffer_count && FAILED(hr = wined3d_rendertarget_view_create_from_surface( > + surface_from_resource(wined3d_texture_get_sub_resource(swapchain->back_buffers[0], 0)), > + NULL, &wined3d_null_parent_ops, &device->back_buffer_view))) > + { > + ERR("Failed to create rendertarget view, hr %#x.\n", hr); > + goto err_out; > + } Having an implicit back buffer render target view managed by wined3d seems a bit odd. Why not let the client libraries create and set the render target view after device creation? That would be similar to what a d3d10 app does after D3D10CreateDeviceAndSwapChain. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJT9huWAAoJEN0/YqbEcdMwvxMQAIcE7cZnRLTTgECUoxQMWkA5 hobDWConkMr0LGeCMt0Aw98UPsq5n7V/qivYdayudgWbt2YkrRnKq6+d7SIuaWBd QnA0q3CRpWa/v4BKfsXN7t2OKnDwwYCeQoW+qqBpentNEblxVAdh4Rh+/AQZ1Oim PjWdi0Nl31VPnRTQq/GpiHFNY87T9l46hsd5W1GfxY8gPuNxBn0P1xDDsYqG8IxQ 3GH5gw3YIk/JTlvX0nSHQbo05WCgxlGUJ+i7LMotlNth0itEBPOI8EqefEwTdfVO a/6O9xdt7FCNuZSb9yA9nCvn65D8k9hJxYjltF2aouLlbbtuV9CeuNrsxQhqWRA4 vKH5agUKa7dH8aGEaEKk1nrcO9r1U//wGVT1jaZRyWaPx2+o/J/RPIGwEx/HZtyv jInN2QpVSQo4YqSRLHB6geJ3K5OvTAVI4X4QtFXiFQ6IABTmsjlIdxF30fFSmOos +45ohC/GguOJKgvApgWix7xRAX7N1U3QaDsNyaQofJ6hDY7EdMW5Ptz58qBqUv6x 4P6PJ+m4BS5yj+hIsOC1HlwQnMRn4JexTfsg4E/mB5Laa3RONQ8x5aX00G3gs6Sv FozirZyoP4n3d7X0nRkRf4qljlW8SsssWhy7paTLgtLJwdFwy97wWLubdZuljeeg GxCvkXAnRBScDk9IE4z4 =UuRt -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 1

Re: [PATCH 2/2] mshtml: Added IHTMLLinkElement::rev property implementation.
by Marvin Aug. 21, 2014

Aug. 21, 2014

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=8616 Your paranoid android. === w2000pro (32 bit dom) === dom.c:5751: Test failed: hasFeature failed: 80070057 === wxppro (32 bit dom) === dom.c:5751: Test failed: hasFeature failed: 80070057

1 0

Re: [PATCH 1/2] mshtml: Added IHTMLDocument5::get_implementation implementation.
by Marvin Aug. 21, 2014

Aug. 21, 2014

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=8615 Your paranoid android. === w2000pro (32 bit dom) === dom.c:5720: Test failed: hasFeature failed: 80070057 === wxppro (32 bit dom) === dom.c:5720: Test failed: hasFeature failed: 80070057

1 0

Re: [1/5] ntdll/tests: Add tests for FILE_PIPE_INFORMATION. (try 2)
by Marvin Aug. 21, 2014

Aug. 21, 2014

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=8610 Your paranoid android. === w8 (32 bit pipe) === pipe.c:546: Test failed: can't open pipe, GetLastError: e7 pipe.c:622: Test failed: can't open pipe, GetLastError: e7

1 0

Re: [4/4] ntdll/tests: Add tests for FILE_PIPE_INFORMATION.
by Alexandre Julliard Aug. 20, 2014

Aug. 20, 2014

Sebastian Lackner <sebastian(a)fds-team.de> writes: > +#define check_pipe_handle_state(handle, r, c) \ > + do \ > + { \ > + memset(&fpi, 0x55, sizeof(fpi)); \ > + if (handle == INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE) break; \ > + res = pNtQueryInformationFile(handle, &iosb, &fpi, sizeof(fpi), (FILE_INFORMATION_CLASS)23); \ > + ok(!res, "NtQueryInformationFile returned %x\n", res); \ > + ok(fpi.ReadMode == r, "ReadMode == %x\n", fpi.ReadMode); \ > + ok(fpi.CompletionMode == c, "CompletionMode == %x\n", fpi.CompletionMode); \ > + } \ > + while (0) Please use a function instead of a macro for that sort of thing. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

1 0

Re: [PATCH 1/2] vbscript: Implemented Date(try 2)
by Piotr Caban Aug. 20, 2014

Aug. 20, 2014

On 08/19/14 17:56, Shuai Meng wrote: > Change log: > checked the type of returned variant instead of printing it. > --- > dlls/vbscript/global.c | 10 ++++++++-- > dlls/vbscript/tests/api.vbs | 2 ++ > 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > The patch will not apply cleanly in current git. I've sent a patch that adds support for VAR_TIMEVALUEONLY and VAR_DATEVALUEONLY flags to VarDateFromUdateEx function. I think it will be nicer to use this function here. Thanks, Piotr

1 0

Wine test analysis August 6
by Jeremy White Aug. 19, 2014

Aug. 19, 2014

Henri asked me to share my daily link; this page: www.winehq.org/~jwhite/latest.html should redirect you to the latest results of my cron job that analyzes test results. My cron job is hopefully only a temporary tool used to shame people into fixing the tests. It's main features: 1. Limits results only to believed 'good' test bot VMs (which is basically all the production ones, minus the win 8 vm) 2. Looks for patterns (e.g. apparently fixed, sporadically failing, consistently failing) 3. Holds an annotation line The goal is to have 0 failures. My first step in that is to have each failure annotated, so we know who to blame <grin>. The 'good' news is that we are back down under 30 - looks like just 27 failures right now. There are five failures not annotated in any way, and my link for them was blue, so they might be new and easy: http://test.winehq.org/data/tests/shlwapi:ordinal.html http://test.winehq.org/data/tests/comctl32:button.html http://test.winehq.org/data/tests/kernel32:change.html http://test.winehq.org/data/tests/user32:listbox.html http://test.winehq.org/data/tests/user32:win.html Any takers? Cheers, Jeremy

3 2

Re: [PATCH 2/2] vbscript: Implemented Time(try 2)
by Marvin Aug. 19, 2014

Aug. 19, 2014

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=8592 Your paranoid android. === w2000pro (32 bit) === No test summary line found === wxppro (32 bit) === No test summary line found === wvistau64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === w2008s64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === w7u (32 bit) === No test summary line found === w8 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === wvistau64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found === w2008s64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found

1 0

Re: [PATCH 1/2] vbscript: Implemented Date(try 2)
by Marvin Aug. 19, 2014

Aug. 19, 2014

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=8591 Your paranoid android. === w2000pro (32 bit) === No test summary line found === wxppro (32 bit) === No test summary line found === wvistau64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === w2008s64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === w7u (32 bit) === No test summary line found === w8 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === wvistau64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found === w2008s64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found

1 0