August 2014 - Wine-Devel - list.winehq.org

Re: [PATCH 7/7] vbscript: Implemented Log(try 3)
by Marvin Aug. 17, 2014

Aug. 17, 2014

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=8550 Your paranoid android. === build (build) === Patch failed to apply

1 0

Re: [PATCH 6/7] vbscript: Implemented Exp(try 3)
by Marvin Aug. 17, 2014

Aug. 17, 2014

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=8549 Your paranoid android. === build (build) === Patch failed to apply

1 0

Re: [PATCH 5/7] vbscript: Implemented Atn(try 3)
by Marvin Aug. 17, 2014

Aug. 17, 2014

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=8548 Your paranoid android. === build (build) === Patch failed to apply

1 0

Re: [PATCH 4/7] vbscript: Implemented Tan(try 3)
by Marvin Aug. 17, 2014

Aug. 17, 2014

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=8547 Your paranoid android. === build (build) === Patch failed to apply

1 0

Re: [PATCH 3/7] vbscript: Implemented Sin(try 3 )
by Marvin Aug. 17, 2014

Aug. 17, 2014

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=8546 Your paranoid android. === build (build) === Patch failed to apply

1 0

Re: [PATCH 2/7] vbscript: Implemented Cos(try 3)
by Marvin Aug. 17, 2014

Aug. 17, 2014

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=8545 Your paranoid android. === build (build) === Patch failed to apply

1 0

Re: [PATCH 1/7] vbscript: Implemented Sqr(try 3)
by Marvin Aug. 17, 2014

Aug. 17, 2014

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=8544 Your paranoid android. === build (build) === Patch failed to apply

1 0

imagehlp: Implement (parts of) BindImageEx
by Bernhard Reiter Aug. 16, 2014

Aug. 16, 2014

Now that the test has been committed, I'd be grateful for any reviews of the implementation! Bernhard

4 9

Missing Bug links in AppDB - a try
by André Hentschel Aug. 15, 2014

Aug. 15, 2014

Hi, I once wrote a script to search the Bugzilla backup file for application names from the AppDB backup file. There are still lots of false positives and it's not respected when the bug url is already linked to the AppDB entry... The script also ignores application names < 4 chars and closed bugs. So if you want to have a bug url adding run through the AppDB, be carefull and have a look at the output: http://dawncrow.de/wine/appdbbugzilla.html

1 1

Re: mshtml: Added IHTMLTableCell::align property implementation.
by Marvin Aug. 15, 2014

Aug. 15, 2014

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=8502 Your paranoid android. === w2000pro (32 bit dom) === dom.c:5936: Test failed: Expect E_INVALIDARG, got 00000000 === wxppro (32 bit dom) === dom.c:5936: Test failed: Expect E_INVALIDARG, got 00000000 === wvistau64 (32 bit dom) === dom.c:5936: Test failed: Expect E_INVALIDARG, got 00000000 === w7u (32 bit dom) === dom.c:5936: Test failed: Expect E_INVALIDARG, got 00000000 === w8 (32 bit dom) === dom.c:5936: Test failed: Expect E_INVALIDARG, got 00000000 === wvistau64 (64 bit dom) === dom.c:5936: Test failed: Expect E_INVALIDARG, got 00000000

1 0