March 2015 - Wine-Devel - list.winehq.org

Re: [PATCH] d3d9/tests: Extend the colorfill test (v2).
by Alexandre Julliard March 15, 2015

March 15, 2015

Stefan Dösinger <stefan(a)codeweavers.com> writes: > This supersedes patch 109855. > > Version 2: Don't check the fill value of D3DFMT_P8. The testbot deviates > from real HW. I could mark it broken, but it doesn't seem worth the > effort because the format is essentially useless. It can only be used > for ColorFill and StretchRect between P8 surfaces. It doesn't work here (GeForce 320M, Nouveau driver): ../../../tools/runtest -q -P wine -T ../../.. -M d3d9.dll -p d3d9_test.exe.so visual && touch visual.ok visual.c:904: Test failed: Failed to color fill, hr 0x8876086c, fmt=D3DFMT_YUY2. visual.c:910: Test failed: Failed to color fill, hr 0x8876086c, fmt=D3DFMT_YUY2. visual.c:916: Test succeeded inside todo block: Got unexpected hr 0x8876086c, fmt=D3DFMT_YUY2. visual.c:904: Test failed: Failed to color fill, hr 0x8876086c, fmt=D3DFMT_UYVY. visual.c:910: Test failed: Failed to color fill, hr 0x8876086c, fmt=D3DFMT_UYVY. visual.c:916: Test succeeded inside todo block: Got unexpected hr 0x8876086c, fmt=D3DFMT_UYVY. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

2 1

Re: d3drm: Add tests for querying between IDirect3DRM interfaces
by Marvin March 15, 2015

March 15, 2015

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=12171 Your paranoid android. === build (build) === Patch failed to apply

1 0

Re: [PATCH] vbscript: Implemented GetLocale
by Marvin March 15, 2015

March 15, 2015

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=12170 Your paranoid android. === w2000pro (32 bit) === No test summary line found === wxppro (32 bit) === No test summary line found === w2003std (32 bit) === No test summary line found === wvistau64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === w2008s64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === w7u (32 bit) === No test summary line found === w8 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === wvistau64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found === w2008s64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found

1 0

GSoC 2015 project
by TARUN GUPTA March 14, 2015

March 14, 2015

Hi, I am an aspirant of GSoC 2015 and interested in tools project. I have good C knowledge. I am ready to put in my best in these projects. How should i get started?

1 0

Regarding WineHQ development
by Shubham kumar March 14, 2015

March 14, 2015

Sir, I want to start contributing to this project but the thing is i don't know how to start or what are the right tools to achieve the tasks mentioned in winehq bugzilla and I was unable to find a guide that can help me. For instance, What am i supposed to do with bug 10000? It has a picture of some application which uses some language other than english and i was only able to make out that since windows api documentation is wrong and incomplete we should use the link from that application to correct it or something like that.... Please guide me on how to start and what are the development kits that i might need. I have installed wine on my Ubuntu package from "https://www.winehq.org/download/ubuntu" but i think this is meant for users not developers.. Thank you

1 0

Re: ntdll/tests: Remove an unneeded NONAMELESSSTRUCT directive. (try2)
by Marvin March 14, 2015

March 14, 2015

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=12159 Your paranoid android. === wvistau64 (32 bit exception) === exception.c:485: Test failed: 42: Wrong exception address 003E0000/003E0001 exception: unhandled exception 80000004 at 003E0000 exception.c:485: Test failed: 42: Wrong exception address 7751ED97/003E0001 === w7u (32 bit exception) === exception.c:485: Test failed: 42: Wrong exception address 002F0000/002F0001 exception: unhandled exception 80000004 at 002F0000 exception.c:485: Test failed: 42: Wrong exception address 77CDE34F/002F0001 === w8 (32 bit exception) === exception.c:485: Test failed: 42: Wrong exception address 003E0000/003E0001 exception: unhandled exception 80000004 at 003E0000 exception.c:485: Test failed: 42: Wrong exception address 77174D17/003E0001

1 0

Re: ntdll: Remove unneeded NONAMELESSXXX directives.
by Francois Gouget March 14, 2015

March 14, 2015

Ignore this patch, it does not compile... but only in 64bit mode. I'll send an updated one. On Fri, 13 Mar 2015, Francois Gouget wrote: [...] > diff --git a/dlls/ntdll/rtl.c b/dlls/ntdll/rtl.c [...] > -#define NONAMELESSUNION > #define NONAMELESSSTRUCT This is the problem: 64bit code does not compile if NONAMELESSSTRUCT is defined but not NONAMELESSUNION. That's because the 64bit KNONVOLATILE_CONTEXT_POINTERS struct then looks like this: { ... union { ... struct { ... } s; }; // Normally called u. union { ... struct { ... } s; }; // Normally called u2. }; So there is no way to determine whether one is accessing the content of the first struct or the second struct. Unfortunately we are stuck as that's really how it is in the PSDK. -- Francois Gouget <fgouget(a)free.fr> http://fgouget.free.fr/ Demander si un ordinateur peut penser revient à demander si un sous-marin peut nager.

1 0

Re: ntdll/tests: Remove unneeded NONAMELESSSXXX directives.
by Marvin March 13, 2015

March 13, 2015

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=12157 Your paranoid android. === build (build) === Make failed

1 0

Re: [PATCH 3/3] dwrite: Fix GetClusterMetrics() return value (try2)
by Marvin March 13, 2015

March 13, 2015

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=12142 Your paranoid android. === wvistau64 (32 bit layout) === layout.c:1109: Test failed: got 0x80004002 === w2008s64 (32 bit layout) === layout.c:1109: Test failed: got 0x80004002 === w7u (32 bit layout) === layout.c:1109: Test failed: got 0x80004002 === wvistau64 (64 bit layout) === layout.c:1109: Test failed: got 0x80004002 === w2008s64 (64 bit layout) === layout.c:1109: Test failed: got 0x80004002

1 0

Re: [PATCH 2/3] dwrite: Store vertical orientation property (resend)
by Marvin March 13, 2015

March 13, 2015

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=12141 Your paranoid android. === wvistau64 (32 bit layout) === layout.c:1110: Test failed: got 0x80004002 === w2008s64 (32 bit layout) === layout.c:1110: Test failed: got 0x80004002 === w7u (32 bit layout) === layout.c:1110: Test failed: got 0x80004002 === wvistau64 (64 bit layout) === layout.c:1110: Test failed: got 0x80004002 === w2008s64 (64 bit layout) === layout.c:1110: Test failed: got 0x80004002

1 0