July 2015 - Wine-Devel - list.winehq.org

Re: msi/tests: Mark a test result on win2k3 as broken.
by Marvin July 17, 2015

July 17, 2015

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=15404 Your paranoid android. === w7u (32 bit package) === The test timed out

1 0

Re: [4/4] user32: SystemParametersInfo(SPI_GETNONCLIENTMETRICS) should return real font names.
by Marvin July 17, 2015

July 17, 2015

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=15397 Your paranoid android. === w8 (32 bit sysparams) === sysparams.c:2488: Test failed: Waiting for the WM_DISPLAYCHANGE message timed out sysparams.c:2501: Test failed: Set bpp 32, but WM_DISPLAYCHANGE reported bpp -1

1 0

Re: winemac.drv: Release mouse capture when destroying window specified in SetCapture call
by Ken Thomases July 17, 2015

July 17, 2015

On Jul 17, 2015, at 5:54 AM, Piotr Caban <piotr(a)codeweavers.com> wrote: > --- > dlls/winemac.drv/window.c | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/dlls/winemac.drv/window.c b/dlls/winemac.drv/window.c > index c67ccd0..9d996ec 100644 > --- a/dlls/winemac.drv/window.c > +++ b/dlls/winemac.drv/window.c > @@ -1274,6 +1274,8 @@ void CDECL macdrv_DestroyWindow(HWND hwnd) > > if (!(data = get_win_data(hwnd))) return; > > + if (hwnd == GetCapture()) macdrv_SetCapture(0, 0); > + > if (data->gl_view) macdrv_dispose_view(data->gl_view); > destroy_cocoa_window(data); > > Looks good to me. Thanks! -Ken

1 0

Re: [1/4] user32: Add a test to show that fonts returned by SystemParametersInfo(SPI_GETNONCLIENTMETRICS) should be listed b
by Marvin July 17, 2015

July 17, 2015

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=15394 Your paranoid android. === w8 (32 bit sysparams) === sysparams.c:2488: Test failed: Waiting for the WM_DISPLAYCHANGE message timed out sysparams.c:2501: Test failed: Set bpp 32, but WM_DISPLAYCHANGE reported bpp -1

1 0

Re: [PATCH 2/2] d3drm/tests: Add version specific tests for CreateDeviceFrom* methods. (try 3)
by Stefan Dösinger July 17, 2015

July 17, 2015

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Sorry, there are always more issues to find :-( . Am 2015-07-16 um 18:08 schrieb Aaryaman Vasishta: > + hr = IDirectDrawSurface_GetClipper(d3drm_primary, &d3drm_clipper); > ... > + if (d3drm_primary) > + IDirectDrawSurface_Release(d3drm_primary); The if check here is redundant. I expect Coverity to complain about this sooner or later... (version 2 and 3 are affected too) > + hr = IDirect3DRM3_CreateDeviceFromClipper(d3drm3, clipper, &driver, 0, 0, &device3); > + todo_wine ok(hr == D3DRMERR_BADVALUE, "Expected hr == D3DRMERR_BADVALUE, got %x.\n", hr); > ... > + /* If NULL is passed for clipper, CreateDeviceFromClipper returns D3DRMERR_BADVALUE */ > + hr = IDirect3DRM3_CreateDeviceFromClipper(d3drm3, NULL, &driver, 0, 0, &device3); > + todo_wine ok(hr == D3DRMERR_BADVALUE, "Expected hr == D3DRMERR_BADVALUE, got %x.\n", hr); Does it return D3DRMERR_BADVALUE because clipper is NULL or because width / height are 0? Don't test two error conditions at once, unless both return a different error and you want to test the priority of the error handling. (version 2 and 3 are affected too) > + /* What happens if we don't pass D3DRMDEVICE_NOZBUFFER and still not attach our own depth surface? */ > + hr = IDirect3DRM3_CreateDeviceFromSurface(d3drm3, &driver, ddraw, surface, D3DRMDEVICE_NOZBUFFER, &device3); > + ok(SUCCEEDED(hr), "Cannot create IDirect3DRMDevice3 interface (hr = %x).\n", hr); Please also test what happens when you have an already attached depth surface and do *not* pass D3DRMDEVICE_NOZBUFFER. I suspect that it either works like version 2 (your surface is kept, no error), or that it returns an error (because AddAttachedSurface fails). -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJVqLmUAAoJEN0/YqbEcdMw3L8P/iqw4zcu9MbgJsfvM7MBLqZa OEbQ5SyYot/QTPqGL1TPujjLIkm4q557Ban2ZBcN3lPSWscJ5KQoo2sKedWfu/yi Y47Cvwqggrx7FUOpdNEdp4311eDQ3xo6wYklhzVAUXqQ4cZRmjm6clhMlIW1PPfX v2iJSNg4xTBqABH6xz+bapO29QpDqq5KuWTRtUuzGFZt9N1cvCzgNHRPmMtlpiCp ray9/trglSQzsqbyamRD5Tr9Cd8bpSgxrtF7juIVc1MEBISuJquN+Hv/I3qqKgUb SZkf3yDmEoKeRrCHgfESR9j9gkzH6Iy0R01GWIVdQCshyW36rNI6NwP8zBu9kaeq psHeFv0Rp0Ed4OKqc+WT+OwagEaH9TwBXmd/JruOiNMQK4/q4HOVvM/10jPG+/gP /PioGPETbISnMZqZBqSJkdw/NgKoiP8AnJKxYI8GNoAPnPbkktTZ+G0T4rRJkKX/ uYEoUma38cSs6Mv0t1Qb5mxMOl6ioeBnZlGF2WxnZkAOct4Xaww2EM7fPN0dqUP3 nDGd4dU4Sj66hrb5p3nb12K/iJ+skjT0beHWQfxPDhlL9NyLDLl/96XCB/sV5S8Y qJR3irxiFgSbcm+kGsSa24GV2B1gDDGeXFDEm6rZo37jlG3ASzoOnek9HqcSgBA1 scHWj2bMxjyM39oePaek =ve5C -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0

[PATCH 0/6] [WIP] AppUserModelID implementation
by Jonas Kümmerlin July 16, 2015

July 16, 2015

Hi, I'm currently working on implementing AppUserModelID[1] support in Wine. It's far from finished, but it's slowly getting there, so I want to show it off and get some feedback. Rationale: AppUserModelIDs can be used to match open windows to shortcuts in order to make the Win7 Taskbar happen. The idea is similar to WM_CLASS in X11/freedesktop.org environments: Add the AppUserModelID to every window and every shortcut and let the shell figure out the matching. The shell can then do fancy things like pinning the app or showing a high quality icon. While most windows apps rely on the fallback algorithm of doing the shortcut<->window mapping via the full path to the executable, some applications, like LibreOffice, are making use of the AppUserModelID feature to appear as a set of different applications (Writer, Calc, ...) while sharing the same exe file (soffice.bin). Modern freedesktop.org shells work very similar to the Win7 Taskbar in this regard (using the X11 WM_CLASS attribute and the StartupWMClass= deskop entry key), and the goal is to have wine apps appear like any native app: With a high-res icon and pinnable. At the moment, the following features are implemented and working: - SetCurrentProcessExplicitAppUserModelID - IPropertyStore implementation on IShellLink - Exporting the AppUserModelID as WM_CLASS in the X11 driver The following things are not yet implemented, but I expect to complete them in the following weeks: - The window-specific property store (SHGetPropertyStoreForWindow) - MSI support for shortcut properties - Extracting the AppUserModelID in winemenubuilder.exe The whole thing required me to implement a fair bit of infrastructure (mostly in propsys.dll), and I am afraid that more might follow. Since I am kinda new to wine development, I appreciate any early feedback and comments. Regards Jonas Kümmerlin [1] Application User Model IDs: https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/dd378459(v=vs.85).… Jonas Kümmerlin (6): shell32: Implement process-wide explicit AppUserModelID winex11.drv: Use process-wide AppUserModelID to populate WM_CLASS ole32, propsys: Rework PROPVARIANT (de)serialization propsys: Implement named properties, serialization on the in-memory store propsys: Partially implement property stringification shell32: Properly implement IPropertyStore for shell links dlls/ole32/ole32.spec | 3 + dlls/ole32/stg_prop.c | 1711 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- dlls/ole32/tests/propvariant.c | 55 +- dlls/propsys/propstore.c | 1088 ++++++++++++++++++++++- dlls/propsys/propsys.spec | 34 +- dlls/propsys/propsys_classes.idl | 7 +- dlls/propsys/propvar.c | 821 +++++++++++++++++- dlls/propsys/tests/Makefile.in | 2 +- dlls/propsys/tests/propstore.c | 400 ++++++++- dlls/propsys/tests/propsys.c | 460 +++++++++- dlls/shell32/shell32.spec | 1 + dlls/shell32/shell32_main.c | 109 ++- dlls/shell32/shelllink.c | 218 +++-- dlls/shell32/tests/Makefile.in | 1 + dlls/shell32/tests/appusermodel.c | 108 +++ dlls/shell32/tests/shell32_test.h | 9 + dlls/shell32/tests/shelllink.c | 123 +++ dlls/winex11.drv/window.c | 72 +- include/propidl.idl | 10 + include/propvarutil.h | 106 ++- include/shobjidl.idl | 6 + include/winbase.h | 2 + 22 files changed, 4971 insertions(+), 375 deletions(-) create mode 100644 dlls/shell32/tests/appusermodel.c -- 2.4.3

4 22

Re: [PATCH 1/4] d3d9/tests: Add a windowed GetFrontBufferData test.
by Henri Verbeet July 16, 2015

July 16, 2015

On 6 July 2015 at 23:47, Stefan Dösinger <stefan(a)codeweavers.com> wrote: > --- > dlls/d3d9/tests/visual.c | 92 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 92 insertions(+) > Testbot failures aside, GetFrontBufferData() is pretty unreliable. This will (potentially) fail if e.g. a different window is covering the test window. (And the ChildWindowFromPoint() in v2 doesn't help, because it only takes other Wine windows into account.)

2 11

Re: [PATCH 2/7] winex11.drv: implement DoDragDrop on top of XDND (try 2)
by Ken Thomases July 16, 2015

July 16, 2015

Hi, On Jul 16, 2015, at 12:38 AM, Damjan Jovanovic <damjan.jov(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Implements DoDragDrop on top of XDND. > --- > dlls/winex11.drv/clipboard.c | 50 +++ > dlls/winex11.drv/event.c | 2 + > dlls/winex11.drv/x11drv.h | 7 + > dlls/winex11.drv/xdnd.c | 837 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 4 files changed, 896 insertions(+) Since you removed the parts touching the user drivers from patch 1 (at my request; thanks), doesn't this patch need to add the entry point to the .spec file? -Ken

2 1

Re: [PATCH (try 2)] user32: Scroll listbox item completely into view on LB_SETCURSEL.
by Marvin July 16, 2015

July 16, 2015

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=15351 Your paranoid android. === wvistau64 (32 bit listbox) === listbox.c:709: Test failed: SendMessage(LB_DIR, DDL_DIRECTORY, *) filled with 7 entries, expected > 7 listbox.c:944: Test failed: SendMessage(LB_DIR, DDL_DIRECTORY|DDL_EXCLUSIVE, *) failed err 18 === wvistau64 (64 bit listbox) === listbox.c:709: Test failed: SendMessage(LB_DIR, DDL_DIRECTORY, *) filled with 7 entries, expected > 7 listbox.c:944: Test failed: SendMessage(LB_DIR, DDL_DIRECTORY|DDL_EXCLUSIVE, *) failed err 18

1 0

Re: [1/4] msvcirt: Implement ios static locking (try 3)
by Piotr Caban July 16, 2015

July 16, 2015

Hi Iván, On 07/15/15 21:29, Iván Matellanes wrote: > +CRITICAL_SECTION ios_static_lock; ... > +CRITICAL_SECTION ios_static_lock = { &ios_static_lock_debug, -1, 0, 0, 0, 0 }; This will not compile when Microsoft Visual Studio is used (variable redefinition). Please use "extern". Thanks, Piotr

1 0