February 2016 - Wine-Devel - list.winehq.org

Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] odbccp32: Implement SQLInstallDriverEx correctly
by Sebastian Lackner Feb. 9, 2016

Feb. 9, 2016

Sorry for the late reply, didn't see that this patch was assigned to me. Below is some feedback on this iteration. On 07.01.2016 08:15, Alistair Leslie-Hughes wrote: > Signed-off-by: Alistair Leslie-Hughes <leslie_alistair(a)hotmail.com> > --- > dlls/odbccp32/odbccp32.c | 90 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- > dlls/odbccp32/tests/misc.c | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 140 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/dlls/odbccp32/odbccp32.c b/dlls/odbccp32/odbccp32.c > index bc643d4..3d150a1 100644 > --- a/dlls/odbccp32/odbccp32.c > +++ b/dlls/odbccp32/odbccp32.c > @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ > #include "winbase.h" > #include "winreg.h" > #include "winnls.h" > +#include "wine/unicode.h" > #include "wine/debug.h" > > #include "odbcinst.h" > @@ -38,6 +39,8 @@ WINE_DEFAULT_DEBUG_CHANNEL(odbc); > /* Registry key names */ > static const WCHAR drivers_key[] = {'S','o','f','t','w','a','r','e','\\','O','D','B','C','\\','O','D','B','C','I','N','S','T','.','I','N','I','\\','O','D','B','C',' ','D','r','i','v','e','r','s',0}; > static const WCHAR odbcW[] = {'S','o','f','t','w','a','r','e','\\','O','D','B','C',0}; > +static const WCHAR odbcini[] = {'S','o','f','t','w','a','r','e','\\','O','D','B','C','\\','O','D','B','C','I','N','S','T','.','I','N','I','\\',0}; > +static const WCHAR odbcdrivers[] = {'O','D','B','C',' ','D','r','i','v','e','r','s',0}; > > /* This config mode is known to be process-wide. > * MSDN documentation suggests that the value is hidden somewhere in the registry but I haven't found it yet. > @@ -626,12 +629,85 @@ BOOL WINAPI SQLInstallDriver(LPCSTR lpszInfFile, LPCSTR lpszDriver, > pcbPathOut, ODBC_INSTALL_COMPLETE, &usage); > } > > +static void write_registry_values(const WCHAR *regkey, const WCHAR *driver, const WCHAR *path_in, WCHAR *path) > +{ > + static const WCHAR installed[] = {'I','n','s','t','a','l','l','e','d',0}; > + static const WCHAR slash[] = {'\\', 0}; > + static const WCHAR driverW[] = {'D','r','i','v','e','r',0}; > + static const WCHAR setupW[] = {'S','e','t','u','p',0}; > + HKEY hkey, hkeydriver; > + > + if (RegCreateKeyW(HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE, odbcini, &hkey) == ERROR_SUCCESS) > + { > + if (RegCreateKeyW(hkey, regkey, &hkeydriver) == ERROR_SUCCESS) > + { > + if(RegSetValueExW(hkeydriver, driver, 0, REG_SZ, (BYTE*)installed, > + (lstrlenW(installed)+1)*sizeof(WCHAR)) != ERROR_SUCCESS) > + ERR("Failed to write registry installed key\n"); I think it would be better to let SQLInstallDriverExW fail when things go wrong. > + > + RegCloseKey(hkeydriver); > + } > + > + if (RegCreateKeyW(hkey, driver, &hkeydriver) == ERROR_SUCCESS) > + { > + WCHAR entry[1024]; > + WCHAR value[MAX_PATH]; > + const WCHAR *p; > + > + /* Skip name entry */ > + p = driver; > + p += lstrlenW(p) + 1; > + > + if(!path_in) > + GetSystemDirectoryW(path, MAX_PATH); > + else > + lstrcpyW(path, path_in); If one of the registry operations above fails, path will be unset, without propagating this failure to the parent function. > + > + for (; *p; p += lstrlenW(p) + 1) > + { > + WCHAR *divider = strchrW(p,'='); > + > + if (divider) > + { > + /* Write pair values to the registry. */ > + lstrcpynW(entry, p, divider - p + 1); The size limit for entry / value could lead to buffer overflows. I'm aware that wine already contains a lot of similar issues, but usually it is recommended to avoid such design decisions for new code (unless Windows has the same limitiation). > + > + divider++; > + TRACE("Writing pair %s,%s\n", debugstr_w(entry), debugstr_w(divider)); > + > + /* Driver and Setup entries use the system path unless a path is specified. */ > + if(lstrcmpiW(driverW, entry) == 0 || lstrcmpiW(setupW, entry) == 0) > + { > + lstrcpyW(value, path); > + lstrcatW(value, slash); > + lstrcatW(value, divider); > + } > + else > + lstrcpyW(value, divider); > + > + if(RegSetValueExW(hkeydriver, entry, 0, REG_SZ, (BYTE*)value, > + (lstrlenW(value)+1)*sizeof(WCHAR)) != ERROR_SUCCESS) > + ERR("Failed to write registry data %s %s\n", debugstr_w(entry), debugstr_w(value)); > + } > + else > + { > + ERR("No pair found. %s\n", debugstr_w(p)); > + break; > + } > + } > + > + RegCloseKey(hkeydriver); > + } > + > + RegCloseKey(hkey); > + } > +} > + > BOOL WINAPI SQLInstallDriverExW(LPCWSTR lpszDriver, LPCWSTR lpszPathIn, > LPWSTR lpszPathOut, WORD cbPathOutMax, WORD *pcbPathOut, > WORD fRequest, LPDWORD lpdwUsageCount) > { > UINT len; > - LPCWSTR p; > WCHAR path[MAX_PATH]; > > clear_errors(); > @@ -639,15 +715,15 @@ BOOL WINAPI SQLInstallDriverExW(LPCWSTR lpszDriver, LPCWSTR lpszPathIn, > debugstr_w(lpszPathIn), lpszPathOut, cbPathOutMax, pcbPathOut, > fRequest, lpdwUsageCount); > > - for (p = lpszDriver; *p; p += lstrlenW(p) + 1) > - TRACE("%s\n", debugstr_w(p)); > + write_registry_values(odbcdrivers, lpszDriver, lpszPathIn, path); > > - len = GetSystemDirectoryW(path, MAX_PATH); > + len = lstrlenW(path); > > if (pcbPathOut) > *pcbPathOut = len; > > - len = GetSystemDirectoryW(path, MAX_PATH); > + if(lpdwUsageCount) > + *lpdwUsageCount = 1; This is probably fine for a first version, but usage count handling is also very important and will require various changes to the registry code (for example, checking for other matching drivers and incrementing usage count) - so I would suggest to look at this early enough to avoid huge rewrites. > > if (lpszPathOut && cbPathOutMax > len) > { > @@ -661,7 +737,6 @@ BOOL WINAPI SQLInstallDriverEx(LPCSTR lpszDriver, LPCSTR lpszPathIn, > LPSTR lpszPathOut, WORD cbPathOutMax, WORD *pcbPathOut, > WORD fRequest, LPDWORD lpdwUsageCount) > { > - LPCSTR p; > LPWSTR driver, pathin; > WCHAR pathout[MAX_PATH]; > BOOL ret; > @@ -672,9 +747,6 @@ BOOL WINAPI SQLInstallDriverEx(LPCSTR lpszDriver, LPCSTR lpszPathIn, > debugstr_a(lpszPathIn), lpszPathOut, cbPathOutMax, pcbPathOut, > fRequest, lpdwUsageCount); > > - for (p = lpszDriver; *p; p += lstrlenA(p) + 1) > - TRACE("%s\n", debugstr_a(p)); > - > driver = SQLInstall_strdup_multi(lpszDriver); > pathin = SQLInstall_strdup(lpszPathIn); > > diff --git a/dlls/odbccp32/tests/misc.c b/dlls/odbccp32/tests/misc.c > index 505ce1b..3ae1fd3 100644 > --- a/dlls/odbccp32/tests/misc.c > +++ b/dlls/odbccp32/tests/misc.c > @@ -412,6 +412,64 @@ static void test_SQLGetPrivateProfileStringW(void) > } > } > > +void test_SQLInstallDriverEx(void) > +{ > + char path[MAX_PATH]; > + char syspath[MAX_PATH]; > + WORD size = 0; > + BOOL ret, sql_ret; > + DWORD cnt, error_code = 0; > + HKEY hkey; > + DWORD reg_ret; > + > + GetSystemDirectoryA(syspath, MAX_PATH); > + > + ret = SQLInstallDriverEx("WINE ODBC Driver\0Driver=sample.dll\0Setup=sample.dll\0\0", NULL, path, MAX_PATH, &size, ODBC_INSTALL_COMPLETE, NULL); Wouldn't it make sense to check ret? Otherwise you can remove this unnecessary assignment. Also, one terminating null "\0" at the end should be sufficient because the second one is added by the compiler. > + sql_ret = SQLInstallerErrorW(1, &error_code, NULL, 0, NULL); > + if (sql_ret && error_code == ODBC_ERROR_WRITING_SYSINFO_FAILED) > + { > + win_skip("not enough privileges\n"); > + return; > + } > + ok(sql_ret && error_code == SQL_SUCCESS, "SQLInstallDriverEx failed %d, %u\n", sql_ret, error_code); > + ok(!strcmp(path, syspath), "invalid path %s\n", path); > + > + ret = SQLInstallDriverEx("WINE ODBC Driver Path\0Driver=sample.dll\0Setup=sample.dll\0\0", "c:\\temp", path, MAX_PATH, &size, ODBC_INSTALL_COMPLETE, NULL); > + sql_ret = SQLInstallerErrorW(1, &error_code, NULL, 0, NULL); > + ok(sql_ret && error_code == SQL_SUCCESS, "SQLInstallDriverEx failed %d, %u\n", sql_ret, error_code); > + ok(!strcmp(path, "c:\\temp"), "invalid path %s\n", path); > + > + if(ret) > + { If this code should always execute fine, you can remove the check for "ret". Otherwise, if it doesn't run on some systems, please add a win_skip(...) message. > + reg_ret = RegOpenKeyExA(HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE, "Software\\ODBC\\ODBCINST.INI\\WINE ODBC Driver", 0, KEY_READ, &hkey); > + ok(reg_ret == ERROR_SUCCESS, "RegOpenKeyExW failed\n"); > + if (reg_ret == ERROR_SUCCESS) > + { > + DWORD type, size = MAX_PATH; > + char driverpath[MAX_PATH]; > + > + strcpy(driverpath, syspath); > + strcat(driverpath, "\\sample.dll"); > + > + reg_ret = RegGetValueA(hkey, NULL, "Driver", RRF_RT_REG_SZ, &type, &path, &size); > + ok(reg_ret == ERROR_SUCCESS, "RegGetValueA failed\n"); > + ok(!strcmp(path, driverpath), "invalid path %s\n", path); > + > + RegCloseKey(hkey); > + } > + } > + > + cnt = 100; > + ret = SQLRemoveDriver("WINE ODBC Driver", FALSE, &cnt); > + ok(ret, "SQLRemoveDriver failed\n"); > + todo_wine ok(cnt == 0, "SQLRemoveDriver failed %d\n", cnt); > + > + cnt = 100; > + ret = SQLRemoveDriver("WINE ODBC Driver Path", FALSE, &cnt); > + ok(ret, "SQLRemoveDriver failed\n"); > + todo_wine ok(cnt == 0, "SQLRemoveDriver failed %d\n", cnt); > +} > + > START_TEST(misc) > { > test_SQLConfigMode(); > @@ -420,4 +478,5 @@ START_TEST(misc) > test_SQLWritePrivateProfileString(); > test_SQLGetPrivateProfileString(); > test_SQLGetPrivateProfileStringW(); > + test_SQLInstallDriverEx(); > } >

1 0

Re: [PATCH 2/7] reg: Split reg_printfW into separate functions
by Alexandre Julliard Feb. 9, 2016

Feb. 9, 2016

Hugh McMaster <hugh.mcmaster(a)outlook.com> writes: > +static void __cdecl output_array(const WCHAR *fmt, ...) > +{ > + __ms_va_list va_args; > + > + __ms_va_start(va_args, fmt); > + output_formatstring(fmt, va_args); > + __ms_va_end(va_args); > } That's a strange name, why "array"? -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

2 4

Re: [PATCH] msvcr120: Implement atoll, _atoll_l, _wtoll, _wtoll_l.
by Piotr Caban Feb. 8, 2016

Feb. 8, 2016

On 02/07/16 23:36, Rafał Harabień wrote: > dlls/msvcr120/msvcr120.spec | 8 ++++---- > dlls/msvcr120_app/msvcr120_app.spec | 8 ++++---- > dlls/msvcrt/string.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++ > dlls/msvcrt/wcs.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++ Please also update: dlls/api-ms-win-crt-convert-l1-1-0/api-ms-win-crt-convert-l1-1-0.spec dlls/ucrtbase/ucrtbase.spec files. > /****************************************************************** > + * _atoll_l (MSVCRT.@) Since it's not exported from MSVCRT please change the comment to "... (MSVCR120.@)" Thanks, Piotr

1 0

Re: shell32/tests: Allow the short and long forms when checking a ShellExecute() path.
by Marvin Feb. 8, 2016

Feb. 8, 2016

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=20248 Your paranoid android. === wvistau64 (32 bit shlexec) === shlexec.c:1691: Test failed: WaitForSingleObject returned 258 === w1064 (32 bit shlexec) === shlexec.c:2458: Test failed: failed: rc=29 err=2 shlexec.c:2456: Test failed: ShlexecVar expected 'Present', but key not found or empty shlexec.c:2458: Test failed: failed: rc=29 err=32 shlexec.c:2458: Test failed: failed: rc=29 err=2 shlexec.c:2456: Test failed: ShlexecVar expected 'Present', but key not found or empty shlexec.c:2458: Test failed: failed: rc=29 err=32 === w1064 (64 bit shlexec) === shlexec.c:2458: Test failed: failed: rc=29 err=2 shlexec.c:2458: Test failed: failed: rc=29 err=2 shlexec.c:2456: Test failed: ShlexecVar expected 'Present', but key not found or empty shlexec.c:2458: Test failed: failed: rc=29 err=32 shlexec.c:2470: Test failed: ddeExec expected '[ifexec("C:\Users\winetest\AppData\Local\Temp\wtA1B2.tmp\test file.sde")]', got '[open("C:\Users\winetest\AppData\Local\Temp\wtA1B2.tmp\test file.sde")]' shlexec.c:2458: Test failed: failed: rc=29 err=2 shlexec.c:2458: Test failed: failed: rc=29 err=2

1 0

Re: shell32/tests: Fix the ShellExecute() environment variable inheritance checks.
by Marvin Feb. 8, 2016

Feb. 8, 2016

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=20247 Your paranoid android. === w1064 (32 bit shlexec) === shlexec.c:2453: Test failed: failed: rc=29 err=2 shlexec.c:2451: Test failed: ShlexecVar expected 'Present', but key not found or empty shlexec.c:2453: Test failed: failed: rc=29 err=32 shlexec.c:2453: Test failed: failed: rc=29 err=2 shlexec.c:2451: Test failed: ShlexecVar expected 'Present', but key not found or empty shlexec.c:2453: Test failed: failed: rc=29 err=32 === w1064 (64 bit shlexec) === shlexec.c:2453: Test failed: failed: rc=29 err=2 shlexec.c:2453: Test failed: failed: rc=29 err=2 shlexec.c:2451: Test failed: ShlexecVar expected 'Present', but key not found or empty shlexec.c:2453: Test failed: failed: rc=29 err=32 shlexec.c:2465: Test failed: ddeExec expected '[ifexec("C:\Users\winetest\AppData\Local\Temp\wt87E1.tmp\test file.sde")]', got '[open("C:\Users\winetest\AppData\Local\Temp\wt87E1.tmp\test file.sde")]' shlexec.c:2453: Test failed: failed: rc=29 err=2 shlexec.c:2453: Test failed: failed: rc=29 err=2

1 0

Re: shell32/tests: Move a test_argify() check so it is run even if we could not create associations.
by Marvin Feb. 8, 2016

Feb. 8, 2016

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=20246 Your paranoid android. === w1064 (32 bit shlexec) === shlexec.c:2442: Test failed: failed: rc=29 err=2 shlexec.c:2440: Test failed: ShlexecVar expected 'Present', but key not found or empty shlexec.c:2442: Test failed: failed: rc=29 err=32 shlexec.c:2442: Test failed: failed: rc=29 err=2 shlexec.c:2440: Test failed: ShlexecVar expected 'Present', but key not found or empty shlexec.c:2442: Test failed: failed: rc=29 err=32 === w1064 (64 bit shlexec) === shlexec.c:2442: Test failed: failed: rc=29 err=2 shlexec.c:2442: Test failed: failed: rc=29 err=2 shlexec.c:2440: Test failed: ShlexecVar expected 'Present', but key not found or empty shlexec.c:2442: Test failed: failed: rc=29 err=32 shlexec.c:2454: Test failed: ddeExec expected '[ifexec("C:\Users\winetest\AppData\Local\Temp\wt5289.tmp\test file.sde")]', got '[open("C:\Users\winetest\AppData\Local\Temp\wt5289.tmp\test file.sde")]' shlexec.c:2442: Test failed: failed: rc=29 err=2 shlexec.c:2442: Test failed: failed: rc=29 err=2

1 0

Re: shell32/tests: Skip a few ShellExecute() tests when the process has insufficient privileges.
by Marvin Feb. 8, 2016

Feb. 8, 2016

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=20245 Your paranoid android. === w1064 (32 bit shlexec) === shlexec.c:2448: Test failed: failed: rc=29 err=2 shlexec.c:2446: Test failed: ShlexecVar expected 'Present', but key not found or empty shlexec.c:2448: Test failed: failed: rc=29 err=32 shlexec.c:2448: Test failed: failed: rc=29 err=2 shlexec.c:2446: Test failed: ShlexecVar expected 'Present', but key not found or empty shlexec.c:2448: Test failed: failed: rc=29 err=32 === w1064 (64 bit shlexec) === shlexec.c:2448: Test failed: failed: rc=29 err=2 shlexec.c:2448: Test failed: failed: rc=29 err=2 shlexec.c:2446: Test failed: ShlexecVar expected 'Present', but key not found or empty shlexec.c:2448: Test failed: failed: rc=29 err=32 shlexec.c:2460: Test failed: ddeExec expected '[ifexec("C:\Users\winetest\AppData\Local\Temp\wt477D.tmp\test file.sde")]', got '[open("C:\Users\winetest\AppData\Local\Temp\wt477D.tmp\test file.sde")]' shlexec.c:2448: Test failed: failed: rc=29 err=2 shlexec.c:2448: Test failed: failed: rc=29 err=2

1 0

Re: shell32/tests: Remove support for a todo_wine flag in ShellExecute()'s test_lnks() loop.
by Marvin Feb. 8, 2016

Feb. 8, 2016

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=20244 Your paranoid android. === wvistau64 (32 bit shlexec) === shlexec.c:1683: Test failed: WaitForSingleObject returned 258 === w1064 (32 bit shlexec) === shlexec.c:2435: Test failed: failed: rc=29 err=2 shlexec.c:2433: Test failed: ShlexecVar expected 'Present', but key not found or empty shlexec.c:2435: Test failed: failed: rc=29 err=32 shlexec.c:2435: Test failed: failed: rc=29 err=2 shlexec.c:2433: Test failed: ShlexecVar expected 'Present', but key not found or empty shlexec.c:2435: Test failed: failed: rc=29 err=32 === w1064 (64 bit shlexec) === shlexec.c:2435: Test failed: failed: rc=29 err=2 shlexec.c:2435: Test failed: failed: rc=29 err=2 shlexec.c:2433: Test failed: ShlexecVar expected 'Present', but key not found or empty shlexec.c:2435: Test failed: failed: rc=29 err=32 shlexec.c:2447: Test failed: ddeExec expected '[ifexec("C:\Users\winetest\AppData\Local\Temp\wt9F9F.tmp\test file.sde")]', got '[open("C:\Users\winetest\AppData\Local\Temp\wt9F9F.tmp\test file.sde")]' shlexec.c:2435: Test failed: failed: rc=29 err=2 shlexec.c:2435: Test failed: failed: rc=29 err=2

1 0

Re: shell32/tests: Fix a ShellExecute() race condition.
by Marvin Feb. 8, 2016

Feb. 8, 2016

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=20243 Your paranoid android. === wvistau64 (32 bit shlexec) === shlexec.c:1675: Test failed: WaitForSingleObject returned 258 shlexec.c:1704: Test failed: argvA3 expected 'Open', but key not found or empty shlexec.c:1712: Test failed: argvA4 expected 'C:\Users\winetest\AppData\Local\Temp\wtDD72.tmp\test file.noassoc.shlexec', but key not found or empty shlexec.c:1704: Test failed: argvA3 expected 'QuotedLowerL', got 'Open' shlexec.c:1712: Test failed: argvA4 expected 'C:\Users\winetest\AppData\Local\Temp\wtDD72.tmp\test file.shlexec', got 'C:\Users\winetest\AppData\Local\Temp\wtDD72.tmp\test file.noassoc.shlexec' shlexec.c:1704: Test failed: argvA3 expected 'QuotedUpperL', got 'QuotedLowerL' === w1064 (32 bit shlexec) === shlexec.c:2443: Test failed: failed: rc=29 err=2 shlexec.c:2441: Test failed: ShlexecVar expected 'Present', but key not found or empty shlexec.c:2443: Test failed: failed: rc=29 err=32 shlexec.c:2443: Test failed: failed: rc=29 err=2 shlexec.c:2441: Test failed: ShlexecVar expected 'Present', but key not found or empty shlexec.c:2443: Test failed: failed: rc=29 err=32 === w1064 (64 bit shlexec) === shlexec.c:2443: Test failed: failed: rc=29 err=2 shlexec.c:2443: Test failed: failed: rc=29 err=2 shlexec.c:2441: Test failed: ShlexecVar expected 'Present', but key not found or empty shlexec.c:2443: Test failed: failed: rc=29 err=32 shlexec.c:2455: Test failed: ddeExec expected '[ifexec("C:\Users\winetest\AppData\Local\Temp\wt48B4.tmp\test file.sde")]', got '[open("C:\Users\winetest\AppData\Local\Temp\wt48B4.tmp\test file.sde")]' shlexec.c:2443: Test failed: failed: rc=29 err=2 shlexec.c:2443: Test failed: failed: rc=29 err=2

1 0

Re: shell32/tests: Fix test_dde_default_app() on Windows XP SP1.
by Marvin Feb. 8, 2016

Feb. 8, 2016

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=20242 Your paranoid android. === w1064 (32 bit shlexec) === shlexec.c:2442: Test failed: failed: rc=29 err=2 shlexec.c:2440: Test failed: ShlexecVar expected 'Present', but key not found or empty shlexec.c:2442: Test failed: failed: rc=29 err=32 shlexec.c:2442: Test failed: failed: rc=29 err=2 shlexec.c:2440: Test failed: ShlexecVar expected 'Present', but key not found or empty shlexec.c:2442: Test failed: failed: rc=29 err=32 === w1064 (64 bit shlexec) === shlexec.c:2442: Test failed: failed: rc=29 err=2 shlexec.c:2440: Test failed: ShlexecVar expected 'Present', but key not found or empty shlexec.c:2442: Test failed: failed: rc=29 err=32 shlexec.c:2442: Test failed: failed: rc=29 err=2 shlexec.c:2440: Test failed: ShlexecVar expected 'Present', but key not found or empty shlexec.c:2442: Test failed: failed: rc=29 err=32

1 0