February 2016 - Wine-Devel - list.winehq.org

Re: [PATCH 2/3] user32: Added more dialog owner tests.
by Marvin Feb. 29, 2016

Feb. 29, 2016

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=20971 Your paranoid android. === w7u (32 bit msg) === msg.c:8926: Test failed: did not get expected count for minimum timeout (51 != ~100). === w7pro64 (32 bit msg) === msg.c:15473: Test failed: wrong status 00400040 === w1064 (32 bit msg) === msg.c:6417: Test failed: Update region shouldn't be empty msg.c:6651: Test failed: InvalidateErase: 0: the msg sequence is not complete: expected 0085 - actual 0000 msg.c:6653: Test failed: Paint: 0: the msg sequence is not complete: expected 000f - actual 0000 msg.c:6423: Test failed: Regions are different msg.c:6423: Test failed: Regions are different msg.c:6423: Test failed: Regions are different

1 0

Re: [PATCH 1/2] include: add authz.h
by Alexandre Julliard Feb. 29, 2016

Feb. 29, 2016

Alistair Leslie-Hughes <leslie_alistair(a)hotmail.com> writes: > +typedef struct _AUTHZ_ACCESS_REPLY > +{ > + DWORD ResultListLength; > + DWORD *SaclEvaluationResults; > + DWORD *Error; > +} AUTHZ_ACCESS_REPLY, *PAUTHZ_ACCESS_REPLY; There's a field missing here. > +BOOL WINAPI AuthzInitializeResourceManager(DWORD flags, void *access_checker, > + void *compute_dyn_groups, void *free_dyn_groups, > + const WCHAR *managername, void *handle ); That's not the correct prototype. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

1 0

Re: [v4 PATCH] comctl32/tooltip: Protect TTM_ADDTOOLW from invalid text pointers
by Alexandre Julliard Feb. 29, 2016

Feb. 29, 2016

Alistair Leslie-Hughes <leslie_alistair(a)hotmail.com> writes: > @@ -1041,6 +1041,9 @@ TOOLTIPS_AddToolT (TOOLTIPS_INFO *infoPtr, const TTTOOLINFOW *ti, BOOL isW) > if (ti->cbSize >= TTTOOLINFOW_V2_SIZE && !ti->lpszText && isW) > return FALSE; > > + if(isW && ti->lpszText && IsBadReadPtr(ti->lpszText, sizeof(WCHAR))) > + return FALSE; You want IsBadStringPtrW, and this should most likely be merged with the check above it one way or another. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

1 0

Re: [PATCH 4/4] d3d10core/tests: Test swapchain buffer cycling.
by Henri Verbeet Feb. 29, 2016

Feb. 29, 2016

On 24 February 2016 at 23:28, Stefan Dösinger <stefandoesinger(a)gmx.at> wrote: > Testing multisampling is not possible because only > DXGI_SWAP_EFFECT_DISCARD supports multisampled swapchains and it allows > only access to buffer 0. > > Not exactly test_flip from ddraw because we can't write to the end of > the chain... > > Plenty of todo_wine in here. The read-only part is missing and texturing > from swapchain buffers doesn't work either. > > foo > Is there a d3d11 version of this as well?

1 0

Re: xcopy/tests: Reset "current directory" of current process.
by Alexandre Julliard Feb. 29, 2016

Feb. 29, 2016

Jactry Zeng <jzeng(a)codeweavers.com> writes: > @@ -97,4 +99,5 @@ START_TEST(xcopy) > > DeleteFileA("xcopy1"); > RemoveDirectoryA("xcopytest"); > + SetCurrentDirectoryW(curdir); Restoring the directory at process exit is not useful. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

1 0

Re: shell32/tests: Reset "current directory" of current process.
by Alexandre Julliard Feb. 29, 2016

Feb. 29, 2016

Jactry Zeng <jzeng(a)codeweavers.com> writes: > @@ -1882,6 +1884,7 @@ static void test_ITEMIDLIST_format(void) { > } > > IShellFolder_Release(psfPersonal); > + SetCurrentDirectoryW(curdir); > } You'd need to do that on the various error returns too. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

1 0

Re: [PATCH 1/2] ntoskrnl.exe: Track drivers created with IoCreateDriver
by Sebastian Lackner Feb. 28, 2016

Feb. 28, 2016

On 26.02.2016 21:22, Aric Stewart wrote: > Signed-off-by: Aric Stewart <aric(a)codeweavers.com> > --- > dlls/ntoskrnl.exe/ntoskrnl.c | 64 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- > 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) > > > > 0002-ntoskrnl.exe-Track-drivers-created-with-IoCreateDriver.txt > > > diff --git a/dlls/ntoskrnl.exe/ntoskrnl.c b/dlls/ntoskrnl.exe/ntoskrnl.c > index 3bee2bf..49c8cab 100644 > --- a/dlls/ntoskrnl.exe/ntoskrnl.c > +++ b/dlls/ntoskrnl.exe/ntoskrnl.c > @@ -72,6 +72,16 @@ static DWORD request_thread; > static DWORD client_tid; > static DWORD client_pid; > > +typedef struct _created_driver { > + struct list entry; > + > + UNICODE_STRING driver_name; > + DRIVER_OBJECT *driver_obj; > + DRIVER_EXTENSION *driver_extension; Isn't it possible to add the DRIVER_OBJECT and DRIVER_EXTENSION struct directly (without pointer), to avoid multiple memory allocations? I would also suggest to use a more meaningful name than "created_driver", and you also don't really need the typedef. Something like "struct wine_driver" would make more sense for example, but probably you have a better idea. ;) > +} created_driver; > + > +struct list created_drivers = LIST_INIT(created_drivers); > + > #ifdef __i386__ > #define DEFINE_FASTCALL1_ENTRYPOINT( name ) \ > __ASM_STDCALL_FUNC( name, 4, \ > @@ -818,36 +828,47 @@ PIRP WINAPI IoBuildSynchronousFsdRequest(ULONG majorfunc, PDEVICE_OBJECT device, > */ > NTSTATUS WINAPI IoCreateDriver( UNICODE_STRING *name, PDRIVER_INITIALIZE init ) > { > - DRIVER_OBJECT *driver; > - DRIVER_EXTENSION *extension; > + created_driver *driver; > NTSTATUS status; > > TRACE("(%s, %p)\n", debugstr_us(name), init); > > if (!(driver = RtlAllocateHeap( GetProcessHeap(), HEAP_ZERO_MEMORY, > - sizeof(*driver) + sizeof(*extension) ))) > + sizeof(*driver) ))) > + return STATUS_NO_MEMORY; > + > + if (!(driver->driver_obj = RtlAllocateHeap( GetProcessHeap(), HEAP_ZERO_MEMORY, > + sizeof(*driver->driver_obj) + sizeof(*driver->driver_extension) ))) > + { > + RtlFreeHeap( GetProcessHeap(), 0, driver ); > return STATUS_NO_MEMORY; > + } > > - if ((status = RtlDuplicateUnicodeString( 1, name, &driver->DriverName ))) > + if ((status = RtlDuplicateUnicodeString( 1, name, &driver->driver_name ))) > { > + RtlFreeHeap( GetProcessHeap(), 0, driver->driver_obj ); > RtlFreeHeap( GetProcessHeap(), 0, driver ); > return status; > } > > - extension = (DRIVER_EXTENSION *)(driver + 1); > - driver->Size = sizeof(*driver); > - driver->DriverInit = init; > - driver->DriverExtension = extension; > - extension->DriverObject = driver; > - extension->ServiceKeyName = driver->DriverName; > + driver->driver_extension = (DRIVER_EXTENSION *)((BYTE*)driver->driver_obj + sizeof(*driver->driver_obj)); > + driver->driver_obj->DriverName = driver->driver_name; > + driver->driver_obj->Size = sizeof(*driver->driver_obj); > + driver->driver_obj->DriverInit = init; > + driver->driver_obj->DriverExtension = driver->driver_extension; > + driver->driver_extension->DriverObject = driver->driver_obj; > + driver->driver_extension->ServiceKeyName = driver->driver_name; > > - status = driver->DriverInit( driver, name ); > + status = driver->driver_obj->DriverInit( driver->driver_obj, name ); > > if (status) > { > - RtlFreeUnicodeString( &driver->DriverName ); > + RtlFreeUnicodeString( &driver->driver_name ); > + RtlFreeHeap( GetProcessHeap(), 0, driver->driver_obj ); > RtlFreeHeap( GetProcessHeap(), 0, driver ); > } > + > + list_add_tail( &created_drivers, &driver->entry ); Such a global list will need locking. > return status; > } > > @@ -855,12 +876,23 @@ NTSTATUS WINAPI IoCreateDriver( UNICODE_STRING *name, PDRIVER_INITIALIZE init ) > /*********************************************************************** > * IoDeleteDriver (NTOSKRNL.EXE.@) > */ > -void WINAPI IoDeleteDriver( DRIVER_OBJECT *driver ) > +void WINAPI IoDeleteDriver( DRIVER_OBJECT *driver_object ) > { > - TRACE("(%p)\n", driver); > + created_driver *driver, *next; > + > + TRACE("(%p)\n", driver_object); > + By putting the driver_object in the same struct, you could use CONTAINING_RECORD here. Also, a lock will be required while unlinking the driver from the list. > + LIST_FOR_EACH_ENTRY_SAFE(driver, next, &created_drivers, created_driver, entry) > + { > + if (driver->driver_obj == driver_object) > + { > + list_remove( &driver->entry ); > + RtlFreeUnicodeString( &driver->driver_name); > + break; > + } > + } > > - RtlFreeUnicodeString( &driver->DriverName ); > - RtlFreeHeap( GetProcessHeap(), 0, driver ); > + RtlFreeHeap( GetProcessHeap(), 0, driver_object ); > } > > > > >

2 2

Re: [PATCH] programs/winedevice.exe: Use IoCreateDriver and IoDeleteDriver
by Sebastian Lackner Feb. 28, 2016

Feb. 28, 2016

On 26.02.2016 21:15, Aric Stewart wrote: > Signed-off-by: Aric Stewart <aric(a)codeweavers.com> > --- > programs/winedevice/device.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------------ > 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-) > > > > 0001-programs-winedevice.exe-Use-IoCreateDriver-and-IoDelet.txt > > > diff --git a/programs/winedevice/device.c b/programs/winedevice/device.c > index 94132ed..f6dd678 100644 > --- a/programs/winedevice/device.c > +++ b/programs/winedevice/device.c > @@ -43,8 +43,8 @@ extern NTSTATUS CDECL wine_ntoskrnl_main_loop( HANDLE stop_event ); > static WCHAR *driver_name; > static SERVICE_STATUS_HANDLE service_handle; > static HANDLE stop_event; > -static DRIVER_OBJECT driver_obj; > -static DRIVER_EXTENSION driver_extension; > +static DRIVER_OBJECT *driver_obj; > +static HMODULE driver_module; Most of it looks fine, but isn't the plan to get rid of global variables? Do you plan to remove it again in follow-up patches? > > /* find the LDR_MODULE corresponding to the driver module */ > static LDR_MODULE *find_ldr_module( HMODULE module ) > @@ -133,38 +133,35 @@ error: > }

2 1

Re: [PATCH] packet: create packet.dll and Implement PacketGetAdapterNames(try 7)
by André Hentschel Feb. 27, 2016

Feb. 27, 2016

Am 26.02.2016 um 02:35 schrieb Jianqiu Zhang: > > Hi, still some problems: see the mail by slackner on try 6 missing blank lines I pointed out meanwhile you can totally omit empty_str no need for brackets around single lines Best regards

1 0

Re: shell32/tests: Reset "current directory" of current process.
by Marvin Feb. 27, 2016

Feb. 27, 2016

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=20931 Your paranoid android. === w1064 (32 bit shlfolder) === shlfolder.c:1591: Test failed: IShellFolder_GetDisplayNameOf(NULL) failed! hr = 80070057

1 0