July 2022 - Wine-Devel - list.winehq.org

Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] mfplat/tests: Merge and reorganize image format tests.
by Marvin July 25, 2022

July 25, 2022

Hi, It looks like your patch introduced the new failures shown below. Please investigate and fix them before resubmitting your patch. If they are not new, fixing them anyway would help a lot. Otherwise please ask for the known failures list to be updated. The full results can be found at: https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=119548 Your paranoid android. === w7u_2qxl (32 bit report) === mfplat: 0124:mfplat: unhandled exception c0000005 at 6ECF7D1C === w7u_el (32 bit report) === mfplat: 085c:mfplat: unhandled exception c0000005 at 72297D1C

1 0

Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] mfplat/tests: Mark some tests as broken on Win 8 and 10 v1507.
by Marvin July 25, 2022

July 25, 2022

Hi, It looks like your patch introduced the new failures shown below. Please investigate and fix them before resubmitting your patch. If they are not new, fixing them anyway would help a lot. Otherwise please ask for the known failures list to be updated. The full results can be found at: https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=119547 Your paranoid android. === w7u_adm (32 bit report) === mfplat: 0884:mfplat: unhandled exception c0000005 at 6EFB7D1C

1 0

Re: [PATCH v2 09/10] mshtml: Implement ProgressEvent's total prop.
by Marvin July 23, 2022

July 23, 2022

Hi, It looks like your patch introduced the new failures shown below. Please investigate and fix them before resubmitting your patch. If they are not new, fixing them anyway would help a lot. Otherwise please ask for the known failures list to be updated. The tests also ran into some preexisting test failures. If you know how to fix them that would be helpful. See the TestBot job for the details: The full results can be found at: https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=119500 Your paranoid android. === w10pro64_ja (testbot log) === WineRunTask.pl:error: The previous 1 run(s) terminated abnormally

1 0

Testbot outage
by Jeremy White July 23, 2022

July 23, 2022

Hi all, We are moving offices. As a result, the WineHQ testnet that powers testbot will be unavailable for some time, starting at 1:30 CDT. It will hopefully just be for the afternoon. Cheers, Jeremy

3 2

Re: [PATCH v2 07/10] mshtml: Implement ProgressEvent's lengthComputable prop.
by Marvin July 22, 2022

July 22, 2022

Hi, It looks like your patch introduced the new failures shown below. Please investigate and fix them before resubmitting your patch. If they are not new, fixing them anyway would help a lot. Otherwise please ask for the known failures list to be updated. The tests also ran into some preexisting test failures. If you know how to fix them that would be helpful. See the TestBot job for the details: The full results can be found at: https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=119498 Your paranoid android. === w1064v1507 (64 bit report) === mshtml: events: Timeout

1 0

Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] dlls/msvcrt: improve support for template in methods
by Marvin July 22, 2022

July 22, 2022

Hi, It looks like your patch introduced the new failures shown below. Please investigate and fix them before resubmitting your patch. If they are not new, fixing them anyway would help a lot. Otherwise please ask for the known failures list to be updated. The full results can be found at: https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=119463 Your paranoid android. === debian11 (32 bit report) === msvcrt: cpp.c:1310: Test failed: 136: Got name "public: __cdecl foo<double>::operator <int>int(void) __ptr64" cpp.c:1313: Test failed: 136: Expected "public: __cdecl foo<double>::operator<int> int(void) __ptr64" === debian11 (32 bit Arabic:Morocco report) === msvcrt: cpp.c:1310: Test failed: 136: Got name "public: __cdecl foo<double>::operator <int>int(void) __ptr64" cpp.c:1313: Test failed: 136: Expected "public: __cdecl foo<double>::operator<int> int(void) __ptr64" === debian11 (32 bit German report) === msvcrt: cpp.c:1310: Test failed: 136: Got name "public: __cdecl foo<double>::operator <int>int(void) __ptr64" cpp.c:1313: Test failed: 136: Expected "public: __cdecl foo<double>::operator<int> int(void) __ptr64" === debian11 (32 bit French report) === msvcrt: cpp.c:1310: Test failed: 136: Got name "public: __cdecl foo<double>::operator <int>int(void) __ptr64" cpp.c:1313: Test failed: 136: Expected "public: __cdecl foo<double>::operator<int> int(void) __ptr64" === debian11 (32 bit Hebrew:Israel report) === msvcrt: cpp.c:1310: Test failed: 136: Got name "public: __cdecl foo<double>::operator <int>int(void) __ptr64" cpp.c:1313: Test failed: 136: Expected "public: __cdecl foo<double>::operator<int> int(void) __ptr64" === debian11 (32 bit Hindi:India report) === msvcrt: cpp.c:1310: Test failed: 136: Got name "public: __cdecl foo<double>::operator <int>int(void) __ptr64" cpp.c:1313: Test failed: 136: Expected "public: __cdecl foo<double>::operator<int> int(void) __ptr64" === debian11 (32 bit Japanese:Japan report) === msvcrt: cpp.c:1310: Test failed: 136: Got name "public: __cdecl foo<double>::operator <int>int(void) __ptr64" cpp.c:1313: Test failed: 136: Expected "public: __cdecl foo<double>::operator<int> int(void) __ptr64" === debian11 (32 bit Chinese:China report) === msvcrt: cpp.c:1310: Test failed: 136: Got name "public: __cdecl foo<double>::operator <int>int(void) __ptr64" cpp.c:1313: Test failed: 136: Expected "public: __cdecl foo<double>::operator<int> int(void) __ptr64" === debian11 (32 bit WoW report) === msvcrt: cpp.c:1310: Test failed: 136: Got name "public: __cdecl foo<double>::operator <int>int(void) __ptr64" cpp.c:1313: Test failed: 136: Expected "public: __cdecl foo<double>::operator<int> int(void) __ptr64" === debian11 (64 bit WoW report) === msvcrt: cpp.c:1310: Test failed: 136: Got name "public: __cdecl foo<double>::operator <int>int(void) __ptr64" cpp.c:1313: Test failed: 136: Expected "public: __cdecl foo<double>::operator<int> int(void) __ptr64"

1 0

Re: [PATCH 2/8] dinput/test: Print the expected values in check_ macros.
by Marvin July 22, 2022

July 22, 2022

Hi, It looks like your patch introduced the new failures shown below. Please investigate and fix them before resubmitting your patch. If they are not new, fixing them anyway would help a lot. Otherwise please ask for the known failures list to be updated. The full results can be found at: https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=119447 Your paranoid android. === w8 (32 bit report) === dinput: joystick8.c:1836: Test failed: 0x700: state[0]: WaitForSingleObject succeeded === w1064_tsign (testbot log) === WineRunTask.pl:error: The previous 1 run(s) terminated abnormally

1 0

Re: [PATCH 2/3] shell32: Add SHBindToFolderIDListParent tests.
by Marvin July 22, 2022

July 22, 2022

Hi, It looks like your patch introduced the new failures shown below. Please investigate and fix them before resubmitting your patch. If they are not new, fixing them anyway would help a lot. Otherwise please ask for the known failures list to be updated. The tests also ran into some preexisting test failures. If you know how to fix them that would be helpful. See the TestBot job for the details: The full results can be found at: https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=119429 Your paranoid android. === w1064_2qxl (64 bit report) === shell32: shlfolder.c:4992: Test failed: RMDIR: expected notification type 10, got: 40000 === w1064_adm (64 bit report) === shell32: shlfolder.c:4992: Test failed: MKDIR: expected notification type 8, got: 40000 === w1064_tsign (64 bit report) === shell32: shlfolder.c:5009: Test failed: Didn't expect a WM_USER_NOTIFY message (event: 2) === debian11 (32 bit report) === shell32: shlfolder.c:5549: Test failed: got DEADBEEF === debian11 (32 bit Arabic:Morocco report) === shell32: shlfolder.c:5549: Test failed: got DEADBEEF === debian11 (32 bit German report) === shell32: shlfolder.c:5549: Test failed: got DEADBEEF === debian11 (32 bit French report) === shell32: shlfolder.c:5549: Test failed: got DEADBEEF === debian11 (32 bit Hebrew:Israel report) === shell32: shlfolder.c:5549: Test failed: got DEADBEEF === debian11 (32 bit Hindi:India report) === shell32: shlfolder.c:5549: Test failed: got DEADBEEF === debian11 (32 bit Japanese:Japan report) === shell32: shlfolder.c:5549: Test failed: got DEADBEEF === debian11 (32 bit Chinese:China report) === shell32: shlfolder.c:5549: Test failed: got DEADBEEF === debian11 (32 bit WoW report) === shell32: shlfolder.c:5549: Test failed: got DEADBEEF === debian11 (64 bit WoW report) === shell32: shlfolder.c:5549: Test failed: got 00000000DEADBEEF

1 0

Re: [PATCH 8/8] dinput/tests: Test GetObjectInfo() with three sliders and a proper format.
by Marvin July 22, 2022

July 22, 2022

Hi, It looks like your patch introduced the new failures shown below. Please investigate and fix them before resubmitting your patch. If they are not new, fixing them anyway would help a lot. Otherwise please ask for the known failures list to be updated. The full results can be found at: https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=119453 Your paranoid android. === w8 (32 bit report) === dinput: joystick8.c:1836: Test failed: 0x500: state[0]: WaitForSingleObject succeeded

1 0

Re: [PATCH 4/8] dinputs/tests: Use helper for checking device object instances.
by Marvin July 22, 2022

July 22, 2022

Hi, It looks like your patch introduced the new failures shown below. Please investigate and fix them before resubmitting your patch. If they are not new, fixing them anyway would help a lot. Otherwise please ask for the known failures list to be updated. The full results can be found at: https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=119449 Your paranoid android. === w8 (32 bit report) === dinput: joystick8.c:1836: Test failed: 0x700: state[0]: WaitForSingleObject succeeded

1 0