July 2022 - Wine-Devel - list.winehq.org

Re: [PATCH v3 7/9] mshtml: Implement previousElementSibling for Elements.
by Marvin July 27, 2022

July 27, 2022

Hi, It looks like your patch introduced the new failures shown below. Please investigate and fix them before resubmitting your patch. If they are not new, fixing them anyway would help a lot. Otherwise please ask for the known failures list to be updated. The full results can be found at: https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=119955 Your paranoid android. === build (build log) === error: patch failed: dlls/mshtml/htmlelem.c:4813 error: patch failed: dlls/mshtml/nsembed.c:998 error: patch failed: dlls/mshtml/htmlelem.c:4845 error: patch failed: dlls/mshtml/tests/documentmode.js:1408 error: patch failed: dlls/mshtml/htmlelem.c:4886 error: patch failed: dlls/mshtml/tests/documentmode.js:1480 error: patch failed: dlls/mshtml/htmlelem.c:4925 error: patch failed: dlls/mshtml/tests/documentmode.js:1418 error: patch failed: dlls/mshtml/htmlelem.c:6524 error: patch failed: dlls/mshtml/tests/dom.js:89 error: patch failed: dlls/mshtml/htmlelem.c:6560 error: patch failed: dlls/mshtml/tests/dom.js:94 error: patch failed: dlls/mshtml/htmlelem.c:6553 error: patch failed: dlls/mshtml/tests/dom.js:98 Task: Patch failed to apply === debian11 (build log) === error: patch failed: dlls/mshtml/htmlelem.c:4813 error: patch failed: dlls/mshtml/nsembed.c:998 error: patch failed: dlls/mshtml/htmlelem.c:4845 error: patch failed: dlls/mshtml/tests/documentmode.js:1408 error: patch failed: dlls/mshtml/htmlelem.c:4886 error: patch failed: dlls/mshtml/tests/documentmode.js:1480 error: patch failed: dlls/mshtml/htmlelem.c:4925 error: patch failed: dlls/mshtml/tests/documentmode.js:1418 error: patch failed: dlls/mshtml/htmlelem.c:6524 error: patch failed: dlls/mshtml/tests/dom.js:89 error: patch failed: dlls/mshtml/htmlelem.c:6560 error: patch failed: dlls/mshtml/tests/dom.js:94 error: patch failed: dlls/mshtml/htmlelem.c:6553 error: patch failed: dlls/mshtml/tests/dom.js:98 Task: Patch failed to apply === debian11 (build log) === error: patch failed: dlls/mshtml/htmlelem.c:4813 error: patch failed: dlls/mshtml/nsembed.c:998 error: patch failed: dlls/mshtml/htmlelem.c:4845 error: patch failed: dlls/mshtml/tests/documentmode.js:1408 error: patch failed: dlls/mshtml/htmlelem.c:4886 error: patch failed: dlls/mshtml/tests/documentmode.js:1480 error: patch failed: dlls/mshtml/htmlelem.c:4925 error: patch failed: dlls/mshtml/tests/documentmode.js:1418 error: patch failed: dlls/mshtml/htmlelem.c:6524 error: patch failed: dlls/mshtml/tests/dom.js:89 error: patch failed: dlls/mshtml/htmlelem.c:6560 error: patch failed: dlls/mshtml/tests/dom.js:94 error: patch failed: dlls/mshtml/htmlelem.c:6553 error: patch failed: dlls/mshtml/tests/dom.js:98 Task: Patch failed to apply

1 0

Re: [PATCH v3 6/9] mshtml: Implement nextElementSibling for Elements.
by Marvin July 27, 2022

July 27, 2022

Hi, It looks like your patch introduced the new failures shown below. Please investigate and fix them before resubmitting your patch. If they are not new, fixing them anyway would help a lot. Otherwise please ask for the known failures list to be updated. The full results can be found at: https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=119954 Your paranoid android. === build (build log) === error: patch failed: dlls/mshtml/htmlelem.c:4813 error: patch failed: dlls/mshtml/nsembed.c:998 error: patch failed: dlls/mshtml/htmlelem.c:4845 error: patch failed: dlls/mshtml/tests/documentmode.js:1408 error: patch failed: dlls/mshtml/htmlelem.c:4886 error: patch failed: dlls/mshtml/tests/documentmode.js:1480 error: patch failed: dlls/mshtml/htmlelem.c:4925 error: patch failed: dlls/mshtml/tests/documentmode.js:1418 error: patch failed: dlls/mshtml/htmlelem.c:6524 error: patch failed: dlls/mshtml/tests/dom.js:89 error: patch failed: dlls/mshtml/htmlelem.c:6560 error: patch failed: dlls/mshtml/tests/dom.js:94 Task: Patch failed to apply === debian11 (build log) === error: patch failed: dlls/mshtml/htmlelem.c:4813 error: patch failed: dlls/mshtml/nsembed.c:998 error: patch failed: dlls/mshtml/htmlelem.c:4845 error: patch failed: dlls/mshtml/tests/documentmode.js:1408 error: patch failed: dlls/mshtml/htmlelem.c:4886 error: patch failed: dlls/mshtml/tests/documentmode.js:1480 error: patch failed: dlls/mshtml/htmlelem.c:4925 error: patch failed: dlls/mshtml/tests/documentmode.js:1418 error: patch failed: dlls/mshtml/htmlelem.c:6524 error: patch failed: dlls/mshtml/tests/dom.js:89 error: patch failed: dlls/mshtml/htmlelem.c:6560 error: patch failed: dlls/mshtml/tests/dom.js:94 Task: Patch failed to apply

1 0

Re: [PATCH v2 5/9] mshtml: Implement lastElementChild for Elements.
by Marvin July 27, 2022

July 27, 2022

Hi, It looks like your patch introduced the new failures shown below. Please investigate and fix them before resubmitting your patch. If they are not new, fixing them anyway would help a lot. Otherwise please ask for the known failures list to be updated. The tests also ran into some preexisting test failures. If you know how to fix them that would be helpful. See the TestBot job for the details: The full results can be found at: https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=119863 Your paranoid android. === w10pro64_zh_CN (64 bit report) === mshtml: htmldoc.c:2541: Test failed: unexpected call UpdateUI htmldoc.c:2853: Test failed: unexpected call Exec_UPDATECOMMANDS htmldoc.c:350: Test failed: expected Exec_SETTITLE htmldoc.c:2859: Test failed: unexpected call Exec_SETTITLE === w7u_adm (32 bit report) === mshtml: script.c:644: Test failed: L"/index.html?es5.js:date_now: unexpected Date.now() result 1658941745587 expected 1658941745649"

1 0

Re: [PATCH v2 4/9] mshtml: Implement hasAttributeNS for Elements.
by Marvin July 27, 2022

July 27, 2022

Hi, It looks like your patch introduced the new failures shown below. Please investigate and fix them before resubmitting your patch. If they are not new, fixing them anyway would help a lot. Otherwise please ask for the known failures list to be updated. The tests also ran into some preexisting test failures. If you know how to fix them that would be helpful. See the TestBot job for the details: The full results can be found at: https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=119862 Your paranoid android. === w10pro64_en_AE_u8 (64 bit report) === mshtml: script.c:3119: Test failed: ReportResult failed: 80ef0001

1 0

Re: [PATCH v17 6/6] tmp
by Marvin July 27, 2022

July 27, 2022

Hi, It looks like your patch introduced the new failures shown below. Please investigate and fix them before resubmitting your patch. If they are not new, fixing them anyway would help a lot. Otherwise please ask for the known failures list to be updated. The full results can be found at: https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=119907 Your paranoid android. === debian11 (build log) === ../wine/dlls/msvcrt/cpp.c:652:2: error: #error _MSVCR_VER STRINGIFY2(_MSVCR_VER) <command-line>: error: expected identifier or ‘(’ before numeric constant Task: The win32 Wine build failed === debian11 (build log) === ../wine/dlls/msvcrt/cpp.c:652:2: error: #error _MSVCR_VER STRINGIFY2(_MSVCR_VER) <command-line>: error: expected identifier or ‘(’ before numeric constant Task: The wow64 Wine build failed

1 0

Re: [PATCH v16 6/6] tmp
by Marvin July 27, 2022

July 27, 2022

Hi, It looks like your patch introduced the new failures shown below. Please investigate and fix them before resubmitting your patch. If they are not new, fixing them anyway would help a lot. Otherwise please ask for the known failures list to be updated. The full results can be found at: https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=119901 Your paranoid android. === debian11 (build log) === ../wine/dlls/msvcrt/cpp.c:651:19: error: _MSVCR_VER: ../wine/dlls/msvcrt/cpp.c:652:2: error: #error _MSVCR_VER STRINGIFY2(_MSVCR_VER) <command-line>: error: expected identifier or ‘(’ before numeric constant Task: The win32 Wine build failed === debian11 (build log) === ../wine/dlls/msvcrt/cpp.c:651:19: error: _MSVCR_VER: ../wine/dlls/msvcrt/cpp.c:652:2: error: #error _MSVCR_VER STRINGIFY2(_MSVCR_VER) <command-line>: error: expected identifier or ‘(’ before numeric constant Task: The wow64 Wine build failed

1 0

Re: [PATCH v2 3/9] mshtml: Implement removeAttributeNS for Elements.
by Marvin July 27, 2022

July 27, 2022

Hi, It looks like your patch introduced the new failures shown below. Please investigate and fix them before resubmitting your patch. If they are not new, fixing them anyway would help a lot. Otherwise please ask for the known failures list to be updated. The tests also ran into some preexisting test failures. If you know how to fix them that would be helpful. See the TestBot job for the details: The full results can be found at: https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=119861 Your paranoid android. === w10pro64_ja (64 bit report) === mshtml: htmldoc.c:2541: Test failed: unexpected call UpdateUI htmldoc.c:2853: Test failed: unexpected call Exec_UPDATECOMMANDS htmldoc.c:350: Test failed: expected Exec_SETTITLE htmldoc.c:2859: Test failed: unexpected call Exec_SETTITLE

1 0

Re: [PATCH v2 2/9] mshtml: Implement setAttributeNS for Elements.
by Marvin July 27, 2022

July 27, 2022

Hi, It looks like your patch introduced the new failures shown below. Please investigate and fix them before resubmitting your patch. If they are not new, fixing them anyway would help a lot. Otherwise please ask for the known failures list to be updated. The tests also ran into some preexisting test failures. If you know how to fix them that would be helpful. See the TestBot job for the details: The full results can be found at: https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=119860 Your paranoid android. === w10pro64 (64 bit report) === mshtml: htmldoc.c:2541: Test failed: unexpected call UpdateUI htmldoc.c:2853: Test failed: unexpected call Exec_UPDATECOMMANDS === w10pro64_ar (64 bit report) === mshtml: htmldoc.c:2541: Test failed: unexpected call UpdateUI htmldoc.c:2853: Test failed: unexpected call Exec_UPDATECOMMANDS

1 0

Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] win32u/window: Ignore changing WS_EX_TOPMOST for message-only windows.
by Marvin July 27, 2022

July 27, 2022

Hi, It looks like your patch introduced the new failures shown below. Please investigate and fix them before resubmitting your patch. If they are not new, fixing them anyway would help a lot. Otherwise please ask for the known failures list to be updated. The tests also ran into some preexisting test failures. If you know how to fix them that would be helpful. See the TestBot job for the details: The full results can be found at: https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=119828 Your paranoid android. === w10pro64_ja (64 bit report) === user32: win.c:189: Test failed: didn't get start_event win.c:10436: Test failed: WindowFromPoint returned 00000000000902BA, expected 0000000000000000 win.c:10444: Test failed: WindowFromPoint returned 00000000000902BA, expected 0000000000000000 win.c:10447: Test failed: Timed out waiting for the child process win.c:10345: Test failed: WindowFromPoint returned 00000000000302B2, expected 00000000000902BA win.c:10352: Test failed: WindowFromPoint returned 00000000000302B2, expected 00000000000401F0 win.c:10358: Test failed: CreateWindowEx failed win.c:10373: Test failed: transparent window didn't get WM_NCHITTEST message === debian11 (32 bit WoW report) === user32: win.c:9024: Test failed: Did not receive WM_KILLFOCUS

1 0

Re: [PATCH v7 1/2] user32/tests: Check that message-only windows ignore WS_EX_TOPMOST.
by Marvin July 27, 2022

July 27, 2022

Hi, It looks like your patch introduced the new failures shown below. Please investigate and fix them before resubmitting your patch. If they are not new, fixing them anyway would help a lot. Otherwise please ask for the known failures list to be updated. The full results can be found at: https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=119827 Your paranoid android. === w8adm (32 bit report) === user32: win.c:2688: Test failed: style 0x200000: expected !100 win.c:2688: Test failed: style 0x300000: expected !100 === w1064 (64 bit report) === user32: win.c:10976: Test failed: pos = 01400154 === debian11 (32 bit report) === user32: win.c:9026: Test failed: Did not receive WM_KILLFOCUS === debian11 (32 bit WoW report) === user32: win.c:9026: Test failed: Did not receive WM_KILLFOCUS

1 0