- Wine-Devel - list.winehq.org

Testbot outage
by Jeremy White July 22, 2022

July 22, 2022

Hi all, We are moving offices. As a result, the WineHQ testnet that powers testbot will be unavailable for some time, starting at 1:30 CDT. It will hopefully just be for the afternoon. Cheers, Jeremy

3 2

Re: [PATCH v2 07/10] mshtml: Implement ProgressEvent's lengthComputable prop.
by Marvin July 22, 2022

July 22, 2022

Hi, It looks like your patch introduced the new failures shown below. Please investigate and fix them before resubmitting your patch. If they are not new, fixing them anyway would help a lot. Otherwise please ask for the known failures list to be updated. The tests also ran into some preexisting test failures. If you know how to fix them that would be helpful. See the TestBot job for the details: The full results can be found at: https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=119498 Your paranoid android. === w1064v1507 (64 bit report) === mshtml: events: Timeout

1 0

Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] dlls/msvcrt: improve support for template in methods
by Marvin July 22, 2022

July 22, 2022

Hi, It looks like your patch introduced the new failures shown below. Please investigate and fix them before resubmitting your patch. If they are not new, fixing them anyway would help a lot. Otherwise please ask for the known failures list to be updated. The full results can be found at: https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=119463 Your paranoid android. === debian11 (32 bit report) === msvcrt: cpp.c:1310: Test failed: 136: Got name "public: __cdecl foo<double>::operator <int>int(void) __ptr64" cpp.c:1313: Test failed: 136: Expected "public: __cdecl foo<double>::operator<int> int(void) __ptr64" === debian11 (32 bit Arabic:Morocco report) === msvcrt: cpp.c:1310: Test failed: 136: Got name "public: __cdecl foo<double>::operator <int>int(void) __ptr64" cpp.c:1313: Test failed: 136: Expected "public: __cdecl foo<double>::operator<int> int(void) __ptr64" === debian11 (32 bit German report) === msvcrt: cpp.c:1310: Test failed: 136: Got name "public: __cdecl foo<double>::operator <int>int(void) __ptr64" cpp.c:1313: Test failed: 136: Expected "public: __cdecl foo<double>::operator<int> int(void) __ptr64" === debian11 (32 bit French report) === msvcrt: cpp.c:1310: Test failed: 136: Got name "public: __cdecl foo<double>::operator <int>int(void) __ptr64" cpp.c:1313: Test failed: 136: Expected "public: __cdecl foo<double>::operator<int> int(void) __ptr64" === debian11 (32 bit Hebrew:Israel report) === msvcrt: cpp.c:1310: Test failed: 136: Got name "public: __cdecl foo<double>::operator <int>int(void) __ptr64" cpp.c:1313: Test failed: 136: Expected "public: __cdecl foo<double>::operator<int> int(void) __ptr64" === debian11 (32 bit Hindi:India report) === msvcrt: cpp.c:1310: Test failed: 136: Got name "public: __cdecl foo<double>::operator <int>int(void) __ptr64" cpp.c:1313: Test failed: 136: Expected "public: __cdecl foo<double>::operator<int> int(void) __ptr64" === debian11 (32 bit Japanese:Japan report) === msvcrt: cpp.c:1310: Test failed: 136: Got name "public: __cdecl foo<double>::operator <int>int(void) __ptr64" cpp.c:1313: Test failed: 136: Expected "public: __cdecl foo<double>::operator<int> int(void) __ptr64" === debian11 (32 bit Chinese:China report) === msvcrt: cpp.c:1310: Test failed: 136: Got name "public: __cdecl foo<double>::operator <int>int(void) __ptr64" cpp.c:1313: Test failed: 136: Expected "public: __cdecl foo<double>::operator<int> int(void) __ptr64" === debian11 (32 bit WoW report) === msvcrt: cpp.c:1310: Test failed: 136: Got name "public: __cdecl foo<double>::operator <int>int(void) __ptr64" cpp.c:1313: Test failed: 136: Expected "public: __cdecl foo<double>::operator<int> int(void) __ptr64" === debian11 (64 bit WoW report) === msvcrt: cpp.c:1310: Test failed: 136: Got name "public: __cdecl foo<double>::operator <int>int(void) __ptr64" cpp.c:1313: Test failed: 136: Expected "public: __cdecl foo<double>::operator<int> int(void) __ptr64"

1 0

Re: [PATCH 2/8] dinput/test: Print the expected values in check_ macros.
by Marvin July 22, 2022

July 22, 2022

Hi, It looks like your patch introduced the new failures shown below. Please investigate and fix them before resubmitting your patch. If they are not new, fixing them anyway would help a lot. Otherwise please ask for the known failures list to be updated. The full results can be found at: https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=119447 Your paranoid android. === w8 (32 bit report) === dinput: joystick8.c:1836: Test failed: 0x700: state[0]: WaitForSingleObject succeeded === w1064_tsign (testbot log) === WineRunTask.pl:error: The previous 1 run(s) terminated abnormally

1 0

Re: [PATCH 2/3] shell32: Add SHBindToFolderIDListParent tests.
by Marvin July 22, 2022

July 22, 2022

Hi, It looks like your patch introduced the new failures shown below. Please investigate and fix them before resubmitting your patch. If they are not new, fixing them anyway would help a lot. Otherwise please ask for the known failures list to be updated. The tests also ran into some preexisting test failures. If you know how to fix them that would be helpful. See the TestBot job for the details: The full results can be found at: https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=119429 Your paranoid android. === w1064_2qxl (64 bit report) === shell32: shlfolder.c:4992: Test failed: RMDIR: expected notification type 10, got: 40000 === w1064_adm (64 bit report) === shell32: shlfolder.c:4992: Test failed: MKDIR: expected notification type 8, got: 40000 === w1064_tsign (64 bit report) === shell32: shlfolder.c:5009: Test failed: Didn't expect a WM_USER_NOTIFY message (event: 2) === debian11 (32 bit report) === shell32: shlfolder.c:5549: Test failed: got DEADBEEF === debian11 (32 bit Arabic:Morocco report) === shell32: shlfolder.c:5549: Test failed: got DEADBEEF === debian11 (32 bit German report) === shell32: shlfolder.c:5549: Test failed: got DEADBEEF === debian11 (32 bit French report) === shell32: shlfolder.c:5549: Test failed: got DEADBEEF === debian11 (32 bit Hebrew:Israel report) === shell32: shlfolder.c:5549: Test failed: got DEADBEEF === debian11 (32 bit Hindi:India report) === shell32: shlfolder.c:5549: Test failed: got DEADBEEF === debian11 (32 bit Japanese:Japan report) === shell32: shlfolder.c:5549: Test failed: got DEADBEEF === debian11 (32 bit Chinese:China report) === shell32: shlfolder.c:5549: Test failed: got DEADBEEF === debian11 (32 bit WoW report) === shell32: shlfolder.c:5549: Test failed: got DEADBEEF === debian11 (64 bit WoW report) === shell32: shlfolder.c:5549: Test failed: got 00000000DEADBEEF

1 0

Re: [PATCH 8/8] dinput/tests: Test GetObjectInfo() with three sliders and a proper format.
by Marvin July 22, 2022

July 22, 2022

Hi, It looks like your patch introduced the new failures shown below. Please investigate and fix them before resubmitting your patch. If they are not new, fixing them anyway would help a lot. Otherwise please ask for the known failures list to be updated. The full results can be found at: https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=119453 Your paranoid android. === w8 (32 bit report) === dinput: joystick8.c:1836: Test failed: 0x500: state[0]: WaitForSingleObject succeeded

1 0

Re: [PATCH 4/8] dinputs/tests: Use helper for checking device object instances.
by Marvin July 22, 2022

July 22, 2022

Hi, It looks like your patch introduced the new failures shown below. Please investigate and fix them before resubmitting your patch. If they are not new, fixing them anyway would help a lot. Otherwise please ask for the known failures list to be updated. The full results can be found at: https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=119449 Your paranoid android. === w8 (32 bit report) === dinput: joystick8.c:1836: Test failed: 0x700: state[0]: WaitForSingleObject succeeded

1 0

Re: [PATCH 3/4] ws2_32: Map AFD_POLL_RESET to both POLLHUP and POLLERR.
by Marvin July 22, 2022

July 22, 2022

Hi, It looks like your patch introduced the new failures shown below. Please investigate and fix them before resubmitting your patch. If they are not new, fixing them anyway would help a lot. Otherwise please ask for the known failures list to be updated. The full results can be found at: https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=119426 Your paranoid android. === debian11 (32 bit report) === ws2_32: sock.c:12874: Test failed: got wrong events 0x12 === debian11 (32 bit Arabic:Morocco report) === ws2_32: sock.c:12874: Test failed: got wrong events 0x12 === debian11 (32 bit German report) === ws2_32: sock.c:12874: Test failed: got wrong events 0x12 === debian11 (32 bit French report) === ws2_32: sock.c:12874: Test failed: got wrong events 0x12 === debian11 (32 bit Hebrew:Israel report) === ws2_32: sock.c:12874: Test failed: got wrong events 0x12 === debian11 (32 bit Hindi:India report) === ws2_32: sock.c:12874: Test failed: got wrong events 0x12 === debian11 (32 bit Japanese:Japan report) === ws2_32: sock.c:12874: Test failed: got wrong events 0x12 === debian11 (32 bit Chinese:China report) === ws2_32: sock.c:12874: Test failed: got wrong events 0x12 === debian11 (32 bit WoW report) === ws2_32: sock.c:12874: Test failed: got wrong events 0x12 === debian11 (64 bit WoW report) === ws2_32: sock.c:12874: Test failed: got wrong events 0x12

1 0

Re: [PATCH v2 6/9] win32u/tests: Add tests for catching exceptions from timer proc.
by Marvin July 22, 2022

July 22, 2022

Hi, It looks like your patch introduced the new failures shown below. Please investigate and fix them before resubmitting your patch. If they are not new, fixing them anyway would help a lot. Otherwise please ask for the known failures list to be updated. The full results can be found at: https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=119391 Your paranoid android. === build (build log) === error: patch failed: dlls/user32/message.c:856 error: patch failed: dlls/user32/user_private.h:89 error: patch failed: dlls/user32/winproc.c:719 error: patch failed: dlls/win32u/message.c:2952 error: patch failed: include/ntuser.h:276 error: patch failed: dlls/user32/message.c:877 error: patch failed: dlls/win32u/message.c:2496 error: patch failed: dlls/win32u/sysparams.c:4880 error: patch failed: dlls/win32u/win32u_private.h:436 error: patch failed: include/ntuser.h:902 error: patch failed: dlls/user32/message.c:597 error: patch failed: dlls/win32u/hook.c:60 error: patch failed: dlls/win32u/message.c:109 error: patch failed: dlls/win32u/tests/win32u.c:425 error: patch failed: dlls/win32u/win32u_private.h:391 error: patch failed: dlls/ntdll/signal_arm.c:533 error: patch failed: dlls/ntdll/signal_arm64.c:576 error: patch failed: dlls/ntdll/signal_i386.c:257 error: patch failed: dlls/ntdll/signal_x86_64.c:661 error: patch failed: dlls/ntdll/unix/signal_arm.c:721 error: patch failed: dlls/ntdll/unix/signal_arm64.c:730 error: patch failed: dlls/ntdll/unix/signal_i386.c:1575 error: patch failed: dlls/ntdll/unix/signal_x86_64.c:2327 error: patch failed: dlls/win32u/gdiobj.c:1158 error: patch failed: dlls/win32u/message.c:2514 error: patch failed: dlls/win32u/syscall.c:117 error: patch failed: dlls/win32u/win32u.spec:839 error: patch failed: dlls/win32u/win32u_private.h:215 error: patch failed: dlls/win32u/wrappers.c:855 error: patch failed: dlls/wow64win/syscall.h:104 error: patch failed: dlls/wow64win/user.c:78 error: patch failed: dlls/win32u/tests/win32u.c:632 Task: Patch failed to apply

1 0

Re: [PATCH v2 3/9] win32u: Avoid using client callbacks for NtUserSendMessage.
by Marvin July 22, 2022

July 22, 2022

Hi, It looks like your patch introduced the new failures shown below. Please investigate and fix them before resubmitting your patch. If they are not new, fixing them anyway would help a lot. Otherwise please ask for the known failures list to be updated. The tests also ran into some preexisting test failures. If you know how to fix them that would be helpful. See the TestBot job for the details: The full results can be found at: https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=119388 Your paranoid android. === build (build log) === error: patch failed: dlls/user32/message.c:856 error: patch failed: dlls/user32/user_private.h:89 error: patch failed: dlls/user32/winproc.c:719 error: patch failed: dlls/win32u/message.c:2952 error: patch failed: include/ntuser.h:276 error: patch failed: dlls/user32/message.c:877 error: patch failed: dlls/win32u/message.c:2496 error: patch failed: dlls/win32u/sysparams.c:4880 error: patch failed: dlls/win32u/win32u_private.h:436 error: patch failed: include/ntuser.h:902 error: patch failed: dlls/user32/message.c:597 error: patch failed: dlls/win32u/hook.c:60 error: patch failed: dlls/win32u/message.c:109 error: patch failed: dlls/win32u/tests/win32u.c:425 error: patch failed: dlls/win32u/win32u_private.h:391 Task: Patch failed to apply

1 0