- Wine-Devel - list.winehq.org

Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] mshtml: Implement overrideMimeType for XMLHttpRequest.
by Marvin July 13, 2022

July 13, 2022

Hi, It looks like your patch introduced the new failures shown below. Please investigate and fix them before resubmitting your patch. If they are not new, fixing them anyway would help a lot. Otherwise please ask for the known failures list to be updated. The tests also ran into some preexisting test failures. If you know how to fix them that would be helpful. See the TestBot job for the details: The full results can be found at: https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=118924 Your paranoid android. === w7u_adm (32 bit report) === mshtml: script.c:644: Test failed: L"/index.html?es5.js:date_now: unexpected Date.now() result 1657738156862 expected 1657738156925"

1 0

Re: [PATCH 1/1] win32u: Send WM_NCPAINT as notify message in send_ncpaint().
by Marvin July 13, 2022

July 13, 2022

Hi, It looks like your patch introduced the new failures shown below. Please investigate and fix them before resubmitting your patch. If they are not new, fixing them anyway would help a lot. Otherwise please ask for the known failures list to be updated. The full results can be found at: https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=118970 Your paranoid android. === w1064_2qxl (64 bit report) === user32: win.c:4579: Test failed: hwnd 000000000001024C/000000000001024C message 0200 win.c:4583: Test failed: hwnd 000000000001024C/000000000001024C message 0201 win.c:4592: Test failed: hwnd 00000000001002B8/00000000001002B8 message 0202 win.c:4595: Test failed: hwnd 00000000001002B8/00000000001002B8 message 0201

1 0

Re: [PATCH v4 3/5] mshtml: Check for valid XML Content-Type for responseXML in IE10+ modes.
by Marvin July 13, 2022

July 13, 2022

Hi, It looks like your patch introduced the new failures shown below. Please investigate and fix them before resubmitting your patch. If they are not new, fixing them anyway would help a lot. Otherwise please ask for the known failures list to be updated. The tests also ran into some preexisting test failures. If you know how to fix them that would be helpful. See the TestBot job for the details: The full results can be found at: https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=118923 Your paranoid android. === w10pro64 (64 bit report) === mshtml: htmldoc.c:2541: Test failed: unexpected call UpdateUI htmldoc.c:2853: Test failed: unexpected call Exec_UPDATECOMMANDS htmldoc.c:350: Test failed: expected Exec_SETTITLE htmldoc.c:2859: Test failed: unexpected call Exec_SETTITLE

1 0

Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] mshtml: Respect LOAD_CALL_CONTENT_SNIFFERS when using detected mime type.
by Marvin July 13, 2022

July 13, 2022

Hi, It looks like your patch introduced the new failures shown below. Please investigate and fix them before resubmitting your patch. If they are not new, fixing them anyway would help a lot. Otherwise please ask for the known failures list to be updated. The tests also ran into some preexisting test failures. If you know how to fix them that would be helpful. See the TestBot job for the details: The full results can be found at: https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=118922 Your paranoid android. === w10pro64_ar (64 bit report) === mshtml: htmldoc.c:2541: Test failed: unexpected call UpdateUI htmldoc.c:2853: Test failed: unexpected call Exec_UPDATECOMMANDS htmldoc.c:350: Test failed: expected Exec_SETTITLE htmldoc.c:2859: Test failed: unexpected call Exec_SETTITLE

1 0

Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] mshtml: Implement overrideMimeType for XMLHttpRequest.
by Marvin July 13, 2022

July 13, 2022

Hi, It looks like your patch introduced the new failures shown below. Please investigate and fix them before resubmitting your patch. If they are not new, fixing them anyway would help a lot. Otherwise please ask for the known failures list to be updated. The tests also ran into some preexisting test failures. If you know how to fix them that would be helpful. See the TestBot job for the details: The full results can be found at: https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=118919 Your paranoid android. === w10pro64_ja (64 bit report) === mshtml: htmldoc.c:2541: Test failed: unexpected call UpdateUI htmldoc.c:2853: Test failed: unexpected call Exec_UPDATECOMMANDS htmldoc.c:350: Test failed: expected Exec_SETTITLE htmldoc.c:2859: Test failed: unexpected call Exec_SETTITLE === w10pro64_zh_CN (64 bit report) === mshtml: htmldoc.c:2541: Test failed: unexpected call UpdateUI htmldoc.c:2853: Test failed: unexpected call Exec_UPDATECOMMANDS htmldoc.c:350: Test failed: expected Exec_SETTITLE htmldoc.c:2859: Test failed: unexpected call Exec_SETTITLE === w7u_adm (32 bit report) === mshtml: script.c:644: Test failed: L"/index.html?es5.js:date_now: unexpected Date.now() result 1657734051954 expected 1657734052016"

1 0

[PATCH 1/5] msvcr120/tests: Add missing newlines to messages.
by Torge Matthies July 13, 2022

July 13, 2022

Signed-off-by: Torge Matthies <tmatthies(a)codeweavers.com> --- dlls/msvcr120/tests/msvcr120.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/dlls/msvcr120/tests/msvcr120.c b/dlls/msvcr120/tests/msvcr120.c index 88a32b382ef..ac35076af03 100644 --- a/dlls/msvcr120/tests/msvcr120.c +++ b/dlls/msvcr120/tests/msvcr120.c @@ -1375,7 +1375,7 @@ static void __cdecl chore_proc(_UnrealizedChore *_this) MSVCRT_bool canceling = call_func1( p__StructuredTaskCollection__IsCanceling, chore->chore.task_collection); - ok(!canceling, "Task is already canceling"); + ok(!canceling, "Task is already canceling\n"); } if (!chore->wait_event) @@ -1399,7 +1399,7 @@ static void __cdecl chore_proc(_UnrealizedChore *_this) MSVCRT_bool canceling = call_func1( p__StructuredTaskCollection__IsCanceling, chore->chore.task_collection); - ok(canceling, "Task is not canceling"); + ok(canceling, "Task is not canceling\n"); } } -- 2.37.0

3 9

Building with MSVC
by Gisle Vanem July 13, 2022

July 13, 2022

Hello list. My first post here. First off, I'm not using Linux and does not want to. I'm on Win-10 and would (just for fun) try to build e.g. Wine's 'explorer.exe' and other tool using MSVC-2022 and/or clang-cl v.13. I see that the sources are full of '_MSC_VER' and assume it would be possible. I've built all 'tools/' program just fine with a set of home-brewed GNU-makefiles. But have some problems with missing symbols during link. For example these: _NtUserMessageCall(a)28 _DrawCaptionTempW(a)28 MSDN came up blank for these. But I see that 'NtUserMessageCall(a)28' is exported from my normal 'win32u.dll' on Win-10. But there's no entry for them in any Win-Kit library AFAICS. So are we supposed to use Wine's 'win32u.dll' as a trampoline to the real and undocumented functions? Then there is 'DrawCaptionTempW'. I find no prototype for it in the Win-Kit SDK. But I find it in TDM-MinGW's 'libuser32.a'. Ref: https://gist.github.com/wbenny/123a41973af776df9c7d5610586b9e9d I've read the FAQ so I'm not sure my effort is supported at all. Or if some MinGW-distro is required. -- --gv

2 2

Re: [PATCH v6 7/7] ntoskrnl: Set device ContainerID from driver
by Marvin July 13, 2022

July 13, 2022

Hi, It looks like your patch introduced the new failures shown below. Please investigate and fix them before resubmitting your patch. If they are not new, fixing them anyway would help a lot. Otherwise please ask for the known failures list to be updated. The full results can be found at: https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=118911 Your paranoid android. === w7u_2qxl (32 bit report) === ntoskrnl.exe: ntoskrnl.c:1654: Test failed: got size 78 ntoskrnl.c:1655: Test failed: got container ID "{" === w7u_el (32 bit report) === ntoskrnl.exe: ntoskrnl.c:1654: Test failed: got size 78 ntoskrnl.c:1655: Test failed: got container ID "{" === w8 (32 bit report) === ntoskrnl.exe: ntoskrnl.c:1654: Test failed: got size 78 ntoskrnl.c:1655: Test failed: got container ID "{" === w1064_tsign (64 bit report) === ntoskrnl.exe: ntoskrnl.c:1654: Test failed: got size 78 ntoskrnl.c:1655: Test failed: got container ID "{"

1 0

Re: [PATCH v6 2/7] ntoskrnl/tests: Add test for getting SPDRP_BASE_CONTAINERID from PnP driver
by Marvin July 13, 2022

July 13, 2022

Hi, It looks like your patch introduced the new failures shown below. Please investigate and fix them before resubmitting your patch. If they are not new, fixing them anyway would help a lot. Otherwise please ask for the known failures list to be updated. The tests also ran into some preexisting test failures. If you know how to fix them that would be helpful. See the TestBot job for the details: The full results can be found at: https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=118906 Your paranoid android. === debian11 (32 bit report) === ntoskrnl.exe: driver_pnp.c:706: Test failed: Got 1 remove events.

1 0

Re: [PATCH 2/2] ddraw/tests: Build ddraw7.c without -DWINE_NO_LONG_TYPES.
by Marvin July 12, 2022

July 12, 2022

Hi, It looks like your patch introduced the new failures shown below. Please investigate and fix them before resubmitting your patch. If they are not new, fixing them anyway would help a lot. Otherwise please ask for the known failures list to be updated. The tests also ran into some preexisting test failures. If you know how to fix them that would be helpful. See the TestBot job for the details: The full results can be found at: https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=118887 Your paranoid android. === w8adm (32 bit report) === ddraw: ddraw7.c:18840: Test failed: Got unexpected color 0x00000040.

1 0