- Wine-Devel - list.winehq.org

{00021401-0000-0000-c000-000000000046}
by Shachar Shemesh July 18, 2004

July 18, 2004

Or "ShellCreateIcon", if I'm not mistaken (I likely am). It appears we don't have that OLE registered in our system. This strikes me as odd, as I know that some installers do actually create icons. How do they do that? If someone can point me to our current icon creating code, I may sit down and create this object. Shachar -- Shachar Shemesh Lingnu Open Source Consulting ltd. http://www.lingnu.com/

3 2

Ogre3D based game crashes on exit
by Saulius Krasuckas July 18, 2004

July 18, 2004

The game [1] crashes when I select DX7 engine at its initial screen, go the gameplay and then simply exit. I have entered a new bug report to provide more details [2] on this issue. My attention was caught by the ending part of the output [3] (quite large, about 400kB in size): trace:module:LdrUnloadDll (L"RenderSystem_Direct3D9.dll") - START trace:module:MODULE_DecRefCount (L"RenderSystem_Direct3D9.dll") ldr.LoadCount: 0 trace:module:MODULE_DecRefCount (L"OgreMain.dll") ldr.LoadCount: 3 trace:module:MODULE_DecRefCount (L"d3d9.dll") ldr.LoadCount: 0 trace:module:MODULE_DecRefCount (L"user32.dll") ldr.LoadCount: 13 trace:module:MODULE_DecRefCount (L"gdi32.dll") ldr.LoadCount: 8 trace:module:MODULE_DecRefCount (L"kernel32.dll") ldr.LoadCount: 23 trace:module:MODULE_DecRefCount (L"kernel32.dll") ldr.LoadCount: 22 trace:module:MODULE_DecRefCount (L"user32.dll") ldr.LoadCount: 12 trace:module:MODULE_DecRefCount (L"gdi32.dll") ldr.LoadCount: 7 trace:module:MODULE_DecRefCount (L"advapi32.dll") ldr.LoadCount: 8 trace:module:MODULE_DecRefCount (L"MSVCP71.dll") ldr.LoadCount: 4 trace:module:MODULE_DecRefCount (L"MSVCR71.dll") ldr.LoadCount: 5 trace:module:MODULE_InitDLL (0x41ca0000 L"RenderSystem_Direct3D9.dll",PROCESS_DETACH,(nil)) - CALL trace:module:MODULE_InitDLL (0x41ca0000,PROCESS_DETACH,(nil)) - RETURN 1 trace:module:MODULE_InitDLL (0x41d30000 L"d3d9.dll",PROCESS_DETACH,(nil)) - CALL trace:module:MODULE_InitDLL (0x41d30000,PROCESS_DETACH,(nil)) - RETURN 1 trace:module:MODULE_FlushModrefs unloading L"F:\\spba\\pluginsr\\RenderSystem_Direct3D9.dll" trace:module:MODULE_FlushModrefs unloading L"c:\\windows\\system\\d3d9.dll" trace:module:LdrUnloadDll END wine: Unhandled exception (thread 0009), starting debugger... <skip /> WineDbg starting on pid 0x8 Unhandled exception: page fault on write access to 0x00000000 in 32-bit code (0x430dc1e9). In 32 bit mode. 0x430dc1e9: sbbl %ebp,0x0(%ebx) Wine-dbg>Backtrace: =>1 0x430dc1e9 (0x4074fe86) Any ideas on how to investigate further on this crash? [1] http://lib.su.lt/~ramonas/spacebandits/ [2] http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2365 [3] http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=630&action=view

1 1

winetest files
by Ivan July 18, 2004

July 18, 2004

In the future please avoid having 22 winetest packages set to active, it doubles the size of the sourceforge download page. Ivan.

1 0

PathSearchAndQualify patch (from 2003/12/22) not applied?
by Jeroen Janssen July 17, 2004

July 17, 2004

Hello, I have an application that tries to use PathSearchAndQualify. However, since the current implementation is just stubbed (it contains only a FIXME + return FALSE), it doesn't work. Now searching in the gmane wine patch archive I found an email dated back to 2003/12/22 that contains a possible implementation for PathSearchAndQualify (see also at http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.wine.patches/6810/match=paths… ). However, it seems that this patch was never applied and I'm wondering why. Note that I haven't tried to apply this patch and test it locally. Can someone clarify if this patch is ok or not (and why it's not applied yet?) Best regards, Jeroen Janssen p.s. I hope this message does not appear multiple times, since I had some problems with gmane

2 1

Test contacts
by Mike Hearn July 17, 2004

July 17, 2004

Hi, The test reports don't seem to include an email address for the reporters. I'd love to contact Nicolas Escuder or Dimitris Koukoravas to try and find out what their drive G: is and why it makes GetDiskFreeSpace fail. Does anybody know why the test system isn't getting their email addresses? thanks -mike

1 0

Re: TOOLBAR: TOOLBAR_DrawPattern
by Robert Shearman July 17, 2004

July 17, 2004

Filip Navara wrote: > Changelog: > - Make the pattern drawing in TOOLBAR_DrawPattern look better. > > Filip Navara, navaraf(a)reactos.com > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >--- dlls/comctl32/toolbar.c 16 Jun 2004 06:46:13 -0000 1.15 >+++ dlls/comctl32/toolbar.c 16 Jul 2004 19:17:24 -0000 >@@ -634,7 +634,7 @@ > INT cy = lpRect->bottom - lpRect->top; > clrTextOld = SetTextColor(hdc, tbcd->clrBtnHighlight); > clrBkOld = SetBkColor(hdc, tbcd->clrBtnFace); >- PatBlt (hdc, lpRect->left, lpRect->top, cx, cy, PATCOPY); >+ PatBlt (hdc, lpRect->left + 2, lpRect->top + 2, cx - 4, cy - 4, PATCOPY); > SetBkColor(hdc, clrBkOld); > SetTextColor(hdc, clrTextOld); > SelectObject (hdc, hbr); > > This should use GetSystemMetrics(SM_CXEDGE and SM_CYEDGE). I'll submit a patch to fix this since it has already been committed. Rob

2 1

final fix collate icon behavior in printdlg
by James Hawkins July 17, 2004

July 17, 2004

Hi, Sorry for the backtracking, but this patch conforms to the printer dialog in Windows, unlike the last patch i sent. The behavior is: Initially, Number of copies is 1 and collate is unchecked and shaded (icon is no_collate). If number of copies changes to > 1, collate becomes unshaded if collate is checked, icon changes to collate. if number of copies > 1 and you drop it to one, collate is shaded and does not check or uncheck so the icon stays the same as well. -- James Hawkins

1 0

Re: PrintDlg collate question
by J. Wesley Cleveland July 17, 2004

July 17, 2004

Hi, With this patch, the behavior of the Copies section of the print dialog box is correct. The new behavior is: If number of copies is 1, collate option is unchecked and shaded because collate is not possible, and collate icon is removed whether it was set to collate or not collate. else if number of copies > 2, collate option is unchecked but not shaded, and no_collate icon is displayed. There is only one change that im not sure should go in or not, and that is when the collate option is checked and we drop the number of copies to one, should we uncheck the collate option as well as shade it? On my windows 2000 box, the collate option comes up checked and grayed as default, and the collate icon does not change as the number of copies is changed. The collate checkbox is grayed and ungrayed as the number of copies changes to and from 1, but the checked status remains whatever I set it to.

1 0

Re: fix collate icon behavior in printdlg
by Robert Shearman July 16, 2004

July 16, 2004

James Hawkins wrote: >Hi, > > With this patch, the behavior of the Copies section of the print >dialog box is correct. The new behavior is: > >If number of copies is 1, > collate option is unchecked and shaded because collate is not possible, and > collate icon is removed whether it was set to collate or not collate. >else if number of copies > 2, > collate option is unchecked but not shaded, and > no_collate icon is displayed. > >There is only one change that im not sure should go in or not, and >that is when the collate option is checked and we drop the number of >copies to one, should we uncheck the collate option as well as shade >it? > > It is a nice touch that shows the user that the option doesn't mean anything in that state. However, if the user decreases the copies to 1 and then increases up to 2 their setting has been lost. Also, the dialog doesn't look right when in its default state of only 1 copy. There is a large gap where the collate image would have been. It would be nice if we could put another image there of say, only one sheet of paper, showing why the collate option is disabled. Rob

1 0

PrintDlg collate question
by James Hawkins July 16, 2004

July 16, 2004

Hi, With this patch, the behavior of the Copies section of the print dialog box is correct. The new behavior is: If number of copies is 1, collate option is unchecked and shaded because collate is not possible, and collate icon is removed whether it was set to collate or not collate. else if number of copies > 2, collate option is unchecked but not shaded, and no_collate icon is displayed. There is only one change that im not sure should go in or not, and that is when the collate option is checked and we drop the number of copies to one, should we uncheck the collate option as well as shade it? -- James Hawkins

1 0