- Wine-Devel - list.winehq.org

dlls/dmusic/dmusic_main.c
by Gerald Pfeifer May 4, 2003

May 4, 2003

The following change to dlls/dmusic/dmusic_main.c revision 1.3 date: 2003/05/04 02:26:03; author: julliard; state: Exp; lines: +8 -0 Rok Mandeljc <rokmandeljc(a)hotmail.com> Dmusic class factory can now create dmloader8 and dmperformance8. introduced the following warnings dmusic_main.c:74: warning: implicit declaration of function `DMUSIC_CreateDirectMusicPerformance8' dmusic_main.c:78: warning: implicit declaration of function `DMUSIC_CreateDirectMusicLoader8' Would you mind addressing this? Thanks, Gerald -- Gerald "Jerry" pfeifer(a)dbai.tuwien.ac.at http://www.pfeifer.com/gerald/

1 0

No console output?
by Juan Lang May 4, 2003

May 4, 2003

I'm trying to run a console program with wineconsole, and I see fixme output from the DLL I'm working on, but no output from my program. Any patches I should be applying? Wine20030408 on RH "phoebe" (8.1-ne-9 beta). FWIW, I'm working on iphlpapi.dll. I might take a crack at consolidating some duplicated code in netapi32, winsock, and wsock32 if I have time. Thanks, --Juan __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. http://search.yahoo.com

2 3

How to add a new DLL?
by Gerhard W. Gruber May 3, 2003

May 3, 2003

I was just trying to add a new dll to wine (w95in32.dll and w95inf16.dll). In order to achieve this I looked into some other dlls and copied the Makefile and Makefile.in. The I created the specfile for the dll and adjusted the Makefile. At least that was what I think I did, but it always complains that I have to run configure. So I adjusted configure as well and rerun it, but i stil get this error. Is there somewhere an explanation so I can look how I have to configure Makefile.in. The Makefile will be generated from this through configure, right? -- Gerhard Gruber Für jedes menschliche Problem gibt es immer eine einfache Lösung: Klar, einleuchtend und falsch. (Henry Louis Mencken)

3 2

Re: Solaris Update Patch 02052003
by Dimitrie O. Paun May 3, 2003

May 3, 2003

On Fri, 2 May 2003, Robert Lunnon wrote: > OOPS forgot to attach the patch here it is This pcontext() thing is very ugly: +static void pcontext ( CONTEXT *context, int trap_code, void *cr2, int err_code){ Please do a const char *dbg_context ( CONTEXT *context ); function which converts the context to a string, and then use directly TRACEs instead of pcontext. There are examples in the code on how to do so via the wine_dbg_sprintf() function. See ./dlls/x11drv/xvidmode.c around line 460, in the _CDS_flags() function. -- Dimi.

3 2

Re: wineHQ update
by Dimitrie O. Paun May 3, 2003

May 3, 2003

On May 3, 2003 03:55 pm, erwin wolff wrote: > This patch modifies the WineHQ website at two pionts. It adds a webbased > forum who is donated by a company to the forums section and updates the > working state of borlands cc in the fun projects page according the news > issue 168. Few comments: -- Please send patches in the right format: http://winehq.org/?page=sending_patches -- I don't think I like yet another forum. It unnecessarily dilutes them. We have the newsgroup, wine-*, they should be enough. If anonymity is the only feature, people should open web-mail accounts, there are plenty around. -- Please funnel all Fun-related changes through me. I'll take care of updating the WineHQ site, otherwise changes submitted to WineHQ will most likely get lost on my next update. -- Dimi.

1 0

Re: More checks when loading the driver
by Eric Pouech May 3, 2003

May 3, 2003

Uwe Bonnes wrote: > Changelog: > wine/dlls/winmm/lolvldrv.c: MMDRV_Install > Check for failing DRIVER_FindFromHDrvr this doesn't seem right to me: either the loading fails and we shouldn't get a valid handle, or it succeeds and we should be able to find it there's must be something wrong elsewhere could you please send a -debugmsg +driver,+module,+winmm to see what happens ? TIA -- Eric Pouech

2 2

winsock and virtual interfaces
by Juan Lang May 3, 2003

May 3, 2003

I'm planning to patch winsock (both ws2_32 and wsock32 varieties) so that virtual interfaces will be included in response to IP address/interface list queries. If you'd like different behavior, please speak up (though it's up to Alexandre anyway :) ) More detail: I'm patching wsock32 and winsock to use iphlpapi.dll to enumerate interfaces, get the route table, and that sort of thing. Less code duplication, and I'm trying to isolate the plaform-specific network code to fewer files. (If any of you saw my earlier call for help, the stack corruption was due to socket() mismatching.) Yet more detail: In writing iphlpapi.dll, I was curious about the code in wsock32 and winsock that tries to filter out virtual interface names (in WSAIOCTL_GetInterfaceName()). So, I tested a little bit with my Linux system, and it seems this code does not behave as desired: On my system, virtual interfaces don't show up in /proc/net/dev, so the filtering for them seems a little pointless. But if they did show up, the filtering seems counterproductive: Say you had three interfaces, lo, eth0, and eth0:0. You'd be told (by WSAIOCTL_GetInterfaceCount()) that you have three interfaces, but if you got the names of them, you'd only get two unique names. Furthermore, since the filtered name is what's used for getting the IP address, MAC address, and whatnot, in fact you'd end up with duplicate entries in responses to queries. I've attached my little test program; try it with and without virtual interfaces to see what I mean. I also tested how Win2K behaves with multiple IP addresses on an interface. In IP address tables, there's one entry per IP address, as expected. In GetAdaptersInfo, the IP address list has every configured address for the adapter, also I suppose as expected. So, in Win2K, an interface (uniquely identified by an index) can have 0..N IP addresses. I've attached some output from a test program on Win2K to illustrate. I don't emulate this behavior. Instead, I let an interface have 0 or 1 IP address, and treat virtual interfaces as unique interfaces, with their own index. This makes the code rather simpler. If anyone has a strong opinion otherwise, please speak up. (Patches coming this week. iphlpapi.dll is working, and wsock32 is using it to implement WsControl now. I want to change iphlpapi a little bit to make it more appropriate for netapi32 before I submit.) Thanks, --Juan __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. http://search.yahoo.com GetIpAddrTable returned 3 entries: GetIpAddrTable entry for adapter index 16777219: ip 192.168.1.2 mask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 1.0.0.0 reasm size 65535 GetIpAddrTable entry for adapter index 16777219: ip 10.0.0.1 mask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 1.0.0.0 reasm size 65535 GetIpAddrTable entry for adapter index 1: ip 127.0.0.1 mask 255.0.0.0 broadcast 1.0.0.0 reasm size 65535 GetIfEntry returned 2 entries: GetIfEntry for adapter index 16777219: name: description: Wireless-G Notebook Adapter Type: ethernet physical address: 00:06:25:3d:b5:58 GetIfEntry for adapter index 1: name: description: MS TCP Loopback interface Type: loopback physical address: See 1 adapters in IP_INTERFACE_INFO Adapter 16777219's name is \DEVICE\TCPIP_{66B081D9-F4E3-4FE8-85CC-0934F6134D44} GetAdaptersInfo output: Name: {66B081D9-F4E3-4FE8-85CC-0934F6134D44} Description: Wireless-G Notebook Adapter MAC addr: 00:06:25:3d:b5:58 Index: 16777219 Type: ethernet IP addresses: 10.0.0.1/255.255.255.0 192.168.1.2/255.255.255.0 Gateways: 192.168.1.1

1 0

iexplore 5.5.
by KK singh May 3, 2003

May 3, 2003

hi, I have tried ie5 installation on wine and failed, I am trying to find workarounds for not using IE. Given a windows executable, can i detect which IE dependent calls it is making ? Or exactly what calls both direct api's and COM Interfaces are successful if IE5.5 is installed and fails otherwise. any pointers shall be helpful to me... Regards -kks PS: thanx for the earlier replies. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. http://search.yahoo.com

2 1

With-* test in configure (was: wine and RedHat 9)
by Sylvain Petreolle May 3, 2003

May 3, 2003

Oh, sorry. The 'with-' is a special case, as a test is done on with-* to only reject invalid shell variable names. I dont know if this should be fixed into autoconf or our configure code. Cc'ing your request to wine-devel. --- Rob Hughes <rob(a)robhughes.com> a écrit : > You have to type --with-lptn or whatever. It doesn't check it, > verified > here on Sunday's CVS source. > > I've also noticed a lot of dialogs showing up in a couple different > languages, but I suppose that's a different issue. do you have examples ? Its easy to fix as they often are untranslated messages. > > On Thu, 2003-05-01 at 11:15, Sylvain Petreolle wrote: > > --- Patrick R Griffin <griffinp(a)MIT.EDU> a écrit : > > > "./configure --with-nptl" is correct. > > > As Rob noticed, though, typing in "./configure --with-ltpn" or some > > > other typo will compile successfully - no error message - but > > > will not include the threading library corrections. > > If this works call me Joan of Arc :) > > > > [syl(a)snoop wine]$ ./configure --ltpn > > configure: error: unrecognized option: --ltpn > > Try `./configure --help' for more information. ===== Sylvain Petreolle (spetreolle at users dot sourceforge dot net) ICQ #170597259 No more War ! "What if tomorrow the War could be over ?" Morpheus, in "Reloaded". For the Law of Oil and Fire, Im an European that lives in France. For all my Brothers and friends, Im a human living on Earth. ___________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? -- Une adresse @yahoo.fr gratuite et en français ! Yahoo! Mail : http://fr.mail.yahoo.com

3 8

Re: Small DSound fix...
by Christian Costa May 3, 2003

May 3, 2003

Lionel Ulmer wrote: >Hi all, > >This makes games which do NOT enumerate the sound devices and go through the >ClassFactory work. > >It has also some miscellaneous tracing fixes. > >Changelog: > - misc. tracing fixes > - handle IID_IDirectSound(8) as the default sound driver > A ce que je vois ton patch remplace le mien (qui n'a pas ete accepte d'ailleurs)... P'tite curiosite.. :-) : Mais qu'est ce que ces foutues IIDs viennent faire a la place des GUID des devices ? C'est une bidouille ou bien DirectSoundCreate les acceptent vraiment ? Christian

4 5