- Wine-Devel - list.winehq.org

DSTRICT: some more fixes for the user dll
by Michael Stefaniuc Oct. 29, 2002

Oct. 29, 2002

Hello, this fixes 117 warning in the user dll when compiled with -DSTRICT License: LGPL, X11 Changelog: Michael Stefaniuc <mstefani(a)redhat.com> - some more fixes for compiling the user dll with -DSTRICT bye michael -- Michael Stefaniuc Tel.: +49-711-96437-199 System Administration Fax.: +49-711-96437-111 Red Hat GmbH Email: mstefani(a)redhat.com Hauptstaetterstr. 58 http://www.redhat.de/ D-70178 Stuttgart

1 1

RE: What is a leap second
by Medland, Bill Oct. 29, 2002

Oct. 29, 2002

> -----Original Message----- > From: wine-devel-admin(a)winehq.com > [mailto:wine-devel-admin(a)winehq.com]On > Behalf Of György 'Nog' Jeney > Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 10:46 AM > To: wine-devel(a)winehq.com > Subject: What is a leap second > > > > While I was looking through dlls/ntdll/time.c I came across > the following > two comments: "FIXME: Compute the number of leap second > corrections here" > and "FIXME: get the GMT offset here" What do these this mean? > > nog. > > > > (Trying to avoid repeating everyone else) The best source I know for information on leap seconds is http://tycho.usno.navy.mil/leapsec.html That includes a link to the list of when the leap seconds have been. I was also looking at "time" over the past couple of days, from the "GetDateFormat" side of things (files/dos_fs.c). I note that (Win98) SystemTimeToFileTime etc do not include any leap seconds (i.e. file time assumes no leap seconds). Bill

1 0

rpc_H_PL3 (do not apply)
by Greg Turner Oct. 29, 2002

Oct. 29, 2002

This fixes wineserver crashes exposed by recent tests, in the unmerged parts of the RPC code. Parts of this may never see the light of day. Relative to H_PL0, of course. LICENSE: X11 CHANGELOG: * dlls/rpcrt4: rpc_epmap.c; server: rpc_epmap.c: Greg Turner <gmturner007(a)ameritech.net> - don't crash the wineserver. - don't printf("%s", NULL). -- gmt "The purpose of government is to rein in the rights of the people" --President Bill Clinton, MTV interview, 1993

1 0

Re: Bug #321: dlls/msvct/vf[w]printf functions (Patch 2)
by Shachar Shemesh Oct. 29, 2002

Oct. 29, 2002

Jaco Greeff wrote: >On Tue, 29 Oct 2002 21:10:52 +0100, Andreas Mohr ><andi(a)rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de> wrote : > > >>[insert some rant about certain highly non-rewarding functions here...] >> >>Still, you're doing some pretty essential work, so let me just say thanks >>for your (annoying ?) work ! >> >> > >Annoying? Sometimes. Boring? Never. I'm enjoying every minute of it, as long >as I don't get to frustrate myself with idiotic mistakes. (Of which I've had >a couple in the last week, the last one just took the prize :)) > I don't know. My personal best is to spend two weeks chasing a one wrong character bug. What's more, it was introduced after adding ~20 lines of code, and I knew it. Beat that! To my credit I will say that this was assembly (68000), and that the problem manifested itself in such an unrelated area of the program, that I overruled my own judgment and searched the problem in the vicinity of where it happened. As life would have it, the real problem was a missing "#" (which means "use immediate value X", so instead it read "Take value from address X"). > O, well, >maybe I just need some extra sleep. > >Thanks a lot, encouragement is always appreciated. > > > >

1 0

Bug in SYSDEPS_CallOnStack()?
by Juraj Hercek Oct. 29, 2002

Oct. 29, 2002

Hi, When I was trying to get wine working on sparc solaris, I experienced troubles with exception handling. I always got error (after Ctrl + C): err:seh:EXC_DefaultHandling Exception frame is not in stack limits => unable to dispatch exception. After deeper insight into wine's guts I've figured out that problem lies in SYSDEPS_CallOnStack function (scheduler/sysdeps.c:236), which doesn't switch thread stack on sparcs -> I'll try to implement this soon. I also looked at implementation of this function for __i386__ (since it was just a couple of lines above... :o) ) and I think there is a mistake in implementation for _MSC_VER compiler. Original: ... __asm mov edx, 8[esp]; __asm mov fs:[0x04], esp; <--- __asm push edx; ... I think it should look like this: ... __asm mov edx, 8[esp]; __asm mov esp, fs:[0x04]; <--- __asm push edx; ... Just some questions: Is anyone compiling wine with microsoft compiler? If so, what are the reasons? Next, current snapshot from cvs doesn't compile on solaris, is anyone compiling wine on solaris? Regards, Juraj

4 3

Re: dlls/advapi32/RegFlushKey (Patch 2)
by Jaco Greeff Oct. 29, 2002

Oct. 29, 2002

On 29 Oct 2002 12:38:10 -0800, Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.com> wrote : > I'm afraid this can't possibly work. Registry keys don't have an > associated file descriptor. Bingo. That was my understanding as well, until I looked at the RegCloseKey and was thrown totally off-track: /* RegCloseKey */ ... return RtlNtStatusToDosError( NtClose( hkey ) ); which translates more or less to: /* NtClose */ ... SERVER_START_REQ( close_handle ) { req->handle = Handle; ret = wine_server_call( req ); if (!ret && reply->fd != -1) close( reply->fd ); } SERVER_END_REQ; ... Basically leading to the belief that there is actually an fd. (Ignoring the fact that we need to keep things general) Which, looking at the arch doesn't make much sense... lots of little files would do nobody good. Next time I'll ask before I'm lead to believe what I shouldn't. Greetings, Jaco

1 0

Re: dlls/advapi32/RegFlushKey (Patch 2)
by Alexandre Julliard Oct. 29, 2002

Oct. 29, 2002

"Jaco Greeff" <jaco(a)puxedo.org> writes: > * dlls/advapi32/registry.c: Jaco Greeff <jaco(a)puxedo.org> > - Implemented the RegFlushKey function I'm afraid this can't possibly work. Registry keys don't have an associated file descriptor. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.com

1 0

RE: winapi update
by Patrik Stridvall Oct. 29, 2002

Oct. 29, 2002

I run the swedish version... > You can change the number of the line wrapping. Tools -> > Options -> Mail > Formating -> ... but I'm with you here. > Internet Format -> Plain Text Options. No, I have no such option. I run Microsoft Outlook 2000...

3 2

RE: winapi update
by Rolf Kalbermatter Oct. 29, 2002

Oct. 29, 2002

From: Patrik Stridvall <ps(a)leissner.se> >> You can change the number of the line wrapping. Tools -> >> Options -> Mail >> Formating -> > >... but I'm with you here. > >> Internet Format -> Plain Text Options. > >No, I have no such option. > >I run Microsoft Outlook 2000... Try "Tools -> Options -> Mail Format. Select "Plain Text" in the "Message Format" and click the "Settings" button. Rolf Kalbermatter CIT Engineering Nederland BV tel: +31 (070) 415 9190 Treubstraat 7H fax: +31 (070) 415 9191 2288 EG Rijswijk http://www.citengineering.com Netherlands mailto:rolf.kalbermatter(a)citeng.com

1 0

Re: Bug #321: dlls/msvct/vf[w]printf functions (Patch 2)
by Jaco Greeff Oct. 29, 2002

Oct. 29, 2002

On 29 Oct 2002 10:53:32 -0800, Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.com> wrote : > Still, this only works for vfprintf, vfwprintf > has to output in Unicode so you cannot convert to ASCII or use the > system printf for that. It would probably be easier to grab a printf > implementation from somewhere and convert it to Unicode. Can I swear on this mailing list? Please, I need to. And one would think I've never used the vfwprintf function before the way I'm making all these wrong assumptions. Damnit, I know the Win32 API. *sigh* Luckily my wife got most of the frustrations at my stupidity... On your suggestion: I've looked at the glibc one. No comments. I'll refrain and look a bit more... I do feel that we are making progress however, albeit slowly ;) Do you think it a good idea just doing the ASCII version now and get it into CVS without the W version. (Ripping out the vfwprintf for now.) I can then proceed to make this ASCII implementation into a full "real-prntf" implementation and subsequently, when we are all happy do the Unicode conversion. Basically I'm suggesting breaking it up into small(er) steps. Comments? Greetings, Jaco

2 1