- Wine-Devel - list.winehq.org

Re: Filesystem Regression Test, was: Re: RESEND: Fix return value ...
by Dmitry Timoshkov Jan. 17, 2002

Jan. 17, 2002

"Andriy Palamarchuk" <apa3a(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > For me it looks like we need to keep both tests > together, because we'll want to compare results of W > and A versions. One more advantage - it is easier to > make changes because both versions are in one place. Then we should invent some approach to easily compare two strings: ANSI and Unicode. > What approach we will use with UNICODE tests on Win95 > platform? There is no difference in API between emulated Windows versions from the Wine point of view. -- Dmitry.

2 3

Re: DOSFS_ToFCBFormat Bug Fix
by Ove Kaaven Jan. 16, 2002

Jan. 16, 2002

On Sun, 13 Jan 2002 ccrayne(a)crayne.org wrote: > Change Log: > files/dos_fs.c > ccrayne(a)crayne.org > Fixed bug in DOSFS_ToFCBFormat which caused "*" to parse as "*." instead > of as "*.*" This sounds like intended behaviour. Under real DOS, "*" really means "*.". The user must type "*.*" to get all files. (This is the stuff that used to confuse DOS users converting to Linux - "*.*" no longer meant all files...) Also, your mailer seems to mangle your patches. You may want to attach them instead of pasting them to avoid that.

4 4

Re: user32.TrackMouseEvent
by David Elliott Jan. 16, 2002

Jan. 16, 2002

On 2002.01.15 11:37 Rein Klazes wrote: > hi, > > to implement user32.TrackMouseEvent: > > Changelog: > dlls/comctl32/ : commctrl.c > dlls/user/ : user32.spec > windows/ : input.c > include/ : winuser.h > > Move the implementation of comctl32._TrackMouseEvent to > user32.TrackMouseEvent and call this function in accordance > with the specs. > Man, it must not be my week. I did the exact same thing two days ago ('cept I put the TME stuff into windows/tme.c instead of adding it to input.c). Was part of making IE work as mentioned in my last mail regarding the stumbling block I hit with DPA that Aric has figured out. That'll teach me to leave patches sitting around in my tree for a couple days. -Dave

1 0

Re: common controls updown patch
by David Elliott Jan. 16, 2002

Jan. 16, 2002

On 2002.01.14 14:45 Shane Shields wrote: > hi all > > this is just a little patch to fix the UPDOWN_GetArrowRect function where > the > midpoint is calculated by adding 1 to odd numbers. before it just added 1 > to > every number now it tests for odd numbers before adding. > > Shane > > Thanks Dan for the tips > > Changelog: > > Shane Shields locutus(a)all.at > > updown.c UPDOWN_GetArrowRect function > added odd number checking > --- ./dlls/comctl32/updown.c.orig Mon Jan 14 20:35:07 2002 > +++ ./dlls/comctl32/updown.c Sun Jan 13 17:28:18 2002 > @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ > -/* > +/* > * Updown control > * > * Copyright 1997 Dimitrie O. Paun > @@ -176,14 +176,16 @@ > * round the uneven numbers by adding 1. > */ > if (dwStyle & UDS_HORZ) { > - len = rect->right - rect->left + 1; /* compute the width */ > + len = rect->right - rect->left; /* compute the width */ > + if (len % 2 != 0 ) len ++; /* if not an even number then add 1 */ > if (incr) > - rect->left = rect->left + len/2; > + rect->left = rect->left + len/2; > else > rect->right = rect->left + len/2; > } > else { > - len = rect->bottom - rect->top + 1; /* compute the height */ > + len = rect->bottom - rect->top; /* compute the height */ > + if (len % 2 != 0 ) len ++; /* if not an even number then add 1 */ > if (incr) > rect->bottom = rect->top + len/2; > else > The remainder of any even number divided by two is 0, the remainder of any odd number divided by two is 1. Knowing this doesn't: len+=(len%2); make more sense. Leave the comment as is for clarity if you wish. -Dave

1 0

Re: basic structures for async IO in winsock
by lawson_whitney＠juno.com Jan. 16, 2002

Jan. 16, 2002

On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, Martin Wilck wrote: > > Patch: async-winsock.diff > Applies: CVS 2002-01-15 > > Introduce data structures and basic functions for asynchronous > Winsock2 operations. > > ChangeLog: > > include/winsock2.h: Fix LPWSAOVERLAPPED declaration. > dlls/winsock/socket.c: Add basic data strutures & functions for overlapped IO > in Winsock. > Juno 4 without the async winsock patches.

1 0

16 bit menus
by lawson_whitney＠juno.com Jan. 16, 2002

Jan. 16, 2002

Good day! Last time but one I tested juno 1.49 for regressions in 16 bit comms, it downloaded a new list of access numbers. Next it presented me with the attached menu (well, I attached a trace of it making the menu), which it expects me to work through and select a new number. Unfortunately, the menu seems to be either 0 or 1 pixels high and I can't find any of the controls in there. If somebody can tell me what parameter to what function provokes this, maybe I can work out a way to fix it. Of course, anybody who knows what [s]he is doing with menus is welcome to fix it, too. I have used this menu with this app, but not for perhaps a year. Lawson

1 0

[PATCH] Overlapped recv(), WSARecv()
by Martin Wilck Jan. 16, 2002

Jan. 16, 2002

This patch needs testing yet - I am sending it for people to review and point out errors right from the start. Currently I only verified that it compiles. ChangeLog: implement overlapped recv(), much like overlapped IO in files/file.c. make WS2_32 WSARecvFrom() the "working" function, all others are wrappers only. implement WSAGetOverlappedResult(). NOTE: My patches submitted yesterday and today (16/01) to wine-patches are necessary for this one to work. CVS base version is 2002-01-15. Martin -- Martin Wilck Phone: +49 5251 8 15113 Fujitsu Siemens Computers Fax: +49 5251 8 20409 Heinz-Nixdorf-Ring 1 mailto:Martin.Wilck(a)Fujitsu-Siemens.com D-33106 Paderborn http://www.fujitsu-siemens.com/primergy diff -ruX diffignore CVS/wine/dlls/winsock/socket.c MW/wine/dlls/winsock/socket.c --- CVS/wine/dlls/winsock/socket.c Wed Jan 16 18:14:19 2002 +++ MW/wine/dlls/winsock/socket.c Wed Jan 16 18:18:27 2002 @@ -85,6 +85,7 @@ #include "wine/winbase16.h" #include "wingdi.h" #include "winuser.h" +#include "winerror.h" #include "winsock2.h" #include "ws2tcpip.h" #include "wsipx.h" @@ -95,7 +96,6 @@ #include "file.h" #include "debugtools.h" - DEFAULT_DEBUG_CHANNEL(winsock); /* critical section to protect some non-rentrant net function */ @@ -167,11 +167,22 @@ if ( !as->user_overlapped ) HeapFree ( GetProcessHeap(), 0, as->overlapped ); + else + /* FIXME: is this correct? How else can we communicate the flags + to WSAGetOverlappedResult() ? */ + as->overlapped->Offset = as->flags; HeapFree ( GetProcessHeap(), 0, as->iovec ); HeapFree ( GetProcessHeap(), 0, as ); } +static void CALLBACK ws2_default_completion ( DWORD dwError, DWORD cbTransferred, + LPWSAOVERLAPPED lpOverlapped, + DWORD dwFlags ) +{ + NtSetEvent ( lpOverlapped->hEvent, NULL ); +} + /****************************************************************/ /* ----------------------------------- internal data */ @@ -307,14 +318,19 @@ static char* check_buffer(int size); -static int _get_sock_fd(SOCKET s) +static int _get_sock_fd_type (SOCKET s, enum fd_type *type, DWORD *flags) { - int fd = FILE_GetUnixHandle( s, GENERIC_READ ); + int fd = FILE_GetUnixHandleType ( s, GENERIC_READ, type, flags ); if (fd == -1) FIXME("handle %d is not a socket (GLE %ld)\n",s,GetLastError()); return fd; } +static int _get_sock_fd (SOCKET s) +{ + return _get_sock_fd_type (s, NULL, NULL); +} + static void _enable_event(SOCKET s, unsigned int event, unsigned int sstate, unsigned int cstate) { @@ -1887,34 +1903,16 @@ */ int WINAPI WS_recv(SOCKET s, char *buf, int len, int flags) { - int fd = _get_sock_fd(s); + DWORD n; + WSABUF wsabuf = { len, buf }; + DWORD dwFlags = flags; TRACE("socket %04x, buf %8x, len %d, flags %d\n", s, (unsigned)buf, len, flags); - if (fd != -1) - { - INT length; - - if (_is_blocking(s)) - { - /* block here */ - /* FIXME: OOB and exceptfds? */ - do_block(fd, 1); - } - if ((length = recv(fd, buf, len, flags)) >= 0) - { - TRACE(" -> %i bytes\n", length); - - close(fd); - _enable_event(s, FD_READ, 0, 0); - return length; - } - SetLastError(wsaErrno()); - close(fd); - } - else SetLastError(WSAENOTSOCK); - WARN(" -> ERROR\n"); - return SOCKET_ERROR; + if ( WSARecv (s, &wsabuf, 1, &n, &dwFlags, NULL, NULL) == SOCKET_ERROR ) + return SOCKET_ERROR; + else + return n; } /*********************************************************************** @@ -1932,60 +1930,14 @@ int WINAPI WS_recvfrom(SOCKET s, char *buf, INT len, int flags, struct WS_sockaddr *from, int *fromlen) { - int fd = _get_sock_fd(s); - int res; - - TRACE("socket %04x, ptr %08x, len %d, flags %d\n", s, (unsigned)buf, len, flags); -#if DEBUG_SOCKADDR - if (from) - dump_sockaddr(from); - else - DPRINTF("from = NULL\n"); -#endif + DWORD n; + WSABUF wsabuf = { len, buf }; + DWORD dwFlags = flags; - res=SOCKET_ERROR; - if (fd != -1) - { - struct sockaddr* uaddr; - int uaddrlen; - int length; - - if (_is_blocking(s)) - { - /* block here */ - /* FIXME: OOB and exceptfds */ - do_block(fd, 1); - } - - uaddr=ws_sockaddr_alloc(from,fromlen,&uaddrlen); - length=recvfrom(fd, buf, len, flags, uaddr, &uaddrlen); - if (length < 0) - { - SetLastError(wsaErrno()); - WARN(" -> ERROR\n"); - } - else if (ws_sockaddr_u2ws(uaddr,uaddrlen,from,fromlen) != 0) - { - /* The from buffer was too small, but we read the data - * anyway. Is that really bad? - */ - SetLastError(WSAEFAULT); - WARN(" -> WSAEFAULT\n"); - } - else - { - TRACE(" -> %i bytes\n", length); - _enable_event(s, FD_READ, 0, 0); - res=length; - } - close(fd); - } + if ( WSARecvFrom (s, &wsabuf, 1, &n, &dwFlags, from, fromlen, NULL, NULL) == SOCKET_ERROR ) + return SOCKET_ERROR; else - { - SetLastError(WSAENOTSOCK); - WARN(" -> WSAENOTSOCK\n"); - } - return res; + return n; } /*********************************************************************** @@ -2811,6 +2763,44 @@ return SOCKET_ERROR; } +/********************************************************************** + * WSAGetOverlappedResult (WS2_32.40) + */ +BOOL WINAPI WSAGetOverlappedResult ( SOCKET s, LPWSAOVERLAPPED lpOverlapped, + LPDWORD lpcbTransfer, BOOL fWait, + LPDWORD lpdwFlags ) +{ + DWORD r; + + TRACE ( "socket %d ovl %p trans %p, wait %d flags %p\n", + s, lpOverlapped, lpcbTransfer, fWait, lpdwFlags ); + + if ( !(lpOverlapped && lpOverlapped->hEvent) ) + { + ERR ( "Invalid pointer\n" ); + WSASetLastError (WSA_INVALID_PARAMETER); + return FALSE; + } + + do { + TRACE("waiting on %p\n",lpOverlapped); + r = WaitForSingleObjectEx (lpOverlapped->hEvent, fWait ? INFINITE : 0, TRUE); + TRACE("wait on %p returned %ld\n",lpOverlapped,r); + } while (r == STATUS_USER_APC); + + if ( lpcbTransfer ) + *lpcbTransfer = lpOverlapped->InternalHigh; + + if ( lpdwFlags ) + *lpdwFlags = lpOverlapped->Offset; /* see ws2_async_call_completion */ + + if (lpOverlapped->Internal == STATUS_PENDING ) + WSASetLastError ( WSA_IO_INCOMPLETE ); + + return (r == WAIT_OBJECT_0); +} + + /*********************************************************************** * WINSOCK_DoAsyncSelect */ @@ -3481,34 +3471,267 @@ /*********************************************************************** + * WSARecv (WS2_32.67) + */ +int WINAPI WSARecv (SOCKET s, LPWSABUF lpBuffers, DWORD dwBufferCount, + LPDWORD NumberOfBytesReceived, LPDWORD lpFlags, + LPWSAOVERLAPPED lpOverlapped, + LPWSAOVERLAPPED_COMPLETION_ROUTINE lpCompletionRoutine) +{ + + return WSARecvFrom (s, lpBuffers, dwBufferCount, NumberOfBytesReceived, lpFlags, + NULL, NULL, lpOverlapped, lpCompletionRoutine); + +} + +/*********************************************************************** + * WS2_recv (INTERNAL) + */ +static int WS2_recv (int fd, struct iovec* iov, int count, + struct WS_sockaddr *lpFrom, LPINT lpFromlen, LPDWORD lpFlags) +{ + /* Uses recvmsg() in order to provide scatter-gather I/O */ + struct msghdr hdr; + int n; + TRACE ( "fd %d, iovec %p, count %d addr %p, len %p, flags %lx\n", + fd, iov, count, lpFrom, lpFromlen, *lpFlags); + + hdr.msg_name = NULL; + + if ( lpFrom ) + { +#if DEBUG_SOCKADDR + dump_sockaddr (lpFrom); +#endif + + hdr.msg_namelen = *lpFromlen; + hdr.msg_name = ws_sockaddr_alloc (lpFrom, lpFromlen, &hdr.msg_namelen); + if ( !hdr.msg_name ) + { + WSASetLastError ( WSAENOBUFS ); + n = -1; + goto out; + } + } + else + hdr.msg_namelen = 0; + + hdr.msg_iov = iov; + hdr.msg_iovlen = count; + hdr.msg_control = NULL; + hdr.msg_controllen = 0; + hdr.msg_flags = 0; + + if ( (n = recvmsg (fd, &hdr, *lpFlags)) == -1 ) + goto out; + + if ( lpFrom && + ws_sockaddr_u2ws ( hdr.msg_name, hdr.msg_namelen, + lpFrom, lpFromlen ) != 0 ) + { + /* The from buffer was too small, but we read the data + * anyway. Is that really bad? + */ + WSASetLastError ( WSAEFAULT ); + WARN ( "Address buffer too small\n" ); + } + +out: + TRACE ( "recvmsg returned %d\n", n ); + + ws_sockaddr_free ( hdr.msg_name, lpFrom ); + return n; +} + + +/*********************************************************************** + * WS2_async_recv (INTERNAL) + */ +static void WS2_async_recv (async_private *as) +{ + ws2_async* wsa = (ws2_async*) as; + int result, err; + + TRACE ( "async %p\n", wsa ); + + result = WS2_recv ( wsa->async.fd, wsa->iovec, wsa->n_iovecs, + wsa->addr, wsa->addrlen, &wsa->flags ); + + if (result >= 0) + { + wsa->overlapped->Internal = STATUS_SUCCESS; + wsa->overlapped->InternalHigh = result; + TRACE ( "received %d bytes\n", result ); + return; + } + + err = errno; + if ( err == EAGAIN || err == EINTR ) + { + wsa->overlapped->Internal = STATUS_PENDING; + TRACE ( "still pending\n" ); + } + else + { + wsa->overlapped->Internal = STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL; + TRACE ( "Error: %d\n", errno ); + } +} + +/*********************************************************************** * WSARecvFrom (WS2_32.69) */ INT WINAPI WSARecvFrom( SOCKET s, LPWSABUF lpBuffers, DWORD dwBufferCount, - LPDWORD lpNumberOfBytesRecvd, LPDWORD lpFlags, struct WS_sockaddr *lpFrom, - LPINT lpFromlen, LPWSAOVERLAPPED lpOverlapped, + LPDWORD lpNumberOfBytesRecvd, LPDWORD lpFlags, + struct WS_sockaddr *lpFrom, LPINT lpFromlen, + LPWSAOVERLAPPED lpOverlapped, LPWSAOVERLAPPED_COMPLETION_ROUTINE lpCompletionRoutine ) { - DWORD dwCount; - INT rc; + struct iovec* iovec; + int fd, i, length, err = WSAENOTSOCK; + enum fd_type type; + DWORD flags; + ws2_async *wsa; + + fd = _get_sock_fd_type (s, &type, &flags); + + TRACE("socket %04x, wsabuf %p, nbufs %ld, flags %ld, from %p, " + "fromlen %ld, ovl %p, func %p, fd %d, type %d, flags %ld\n", + s, lpBuffers, dwBufferCount, *lpFlags, lpFrom, + (lpFromlen ? *lpFromlen : -1L), + lpOverlapped, lpCompletionRoutine, + fd, (int) type, flags); - FIXME( "(%i,%p,%lu,%p,%p,%p,%p,%p,%p: stub\n", - s, lpBuffers, dwBufferCount, lpNumberOfBytesRecvd, lpFlags, - lpFrom, lpFromlen, lpOverlapped, lpCompletionRoutine ); + if (fd == -1) + { + err = WSAENOTSOCK; + goto error; + } - for( dwCount = 0, rc = 0; dwCount < dwBufferCount; dwCount++ ) - { + iovec = HeapAlloc (GetProcessHeap(), 0, + dwBufferCount * sizeof (struct iovec) ); + if ( !iovec ) + { + err = WSAENOBUFS; + goto err_close; + } - if( ( rc = WS_recvfrom(s, lpBuffers[ dwCount ].buf, (INT)lpBuffers[ dwCount ].len, - (INT)*lpFlags, lpFrom, lpFromlen ) ) != 0 ) + for (i = 0; i < dwBufferCount; i++) { - break; + iovec[i].iov_base = lpBuffers[i].buf; + iovec[i].iov_len = lpBuffers[i].len; } - } + if ( (lpOverlapped || lpCompletionRoutine) && flags & FD_FLAG_OVERLAPPED ) + { + /* Asynchronous recv */ - return rc; -} + wsa = HeapAlloc ( GetProcessHeap(), 0, sizeof (ws2_async) ); + if ( !wsa ) + { + err = WSAENOBUFS; + goto err_free; + } + + wsa->async.ops = &ws2_async_ops; + wsa->async.handle = (HANDLE) s; + wsa->async.fd = fd; + wsa->async.type = ASYNC_TYPE_READ; + wsa->async.func = WS2_async_recv; + wsa->user_overlapped = lpOverlapped; + if ( lpOverlapped ) + wsa->overlapped = lpOverlapped; + else + { + wsa->overlapped = HeapAlloc ( GetProcessHeap(), 0, + sizeof (WSAOVERLAPPED) ); + if ( !wsa->overlapped ) + { + err = WSAENOBUFS; + goto err_free_as; + } + } + wsa->completion_func = ( lpCompletionRoutine ? + lpCompletionRoutine : ws2_default_completion ); + wsa->iovec = iovec; + wsa->n_iovecs = dwBufferCount; + wsa->addr = lpFrom; + wsa->addrlen = lpFromlen; + wsa->flags = *lpFlags; + + wsa->overlapped->Internal = STATUS_USER_APC; + wsa->overlapped->InternalHigh = 0; + TRACE ( "async %p, overlapped: %p, user overlapped: %p, completion: %p\n", + wsa, wsa->overlapped, wsa->user_overlapped, wsa->completion_func ); + + if ( !register_async ( &wsa->async ) ) + { + err = wsaErrno (); + goto err_free_ov; + } + + /* Check for immediate completion + (only possible if lpOverlapped is non-NULL) */ + if ( !lpOverlapped ) + { + WSASetLastError ( WSA_IO_PENDING ); + return SOCKET_ERROR; + } + else if ( WSAGetOverlappedResult ( (HANDLE) s, lpOverlapped, + lpNumberOfBytesRecvd, FALSE, lpFlags) ) + { + return 0; + } + else if ( WSAGetLastError () == WSA_IO_INCOMPLETE ) + { + WSASetLastError ( WSA_IO_PENDING ); + return SOCKET_ERROR; + } + else + goto err_free_ov; + } + + /* Synchronous recv */ + + if (_is_blocking(s)) + { + /* block here */ + /* FIXME: OOB and exceptfds? */ + do_block(fd, 1); + } + + length = WS2_recv ( fd, iovec, dwBufferCount, lpFrom, lpFromlen, lpFlags ); + if ( length == -1 ) + { + err = wsaErrno(); + goto err_free; + } + + TRACE(" -> %i bytes\n", length); + + *lpNumberOfBytesRecvd = length; + + WS_FREE (iovec); + close(fd); + _enable_event(s, FD_READ, 0, 0); + + return 0; + +err_free_ov: + if ( !wsa->user_overlapped ) + HeapFree ( GetProcessHeap(), 0, wsa->overlapped ); +err_free_as: + HeapFree ( GetProcessHeap(), 0, wsa ); +err_free: + WS_FREE (iovec); +err_close: + close (fd); +error: + WARN(" -> ERROR %d\n", err); + SetLastError ( err ); + return SOCKET_ERROR; +} /*********************************************************************** * WSCInstallProvider (WS2_32.88) diff -ruX diffignore CVS/wine/dlls/winsock/ws2_32.spec MW/wine/dlls/winsock/ws2_32.spec --- CVS/wine/dlls/winsock/ws2_32.spec Tue Jan 15 20:17:38 2002 +++ MW/wine/dlls/winsock/ws2_32.spec Wed Jan 16 18:13:36 2002 @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ 37 stub WSAEnumProtocolsA 38 stub WSAEnumProtocolsW 39 stdcall WSAEventSelect(long long long) WSAEventSelect -40 stub WSAGetOverlappedResult +40 stdcall WSAGetOverlappedResult(long ptr ptr long ptr) WSAGetOverlappedResult 41 stub WSAGetQOSByName 42 stub WSAGetServiceClassInfoA 43 stub WSAGetServiceClassInfoW @@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ 64 stub WSANtohl 65 stub WSANtohs 66 stub WSAProviderConfigChange -67 stub WSARecv +67 stdcall WSARecv(long ptr long ptr ptr ptr ptr) WSARecv 68 stub WSARecvDisconnect 69 stdcall WSARecvFrom(long ptr long ptr ptr ptr ptr ptr ptr ) WSARecvFrom 70 stub WSARemoveServiceClass diff -ruX diffignore CVS/wine/files/file.c MW/wine/files/file.c --- CVS/wine/files/file.c Wed Jan 16 18:14:09 2002 +++ MW/wine/files/file.c Wed Jan 16 17:34:34 2002 @@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ * Retrieve the Unix handle corresponding to a file handle. * Returns -1 on failure. */ -static int FILE_GetUnixHandleType( HANDLE handle, DWORD access, enum fd_type *type, DWORD *flags ) +int FILE_GetUnixHandleType( HANDLE handle, DWORD access, enum fd_type *type, DWORD *flags ) { int ret, fd = -1; diff -ruX diffignore CVS/wine/include/file.h MW/wine/include/file.h --- CVS/wine/include/file.h Wed Jan 16 18:14:04 2002 +++ MW/wine/include/file.h Wed Jan 16 18:15:12 2002 @@ -12,6 +12,9 @@ #include "winbase.h" #include "wine/windef16.h" /* HFILE16 */ +/* FIXME: including server/protocol.h here leads to a handle_t type conflict elsewhere */ +enum fd_type; /* declared in server_protocol.h */ + #define MAX_PATHNAME_LEN 1024 /* Definition of a full DOS file name */ @@ -97,6 +100,7 @@ extern int FILE_strncasecmp( const char *str1, const char *str2, int len ); extern void FILE_SetDosError(void); extern HANDLE FILE_DupUnixHandle( int fd, DWORD access, BOOL inherit ); +extern int FILE_GetUnixHandleType ( HANDLE handle, DWORD access, enum fd_type *type, DWORD *flags ); extern int FILE_GetUnixHandle( HANDLE handle, DWORD access ); extern BOOL FILE_Stat( LPCSTR unixName, BY_HANDLE_FILE_INFORMATION *info ); extern HFILE16 FILE_Dup2( HFILE16 hFile1, HFILE16 hFile2 );

2 1

Re: SHGetSpecialFolderLocation function
by juergen.schmied＠debitel.net Jan. 16, 2002

Jan. 16, 2002

> What I've found though with the SHGetSpecialFolderLocation, is that it seems > to me that it is designed to allow the caller to pick an arbitrary value for > the CSIDL, and that this will cause windows to create a new CSIDL. As the > function's implementation currently stands, it has a hard-coded table of > possible CSIDLs, and rejects calls with unknown CSIDLs. This is right. There is a list with valid CSIDL's. These CSIDL's are mapped to a unique value name in the registry. These functions are supposed to fail when called with a CSIDL which is not predefined. (Whats not saying wine knows all CSIDL's). > Has anyone else looked at this function, and does anyone have any comments or > suggestions on ways to address this? I'm thinking that these values probably > need to go into the registry, or something, rather than being stored in the > code... There is only a need to store the values in the registry when the path is different from the default value. If the there are no registry entrys in HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\ Explorer\Shell Folders HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\ Explorer\User Shell Folders HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVer sion\Explorer\Sh ell Folders HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVer sion\Explorer\Us er Shell Folders the the default values are used. (Was in w95, nt4 like this. Don't know it its true for w2k since apparently most values are set at installation time and there are more values used than before.) Last but the not least: the current implementation was designed to work without much preset values in the registry to simplify the installation. The implementation should be cleaned up starting with ShGetFolderLocation since this is the common base of SHGetFolderLocation, SHGetFolderPath, SHGetSpecialFolderLocationand SHGetSpecialFolderPath and you should have a fallback to deal with a empty registry. (I'm not up to date with the wine installation procedure but the installer would have to put many keys in the registry for a good shell32 konfiguration.) Juergen --- juergen.schmied(a)debitel.net

1 0

Re: [PATCH] Overlapped recv(), WSARecv()
by lawson_whitney＠juno.com Jan. 16, 2002

Jan. 16, 2002

> > This patch needs testing yet - I am sending it for people to > review and point out errors right from the start. > > Currently I only verified that it compiles. > > ChangeLog: > implement overlapped recv(), much like overlapped IO in > files/file.c. > make WS2_32 WSARecvFrom() the "working" function, > all others are wrappers only. > implement WSAGetOverlappedResult(). > > NOTE: My patches submitted yesterday and today (16/01) to wine-patches > are necessary for this one to work. CVS base version is 2002-01-15. > > Martin > > -- Just to add insult to injury, this letter is by juno version 4 using winsocks, this patch and the 3 others mentioned above. Had to use patch -l again. It doesn't constitute a test for asynchronous winsocks, but at least the patches don't break my mail apps. Maybe. Lawson

1 1

RE: What are you really aiming to do with winetest?
by Patrik Stridvall Jan. 16, 2002

Jan. 16, 2002

> Patrik Stridvall <ps(a)leissner.se> writes: > > > Perhaps you remember me wanting to extend the .spec files > > with information whether a ptr/str was [in], [out], [in/out] > > > > In Perl all string, like in C, are read/write, so I think > > we can live without it. > > > > But return type would be nice to have in the .spec files. > > We discussed this before; I agree it would be nice to have a lot more > information like in/out, return values, more detailed types, etc. But > I don't think the spec file is the right place for that. I'd like the > spec to remain simple (and in fact to even be simplified) and to > contain only the minimal info needed to generate a correct dll. Yes, I remember. I just pointed out the possibillity, in case you had changed your mind. > All > the rest that's used for debug/testing should be moved somewhere else, > preferably directly into the code. So what you basicly want is something like: my %return_type_exceptions; $return_type_exceptions{"foo"} = { Bar => "str", Baz => "ptr" }; $return_type_exceptions{"bar"} = { Foo => "str" }; A file in this format could quite easily be generated by an appropriate script as well.

2 1