On Jan 12, 2015 12:56 AM, "Ken Sharp" <imwellcushtymelike@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 11/01/15 12:07, Nikolay Sivov wrote:
>>
>> On 11.01.2015 14:33, Ken Sharp wrote:
>>>
>>> ������ ������ ������ { "win7",������ ������ ������ ������ "Windows 7",������ ������ ������ ������ ������6,������ 1,
>>> 0x1DB1,VER_PLATFORM_WIN32_NT, "Service Pack 1", 1, 0, "WinNT"},
>>> ������ ������ ������ { "vista",������ ������ ������ ������"Windows Vista",������ ������ ������6,������ 0,
>>> 0x1772,VER_PLATFORM_WIN32_NT, "Service Pack 2", 2, 0, "WinNT"},
>>> ������ #ifdef _WIN64
>>> -������ ������ { "winxp64",������ ������ ������"Windows XP",������ ������ ������ ������ 5,������ 2, 0xECE,
>>> VER_PLATFORM_WIN32_NT, "Service Pack 2", 2, 0, "WinNT"},
>>> -#else
>>> -������ ������ { "winxp",������ ������ ������ ������"Windows XP",������ ������ ������ ������ 5,������ 1, 0xA28,
>>> VER_PLATFORM_WIN32_NT, "Service Pack 3", 3, 0, "WinNT"},
>>> +������ ������ { "winxp64",������ ������ ������"Windows XP x64",������ ������ 5,������ 2, 0xECE,
>>> VER_PLATFORM_WIN32_NT, "Service Pack 2", 2, 0, "WinNT"},
>>> ������ #endif
>>> +������ ������ { "winxp",������ ������ ������ ������"Windows XP",������ ������ ������ ������ 5,������ 1, 0xA28,
>>> VER_PLATFORM_WIN32_NT, "Service Pack 3", 3, 0, "WinNT"},
>>
>>
>> If we're doing this it should be called "winxp" in both cases, we don't
>> have "win764", so why XP should be different?
>
>
> Because Windows XP and Windows XP x64 Edition are different versions entirely.

Right, but there isn't the case where Windows xp is 64 bit and not xp64. A 64 bit prefix shouldn't be able to pretend to be a (non-existent) 32 bit version.