j
k
j a
j l
Alexandre Julliard wrote:
......since a server call is much more expensive than a Windows system call. Would using shm fix that? No, you don't want to put the message queue in shared memory, that's not reliable.
...since a server call is much more expensive than a Windows system call. Would using shm fix that? No, you don't want to put the message queue in shared memory, that's not reliable.
since a server call is much more expensive than a Windows system call. Would using shm fix that? No, you don't want to put the message queue in shared memory, that's not reliable.
shm + kernel handles for synchronization then? Felix
Back to the thread
Back to the list
