winetest reporting http://test.winehq.org/data/200404192305/
First of all, the report on http://test.winehq.org/data/200404192305/ is VERY pretty. Almost get misty eyed here. ;-) Things are coming along very nicely. Anyway, I am curious what happens if I run winetest.exe in Wine. Will it get reported accurately as Wine, or will it get misrepresented in for instance the XP column? regards, Jakob
Jakob Eriksson <jakov(a)vmlinux.org> writes:
Anyway, I am curious what happens if I run winetest.exe in Wine. Will it get reported accurately as Wine, or will it get misrepresented in for instance the XP column?
Yes, it will get misrepresented as the emulated Windows version. We simply use GetVersionEx. -- Feri.
Ferenc Wagner wrote:
Jakob Eriksson <jakov(a)vmlinux.org> writes:
Anyway, I am curious what happens if I run winetest.exe in Wine. Will it get reported accurately as Wine, or will it get misrepresented in for instance the XP column?
Yes, it will get misrepresented as the emulated Windows version. We simply use GetVersionEx.
That's what I figured... Ooops. Because then I think some of the XP results are actually me running the test in Wine. I should have thought of that way back in august... I will try to find a way for winetest.exe to detect Wine... Jakob
Ferenc Wagner wrote:
Jakob Eriksson <jakov(a)vmlinux.org> writes:
Anyway, I am curious what happens if I run winetest.exe in Wine. Will it get reported accurately as Wine, or will it get misrepresented in for instance the XP column?
Yes, it will get misrepresented as the emulated Windows version. We simply use GetVersionEx.
The FAQ is still lacking... I agree, it is kind of tacky to not give a straight answer. http://www.winehq.com/hypermail/wine-devel/2002/10/0715.html http://www.winehq.org/site/docs/wine-faq/index regards, Jakob
On Tue, 20 Apr 2004, Jakob Eriksson wrote:
First of all, the report on http://test.winehq.org/data/200404192305/ is VERY pretty.
Hmmm, I know beauty is in the eye of the beholder and all but... I would suggest reusing the same green, orange and red colors (1) as on the status page: http://www.winehq.org/site/status Yeah, let's say it's for consistency's sake<g>. (1) E.g., take green, orange and red from the Good, Poor and Nonexistent cells. PS: I just noticed that there's a bug in the status page. 'Good' is not readable. The text must have got the same color as the background somehow. -- Francois Gouget fgouget(a)free.fr http://fgouget.free.fr/ $live{free} || die "";
Francois Gouget wrote:
On Tue, 20 Apr 2004, Jakob Eriksson wrote:
First of all, the report on http://test.winehq.org/data/200404192305/ is VERY pretty.
Hmmm, I know beauty is in the eye of the beholder and all but... I would suggest reusing the same green, orange and red colors (1) as on the status page:
http://www.winehq.org/site/status
Yeah, let's say it's for consistency's sake<g>.
That sounds good. Can we also ditch the zero (0), since it doesn't add any information. Naturally, 0 tests failed if it is OK. regards, Jakob
Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
On April 20, 2004 7:50 pm, Jakob Eriksson wrote:
That sounds good. Can we also ditch the zero (0), since it doesn't add any information. Naturally, 0 tests failed if it is OK.
Well, I kinda like the 0.
The fanboy I am, I better start liking it too, then. :-) regards, Jakob
participants (4)
-
Dimitrie O. Paun -
Ferenc Wagner -
Francois Gouget -
Jakob Eriksson