Re: Re: cleaning the source tree when compiling outside the source tree

[Pouech Eric DMI AEI CAEN]

> I don't think we should do that. IMO we must not modify the source
> tree in any way when building in a separate dir.
> It depends which files we're talking about
> I think that *~ (and any editor backup files), *rej* *orig* (patch leftovers), .#* (cvs update leftovers) should be removed from the source tree
> perhaps we need to seperate the semantics from clean and distclean. but at least, from a distclean point of view, I do think it would be great to remove the hereabove mentionned files from the source tree
> A+

cleaning the source tree when compiling outside the source tree

[Alexandre Julliard]

Pouech Eric DMI AEI CAEN <pouech-eric(a)wanadoo.fr> writes:
> I think that *~ (and any editor backup files), *rej* *orig* (patch
> leftovers), .#* (cvs update leftovers) should be removed from the
> source tree perhaps we need to seperate the semantics from clean and
> distclean. but at least, from a distclean point of view, I do think
> it would be great to remove the hereabove mentionned files from the
> source tree

I think it's better to not touch the source tree at all, and that
seems to be the common practice with out of tree builds. If you want
to clean the source tree you can always do ./configure; make distclean.

-- 
Alexandre Julliard
julliard(a)winehq.com