[PATCH v2 2/2] user32/listbox: Use is_item_selected in GetSelCount and GetSelItems

[Huw Davies]

From: Gabriel Ivăncescu <gabrielopcode(a)gmail.com>

Signed-off-by: Gabriel Ivăncescu <gabrielopcode(a)gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Huw Davies <huw(a)codeweavers.com>
---
 dlls/user32/listbox.c | 10 ++++------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/dlls/user32/listbox.c b/dlls/user32/listbox.c
index 0be48673ca..826ce01cc4 100644
--- a/dlls/user32/listbox.c
+++ b/dlls/user32/listbox.c
@@ -1066,13 +1066,12 @@ static INT LISTBOX_FindString( LB_DESCR *descr, INT start, LPCWSTR str, BOOL exa
 static LRESULT LISTBOX_GetSelCount( const LB_DESCR *descr )
 {
     INT i, count;
-    const LB_ITEMDATA *item = descr->items;
 
     if (!(descr->style & LBS_MULTIPLESEL) ||
         (descr->style & LBS_NOSEL))
       return LB_ERR;
-    for (i = count = 0; i < descr->nb_items; i++, item++)
-        if (item->selected) count++;
+    for (i = count = 0; i < descr->nb_items; i++)
+        if (is_item_selected(descr, i)) count++;
     return count;
 }
 
@@ -1083,11 +1082,10 @@ static LRESULT LISTBOX_GetSelCount( const LB_DESCR *descr )
 static LRESULT LISTBOX_GetSelItems( const LB_DESCR *descr, INT max, LPINT array )
 {
     INT i, count;
-    const LB_ITEMDATA *item = descr->items;
 
     if (!(descr->style & LBS_MULTIPLESEL)) return LB_ERR;
-    for (i = count = 0; (i < descr->nb_items) && (count < max); i++, item++)
-        if (item->selected) array[count++] = i;
+    for (i = count = 0; (i < descr->nb_items) && (count < max); i++)
+        if (is_item_selected(descr, i)) array[count++] = i;
     return count;
 }
 
-- 
2.18.0

[Marvin]

Hi,

While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?

Full results can be found at:
https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=48225

Your paranoid android.


=== debian9 (64 bit WoW report) ===

user32:
msg.c:8713: Test failed: WaitForSingleObject failed 102
msg.c:8719: Test failed: destroy child on thread exit: 0: the msg 0x0082 was expected, but got msg 0x000f instead
msg.c:8719: Test failed: destroy child on thread exit: 1: the msg 0x000f was expected, but got msg 0x0014 instead
msg.c:8719: Test failed: destroy child on thread exit: 2: the msg sequence is not complete: expected 0014 - actual 0000