Re: Repackaging Mozilla ActiveX control to include MSVCP60.DLL? [FIXED]

[Tony Lambregts]

I dont normally top post ;^) but this time it makes sense to. This (replied to) 
email is not archived in the Piper Mail archive correctly although it looks fine 
here. In the  pipermail archive there is only a pgp signature. This is not the 
first time I have seen this, it seems that Piper Mail grabs the pgp signature 
and does not archive the patch which makes the archive less usefull. If you ask 
me this is what I would call a bug in pipermail.

http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2006-January/023490.html


Between this bug and the lack of dates in the archive I really getting to 
despise pipermail. So... I went looking at the alternative and thought of GMANE 
and it turns out that this patch is not archived there at all. In fact the last 
patch by Jonathan Ernst that was archived by GMANE is 2005-12-19 16:28:02 GMT 
and I know that there are more after that date.

http://search.gmane.org/?query=&email=Jonathan+Ernst&group=gmane.comp.emulat...

So now I'm really starting to get upset because we have no reliable archive and 
that just sucks. Has anyone got any ideas on how to fix this.

--

Tony Lambregts

Jonathan Ernst wrote:
> Le dimanche 15 janvier 2006 à 07:40 -0800, Dan Kegel a écrit :
> > On 1/15/06, Ge van Geldorp <gvg(a)reactos.org> wrote:
> > > > The Mozilla ActiveX control download feature is cool and all,
> > > > but until we repackage the sucker to include MSVCP60.DLL to fix
> > > > http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4064 ...
> > > > I could have sworn I saw somebody post a note saying they had
> > > > done said repackaging, but I can't find it now...
> > >
> > > http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2005-December/022795.html
> > > Instructions on how to repackage can be found at
> > > svn://svn.reactos.org/trunk/tools/MozillaControl/
> >
> > Thanks!  I've updated bug 4064.  Now can somebody
> > update winehq.org's copy of the control so we can close that bug?
> > - Dan
> >
> > --
> > Wine for Windows ISVs: http://kegel.com/wine/isv
>
> Le lundi 16 janvier 2006 à 14:30 +0100, Filip Navara a écrit :
> > Jonathan Ernst wrote:
> > > // Exact size of the file:
> > > $iFileSize = 4771240;
> >
> > Shouldn't you change the file size too?
> >
> > - Filip
>
> Sure, thanks for spotting it ;-)
>
> Changelog:
> - use repackaged Mozilla ActiveX control from ReactOS
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Index: mozactivex.php
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /home/wine/tools/mozactivex.php,v
> retrieving revision 1.1
> diff -u -p -r1.1 mozactivex.php
> --- mozactivex.php	19 Oct 2005 16:17:09 -0000	1.1
> +++ mozactivex.php	16 Jan 2006 14:02:33 -0000
> @@ -14,31 +14,27 @@
>
> // Name of the file
> -$sFileName = "MozillaControl1712.exe";
> +$sFileName = "MozillaControl1712-ReactOS.exe";
>
> // Exact size of the file:
> -$iFileSize = 4771240;
> +$iFileSize = 4735160;
>
> // List of locations
> -$aList = array("http://www.iol.ie/~locka/mozilla/",
> -               "http://osdn.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/wine/",
> -               "http://nchc.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/wine/",
> -               "http://easynews.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/wine/",
> -               "http://mesh.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/wine/",
> -               "http://puzzle.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/wine/",
> -               "http://citkit.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/wine/",
> -               "http://umn.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/wine/",
> -               "http://cogent.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/wine/",
> -               "http://jaist.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/wine/",
> -               "http://surfnet.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/wine/",
> -               "http://peterhost.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/wine/",
> -               "http://ufpr.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/wine/",
> -               "http://optusnet.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/wine/",
> -               "http://keihanna.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/wine/",
> -               "http://heanet.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/wine/",
> -               "http://switch.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/wine/",
> -               "http://internap.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/wine/",
> -               "http://ovh.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/wine/"
> +$aList = array("http://switch.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/reactos/",
> +               "http://surfnet.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/reactos/",
> +               "http://citkit.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/reactos/",
> +               "http://keihanna.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/reactos/",
> +               "http://heanet.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/reactos/",
> +               "http://easynews.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/reactos/",
> +               "http://ovh.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/reactos/",
> +               "http://jaist.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/reactos/",
> +               "http://puzzle.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/reactos/",
> +               "http://nchc.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/reactos/",
> +               "http://switch.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/reactos/",
> +               "http://kent.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/reactos/",
> +               "http://optusnet.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/reactos/",
> +               "http://mesh.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/reactos/",
> +               "http://internap.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/reactos/"
>                 );
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------

Repackaging Mozilla ActiveX control to include MSVCP60.DLL? [FIXED]

[Will L (sent by Nabble.com)]

Tony Lambregts wrote:
> ...
>
> Between this bug and the lack of dates in the archive I really getting to 
> despise pipermail. So... I went looking at the alternative and thought of GMANE 
> and it turns out that this patch is not archived there at all. In fact the last 
> patch by Jonathan Ernst that was archived by GMANE is 2005-12-19 16:28:02 GMT 
> and I know that there are more after that date.
>
> http://search.gmane.org/?query=&email=Jonathan+Ernst&group=gmane.comp.emulat...
>
> So now I'm really starting to get upset because we have no reliable archive and 
> that just sucks. Has anyone got any ideas on how to fix this.
>
> ...

Tony,

Please try the Nabble archive of the Wine lists: http://www.nabble.com/Wine-f924.html - The is the parent Wine archive that combines all the Devel, Users, Patches, Bugs into a single place. 

With regard to the latest patch post by "Jonathan Ernst", Nabble shows it should be Jan 16, 2006. http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-Repackaging-Mozilla-ActiveX-control-to-include-M...

You can simply click the user name link in the thread. That will show you all the posts by a user. To narrow it down, you can click the dropdown box (located at the top) from  "All Dates" to "Past Month", then search again. Also, you can narrow it down by forums (located to the right) to narrow down to the "Wine - Patches" archive.

Nabble is a new project trying to improve online discussions. It archives all the post up to the minute. Hope this helps.

Will L
Nabble.com

--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Repackaging-Mozilla-ActiveX-control-to-include-MSVCP60...
Sent from the Wine - Devel forum at Nabble.com.

Repackaging Mozilla ActiveX control to include MSVCP60.DLL? [FIXED]

[Tony Lambregts]

Will L (sent by Nabble.com) wrote:
> Tony Lambregts wrote:
>     ...
>
> Between this bug and the lack of dates in the archive I really
>     getting to
>     despise pipermail. So... I went looking at the alternative and
>     thought of GMANE
>     and it turns out that this patch is not archived there at all. In
>     fact the last
>     patch by Jonathan Ernst that was archived by GMANE is 2005-12-19
>     16:28:02 GMT
>     and I know that there are more after that date.
>
> http://search.gmane.org/?query=&email=Jonathan+Ernst&group=gmane.comp.emulat...
>     <http://search.gmane.org/?query=&email=Jonathan+Ernst&group=gmane.comp.emulat...>
>
> So now I'm really starting to get upset because we have no reliable
>     archive and
>     that just sucks. Has anyone got any ideas on how to fix this.
>
> ...
>
> Tony,
>
> Please try the Nabble archive of the Wine lists: 
> http://www.nabble.com/Wine-f924.html - The is the parent Wine archive 
> that combines all the Devel, Users, Patches, Bugs into a single place.
>
> With regard to the latest patch post by "Jonathan Ernst", Nabble shows 
> it should be Jan 16, 2006. 
> http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-Repackaging-Mozilla-ActiveX-control-to-include-M...
>
> You can simply click the user name link in the thread. That will show 
> you all the posts by a user. To narrow it down, you can click the 
> dropdown box (located at the top) from  "All Dates" to "Past Month", 
> then search again. Also, you can narrow it down by forums (located to 
> the right) to narrow down to the "Wine - Patches" archive.
>
> Nabble is a new project trying to improve online discussions. It 
> archives all the post up to the minute. Hope this helps.

Thank you for trying but unfortunately it does not help, it does not have the 
patch either. ;^(

 From the link...
--8<---
Changelog:
- use repackaged Mozilla ActiveX control from ReactOS


[attachment removed][attachment removed]
--8<---

So any one else have ideas..

--

Tony Lambregts

Repackaging Mozilla ActiveX control to include MSVCP60.DLL? [FIXED]

[Molle Bestefich]

Tony Lambregts wrote:
> http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2006-January/023490.html

Looks odd with all the MIME in there.
> So... I went looking at the alternative and thought of
> GMANE and it turns out that this patch is not archived there at all.

GMANE snips stuff with X-No-Archive set - just offering pointers.

[snip body of email from Jonathan Ernst]

Would you mind posting the entire email, including headers etc., as an
attachment?
I'd like to take a look at it too but I'm not subscribed to wine-patches =).

Repackaging Mozilla ActiveX control to include MSVCP60.DLL? [FIXED]

[Tony Lambregts]

Molle Bestefich wrote:

>Tony Lambregts wrote:
>  
>
>>http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2006-January/023490.html
>>    
>>
>
>Looks odd with all the MIME in there.
>
>  
>
>>So... I went looking at the alternative and thought of
>>GMANE and it turns out that this patch is not archived there at all.
>>    
>>
>
>GMANE snips stuff with X-No-Archive set - just offering pointers.
>
>[snip body of email from Jonathan Ernst]
>
>Would you mind posting the entire email, including headers etc., as an
>attachment?
>I'd like to take a look at it too but I'm not subscribed to wine-patches =).
>
>  
>
attached is the message source  that I got throught gmane news server. 
(I do not get emails from wine patches even though I am subscribed...)

Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Jonathan Ernst <jonathan(a)ernstfamily.ch>
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.emulators.wine.patches
Subject: Re: Repackaging Mozilla ActiveX control to include MSVCP60.DLL?
	[FIXED]
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 15:05:21 +0100
Lines: 146
Approved: news(a)gmane.org
Message-ID: <1137420321.19535.8.camel(a)localhost>
References: <a71bd89a0601142200i129ec8f0peb4965721fd3c610(a)mail.gmail.com>
	<200601151021.k0FALevx017514(a)mailhost.geldorp.nl>
	<a71bd89a0601150740q21686c09lee0438f8318a6da8(a)mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: wine-devel(a)winehq.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0121623449=="
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1137420449 22397 80.91.229.2 (16 Jan 2006 14:07:29 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet(a)sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 14:07:29 +0000 (UTC)
Original-X-From: wine-patches-bounces(a)winehq.org Mon Jan 16 15:07:24 2006
Return-path: <wine-patches-bounces(a)winehq.org>
Envelope-to: comp-wine-patches(a)gmane.org
Original-Received: from wine.codeweavers.com ([209.32.141.3])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EyV0w-0005FB-AD
	for comp-wine-patches(a)gmane.org; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 15:07:18 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=localhost.localdomain)
	by wine.codeweavers.com with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1EyUzk-00022z-RS; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 08:06:04 -0600
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1])
	by wine.codeweavers.com with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EyUzi-00022n-DL
	for wine-patches(a)winehq.org; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 08:06:02 -0600
Original-Received: from wine.codeweavers.com ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (wine [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP
	id 01730-10 for <wine-patches(a)winehq.org>;
	Mon, 16 Jan 2006 08:06:02 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: from sun3.netoxygen.ch ([193.73.122.103])
	by wine.codeweavers.com with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EyUzX-000206-5u
	for wine-patches(a)winehq.org; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 08:06:02 -0600
Original-Received: from [192.168.1.13] (adsl-62-167-24-207.adslplus.ch [62.167.24.207])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by sun3.netoxygen.ch (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k0GE5SjV011432;
	Mon, 16 Jan 2006 15:05:29 +0100
Original-To: Filip Navara <xnavara(a)volny.cz>, wine-patches(a)winehq.org
In-Reply-To: <a71bd89a0601150740q21686c09lee0438f8318a6da8(a)mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.2.1 
X-Auth_User: ernstfamily.ch1
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 193.73.122.103
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on wine
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.6 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=ham version=3.0.3
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at codeweavers.com
X-BeenThere: wine-patches(a)winehq.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Wine Patch Submissions <wine-patches.winehq.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.winehq.org/mailman/listinfo/wine-patches>,
	<mailto:wine-patches-request(a)winehq.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches>
List-Post: <mailto:wine-patches(a)winehq.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wine-patches-request(a)winehq.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.winehq.org/mailman/listinfo/wine-patches>,
	<mailto:wine-patches-request(a)winehq.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Mime-version: 1.0
Original-Sender: wine-patches-bounces(a)winehq.org
Errors-To: wine-patches-bounces(a)winehq.org
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: wine-patches-bounces(a)winehq.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on wine.codeweavers.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.emulators.wine.patches:21235
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.wine.patches/21235>


--===============0121623449==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	boundary="=-Vvuh16CRO4mt6LCzAjUl"


--=-Vvuh16CRO4mt6LCzAjUl
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-hIMNUJu5LS0S9amw3+Fv"


--=-hIMNUJu5LS0S9amw3+Fv
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Le dimanche 15 janvier 2006 =C3=A0 07:40 -0800, Dan Kegel a =C3=A9crit :
> On 1/15/06, Ge van Geldorp <gvg(a)reactos.org> wrote:
> > > The Mozilla ActiveX control download feature is cool and all,
> > > but until we repackage the sucker to include MSVCP60.DLL to fix
> > > http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D4064 ...
> > > I could have sworn I saw somebody post a note saying they had
> > > done said repackaging, but I can't find it now...
> >
> > http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2005-December/022795.html
> > Instructions on how to repackage can be found at
> > svn://svn.reactos.org/trunk/tools/MozillaControl/
>=20
> Thanks!  I've updated bug 4064.  Now can somebody
> update winehq.org's copy of the control so we can close that bug?
> - Dan
>=20
> --
> Wine for Windows ISVs: http://kegel.com/wine/isv
>=20
>=20
>=20

Le lundi 16 janvier 2006 =C3=A0 14:30 +0100, Filip Navara a =C3=A9crit :=20
> Jonathan Ernst wrote:
>=20
> > // Exact size of the file:
> > $iFileSize =3D 4771240;
> >
> Shouldn't you change the file size too?
>=20
> - Filip
>=20

Sure, thanks for spotting it ;-)

Changelog:
- use repackaged Mozilla ActiveX control from ReactOS



--=-hIMNUJu5LS0S9amw3+Fv
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=mozactivex.patch
Content-Type: text/x-patch; name=mozactivex.patch; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
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--=-hIMNUJu5LS0S9amw3+Fv--

--=-Vvuh16CRO4mt6LCzAjUl
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Ceci est une partie de message
	=?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBDy6ghIW5mR/h6b38RAt7kAJ4pu3x50sV01szFkzhGuRH3rHB1BwCeKCvV
up0s6nDm61QdZMhJrmlDD4A=
=eCBO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-Vvuh16CRO4mt6LCzAjUl--



--===============0121623449==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline



--===============0121623449==--

Repackaging Mozilla ActiveX control to include MSVCP60.DLL? [FIXED]

[Molle Bestefich]

Tony Lambregts wrote:
> attached is the message source  that I got throught gmane news server.

Thanks.
gmail seems to like to ruin line endings as much as Outlook does,
so I've attached my reply to preserve the fine ASCII art :-).

Please take a look...
> (I do not get emails from wine patches even though I am subscribed...)

Oh, ok.

Repackaging Mozilla ActiveX control to include MSVCP60.DLL? [FIXED]

[Tony Lambregts]

Molle Bestefich wrote:
> Tony Lambregts wrote:
> > attached is the message source  that I got throught gmane news server.
>
> Thanks.
> gmail seems to like to ruin line endings as much as Outlook does,
> so I've attached my reply to preserve the fine ASCII art :-).
>
> Please take a look...
> > (I do not get emails from wine patches even though I am subscribed...)
>
> Oh, ok.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Mime-Version: 1.0
>
> Looks odd, usually it's "MIME-Version".
> Not that it should matter.
> And it could be gmane that's altering it.
> > Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.wine.patches/21235>
>
> Which means that it's also available at:
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.wine.patches/21235

I missed that, cool.. it archived it with a .bin extention even though I 
could open it in gedit fine.

Now the question remains (now that we know it is archived) how do would 
one actually find it

http://search.gmane.org/

As a matter of fact I could not find any reference to your post or mine 
in this thread

http://search.gmane.org/?query=&email=tony.lambregts%40gmail.com&group=gmane...

Something to talk to Gmane about?
> So it's not really missing from gmane, or?
>
> Anyway, the MIME structure of the email is:
>
> body: multipart/mixed
>      |
>      +-- multipart/signed
>      |   |
>      |   +-- multipart/mixed
>      |   |   |
>      |   |   +-- text/plain                       (Jonathan's mail)
>      |   |   |
>      |   |   +-- text/x-patch [attachment]        (Jonathan's patch)
>      |   |
>      |   +-- section: application/pgp-signature   (Jonathan's pgp sig)
>      |
>      +-- text/plain                               (blank text/plain?!)
>
> So looking at the inner multipart/mixed, it contains a "text/plain" which is Jonathan's bread text, and a "text/x-patch" with an attachment flag, which is obviously his attachment.
>
> But if you take a look at the outer multipart/mixed, there's a multipart/signed and then there's a completely blank text/plain section:
> > --===============0121623449==
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> > MIME-Version: 1.0
> > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> > Content-Disposition: inline
> >
> > --===============0121623449==--
>
> Which makes no sense to me at all.
>
> If I were writing a mail parser, I'd have serious trouble choosing what to do with this kind of c... too :-).
>
> I think I'd choose to merge all the text/plain sections (without attachment flags) into a single entity and consider that the bread text.
>
> Pipermail seems to choose to pick the first text/plain section, the outer one (which happens to be empty) and just use that.
> And then scrub that other multipart/signed part, who needs that anyway.
> Right?

Is it Jonathan's mailer or gmane that does this???

At this point I am happy that it is archived somewhere at least.

-- 

Tony Lambregts

Repackaging Mozilla ActiveX control to include MSVCP60.DLL? [FIXED]

[Molle Bestefich]

Tony Lambregts wrote:
> Now the question remains (now that we know it is archived) how do would
> one actually find it
>
> http://search.gmane.org/

I'm leaving now, but I'll check this out later.
If I remember :-).
> > If I were writing a mail parser, I'd have serious trouble choosing what to
> > do with this kind of c... too :-).
> >
> > I think I'd choose to merge all the text/plain sections (without attachment
> > flags) into a single entity and consider that the bread text.
> >
> > Pipermail seems to choose to pick the first text/plain section, the outer
> > one (which happens to be empty) and just use that.
> > And then scrub that other multipart/signed part, who needs that anyway.
>
> Is it Jonathan's mailer or gmane that does this???

I assume it's Jonathan's mailer, since I can't find any good reasons
why gmane would do this.

Jonathan, what software do you use, if you don't mind revealing? :-)

Repackaging Mozilla ActiveX control to include MSVCP60.DLL? [FIXED]

[Jonathan Ernst]

Le samedi 28 janvier 2006 à 21:07 +0000, Molle Bestefich a écrit :
> Tony Lambregts wrote:
> [...]
> > Is it Jonathan's mailer or gmane that does this???
>
> I assume it's Jonathan's mailer, since I can't find any good reasons
> why gmane would do this.
>
> Jonathan, what software do you use, if you don't mind revealing? :-)

It's Evolution 2.4.2.1, pretty good e-mail client if you ask me.

Repackaging Mozilla ActiveX control to include MSVCP60.DLL? [FIXED]

[Molle Bestefich]

Jonathan Ernst wrote:
> Le samedi 28 janvier 2006 à 21:07 +0000, Molle Bestefich a écrit :
> > Jonathan, what software do you use, if you don't mind revealing? :-)
>
> It's Evolution 2.4.2.1, pretty good e-mail client if you ask me.

I'll agree that the GUI is pretty good.
The MIME assembly lacks somewhat :-).

And for some odd reason Gmail's aggregation feature doesn't like your
mails either - the same email always shows up twice for me.  I wonder.

Repackaging Mozilla ActiveX control to include MSVCP60.DLL? [FIXED]

[Detlef Riekenberg]

Am Sonntag, den 29.01.2006, 14:08 +0100 schrieb Jonathan Ernst:
> > Jonathan, what software do you use, if you don't mind revealing? :-)
>
> It's Evolution 2.4.2.1, pretty good e-mail client if you ask me.

Evolution 2.2.1.1 here and i had a similar problem with my Patches:
I used UTF-8 in as the prefered Encoding in the Editor.

The attachment is encoded as 7-Bit, but Evolution is unable to drop the
charset UTF-8 in the Header down to 7-Bit ASCII.
=> The mail arrived to some People as binary.

I switched back to ISO8859-15.


-- 
By By ...
      ... Detlef