New version of my test for bug 4543
Hi, This is a new version of my test for bug 4543. This time, I followed Dmitry's suggestion of using the existing functions for comparing the contents of EMFs. I can't build tests for Windows both due to bug 20763 and due to the fact that I don't have any Windows boxes, so once again I need people to run this test on Windows to make sure it's an accurate representation of Windows' behavior. The test currently succeeds on Wine. Thanks in advance. Chip
From 574bb4f7b2b90a209b1693b7f8048a2eb271ada8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Charles Davis <cdavis(a)mymail.mines.edu> Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 11:10:50 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] gdi32/tests: Test BitBlt() to an enhanced metafile. To: wine-patches <wine-patches(a)winehq.org> Reply-To: wine-devel <wine-devel(a)winehq.org>
--- dlls/gdi32/tests/metafile.c | 125 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 files changed, 125 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/dlls/gdi32/tests/metafile.c b/dlls/gdi32/tests/metafile.c index b559901..3bd413b 100644 --- a/dlls/gdi32/tests/metafile.c +++ b/dlls/gdi32/tests/metafile.c @@ -1030,6 +1030,63 @@ static const unsigned char EMF_LINETO_MM_TEXT_BITS[] = { 0x14, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00 }; +static const unsigned char EMF_BITBLT[] = +{ + 0x01, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x6c, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x03, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x03, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x94, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x79, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x20, 0x45, 0x4d, 0x46, 0x00, 0x00, 0x01, 0x00, + 0xa0, 0x01, 0x00, 0x00, 0x04, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x01, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x00, 0x04, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x03, 0x00, 0x00, + 0xfc, 0x01, 0x00, 0x00, 0x38, 0x01, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x60, 0xc0, 0x07, 0x00, + 0xc0, 0xc2, 0x04, 0x00, 0x4c, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0xbc, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x03, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x03, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x04, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x04, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x20, 0x00, 0xcc, 0x00, + 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x00, 0x00, 0x80, 0x3f, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x80, 0x3f, + 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x64, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x28, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x8c, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x30, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x28, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x04, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x04, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x01, 0x00, 0x18, 0x00, + 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x30, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0xc4, 0x0e, 0x00, 0x00, 0xc4, 0x0e, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x4c, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x64, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x03, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x03, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x04, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x04, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x62, 0x00, 0xff, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x80, 0x3f, + 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x00, 0x00, 0x80, 0x3f, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x64, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x64, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x0e, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x14, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x10, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x14, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00 +}; + + /* For debugging or dumping the raw metafiles produced by * new test functions. */ @@ -1382,6 +1439,73 @@ static int compare_emf_bits(const HENHMETAFILE mf, const unsigned char *bits, return 0; } + +/* tests blitting to an EMF */ +static void test_emf_BitBlt(void) +{ + HDC hdcDisplay, hdcMetafile, hdcBitmap; + HBITMAP hBitmap, hOldBitmap; + HENHMETAFILE hMetafile; +#define BMP_DIM 4 + BITMAPINFOHEADER bmih = + { + sizeof(BITMAPINFOHEADER), + BMP_DIM,/* biWidth */ + BMP_DIM,/* biHeight */ + 1, /* biPlanes */ + 24, /* biBitCount */ + BI_RGB, /* biCompression */ + 0, /* biXPelsPerMeter */ + 0, /* biYPelsPerMeter */ + 0, /* biClrUsed */ + 0, /* biClrImportant */ + }; + void *bits; + BOOL ret; + + hdcDisplay = CreateDCA("DISPLAY", NULL, NULL, NULL); + ok( hdcDisplay != 0, "CreateDCA error %d\n", GetLastError() ); + + hdcBitmap = CreateCompatibleDC(hdcDisplay); + ok( hdcBitmap != 0, "CreateCompatibleDC failed\n" ); + bmih.biXPelsPerMeter = MulDiv(GetDeviceCaps(hdcDisplay, LOGPIXELSX), 100, 3937); + bmih.biYPelsPerMeter = MulDiv(GetDeviceCaps(hdcDisplay, LOGPIXELSY), 100, 3937); + hBitmap = CreateDIBSection(hdcDisplay, (const BITMAPINFO *)&bmih, + DIB_RGB_COLORS, &bits, NULL, 0); + hOldBitmap = SelectObject(hdcBitmap, hBitmap); + + hdcMetafile = CreateEnhMetaFileA(hdcBitmap, NULL, NULL, NULL); + ok( hdcMetafile != 0, "CreateEnhMetaFileA failed\n" ); + + /* First fill the bitmap DC with something recognizable, like BLACKNESS */ + ret = BitBlt(hdcBitmap, 0, 0, BMP_DIM, BMP_DIM, 0, 0, 0, BLACKNESS); + ok( ret, "BitBlt(BLACKNESS) failed\n" ); + + ret = BitBlt(hdcMetafile, 0, 0, BMP_DIM, BMP_DIM, hdcBitmap, 0, 0, SRCCOPY); + ok( ret, "BitBlt(SRCCOPY) failed\n" ); + if(0) /* Crashes on wine */ + { + ret = BitBlt(hdcMetafile, 0, 0, BMP_DIM, BMP_DIM, 0, 0, 0, WHITENESS); + ok( ret, "BitBlt(WHITENESS) failed\n" ); + } + + hMetafile = CloseEnhMetaFile(hdcMetafile); + ok( hMetafile != 0, "CloseEnhMetaFile failed\n" ); + + if(1 || compare_emf_bits(hMetafile, EMF_BITBLT, sizeof(EMF_BITBLT), + "emf_BitBlt", FALSE) != 0) + { + dump_emf_bits(hMetafile, "emf_BitBlt"); + dump_emf_records(hMetafile, "emf_BitBlt"); + } + + SelectObject(hdcBitmap, hOldBitmap); + DeleteObject(hBitmap); + DeleteDC(hdcBitmap); + DeleteDC(hdcDisplay); +#undef BMP_DIM +} + /* Test a blank metafile. May be used as a template for new tests. */ static void test_mf_Blank(void) @@ -2628,6 +2752,7 @@ START_TEST(metafile) /* For enhanced metafiles (enhmfdrv) */ test_ExtTextOut(); test_SaveDC(); + test_emf_BitBlt(); /* For win-format metafiles (mfdrv) */ test_mf_SaveDC(); -- 1.6.5.2
2009/11/19 Charles Davis <cdavis(a)mymail.mines.edu>:
Hi,
This is a new version of my test for bug 4543. This time, I followed Dmitry's suggestion of using the existing functions for comparing the contents of EMFs. I can't build tests for Windows both due to bug 20763 and due to the fact that I don't have any Windows boxes, so once again I need people to run this test on Windows to make sure it's an accurate representation of Windows' behavior. The test currently succeeds on Wine.
Thanks in advance.
Chip
From 574bb4f7b2b90a209b1693b7f8048a2eb271ada8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Charles Davis <cdavis(a)mymail.mines.edu> Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 11:10:50 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] gdi32/tests: Test BitBlt() to an enhanced metafile. To: wine-patches <wine-patches(a)winehq.org> Reply-To: wine-devel <wine-devel(a)winehq.org>
--- dlls/gdi32/tests/metafile.c | 125 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 files changed, 125 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/dlls/gdi32/tests/metafile.c b/dlls/gdi32/tests/metafile.c index b559901..3bd413b 100644 --- a/dlls/gdi32/tests/metafile.c +++ b/dlls/gdi32/tests/metafile.c @@ -1030,6 +1030,63 @@ static const unsigned char EMF_LINETO_MM_TEXT_BITS[] = { 0x14, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00 };
+static const unsigned char EMF_BITBLT[] = +{ + 0x01, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x6c, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x03, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x03, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x94, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x79, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x20, 0x45, 0x4d, 0x46, 0x00, 0x00, 0x01, 0x00, + 0xa0, 0x01, 0x00, 0x00, 0x04, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x01, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x00, 0x04, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x03, 0x00, 0x00, + 0xfc, 0x01, 0x00, 0x00, 0x38, 0x01, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x60, 0xc0, 0x07, 0x00, + 0xc0, 0xc2, 0x04, 0x00, 0x4c, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0xbc, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x03, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x03, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x04, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x04, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x20, 0x00, 0xcc, 0x00, + 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x00, 0x00, 0x80, 0x3f, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x80, 0x3f, + 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x64, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x28, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x8c, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x30, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x28, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x04, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x04, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x01, 0x00, 0x18, 0x00, + 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x30, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0xc4, 0x0e, 0x00, 0x00, 0xc4, 0x0e, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x4c, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x64, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x03, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x03, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x04, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x04, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x62, 0x00, 0xff, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x80, 0x3f, + 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x00, 0x00, 0x80, 0x3f, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x64, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x64, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x0e, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x14, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x10, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x14, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00 +}; + + /* For debugging or dumping the raw metafiles produced by * new test functions. */ @@ -1382,6 +1439,73 @@ static int compare_emf_bits(const HENHMETAFILE mf, const unsigned char *bits, return 0; }
+ +/* tests blitting to an EMF */ +static void test_emf_BitBlt(void) +{ + HDC hdcDisplay, hdcMetafile, hdcBitmap; + HBITMAP hBitmap, hOldBitmap; + HENHMETAFILE hMetafile; +#define BMP_DIM 4 + BITMAPINFOHEADER bmih = + { + sizeof(BITMAPINFOHEADER), + BMP_DIM,/* biWidth */ + BMP_DIM,/* biHeight */ + 1, /* biPlanes */ + 24, /* biBitCount */ + BI_RGB, /* biCompression */ + 0, /* biXPelsPerMeter */ + 0, /* biYPelsPerMeter */ + 0, /* biClrUsed */ + 0, /* biClrImportant */ + }; + void *bits; + BOOL ret; + + hdcDisplay = CreateDCA("DISPLAY", NULL, NULL, NULL); + ok( hdcDisplay != 0, "CreateDCA error %d\n", GetLastError() ); + + hdcBitmap = CreateCompatibleDC(hdcDisplay); + ok( hdcBitmap != 0, "CreateCompatibleDC failed\n" ); + bmih.biXPelsPerMeter = MulDiv(GetDeviceCaps(hdcDisplay, LOGPIXELSX), 100, 3937); + bmih.biYPelsPerMeter = MulDiv(GetDeviceCaps(hdcDisplay, LOGPIXELSY), 100, 3937); + hBitmap = CreateDIBSection(hdcDisplay, (const BITMAPINFO *)&bmih, + DIB_RGB_COLORS, &bits, NULL, 0); + hOldBitmap = SelectObject(hdcBitmap, hBitmap); + + hdcMetafile = CreateEnhMetaFileA(hdcBitmap, NULL, NULL, NULL); + ok( hdcMetafile != 0, "CreateEnhMetaFileA failed\n" ); + + /* First fill the bitmap DC with something recognizable, like BLACKNESS */ + ret = BitBlt(hdcBitmap, 0, 0, BMP_DIM, BMP_DIM, 0, 0, 0, BLACKNESS); + ok( ret, "BitBlt(BLACKNESS) failed\n" ); + + ret = BitBlt(hdcMetafile, 0, 0, BMP_DIM, BMP_DIM, hdcBitmap, 0, 0, SRCCOPY); + ok( ret, "BitBlt(SRCCOPY) failed\n" ); + if(0) /* Crashes on wine */ + { + ret = BitBlt(hdcMetafile, 0, 0, BMP_DIM, BMP_DIM, 0, 0, 0, WHITENESS); + ok( ret, "BitBlt(WHITENESS) failed\n" ); + } + + hMetafile = CloseEnhMetaFile(hdcMetafile); + ok( hMetafile != 0, "CloseEnhMetaFile failed\n" ); + + if(1 || compare_emf_bits(hMetafile, EMF_BITBLT, sizeof(EMF_BITBLT), + "emf_BitBlt", FALSE) != 0) + { + dump_emf_bits(hMetafile, "emf_BitBlt"); + dump_emf_records(hMetafile, "emf_BitBlt"); + } + + SelectObject(hdcBitmap, hOldBitmap); + DeleteObject(hBitmap); + DeleteDC(hdcBitmap); + DeleteDC(hdcDisplay); +#undef BMP_DIM +} + /* Test a blank metafile. May be used as a template for new tests. */
static void test_mf_Blank(void) @@ -2628,6 +2752,7 @@ START_TEST(metafile) /* For enhanced metafiles (enhmfdrv) */ test_ExtTextOut(); test_SaveDC(); + test_emf_BitBlt();
/* For win-format metafiles (mfdrv) */ test_mf_SaveDC(); -- 1.6.5.2
it would really help you get some more tests if you just cross compiled the dll, hosted it somewhere and gave the link on the email ;) not all of us are on linux when we read the mail or have a compiler ready on windows :)
Ricardo Filipe wrote:
2009/11/19 Charles Davis <cdavis(a)mymail.mines.edu>:
Hi,
This is a new version of my test for bug 4543. This time, I followed Dmitry's suggestion of using the existing functions for comparing the contents of EMFs. I can't build tests for Windows both due to bug 20763 and due to the fact that I don't have any Windows boxes, so once again I need people to run this test on Windows to make sure it's an accurate representation of Windows' behavior. The test currently succeeds on Wine.
Thanks in advance.
Chip
From 574bb4f7b2b90a209b1693b7f8048a2eb271ada8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Charles Davis <cdavis(a)mymail.mines.edu> Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 11:10:50 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] gdi32/tests: Test BitBlt() to an enhanced metafile. To: wine-patches <wine-patches(a)winehq.org> Reply-To: wine-devel <wine-devel(a)winehq.org>
--- dlls/gdi32/tests/metafile.c | 125 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 files changed, 125 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/dlls/gdi32/tests/metafile.c b/dlls/gdi32/tests/metafile.c index b559901..3bd413b 100644 --- a/dlls/gdi32/tests/metafile.c +++ b/dlls/gdi32/tests/metafile.c @@ -1030,6 +1030,63 @@ static const unsigned char EMF_LINETO_MM_TEXT_BITS[] = { 0x14, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00 };
+static const unsigned char EMF_BITBLT[] = +{ + 0x01, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x6c, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x03, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x03, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x94, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x79, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x20, 0x45, 0x4d, 0x46, 0x00, 0x00, 0x01, 0x00, + 0xa0, 0x01, 0x00, 0x00, 0x04, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x01, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x00, 0x04, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x03, 0x00, 0x00, + 0xfc, 0x01, 0x00, 0x00, 0x38, 0x01, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x60, 0xc0, 0x07, 0x00, + 0xc0, 0xc2, 0x04, 0x00, 0x4c, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0xbc, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x03, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x03, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x04, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x04, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x20, 0x00, 0xcc, 0x00, + 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x00, 0x00, 0x80, 0x3f, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x80, 0x3f, + 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x64, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x28, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x8c, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x30, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x28, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x04, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x04, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x01, 0x00, 0x18, 0x00, + 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x30, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0xc4, 0x0e, 0x00, 0x00, 0xc4, 0x0e, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x4c, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x64, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x03, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x03, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x04, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x04, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x62, 0x00, 0xff, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x80, 0x3f, + 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x00, 0x00, 0x80, 0x3f, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x64, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x64, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x0e, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x14, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x10, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x14, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00 +}; + + /* For debugging or dumping the raw metafiles produced by * new test functions. */ @@ -1382,6 +1439,73 @@ static int compare_emf_bits(const HENHMETAFILE mf, const unsigned char *bits, return 0; }
+ +/* tests blitting to an EMF */ +static void test_emf_BitBlt(void) +{ + HDC hdcDisplay, hdcMetafile, hdcBitmap; + HBITMAP hBitmap, hOldBitmap; + HENHMETAFILE hMetafile; +#define BMP_DIM 4 + BITMAPINFOHEADER bmih = + { + sizeof(BITMAPINFOHEADER), + BMP_DIM,/* biWidth */ + BMP_DIM,/* biHeight */ + 1, /* biPlanes */ + 24, /* biBitCount */ + BI_RGB, /* biCompression */ + 0, /* biXPelsPerMeter */ + 0, /* biYPelsPerMeter */ + 0, /* biClrUsed */ + 0, /* biClrImportant */ + }; + void *bits; + BOOL ret; + + hdcDisplay = CreateDCA("DISPLAY", NULL, NULL, NULL); + ok( hdcDisplay != 0, "CreateDCA error %d\n", GetLastError() ); + + hdcBitmap = CreateCompatibleDC(hdcDisplay); + ok( hdcBitmap != 0, "CreateCompatibleDC failed\n" ); + bmih.biXPelsPerMeter = MulDiv(GetDeviceCaps(hdcDisplay, LOGPIXELSX), 100, 3937); + bmih.biYPelsPerMeter = MulDiv(GetDeviceCaps(hdcDisplay, LOGPIXELSY), 100, 3937); + hBitmap = CreateDIBSection(hdcDisplay, (const BITMAPINFO *)&bmih, + DIB_RGB_COLORS, &bits, NULL, 0); + hOldBitmap = SelectObject(hdcBitmap, hBitmap); + + hdcMetafile = CreateEnhMetaFileA(hdcBitmap, NULL, NULL, NULL); + ok( hdcMetafile != 0, "CreateEnhMetaFileA failed\n" ); + + /* First fill the bitmap DC with something recognizable, like BLACKNESS */ + ret = BitBlt(hdcBitmap, 0, 0, BMP_DIM, BMP_DIM, 0, 0, 0, BLACKNESS); + ok( ret, "BitBlt(BLACKNESS) failed\n" ); + + ret = BitBlt(hdcMetafile, 0, 0, BMP_DIM, BMP_DIM, hdcBitmap, 0, 0, SRCCOPY); + ok( ret, "BitBlt(SRCCOPY) failed\n" ); + if(0) /* Crashes on wine */ + { + ret = BitBlt(hdcMetafile, 0, 0, BMP_DIM, BMP_DIM, 0, 0, 0, WHITENESS); + ok( ret, "BitBlt(WHITENESS) failed\n" ); + } + + hMetafile = CloseEnhMetaFile(hdcMetafile); + ok( hMetafile != 0, "CloseEnhMetaFile failed\n" ); + + if(1 || compare_emf_bits(hMetafile, EMF_BITBLT, sizeof(EMF_BITBLT), + "emf_BitBlt", FALSE) != 0) + { + dump_emf_bits(hMetafile, "emf_BitBlt"); + dump_emf_records(hMetafile, "emf_BitBlt"); + } + + SelectObject(hdcBitmap, hOldBitmap); + DeleteObject(hBitmap); + DeleteDC(hdcBitmap); + DeleteDC(hdcDisplay); +#undef BMP_DIM +} + /* Test a blank metafile. May be used as a template for new tests. */
static void test_mf_Blank(void) @@ -2628,6 +2752,7 @@ START_TEST(metafile) /* For enhanced metafiles (enhmfdrv) */ test_ExtTextOut(); test_SaveDC(); + test_emf_BitBlt();
/* For win-format metafiles (mfdrv) */ test_mf_SaveDC(); -- 1.6.5.2
it would really help you get some more tests if you just cross compiled the dll, hosted it somewhere and gave the link on the email ;) not all of us are on linux when we read the mail or have a compiler ready on windows :) I told you, I can't cross-compile for Windows right now. See bug 20763.
Chip
On 11/19/2009 11:17 PM, Charles Davis wrote:
Hi,
This is a new version of my test for bug 4543. This time, I followed Dmitry's suggestion of using the existing functions for comparing the contents of EMFs. I can't build tests for Windows both due to bug 20763 and due to the fact that I don't have any Windows boxes, so once again I need people to run this test on Windows to make sure it's an accurate representation of Windows' behavior. The test currently succeeds on Wine.
Thanks in advance.
Chip
Hi, I only ran your new tests and removed that "if(0)", please find the results attached. Win95/98/me have the same results (as expected) and have several failures (as expected). Fixing them would be a bonus but we currently are having several metafile failures for these platforms anyway. -- Cheers, Paul.
Paul Vriens wrote:
On 11/19/2009 11:17 PM, Charles Davis wrote:
Hi,
This is a new version of my test for bug 4543. This time, I followed Dmitry's suggestion of using the existing functions for comparing the contents of EMFs. I can't build tests for Windows both due to bug 20763 and due to the fact that I don't have any Windows boxes, so once again I need people to run this test on Windows to make sure it's an accurate representation of Windows' behavior. The test currently succeeds on Wine.
Thanks in advance.
Chip
Hi,
I only ran your new tests and removed that "if(0)", please find the results attached.
Win95/98/me have the same results (as expected) and have several failures (as expected). Fixing them would be a bonus but we currently are having several metafile failures for these platforms anyway.
Thanks, Paul! Based on these results, I modified my test (and Wine to pass), using the WinXP results as the expected bits. I've submitted the patches to wine-patches, so now we'll see what Alexandre thinks. The Win9x failures mystify me. Why would CreateEnhMetaFileA() fail? I need to look into this. Chip
On 11/20/2009 04:25 PM, Charles Davis wrote:
Paul Vriens wrote:
On 11/19/2009 11:17 PM, Charles Davis wrote:
Hi,
This is a new version of my test for bug 4543. This time, I followed Dmitry's suggestion of using the existing functions for comparing the contents of EMFs. I can't build tests for Windows both due to bug 20763 and due to the fact that I don't have any Windows boxes, so once again I need people to run this test on Windows to make sure it's an accurate representation of Windows' behavior. The test currently succeeds on Wine.
Thanks in advance.
Chip
Hi,
I only ran your new tests and removed that "if(0)", please find the results attached.
Win95/98/me have the same results (as expected) and have several failures (as expected). Fixing them would be a bonus but we currently are having several metafile failures for these platforms anyway.
Thanks, Paul!
Based on these results, I modified my test (and Wine to pass), using the WinXP results as the expected bits. I've submitted the patches to wine-patches, so now we'll see what Alexandre thinks.
The Win9x failures mystify me. Why would CreateEnhMetaFileA() fail? I need to look into this.
The last error is set to ERROR_FILE_NOT_FOUND.
Chip
-- Cheers, Paul.
participants (3)
-
Charles Davis -
Paul Vriens -
Ricardo Filipe