Re: Virtual memory under Win95

[Alexandre Julliard]

"Dmitry Timoshkov" <dmitry(a)sloboda.ru> writes:
> Perhaps applications which use assumptions about Win95 virtual memory
> management should be considered as broken? Or it is worth to support them?

What should be considered broken is the memory management of Win95 ;-)

But yes, we should probably forget about making this kind of things
work, we cannot possibly support the Win95 memory model 100% right
anyway. Especially since the app works with -winver nt40, I think
that's a reasonable work-around.

-- 
Alexandre Julliard
julliard(a)winehq.com