Re: [PATCH 3/6] oleaut32: Comment out "dual" attribute of IKindaEnumWidget in tmarshal test to cause the interface to be marshaled correctly.
Robert Shearman <rob(a)codeweavers.com> writes:
This fixes a bunch of tmarshal tests.
It doesn't seem to make any difference for me: ../../../tools/runtest -q -P wine -M oleaut32.dll -T ../../.. -p oleaut32_test.exe.so tmarshal.c && touch tmarshal.ok tmarshal.c:139: Test failed: CoMarshalInterface failed with error 0x80040155 tmarshal.c:765: Test failed: CoUnmarshalInterface failed with error 0x80040155 tmarshal.c:784: Test failed: EXCEPINFO differs from expected: wCode = 0x2, scode = 0x7bc7a2c8 tmarshal.c:803: Test failed: EXCEPINFO differs from expected: wCode = 0x2, scode = 0x7bc7a2c8 tmarshal.c:915: Test failed: EXCEPINFO differs from expected: wCode = 0x2, scode = 0x7bc7a2c8 tmarshal.c:942: Test failed: EXCEPINFO differs from expected: wCode = 0x2, scode = 0x7bc7a2c8 tmarshal.c:977: Test failed: EXCEPINFO differs from expected: wCode = 0x2, scode = 0x80004001 make: *** [tmarshal.ok] Error 7 -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org
Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Robert Shearman <rob(a)codeweavers.com> writes:
This fixes a bunch of tmarshal tests.
It doesn't seem to make any difference for me:
../../../tools/runtest -q -P wine -M oleaut32.dll -T ../../.. -p oleaut32_test.exe.so tmarshal.c && touch tmarshal.ok tmarshal.c:139: Test failed: CoMarshalInterface failed with error 0x80040155 tmarshal.c:765: Test failed: CoUnmarshalInterface failed with error 0x80040155 tmarshal.c:784: Test failed: EXCEPINFO differs from expected: wCode = 0x2, scode = 0x7bc7a2c8 tmarshal.c:803: Test failed: EXCEPINFO differs from expected: wCode = 0x2, scode = 0x7bc7a2c8 tmarshal.c:915: Test failed: EXCEPINFO differs from expected: wCode = 0x2, scode = 0x7bc7a2c8 tmarshal.c:942: Test failed: EXCEPINFO differs from expected: wCode = 0x2, scode = 0x7bc7a2c8 tmarshal.c:977: Test failed: EXCEPINFO differs from expected: wCode = 0x2, scode = 0x80004001 make: *** [tmarshal.ok] Error 7
Did you remove ~/.wine? It only registers the typelib if the typelib hasn't already been registered (perhaps this should be changed.) -- Rob Shearman
Robert Shearman <rob(a)codeweavers.com> writes:
Did you remove ~/.wine? It only registers the typelib if the typelib hasn't already been registered (perhaps this should be changed.)
Ah sorry, I missed that part. Yes, I think that needs to be changed, we can't ask people to rm -rf their .wine dir all the time. At the very least there needs to be an easy way to force the re-registration. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org
participants (2)
-
Alexandre Julliard -
Robert Shearman