Please create 1.2.0 milestone in Bugzilla
The 1.1.x releases will be development releases, so a 1.1.0 milestone doesn't make much sense. Please create a 1.2.0 milestone in Bugzilla. Thanks! - Dan
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 10:15 AM, Dan Kegel <dank(a)kegel.com> wrote:
The 1.1.x releases will be development releases, so a 1.1.0 milestone doesn't make much sense. Please create a 1.2.0 milestone in Bugzilla. Thanks! - Dan
Is there a reason we wont be continuing the current y.y.x (ie 0.9.x and 1.0.x) style releases for development? Most foss applications seem to have moved away from the even odd release cycle and due to wines long lead times between releases having it this way could get rather confusing for newer users not expecting it. Edward Ps Sorry for the dupe dan, hit the wrong button.
Edward Savage wrote:
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 10:15 AM, Dan Kegel <dank(a)kegel.com> wrote:
The 1.1.x releases will be development releases, so a 1.1.0 milestone doesn't make much sense. Please create a 1.2.0 milestone in Bugzilla. Thanks! - Dan
Is there a reason we wont be continuing the current y.y.x (ie 0.9.x and 1.0.x) style releases for development?
Most foss applications seem to have moved away from the even odd release cycle and due to wines long lead times between releases having it this way could get rather confusing for newer users not expecting it.
Edward
Ps Sorry for the dupe dan, hit the wrong button.
As far as I'm aware, 1.2.0 will be a long time off (as would 1.1.0) it's just the next _big_ milestone. He doesn't mean that after 1.0.0 there wont be anything before 1.1.0. It's just a point to aim to fix the main bugs by. Ben H.
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 3:30 AM, Edward Savage <epssyis(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Is there a reason we wont be continuing the current y.y.x (ie 0.9.x and 1.0.x) style releases for development?
We will, actually. What made you think we wouldn't? Is http://wiki.winehq.org/WineReleasePlan poorly written? 1.1.x will be our trunk during the 1.1 era. We may or may not have development on the 1.0 branch; depends on if there's demand and volunteer manpower. - Dan
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 10:32 AM, Dan Kegel <dank(a)kegel.com> wrote:
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 3:30 AM, Edward Savage <epssyis(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Is there a reason we wont be continuing the current y.y.x (ie 0.9.x and 1.0.x) style releases for development?
We will, actually. What made you think we wouldn't? Is http://wiki.winehq.org/WineReleasePlan poorly written?
1.1.x will be our trunk during the 1.1 era. We may or may not have development on the 1.0 branch; depends on if there's demand and volunteer manpower. - Dan
If 1.1.0 is set to be released two weeks after 1.0, then we may need to adjust the target milestones in bugzilla for some of them. I doubt, for instance, that a DIB engine will be implemented in a that time. -Austin (Sorry for the dupe Dan, hit the wrong button).
participants (4)
-
Austin English -
Ben Hodgetts -
Dan Kegel -
Edward Savage