[Winetest] Status update (rsabase and secur32)
Hi, The new winetest is running fine and new reports are produced (http://test.winehq.org/data/200708071000/). I have seen at least 2 things so far that I need some info on. rsabase.dll is not available on for example w2k3 and vista but the tests ran in the past. secur32.dll is not available on for example NT4 but the current tests check if security.dll is available instead. What should we do to cater for the above: - we could move for example rsabase tests to rsaenh (we forward everything to rsaenh as well) and something similar for secur32. - we could implement an exception list in winetest for these particular cases. Remarks/Comments? Cheers, Paul.
On Tuesday 07 August 2007 14:43:33 Paul Vriens wrote:
Hi,
The new winetest is running fine and new reports are produced (http://test.winehq.org/data/200708071000/).
I have seen at least 2 things so far that I need some info on.
rsabase.dll is not available on for example w2k3 and vista but the tests ran in the past.
secur32.dll is not available on for example NT4 but the current tests check if security.dll is available instead.
What should we do to cater for the above:
- we could move for example rsabase tests to rsaenh (we forward everything to rsaenh as well) and something similar for secur32.
Is there a scurity.dll on later win versions? In any case, I think that's a little clumsy. I doubt anybody out there is even using security.dll. :) Cheers, Kai -- Kai Blin WorldForge developer http://www.worldforge.org/ Wine developer http://wiki.winehq.org/KaiBlin Samba team member http://www.samba.org/samba/team/ -- Will code for cotton.
Kai Blin wrote:
On Tuesday 07 August 2007 14:43:33 Paul Vriens wrote:
Hi,
The new winetest is running fine and new reports are produced (http://test.winehq.org/data/200708071000/).
I have seen at least 2 things so far that I need some info on.
rsabase.dll is not available on for example w2k3 and vista but the tests ran in the past.
secur32.dll is not available on for example NT4 but the current tests check if security.dll is available instead.
What should we do to cater for the above:
- we could move for example rsabase tests to rsaenh (we forward everything to rsaenh as well) and something similar for secur32.
Is there a scurity.dll on later win versions? In any case, I think that's a little clumsy. I doubt anybody out there is even using security.dll. :)
Cheers, Kai
------------------------------------------------------------------------
security.dll is available on vista for example but all calls are forwarded to secur32.dll So the only issue is with NT4 which doesn't have a secur32.dll. Should we just silently ignore NT4 for this particular dll? An other alternative is to move all secur32 tests to security (but that's seems a bit strange). And as said we could also use an exception list in winetest. Cheers, Paul.
Paul, need more details here. Is that the latest dll version? On 8/7/07, Paul Vriens <paul.vriens.wine(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
The new winetest is running fine and new reports are produced (http://test.winehq.org/data/200708071000/).
I have seen at least 2 things so far that I need some info on.
rsabase.dll is not available on for example w2k3 and vista but the tests ran in the past.
secur32.dll is not available on for example NT4 but the current tests check if security.dll is available instead.
What should we do to cater for the above:
- we could move for example rsabase tests to rsaenh (we forward everything to rsaenh as well) and something similar for secur32. - we could implement an exception list in winetest for these particular cases.
Remarks/Comments?
Cheers,
Paul.
-- Robert Q Kim, Wireless Satellite Internet http://groups.google.com/group/unpaid-overtime http://evdo-coverage.com/satellite-wireless-internet.html 2611 S. Pacific Coast Highway 101 Suite 203 Unpaid Overtime and Break Laws Dept SD, CA 92007 206 984 0880
participants (3)
-
Kai Blin -
Paul Vriens -
Robert Kim Wireless Internet Advisor